GameShark - I’m really tired of this long-running trend in game design where the overwhelming number of arbitrary objectives serves as nothing more than inconveniences. Most of the time, they only exist to artificially inflate the running time. The “find these five things” fetch-quest works, sure, but it’s made worse when things go awry – of course. You came to collect three of the five, but even the bundle that’d save you time and effort you’d rather spend elsewhere wind up scattered across the world – or Rome, as the case may be.
This should make fans and collectors very happy. PureArts & Ubisoft Announce Assassin’s Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama Assassin's Creed Hunt for the Nine 1/6 Scale Diorama available for pre-order on January 25.
AC3 was released during a turbulent transition period for Ubisoft and the Assassin's Creed series. It ventured into uncharted territory, narratively and mechanically, which caused it to receive mixed reviews. At its core, though, it's a damn good stealth game.
Nope, I hated 3, connar was bland, literally the most flat character in the entire game. Not to mention to myriad of bugs, camera issues, and that annoying thing where he automatically ditches his weapon you payed for for the sake of a cool finishing move forcing you to trek back to your base after almost every encounter just to re-equip your own weapon. It just didn't work as fluidly as the others like 2 and 4
The series peaked at AC3 for me. It’s been my favourite in the series. Connor will always be one of my favourite video game protagonists.
No. Game was BORING. Connor was really dull. Environments, while impressive, because of the geographic location and time period were not really exciting to be in. I would love some kind of game set in there colonial American time period, but a game like AC that back then centered around parkour and vertical traversal really didn't fit those environments.
Nope
There was a lot of issues but mine is how they handled the war
They told us Connor was not going to get involved, that the war was more of a background setting for the real story and it wasn’t going to be one sided
They lied, even the cinematic E3 trailer showed Connor emerge from the Colonist side and slaughter the red coats to get to his target, inspiring the Colonists to fight back
I just thought it would have made more sense lore wise that the red coats were mostly compiled of Assassins fighting the Colonist templars who wanted to take the new world for themselves.
Since the Red coats lost the war, it would then explain how the Templars started to gain the upper hand and how on the future the assassins were mostly killed off and the Templar’s had pretty much taken over everything.
Instead it just felt like they didn’t want to p*** off the American audience
Even Haytham was cool, he should have been an Assassin through and through and should have been the main lead.
I’m one one of those weird people that liked Ass Creed 3, but to be fair I never got around to finishing it.
There are good video game protagonists, and there are bad video game protagonists.
I disagree that max is unlikable. Chloe is infinitely more unlikable in my opinion.
Most of these aren't even that bad. Especially comparing to others like Squall "Whatever" Leonhart, Forspoken's Frey, and the guy from Atomic Heart.
i had to stop reading after the "blatant misogyny" in the Dantes inferno section.
i actually liked Max haha.
the forspoken chick is missing tho
Reading what he says about the multiplayer sums up exactly what is wrong with the devs ideas about multiplayer DLC....
Releasing game "mode" DLC is even worse than map packs as it divides the community even more and shortens the life (and interest in) the game.
Surely it makes more sense to release "free" DLC of game modes and new maps alongside the paid for DLC.... so sell some DLC worth buying to make the money, but do it in a way that the whole multiplayer community of the game can still play together!
That is a good thing about BF:BC2, they don't divide the gamers up into who got the DLC and who didn't when it comes to maps.... which just means everyone can keep playing against everyone else.
And when they sold the Vietnam DLC, it was like a separate game that felt like an extra to the game.