1040°

Crysis 2 Screenshot Shows Detailed Difference Between PS3/360 Versions

A screenshot to see which console is truly the ultimate version for Crysis 2 has been unveiled.

The-Tentacle4796d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

Wow, guess the haters were wrong on this one, looks like PS3 version looks better!

See the greater draw distance, less 'fog', better reflection on the water, generally sharper image quality, etc.

edit:@Starhawk You're right, it's pretty hard judge exactly what each version does best by looking at screenshots but these clearly show a PS3 win. You're also right that Killzone still holds the crown, cryisis 2 is good enough for the xbox sites to try and claim it looks better but in actuality it doesn't.

Starhawk4795d ago

I think that, at the end of the day, one version will do some things better and the other one other things.

But Killzone is still the best looking console FPS, and not sub HD like Crysis 2. :)

peowpeow4795d ago

I thought so too, but have you seen alot of the footage from single player? I think it looks amazing and better than Killzone 3

NanoSoldier4795d ago

Agree, Crysis 2 looks awesome on PS3. A lot of BS were told according to the PS3 Version and in the end they both look great. Great game for PS3 and Xbox 360 fans. Let us just enjoy what Crytek did on consoles ... respect

deadpoole4795d ago

Though in my opinion Crysis 2 isnt the best lookin game on ps3 ... but considerin the amount of effort Crytek has put and thier first ever PS3 game. Theet deserve this chance.

4795d ago
Vherostar4795d ago

As always the case with every multi platform game starhawk but the fanboys will always pick up on one better thing on one game and say the game is superior because of it.

Aquanox4795d ago

Wow! Are you guys looking at the same screens? The reflections and lighting (which these are suppossed to prove) are way more generic looking on the PS3 version. Man, it's amazing what fanboyism can do.

Just wait for the digital foundry analysis so you can be, once again, cured from ur blindness.

HolyOrangeCows4795d ago

So, basically the 360 version is darker and has a slightly higher sub-HD resolution.

TKCMuzzer4795d ago

@ Aquanox
What's funny is how you seem to sum up yourself in your own comment about others.

chainer30004795d ago

Piss poor comparison pictures... Seriously? Clearly the gamma has been fudged with. Crytek claims the final versions of the two are identical, I do not doubt that very much. From what I've seen through.... well... beating the PC version... It's a good looking game and fun to play but suffers from over-hyper syndrome, with a small bit of squeal-being-confused disease.

blackmagic4795d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

kind of a poor comparison. One is taken at 1:31, the other is taken at 8:01! Show me a comparison at 1:31 to 1:31 and a comparison at 8:01 to 8:01 when the light source is in the same position.
Still going to get it on pc regardless...

4795d ago
Agent VX4795d ago

Again, another stupid silly fanboy article, and all these silly fanboys putting in their 2 cents worth of "Opinion" when they haven't played the final version of the game.

LOL to silly fanboys...

DragonKnight4795d ago

Didn't Crytek challenge people to find differences between the two versions? Guess their challenge was accepted and beaten.

ChrisW4795d ago

So, the Xbox version has the sun in the background and which make the lighting effects look slightly off.

ERKAY......

tacosRcool4791d ago

Killzone 3 does have the best visuals on any of the consoles as of right now. Crysis isn't even HD but sub-HD. For one Crytek has disappointed me as the PC version is another console port. A world class PC developer Crytek was as they pushed the limits of PC hardware. A DX9 game?!?!?! No DX 10 or even DX 11 for that matter. Crytek I will most likely never buy any of the games you produce since you basically went in favor of the consoles as opposed to the PC gamers that helped put you in the position of a world class developer you are today

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4791d ago
Blacktric4795d ago

Mind you, these screens are taken from multiplayer portion (notice the Nano Suit's color/pattern differences in both screenshots), so I'm pretty sure that singleplayer will look better than this.

beastgamer4795d ago

All haters are Stupid, Every since fanboy site and etc. said the ps3 version sucks, why? Well its in the Demo, WTF!!!!
This is why IGN was told to STFU, by Crytex.
They have video of the Final code, and how it shows on a blu-ray disc.
It was on IGN tiled something like ps3 version superior over 360, but it was overshadowed by the dumb demo saying ps3 version inferior.
Take a look, the PS3 rapes the 360.
This is based off final game, not a fucking months old demo they showed at E3.

Tyre4795d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

the PS3 demo also looked better than the 360 demo...cloack look better(lot more detail were u actually could see the skin change better)water reflection looked better more realtime/oil on the water on Pier 17 looked way better...underwater was also better and less texture build up...but overal the 360 version is looked just as good...SP will kick #ss believe it!!! f#ck IGN for saying that...u need glasses or less paychecks or agendas....u all mislead the PS3 owners...the demo looked better on PS3....could be it was a later build, but that doesn't matter=>it was not the final game that's for sure. I believe the final game will look/run solid. just you wait! oops they already have started beneath me...so sad.

lil Titan4795d ago

even the HUB looks blurry smh

lil Titan4795d ago

yeah, dont know how i missed that

trancefreak4795d ago

I think starhawk said it all can we close this chapter now :)

Looking forward to some single player campaign vids that are direct hd feeds.

xAlmostPro4795d ago

Overall they both look good however by the looks of it the ps3 has better lighting and water effects, also the shadows on 360 seem very dark..

Maybe crytek actually stuck to their word..

Shame about the snowball of bullshit surrounding the ps3 version. IGN = meh

units4795d ago

look at the hud and its also worth mention that xbox version is running at higher framrate and resolution

firetaw4795d ago

i didnt know higher resolution is what makes a garante "looks better" winner.

SonyPS3604795d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

Hold the phone, chuck.

I personally can't tell which one is better. It's a bad comparison taken at different points of the night/day cycle. You can't see the water in the 360 version as well without the lighting on it.

nnotdead4795d ago

hard to tell because of the different time of day. it kind of looks like the 360 might be running at a higher resolution, because the PS3 looks a bit blurrier and softer.

Clarence4795d ago

Good eye that's what I was comparing. KZ3 all the way until BF3 comes out.

Ducky4795d ago

I bet if the platform-tag on each picture was switched around, you'd still have made the same post.

juggulator4795d ago

The true difference is lighting. The two screens are similar if you look at them closely. The 360 version is just "lit up" more.There's alot of over exposure which is actually doing some harm and some good.

darkziosj4795d ago

lmao at those screen 2 barealy visible screens, just go look at some trustfull site

hiredhelp4795d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

awww well i dont want to say i told you all so. for anyone whos been following me for past 6 months.
crytek will be bringing future titles other than crysis.

its the engine that makes the differnce on this console unlike any other multiplatform game were can be ported this engine was desgned to program both consoles seperatly but still on the fly, no other dev kit can do this. visually its still one the best multiplatform games and even exclusives the 360 has so dont be cheesed off be greatfull and even beats some the ps3 games. in terms of graphics. and i hate to say that cos i own a ps3 but i know crytek they do awsome stuff.

only worrying factor i have is people who dont know crysis like many of us pc gamers may or may not take to the nano suite and the way the games meant to be played. not a all out run and gun like you all imagin.

but boy its a good start for crytek.
on last note. them photos hmm smells bit funny.

Gamer_Z4795d ago

Let’s put this topic to rest already; PC PWNS everything that’s it end of story.

BABY-JEDI4795d ago

PS3 has greater draw distance, but general lighting on surroundings & clarity of hub & general details goes to 360 clearly IMO. Which obviously counts for nothing LoL

ironmonkey4795d ago

it seems like the ps3 versions gun has more detail

zeddy4795d ago

its one picture, lets jus wait for the reviews.

freeblue4795d ago

check out 2:33.. where are the char shadows from the light??

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4791d ago
jozzah4795d ago

More fuel to the fire.....

Masterchef20074795d ago

Please people make it stop. This is going a bit out of hand.

Vherostar4795d ago

Totally agree why do we have to compare EVERY single multi platform game? The only people who care who wins are fanboys and these articles give fanboys fire. Without them fanboys would die.

Raendom4795d ago

1280x720? Both look really good? WTF is going on with all the bad news for console versions (I heard it was sub-HD and the PS3 looked terrible...)

Looks like when it comes to who do you trust "the developers or the idiot journalists" we're going to say the developers every time now!

achira4795d ago

like i said. the ps3 version looks better than the xbox360 counterpart. ask my self where the trolls are now ?

tudors4795d ago

@achira you should know where they are because they were mainly PS3 fans calling it rubbish.

achira4795d ago

and where are your proofs ? because everyone here can say what he wants.

for example: i have played the xbox360 version and was shocked how poor it looks compared to the ps3 (especially the water effects).

ok the example is true, but you get the idea.

DelbertGrady4795d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

I've seen more credible sites(LOT, IGN) saying the 360 version looks better. This lousy, and probably faked, comparison only shows how far PS3 fanboys like yourself are willing to reach to 1-up the 360.

Let's wait until Digital Foundry compare it, shall we? I doubt you're gonna like the results.

Thoreau4795d ago

the result of what. a lame game that everyone might forget in 3 months when battlefield3 drops? how about you quit hating or are you the typical broke azz fanboy...

knowledge4lfe4795d ago

did you just say IGN is a credible site? oh God please help this poor man. i shall pray for you

matt_hooper4795d ago

Haha, "Print Screen" from a compressed youtube video!? Then paste in MS Paint! Are you kidding me? What a joke comparison.

Delbert is right this time, wait for the professionals. Without "tailor made" N4G articles, that site wouldn't even exist.

SonyPS3604795d ago

You shouldn't conclude this after seeing two crappy screenshots.

theonlylolking4795d ago

The graphics look better on the PS3. This IS what the PS3 version looks like and in motion the PS3 looks even better because of extra motion blur. Although there are more frame rate issues but lets hope those get fixed.

darkziosj4795d ago (Edited 4795d ago )

fanboys see what they want to see, even the developers said that there was no difference at all, they just believe a unknow blog from another fanboy that take 2 screens that sucks ass

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4795d ago
Masterchef20074795d ago

Strange that the PS3 version looks a little bit better in the shots.

Jeez i dont know who to believe any longer. I am just going to wait for DF and see what they say

lastdual4795d ago

It's the same issue: the lighting. The 360 looks to have higher contrast (and possibly more bloom).

The result is that in certain scenes the details will look hidden thanks to darker shadows, etc., while those details will be more visible on the PS3 version with less dramatic contrast, as seen here.

By the same token, this will lead to complaints over the PS3 version's lighting looking "flat" in other scenes, as some complained about in the demo.

It really depends on the scene (and personal taste) as to whether the lighting differences make one version look better or worse.

NiKK_4194795d ago

exactly, that's pretty much what it is, it's easy to spin for either side because of picking and choosing screenshots, videos, however, are what matter for this game, and from the video comparisons i've seen, they're pretty equal, but they both have their strengths.

now can we get back to actual news, please?

sarshelyam4795d ago

...that this is a very Chocolate vs Vanilla debate? I'd say that about sums it up. Everyone is going to have pros and cons in their corner, but at the end of the day it's going to come back as wanting a clear box, or a green box, because they both looks great in their own right...just not identical.

Show all comments (149)
100°

The Crysis Trilogy Joins EA Access Vault

Featuring the complete nanosuit experience, The Crysis Trilogy has now joined the EA Access vault as a title that's free for those that subscribe to the EA service on Xbox One consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
Games1st1394d ago (Edited 1394d ago )

Just in time for those that got the month trial.

DrDeath1394d ago

Wait? There is more than one? lol

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster1778d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada071778d ago (Edited 1778d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X141778d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase1777d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted1778d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster1778d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack1778d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH1773d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.

80°

13 Awesome Games Set In Real Places

Jum Jum from Unleashthegamer writes: We gathered the best real setting games we could think of if you’re looking for something in a familiar location to soothe your thirst for real-world games.

Read Full Story >>
unleashthegamer.com