450°
4.0

Folklore Review: 4/10 from GameDaily

GameDaily writes:
Folklore is one of 2007's biggest disappointments. A PlayStation 3 game that at first seemed promising, but explodes in a fiery wreck, thanks to annoying dialogue, bizarre comic book style cut scenes and drab game play. We love the intro, which sets up this mysterious, Silent Hill-esque adventure through a ghostly town, but we knew this game would bomb the moment we bumped into the scarecrow that continuously mutters "Uwee Hee Hee".

Read Full Story >>
gamedaily.com
MK_Red6063d ago

Wow, and I though that other review was biased and wrong. Even the biggest haters of PS3 know that this game deserves higher than 4. Terrible review. It has superb art design, kool and innovative use of SIXAXIS and isn't that short. The belive it should be somewhere between 7 and 9.

Maddens Raiders6063d ago

*something is wrong with reviews these days. That's a fact.

TheSadTruth6063d ago

Reviews are opinions, not everyone loved Halo, and no one loved Lair. Some people expect more out of games, and others like IGN, only tend to look at the positives. This site gave Heavenly Sword and Warhawk both 8's, so you can't cry "Xbots." They state why the game is bad, so just accept it and move on, if you enjoy mashing buttons with pretty graphics, then buy the game.

SL1M DADDY6063d ago

They gave Ninety Nine Nights a 6 for god’s sakes… You want to talk about button mashers then there ya go. If they can award N3 with a six, folklore deserves at least that much. These guys are pathetic, just like 90% of the other review critics. Perhaps Sony needs to start dishing out some goodie bags too.

jackfatal6063d ago

what makes a game get perfect 10/10??

graphics should be the best out there!
gameplay should be the best out there!
story should be the best out there!
lenght should be the best out there!
value(replaying it again) should be the best out there!
sound should be the best out there!

now can someone dare and tell me any game this year including halo 3 has all these points??

the answer is simple NO!
then y we see games such as bioshock and halo 3 gets 10/10?? think about it and tell me!!

Sayai jin6063d ago

I think what the review sites should do is to hire a few fanboys for al 3 sides and some unbiased gamers (switch them out for diffrent games) and let them review a game. I think this would put back some credibaility in reviews, plus it would help fanboys over time see that there are great games and poor games on all the systems.

Back on topic...I have not played the game, but I still do not take reviews for the gospel. From what I have seen the game does deserve a higher score than what it received.

@Madden Raiders you say *something is wrong with reviews these days. That's a fact. But I see so many people waiting for a game on anothr sytem to get a bad review and suddenly they change there tune and say, ooh that games was terrible like I suspected.

People are we all in elemtary school again. Names like Fony Fangirls, Xbots, etc sounds like name calling that was dne in elemtary school. I am sure we cn debte on a igher evel than this. Alot of you are missing this... IT is the BEST time to be a GAMER EVER!

JasonXE6063d ago

isn't that good? idk, but I suggest you find a site with an opinion you can trust. Lots of different view points in scores so I suggest a rent before a buy.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 6063d ago
xaphanze6063d ago (Edited 6063d ago )

From 4(gamedaily) to 9(ign)? There's something wrong for sure. The reviews totally contradict each other.
IGN rated this game as an adventure game and not RPG and I think this is what it is.

MK_Red6063d ago

Good point. 2 9s (IGN, Play), 8, 7.2, 6.9, 6.6, 5.8, 5, 4. Aside from 1 to 3 and 10, Folklore scores have covered all review numbers.

wageslave6063d ago

Its funny that fanboys -- when they dont get what they want ie: rave reviews for PS3 gamess, and criticism of Wii and Xbox games -- are assuaulting the very notion of Criticism.

Not every reviewer is right on every count. But, taken as a COLLECTIVE, they are pretty much dead on.

Review happens happens in every human endevour, and the collection of those reviews is pretty accurate knowledge.

It builds a concensus. Can you disagree with it? Sure, but if you constantly disagree, you have to ask yourself "Why am I _wrong_ all the time?"

Want to know what the world's independant, neutral game press thinks of a game? Simple.

Use gamerankings.net or metacritic.com to find what the Aggregate concensus on it is.

Can you disagree with the concensus? Sure -- but if you do it over and over and over again, you've got to do some introspection.

The Consensus on Folklore?

http://www.bungie.net/News/...

7.3 / 10 "Mixed or Average Reviews" as they say.

cr33ping_death6063d ago

"but we knew this game would bomb" wow enough said....BS review...i enjoyed the demo and some bias F*CK isnt going to change what i experienced hands on.

MK_Red6063d ago

Totally agreed.

I don't know but putting "but we knew this game would bomb" in start of your review is one seriously unprofessional and kinda biased way.

BIadestarX6063d ago

There it goes the hope and dream of one AAA PS3 title. (at least from this review)... to give this game the benefit of the doubt... let see what others reviewers give... if it turns into another Lair or worst... the it's no AAA. Period.

xplosneer6063d ago

A matter of opinion Bladestar, All a matter of opinion....

MarioFromTexas6063d ago

You are an idiot...Since when has score had anything to do with AAA...Is bioshock a AAA title since it 95 score? how many copies sold detemines if a game is AAA status. A game could score 10/10 and it won't mean crap. AAA games are games that sell systems. Bioshock got a 95/100 and I bet spiderman game out sold it by 4 to 1. A reveiw is just an opinion which M$ bought for Halo3, because after playing for 4 hours, there is no way in hell Halo3 is 10/10..I guess someone forgot to tell bungie that the game should cover the whole TV Screen. The animations sux, the story sux, the most linear game in history, the game doesn't even cover my tv widescreen, graphics that the xbox1 could of done. I played your precious game and it sux balls...Not even Halo1 that was great got a 10/10 and yet bungie released this garbage and stupid reveiwers give it a 10/10. People complain about framerate in the PS3, then you are going to complain about frame rate in halo because it slows down tremendously and to top it the graphics sux so there is no excuse. Halo3 is in the same catogory as Lair in my opinion. Where are the point deductions for this game? Where? Halo3 is garbage, it's an updated multiplayer halo2 pack...I played Halo2 more than most people and I can say that it's sad when you know reviews were bought

Pika-pie6063d ago

The word we are all looking for is Tosser

BIadestarX6063d ago (Edited 6063d ago )

@MarioFromTexas - mmm... I am not sure what a AAA means to you Sony fanboys.... I but for most gamers.... a AAA title is one that scores 9-10/10 in most reviews and sells lots of copies because gamers agree... now as far as you Sony fanboys... you have a different criteria...
Here is the criteria for Sony fanboys:
If most reviewers give 9-10/10 and is on the xbox 360 then it sucks...
If most reviewers give 4-6/10 and is on the PS3 than it's a AAA...
we know the drill... we lair was an example... no Sony fanboy agrees with the score it got... and no Sony fanboy agree with the score Halo 3 got... get it? it's phycological... everything is a conspiracy with you guys.. and everyone is against PS3 games...

Let me guess... you sudgest... ignore the review PS3 games get (when negative) and listen to what Sony fanboys such as yourself say.... ohh I get it... too bad you Sony fanboys can't be trusted to rate a PS3 game... you are not capable of giving a non-bias review about anything published on the PS3... everything runs better or is better on the PS3...

I listen to these reviews... even if I don't like it... this is why I didn't get Blue Dragon eventhough I was waiting for it for ever... one must learn to assept when things don't go our way...

and like I said before... let wait for other reviewers... it's only fair... if the game gets a bad score from multiple places.. than the game sucks... and it's just a rental.

Edit:
--------------
So, if what you say is true about AAA games... than by default it's not possible to have a AAA game... there is no such thing as to have a Perfect game. I would go even further as to say.. that no matter how good or fun a wii game is it can't possible be a AAA? "graphics should be the best out there!" as far as I can tell.. the wii will never be able to reach the Kill Zone 2 or Gears in terms of graphics... so.. if you are right then the wii can't have AAA... how about the PC? the PC can produce better graphics than any game on the console... so it's impossible for the PS3 and the xbox 360 to match, "graphics should be the best out there!" when compared to Crysis... how can console match the huge amount of Memory, CPU power, and GPU available on PC today...
So if a game does not offer multiplayer as robust as Halo 3, co-op like Halo 3, graphics like Crysis, story line like Final fantasy or metal gear... then it's not a AAA title and should never get 10/10?
WOW.. you may want to check your standards as far as gaming is concern or you are in for a big let down... the games your are describing will never happen.. since it would take for ever to make and the budget would be huge.

jackfatal6063d ago

what makes a game get perfect 10/10??
graphics should be the best out there!
gameplay should be the best out there!
story should be the best out there!
lenght should be the best out there!
value(replaying it again) should be the best out there!
sound should be the best out there!

now can someone dare and tell me any game this year including halo 3 has all these points??

the answer is simple NO!
then y we see games such as bioshock and halo 3 gets 10/10?? think about it and tell me!!

gololo6063d ago

@bladestar
Check out an article for the def. of AAA, A and B level games...then come back and tell us what you found out..or if you don't want to read it then here is a summary:
"AAA game means games that have almost unlimited budgets and are media events." (IE Halo 3)
"[A level games] may be as fun or even funner than AAA games but dont have the budgets behind them...No full motion video between every level, they are about the game, not the game and experience." (IE Shadow of Colossus)
"[B games] Cheap to make."
"Historically, AAA, A, and B games represented how much money youd put in and get back."
"AAA, A, and B level games have nothing to do with how good the game is."
Source: http://www.stardock.com/sta...

blackmagic6063d ago (Edited 6063d ago )

Gololo, I think the point you are missing here is in this statement:
"Historically, AAA, A, and B games represented how much money you'd put in and GET BACK." The stipulation there being that a game has to be a money maker to be considered AAA. ie popular

Even a small budget game can be a AAA title if it makes a lot of money/is popular. In the movie world think of 'The Terminator' and 'Waterworld'. The Terminator had a tiny budget yet has massive fanfair, has recieved great reviews and has made tons of money - AAA title. Waterworld had a massive budget, limited fanfair, recieved horrible reviews and flopped in the box office - B title. On the PS3 I believe the equivalent titles would be Little Big Planet (The Terminator) and Lair (Waterworld). On the 360 I'd say Geometry Wars (The Terminator) and Ninety Nine Nights (Waterworld). Of course the majority of AAA titles also have large budgets.

Personally, I use Metacritic as the ONLY source of reliable reviews since it balances the extremes. I also have a scale that I apply to what I think the populace thinks and it rarely fails me:

Casual gamers
AAA -> 90 - 100 Metacritic Score
A -> 80 - 89 Metacritic Score
B -> 70 - 79 Metacritic Score
unplayable 69 and below

Genre Gamer (ie rpg fan looking at rpg review)
AAA -> 80 - 100 Metacritic Score
A -> 70 - 79 Metacritic Score
B -> 60 - 69 Metacritic Score
unplayable 59 and below

Fanboy
AAA -> 75 - 100 Metacritic Score OR 1st/2nd party title
A -> 55 - 74 Metacritic Score
B -> 0 - 54 Metacritic Score
No games unplayable

Keep in mind that a title that ranks in the 70's on metacritic could easily have reviews ranging from 50-90.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6063d ago
umair_s516063d ago

I agree absolutely a baised review, the six axis controls and innovative art style deserves more than 4.

Show all comments (124)
200°

Remembering the Best JRPGs on the PS3

Get ready to embark on a journey filled with monsters, magic, and overpowered haircuts, because this list features the best JRPGs on the PS3.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
shinoff2183279d ago (Edited 279d ago )

There wasn't that many. Thanks to the west's criticism. It was definitely lacking compared to every other ps system. Dont get me wrong there were a few good ones i know that.

jznrpg279d ago

Nier, Valkyrie Chronciles, Tales games , Ni No Kuni, Resonance of Fate, FF13’s, Ys8 just a few off the top of my head and there were a lot more.

CrimsonWing69278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

Not nearly to the degree of PS1 and PS2.

@shinoff2183 makes a good point that around the PS3/Xbox 360 gen is when the genre wasn’t as prevalent and began to shy away from turn-based. There’s some standouts for sure, but look at the PS1 and PS2 JRPG library and then compare that to the PS3 and PS4’s.

Theres definitely a decline in a selection of titles. Even worse was the quality seemed to take a massive hit as well. I think Lost Odyssey was a huge standout for that gen when you look at production values, then you look at something like Fairy Fencer on the PS3 and it’s kind of depressing.

But by that generation there was a shift from western developed games overtaking Japanese developed games. Back from the NES to PS2 Japanese games were the cream of the crop… I don’t know what happened but like midway into the PS3/360 life-time they became less so.

shinoff2183278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

Compared to the ps1 ps2 and he'll even ps4 ps3 doesn't hold a candle to either imo. It's also when turn based damn near disappeared. Again thanks to the west's criticism

Crimson I'd put money on the west being at fault, guys like Phil phish, and numerous others at that time were attacking jrpg and Japanese games in general pretty hard.

Ni no kuni was probably my fav jrpg back then , and the blue dragon

GameBoyColor278d ago

Tales got kinda lucky here. When they took a chance and finally brought tales of graces f over west it sold like 250k lmao a lot of jrpgs did 500k or below. Disgaea was worse i think. Bamco decided to keep bringing more games over though.

Tapani278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

Demon's Souls, Dark Souls and Dark Souls II were the best RPGs on PS3 made by Japanese developers. Everything else just fell short always. Ni No Kuni was a full package, an okayish game as well. Nier and Drakengard III had superb writing, setting and voice acting, however, the performance was a real drag on the gameplay. Traditional RPG-wise I'd actually say 360 had better JRPGs, and think that Lost Odyssey and Blue Dragon were the best traditional JRPGs of the era. PS3 Valkyria Chronicles was okay, but it is closer to an SRPG.

Ryu Ga Gotoku games were also solid, they were still finding their footing and breaking new ground with new cities and formats.

PS3 was the era that almost made me quit gaming and I started playing on PC because I could not find good performance nor games on the system. PS4 got me back into it, and now PS5 is a mix in and between, I just play my PS4 library on the PS5 and rest on PC, just like during the PS3 era. The only new exclusive Sony JRPG is pretty much FFXVI and it is so streamlined and simplified from the normal RPG experience that I can't fit it into the genre anymore. Dragon Quest XII hopefully remedies all of this, but it is just one game.

These new games will all be on PC (while it does take 2-3 years to wait, and 6-12 months from launch to have them patched + fixed by modders) and they perform better on it. The only point in owning a PS5 is to play games a couple of years earlier, but for a hard-working family man like me, the quality of the experience is more important than playing it as soon as possible. And I can't do modern games at 30fps 720p after playing 120fps at 4K. For older games, that's okay.

PSX and PS2 though, those were the days...Still have a massive collections of classic RPGs in CD and DVD format and a phat PS3 to play them!

FinalFantasyFanatic278d ago

It's kinda like that, the PS3 generation was a bad time for JRPGs, especially with the Japanese feeling the need to westernize their games, shooters dominating that gen, the racism from western game journalists (it was bad, between G4, Phill Fish, and a slew of others), and the higher development costs...

It really made me miss the PS1/PS2 days of JRPGs, even the quality of half of those games during the 7th gen weren't as good. The 360 tried, but Microsoft's consoles weren't popular in Japan and no body in the West bought a Xbox for JRPGs (despite Xbox having Vesperia, Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey).

on_line_forever278d ago

" It's kinda like that, the PS3 generation was a bad time for JRPGs, especially with the Japanese feeling the need to westernize their games "

This is when everything fall down and games looks not fun to play anymore except for few games like demon and dark souls for example

-Foxtrot278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

Nah. It's a bad trilogy of games

The only reason XIII-2 stands out is because XIII was so bad

When the bar is so low, anything after feels better.

goldwyncq278d ago

The monster catching mechanic was nice.

Eonjay278d ago

Don't understand the hate for it at all. Seems forced.

shinoff2183278d ago

Watching the credits roll on ff16 now it is good but , I'd really like to re try ff13 least it's turn based and would fill that gap for me.

FinalFantasyFanatic278d ago

They got better after the first one in the trilogy, not outstanding game though.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 278d ago
CS7278d ago

Honestly, I played FFXIII a few years after release and maybe because it was after the hype cycle and I knew the flaws of the game, it actually became my favorite FF after VII.

I took off the mini map and never used auto battle and the stuff that mattered to me in an FF was just so well done.

The art and graphics were insane at the time
The music is still special
The story still lingers in memory more than a decade later
The RPG systems were decent

I never really got the hate for it, still have a soft spot for that game inside me.

goldwyncq278d ago

Still better than XV and XVI.

Yui_Suzumiya278d ago

Drakengard 3 goes for a small fortune nowadays

Knightofelemia278d ago (Edited 278d ago )

Only gripe I have with Ar Tonelico 3 is that Saki is annoying as hell whether English or in Japanese. Then Saki's English voice actor became Ionasal on Ar Nosurge she was a little annoying but not as bad. Johnny Young Bosch voicing Tatsumi I thought he did a great job. And Akiko Shikata with her vocals and the music from the games just went hand and hand.

DarkZane278d ago

I wish Ar No Surge and Ar Tonelico 3 would be remastered on PS4/PS5.

Show all comments (31)
836d ago
Jiub835d ago

Legend of Dragoon was amazing

290°

These PS3 Games are Going to get Really Expensive

Could you get rich by investing in PS3 games? Almost definitely not. Can you make a few bucks by flipping PS3 games over the years? Yeah, sure! It wouldn’t even be that difficult. But let’s face it: Once these games are in your collection, you’re probably keeping them forever.

Read Full Story >>
ghettogamer.net
CDbiggen975d ago

There's a reason I didn't buy most of these when they came out.

MadLad975d ago

After a game's multiple generations old, and can't be had new at a reasonable price, that's when I see nothing wrong with emulation.

What's the point of paying someone scalper prices when the dev/publisher isn't even benefiting from it?

mkis007974d ago

Emulation doesn't stop a games physical box from becoming collectible.

Knightofelemia975d ago

I paid $30 for SH Downpour on PS3 now it's around $70-$85 Canadian Lolipop Chainsaw I paid $15 and it has really gone up in price. I wonder if Transformers War and Fall of Cybertron will go up in price two of the best Transformers games every made.

neutralgamer1992975d ago

In 5 years time all those games will be worth at least $150 to $200 that you listed

975d ago
neutralgamer1992975d ago

Ever since Sony announced that they would shut down PS3 store these prices have skyrocketed and even though Sony backtracked now most gamers realize that it's a matter of time before the PlayStation 3 store is shut down. If you want these games get them while you can even if digital because once that story shut down the physical prices will just go crazy high we saw that already

And many of these games did not sell like crazy amounts so they are limited number of copies available for sale at any given time

MadLad975d ago

Folklore is a game I've always really wanted to play, but I got a PS3 late in the generation, and it was already really expensive to find, being it didn't exactly sell well, therefore was already kind of a collector's item.

Kept hoping I'd find a cheap copy randomly at stores and flea markets, but never happened.

franwex974d ago

I got mine for $5 at Walmart like 10 years ago. I have yet to play it.

neutralgamer1992974d ago

It was available at GameStop for a while for under $20. Don't know har happened but GameStop started to sell their used games based on ebay prices it seems

You can still find it for around $60-70 and which in my opinion is a good price for a game that will be worth double if not triple that in next 5 years

Mr Logic974d ago

Have you considered modding your PS3? Neither Sony or the dev would be getting money from that Folklore purchase. Kind of a victimless crime at that point.

MadLad974d ago (Edited 974d ago )

@neutral

Honestly, I just want to actually give the experience a try. I'm not someone who would buy it at a premium just to potentially rip someone off down the road.
I mean, there are collectors out there and if paying a couple hundred dollars is worth it to them then more power to them, but I'm not one to be on either end of that exchange.

I know it's taboo, but I might dig in and see the state of PS3 emulation on PC. I have a good PC, so it might be able to power through the often times poor performance, being PS3 is known to be hard to emulate.

I've never emulated anything past the PS2/Dreamcast but, as I said in my first post, I don't see anything wrong with emulation if the game you want to play can only be had used, with no money going to the creators.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 974d ago
Show all comments (20)