70°

Battle: Los Angeles PC Review - GamingShogun

GamingShogun.com writes: "Also, if the game were accurate, US Marines would only be able to run for about fifteen feet before being winded for five to ten seconds. Meanwhile, your AI-driven squad mates seem to go forever, often times leaving you playing catch up. Also of concern is that none of the marines seem to be carrying a standard issue sidearm or fighting knife. The game features three weapons - an assault rifle, a rocket launcher, and a sniper rifle..."

Read Full Story >>
gamingshogun.com
Jacobite4800d ago

Never mind theirs alvays Crysis 2

Nes_Daze4800d ago

Even Cabela's outdoor adventures is better than this game.

dirthurts4800d ago

With a game taking 45 minutes to complete, I would expect a freaking epic 45 minutes of gameplay.
Alas, this not the case.
I would pay maybe 2-3 bucks to try it out. Why is there no PC trial game out there?

10°
7.0

Msxbox - Battle: Los Angeles 3D specific review

Msxbox-world takes a 3D look at the movie tie in game Battle Los Angeles and determines whether the 3D addition is worth the 800 point price tag.

Read Full Story >>
msxbox-world.com
70°
6.0

PlayDevil: Battle: Los Angeles Review

PlayDevil has posted a review of Konami's new FPS (based on the same movie) of "Battle: Los Angeles".

Read Full Story >>
playdevil.com
velaxun4737d ago (Edited 4737d ago )

Is anyone anywhere surprised by this review? Graphics look decent though, I can give them that

ShyGuy134737d ago

Not at all. The game is literally 45 minutes long, if that.

90°

GameSpot Sync - May 4, 2011

GameSpot's Jody continues the Sony saga, gives us a reason to buy Battle: Los Angeles, and fills us in on Child of Eden, Sanctum, and more.

Read Full Story >>
uk.gamespot.com
Zydake4749d ago

I guess this is Gamespot's answer to IGN's DailyFix. I cant wait to read the youtube comments reading "Show us your Tits"