110°
5.5

IGN: Battle: Los Angeles Review

There are plenty of other games on the download circuit that offer more than Battle: L.A. does for a $10 pricetag, but it's still not the worst investment you could make. The game lacks variety, but it also doesn't outstay its welcome. If you want some laughs and don't mind that the shooting experience is average at best, playing through this alien invasion is probably more entertaining than the movie and you'll get some Achievements/Trophies out of it.

Presentation - 6.0
Graphics - 5.5
Sound - 5.0
Gameplay - 6.0
Lasting Appeal - 4.0

Read Full Story >>
xboxlive.ign.com
Kran4802d ago

had been thinking on getting this. Looks like I wont :D Thanks for saving me from a mistake IGN. Ya did good.

pxpxp4802d ago

Just like the movie... it sucks.

The_Zeitgeist4802d ago

What are you talking about? The movie is awesome. It's Blackhawk Down meets Independence Day, what's not to like about that?

Hanuman4802d ago

I knew I was wasting my time when I saw the first bulletimpact in the demo.

10°
7.0

Msxbox - Battle: Los Angeles 3D specific review

Msxbox-world takes a 3D look at the movie tie in game Battle Los Angeles and determines whether the 3D addition is worth the 800 point price tag.

Read Full Story >>
msxbox-world.com
70°
6.0

PlayDevil: Battle: Los Angeles Review

PlayDevil has posted a review of Konami's new FPS (based on the same movie) of "Battle: Los Angeles".

Read Full Story >>
playdevil.com
velaxun4738d ago (Edited 4738d ago )

Is anyone anywhere surprised by this review? Graphics look decent though, I can give them that

ShyGuy134738d ago

Not at all. The game is literally 45 minutes long, if that.

90°

GameSpot Sync - May 4, 2011

GameSpot's Jody continues the Sony saga, gives us a reason to buy Battle: Los Angeles, and fills us in on Child of Eden, Sanctum, and more.

Read Full Story >>
uk.gamespot.com
Zydake4749d ago

I guess this is Gamespot's answer to IGN's DailyFix. I cant wait to read the youtube comments reading "Show us your Tits"