280°

StrengthGamer: Homosexuality in Dragon Age 2 - Now You Judge?

" If you are playing as a Male and decide that you want to be in a relationship with another Male character - the choice is right there. Prefer the company of Females? Have at it. Dragon Age 2 doesn't judge.

Unfortunately for both Bioware and the gay community, gamers everywhere do judge."

Read Full Story >>
strengthgamer.com
AvidGamerrrr4809d ago

Very good points - not what I thought the article was going to be about at all. I figured it would be anti-gay, and it's pro. Nicely done.

Christopher4809d ago

I do have to admit that it felt like it was actually a lot easier to have a relationship with male characters, whether a male of female Hawke, than it was with female characters. Both Anders and Fenris gave me flirt options a ton, especially. Though, Isabella is the easiest to get into bed it seems, requiring only two flirtation moments before she comes over for a quick, tame cut scene.

Active Reload4809d ago

I'm a lesbian who loves eating kitty cat.

DigitalHorror814809d ago

I'm a straight guy that loves eating kitty cat.

mindedone4809d ago

I'm a kitty cat that likes eating soylent green.

Active Reload4809d ago

I will fight you over the kitty cat.

Mystickay864809d ago

Here's a confession: I'm in love with a man. What? I'm in love with a man... a man named God. Does that make me gay? Am I gay for God? You betcha.

The Meerkat4809d ago ShowReplies(4)
Kran4809d ago (Edited 4809d ago )

Its wrong people against it. Im a straight guy and its just wrong. How love is portrayed in a game is the developers choice, not the gamers.

Don't want your character to fall in love with a guy if you're a guy? Then stay away from those options.

I find it odd how girl on girl is fine to gamers, but guy on guy is just completely wrong. How stupid is that? Nobody's forcing you to watch the sex scenes, so dont. To make it easier, dont fall in love at all in the game :/

Baka-akaB4809d ago (Edited 4809d ago )

I dont care with the choice . It's just that in da2 , the conversation led too quickly to male/male romance .

Seriously the very first times you meet with anders or fenris you get the heart shaped flirt related lines , and for a girl openly skanky as Isabela you need a bit more ?

Good idea but not always well executed

DanSolo4809d ago (Edited 4809d ago )

That is the problem with this type of thing. Whether or not it should even be included in games, especially games that might be played by children is one argument...

But if it is included (rightly or wrongly) then it should not be an open or in your face thing. It should be something that would take a small amount of effort to get things going in that direction before it becomes accessible, as at least then the very small percentage of the population who want it are catered for, but without it being something that would be accidentally stumbled into by some kid just trying to play a game with swords and spells.

But then sometimes the motives behind the inclusion of this type of thing is questionable.... maybe it is just to give people of different types options.... but just as often it is about the wider promotion of something and to gradually force it to be acceptable (particularly by targeting entertainment mediums in which kids will be repeatedly exposed to it)
that type of thing happens all too often and is quite an insidious and creepy way of doing things....
It also lessens any real arguments by decent people who happen to be different and just want to be allowed to live their lives as who they are.

TacoTaru4809d ago

I'm not so sure that being disturbed by homosexuality has to be a religious thing. Evolution would lead us in the direction of whatever is best for propagation of the species and acceptance of homosexuality would tend to be counter (re)productive.

Just a thought I never thought before.

DanSolo4809d ago

Well that's the thing mate, these days people get so caught up in the whole religious side of the argument that they overlook the scientific facts of procreation.

It's like if someone is homosexual then what they do is their business. But it is quite obviously not the way nature intended it to be and can never be "right" no matter how many arguments are made in its defense or how many arguments against it are shouted down.

It is not a good thing for our species no matter how it is dressed up; but at the same time that does not give anyone the right to persecute people for being the way they are if they do not hurt anyone else.

Baka-akaB4809d ago

I doubt its fair to single out that aspect as counter productive to species propagation , when well it has hardly been a prerogative and preoccupation .

Most of our society and traditions are definitively unnatural in that aspect .
So what's the point of isolating that one deviation among gazillions of them ?

DanSolo4809d ago

That is true, there are a lot of unnatural things that the human race as a species, and the various cultures around the world engage in.

But that does not change the fact that as things stand at the moment, there has been a big push in recent years to make homosexuality accepted as normal, good, and even cool.

Now I have no objections to a genuine drive to stop a group of people being bullied or picked on because of who and what they are as long as they are not hurting anyone else. But what has been happening is more social engineering to force people to accept something, than any kind of altruistic push to better humanity.... and yet that is what it is nauseatingly dressed up as.

Reasonable debate has been quashed repeatedly by various means, and numerous tactics of manipulation have been disguised as reasonable debate.

Mr Scooch4808d ago

Woooo there!!!

What's happened here???

This is turning into a reasonably intelligent debate!

That's not why I stopped readin N4G comments!

Where's all the "My Xbox pwns ur PS3" comments?

Well said though, you both made some interesting and thought provoking comments ther!

mindedone4809d ago

One might also note that the biological imperative might not always be what is good for the species. This particular imperative is blind to overpopulation; it is blind to genetic deformities that do not manifest until after a species has past its fertile years. So, although homosexuality may not be a trait that manifests itself from this particular biological imperative, homosexuality may be good for the species in some aspect.

Sharingan_no_Kakashi4809d ago

"in some aspects" isn't good enough. Homosexuals still account for the vast majority of sexually transmitted diseases. Also I'm not sure what you mean by "trait". Homosexuality is a choice not a gene.

mindedone4809d ago

Isn't good enough for what? By your comment about STDs, clearly you didn't understand me, as STDs solve the same biological problem that homosexuality does, i.e., overpopulation.

As for the use of trait, I was specific enough to not use the term "genetic" trait, but I'm glad that you are able to positively affirm a question that scientists still debate.

DanSolo4808d ago

Actually it does nothing to stem the MASSIVE problem of overpopulation that the human race has to deal with in the coming years.

What with homosexuals now adopting kids, and lesbians getting IVF treatments and sperm donations it pretty much will have no impact on stemming overpopulation.... which is a shame seeing as overpopulation is at the very top of all the mounting problems the human race will have to finally start dealing with at some point.

And all that homosexuals having kids will do is ensure, in yet another of many ways, that the next generation will be even more inclined towards buying in to the notion that it is a good and normal thing which is currently being force-fed to society.

When really the only argument that should be made is that even if it is not a good and normal thing that they should not be persecuted for it if they are not hurting anyone else.

Unfortunately that good and reasonable argument has been well and truly buried beneath manipulated popular opinion and militant actions behind the scenes.

And to digress a little bit... that is the problem with the human race in most respects.... that rather than use our intelligence to solve problems by looking at them honestly and objectively... every group/facet of society just uses it to try to prove that they are "right" irrespective of the reality of the situation.
Lying to themselves so as not to have to deal with the cognitive dissonance of realising that they are wrong and in fact their "RIGHTS" may actually be more about what they "WANT".

But hey.... if people were to think logically and to think about the betterment of the species rather than their own selfish wants..... then the fanboy/celebrity worshippers/and idiots of every other kind would just die out..... and wouldn't that be a shame?

mindedone4808d ago

By "it does nothing" I will assume you mean "it does almost nothing," as it can be measured that homosexuals have on average less babies than heterosexuals. If you feel I am nitpicking, I apologize. I do not much like hyperbole and exaggeration.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4808d ago
Show all comments (50)
130°

BioWare Could be Working on More than Just Dragon Age Dreadwolf and Mass Effect 4

Earlier this year, BioWare was hit with layoffs as part of a downsizing of parent company Electronic Arts, but fans have been reassured that the next Mass Effect game hasn’t been impacted. Likewise, Dragon Age: Dreadwolf’s development is still churning along, with BioWare putting it at the forefront of its focus and rumors suggesting that it could launch sometime later this year. Fans might be getting another look at the long-in-development Dragon Age: Dreadwolf at the Summer Game Fest in June.

If the recently posted job offering for a temporary development manager is any indication, BioWare could have yet another surprise up its sleeve for when Mass Effect 4 and Dragon Age: Dreadwolf are nearing completion. This mystery BioWare video game could truly be anything, from another spin-off of its two major properties to something entirely new. All there is to go on at the moment is a vague mention in the job posting, and it might still be some time before BioWare is ready to confirm any new games in its pipeline.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
just_looken42d ago

So a studio that spent years on anthem then this dragon age thing is now also working on another ip along with mass effect,

You think they would be worried that there brand has been on 3 major screw ups

Dragon age 3 launched broken with the frostbite engine yes its a good game but you can see in the late game how rough it was

anthem......

Mass effect 4 well that dev team was fired so yeah.....

They should make sure this new dragon age is a goat instead of putting more work on the table

bababooiy41d ago

Bioware today is like 150 poeple i dont see how they are seemingly working on all these projects at the same time.

Michiel198941d ago

Inquisition wasn't broken, it just had some flaws and on the contrary it also had some strengths. If you call inquisition a major screw up then idk what to say.

That said with what happened to the study since then and now, I'm not really confident that their next game will be any good.

just_looken41d ago

If you played it fully to get plat like me back in its novemeber launch window you had that castle with empty area's endgame missions not there or working and a mp that was made around loot box grind like the mass effect mp.

Its hard to explain to those that played it years later after they tossed out the dlc/patch's

Michiel198940d ago

entitled much? I played it at launch too. Why you even platted it if it was a "major screw up"?
It was good enough for you to sink 100 hours in but also a complete fuckup at the same time, make up your mind.
So either you like shitty games or you're just talking out of your ass.

RaidenBlack41d ago

Well just wanna say, Archetype Entertainment is the new BioWare, composed of mainly ex-BioWare vets.
And they're developing Exodus (starring Matthew McConaughey), a new sci-fi RPG (spiritual successor to Mass Effect, dare I say?)

CantThinkOfAUsername41d ago

I hope it's a single player game with Anthem's gameplay mechanics.

Becuzisaid41d ago

They're owned by EA. What makes you think that they wouldn't publish for PS5? Shoot, if your fridge could connect to your bank account EA would try to release it for that if they could!

Double_O_Revan41d ago

How about they focus on those games and not over extend themselves? We don't need another Anthem.

Becuzisaid41d ago

Bioware died after Inquisition (some would even argue after ME3). They are no longer the same company.

Show all comments (14)
70°

Mass Effect Writer Reveals Why He Left BioWare

During a part of his interview with Minnmax, Mac Walters gave details of why he chose to leave BioWare.

Read Full Story >>
gameshorizon.com
140°

New Mass Effect Game Teased for N7 Day, and It Shows a Mysterious Individual

Today is known as Mass Effect N7 Day, and BioWare has released what looks to be teasers for the new Mass Effect game.

Snookies12187d ago (Edited 187d ago )

We really need another solid Mass Effect entry. It's a real shame that such a legendary franchise was left off with such a blemish to its overall astounding track record. Andromeda was just not it, don't know what they were thinking there.

-Foxtrot187d ago

Surprised it got a subtitle

I thought after Andromeda they’d have kept to the numbers so people wouldn’t think “oh another spin off”

Unless Shepard returns

Obscure_Observer187d ago

"Unless Shepard returns"

After ME3, Shepard should f* off

Stanjara186d ago

Put a chick in it and make her gay.

Ethereal186d ago

Yes! One of my all time favorite trilogies. Hopefully they do ME justice. Andromeda was passable and had bones of a good game but just lacked the depth and intrigue that the originals had.