GC 2006: Full Auto 2 no longer a PS3 exclusive

clayton6466d ago

That was a funny post, I love it. One more PS3 exclusive flushed down the toilet, swish!

General6466d ago

Crappy game anyways, Never was interested in it.

Balance6466d ago

agreed, it is nice that it isn't an exclusive now but i am not interested in it either

DC RID3R6466d ago

not to release it multi format!?!

Not really big news for the game, but it still is a sure sign on how far sony have dropped down the pecking order amongst game devs!!!!

All ms need to do now is sign up VF5, and it's a GO!!!!

jiggajayp6466d ago

No big surprise here!!! They know that it`s a big risk being that the ps3 might not survive with that pricetag!! Also, with the installed user base that the XBOX 360 has, it`s smart to release it for the 360!! although, the 1st version of this game sucked @$$! I won`t be buying this title again!!!

jiggajayp6466d ago

They are a bunch of liers anyways!! They have been co-deving this game all along!! Like I said b4, It`s trash!!!! Fock this game yo!!

bizzy126466d ago

dam sony is losing everything merceneries,assincreed,devil may cry,full auto,and not getting none of the soccer games this year or next.

specialguest6466d ago

hahah this news is funny. Sega is like that child that runs away from home, then realizes that it was a bad idea and now they want to come back home. or that college student that wants to be independant and live on his own, but now he's broke and wants to live back at home.

johnrichardandrew6466d ago

The original was crap for 360 and the sequel would probably have been similar on the PS3, all that happens now is more people can buy crap... woo.

I love my 360 but this is not anything worth jumping around about, I doubt it will be a stellar title.

ChaosKnight6466d ago

Personally i don't really care that much for Full Auto, it felt like a racing twisted metal (and really i didnt like twisted). I like how Sega is going multi-platform and i think most companies should do that, but I ain't buying FA2 anyways, so... Meh ^_^

zypher6466d ago

good news for 360 fanboys...i guess. me? i had no intentions of getting either version. Twisted Metal is where the true car carnage is at. all others are shallow imitations

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

Silverwolf6466d ago

I think Sega must have looked at Capcom and seen that there's money to be made going multi-platform. Just imagine if MGS4 was also released on the xbox 360. This would no doubt be the best selling game ever period.

Chronical6466d ago

Another loss for Sony... keep them coming

Mr Bubbles6466d ago

I could be a d!ck and quote all the folks that were writing about how the PS3 version was gonna be so much better... but it's really not worth it with this game. Granted the developer's words were twisted to some extent, so I can't blame people for getting excited and thinking the new features on FA2 could only be possible on PS3.

So what have we learned? Don't expect the games made by rubbish developers to be any real indication of the limits or strengths of ANY console.

Twist966466d ago

It was a poor game anyway. I don't care if I can get it for 360 now, I don't want it anyway.

PS360PCROCKS6466d ago

HAHA! I actually laughed outloud when I read this headline. My god all the fighting trying to tell all you PS3 fans this game sucks and still will suck even only on PS3 and now it's multi platform, lol, I will assume now the tune will change to "Oh well I never was going to get it, it looks dumb anyways"

shotty6466d ago

The first 1 was alright, hopefully the second one will be better. Come how about a demo on the marketplace. Remember Segas boss works at microsoft.

Marriot VP6466d ago

This is retarded, who cares or wants full auto 2. It's not gonna sell well even on a launch title for the PS3 so they multi platformed it.

HAH, your going to give a game with the same graphics and horrible arcade driving 1 year later expecting people to buy it.

TheMART6466d ago

F*ck I hope it's not! The lamest franchise ever, please let it be a PS exclusive from now on!

I just posted this also in pending stories and gave it a lame vote even on an own post. So I'll do on this one also. Not because the posting is lame, but the freaking game is!!!

SEER6466d ago

Full Auto was the worst game i've ever played on 360. It can keep on the PS3 for all i care.

kewlkat0076466d ago (Edited 6466d ago )

I remember the old fullauto 2 thread about this being only PS3 exclusive. The Tides have turned yet again. Now 360 fans don't even want it back and now PS3 fanboys are all about the game sucking @ss.
So typical of bashing Ports..

Anyhow Where is the next installment of TWISTED METAL??? I wanna go back to my Twisted Metal 2 Glory days.

Every little market share 360 take is always good news. Even if its a bad game. After all that is the strategy so +1 for MS.

TheMART6466d ago

I already said this when I saw the game and when it got a PS3 exclusive still and now it comes back I still say it.

It s*cks big time

BURLY6466d ago

The game blows chunks boy's, the game blows chunks.

BIadestarX6466d ago

The story repeats. Sony Fanboys hear some good news about the PS3. Start talking lots of crap and finally have to swallow their on vomit. It sucks to be a Sony Fanboy now in days. My most sincere sympathies to Sony fan boys.

SDS Overfiend6466d ago

This game was running on 360 already and sony paid for announcement rights. now like DC Rider said Give US VF So we can Finesse that then Sega Can be on they merry way.

atomheart6466d ago

Wow. Sony can't even keep crap games like full auto exclusive?

timmyp536466d ago

achira6466d ago

hmmm, i think this news is not true. wait till tomorrow than everything will be cleared up.

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 2

The Real Deal6466d ago

Whether the game is crap or good is irrelevant...the xbox 360 has more exclusives and more games period...which means more choices for a lower price. Thats a formula for complete domination. More games, more exclusives, lower price point. Thanks Microsoft. And yes, when they announced this game exclusive for the ps3, all the extreme sony fan boys were screaming about how much better full auto 2 is going to be than full auto 1. lol...lol....lol.... I guess we (xbox 360 owners) will get to see for ourselves via xbox live demo at some point before release.

Mikey_Gee6466d ago

But they could have kept it ... this game blows !!

DEIx15x86466d ago

Weren't we all being told that this game was only on PS3 because the console was more powerful and the only one capable of this quality of game. I guess it's not to much better it they can port it at the last second. All the remaining time will be just to rescript the processors.

LightWarrior3936466d ago

I didn't like the original Full Auto, but I did see some footage of the new one and it does look way better. Finally I must say they added the Arena's. I don't care what anyone says if I'm getting a game to smash cars I want some arena like multiplayer like Twisted Metal. Well we will all just have to see how it turns out. I'm not going to say it's going to suck, but I must say they made some improvements that should have been in the original to start with.

kikilala6465d ago

is this game that bad?? even if its not that bad how come its become a loss to Sony?? the game is out on both system.. unless of course its switch overboard from being a ps3 exclusive to x360 exclusive...

Show all comments (34)

- Comments (64)

Expand all

marcusfenix6368d ago

Look the same, except Ridge Racer and Blazing Angels. To me RR6 looks better, but blazing angels looks a little better on the ps3 with the extra polish time.

videl6368d ago

is this a joke ? ridge racer is far better on the ps3. go into a shop and look at it, and then look at rr6.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 2

THWIP6368d ago

...YOU are the joke. Any moron with ONE EYE can see the PS3 games don't look any better than the 360's. In some cases...and reviewers agree...the 360 versions look BETTER.
The only PS3 games that will have a shot at looking close to what Sony has promised, are 1st party/exclusive titles, that get alot more $$ and dev time thrown at them. Sadly, R:FOM was forced to be a day-1 launch title, because Sony had nothing else ready for launch (i.e. Killzone 2); therefore, it looks more like an HD version of Black, rather than a truly next-gen title.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 3

Marty83706368d ago

The colours and lighting in the majority of those games looks better on the PS3.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 3

CG6368d ago

Watch them again!! but with your eyes OPEN this time fool.

Reply Agree 3 Disagree 0

FordGTGuy6368d ago

and thats all I have t osay about that.

Geohound6368d ago

PS3 looks brighter, and I couldn't care less. Sony's titles at this time make me sleepy.

TheMART6368d ago

I call that

WASHED OUT

If they used the wrong kind of washing powder. Too bright, too light. The 360 has the better colour palettes overal. And watch COD3 with the helmets physics of stuff flying away after shooting. The PS3 helmets pop up so strange

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

InMyOpinion6368d ago

Can't judge from these videos, they all look the same. COD 3 on the Ps3 is supposed to run in 30 fps and 360 60, but I can't see any difference between the versions. Bad videos I guess considering reviewers say the Ps3 version is'nt as good.

power of Green 6368d ago

Nevermind the videos and nevermind these Sony fans the reviewers say games look and run better on the 360 and the games that were built for the PS3(1st party)a far worse.

MicroGamer6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

and here is my breakdown:

Call Of Duty and Ridge Racer + PS3

Tiger Woods,Madden and Full Auto + 360

Fight Night, NBA 2K7, Need for Speed so close it doesn't matter which system you play them on

Tony Hawk, Marvel Ultimate Alliance, absolutely the same, no differences at all.

Blazing Angels, couldn't really judge it accurately since two different planes and two different environments were used.

I'm being as fair as I can here. PS3 is stronger in a couple of the games, 360 is also stronger in some and many of them are so similar or identical that it doesn't matter. You still have to factor the price into the equation, though. For the money Sony is asking, they better damn well knock my socks off in every single game, and they haven't done that with these games. Even in the games where PS3 looked noticeably better, the 360 versions were still more than acceptable.

TheMART6368d ago

Bullsh!t on COD3

Multiple reviews have stated that it's better looking on the 360 also in framerate

And if you watch the video good enough you'll see the 360 version kicks the PS3's version butt

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 2

MicroGamer6368d ago

I thought the 360 version looked dark and murky compared to the PS3. In a game where you are sometimes called on to shoot targets from a distance, I prefer the scenery to be bright and clear so I can pick off that sniper up in the tree from the glint off his scope before he parts my hair with a bullet.

uxo226367d ago

Try adjusting to brightness or gamma in the options menu.

super bill6368d ago

i cant believe all the ps3 fanboys shell out 600 dollars on that piece of secand rate games machine.when its clear the 360 looks better and gets better reviews.the reviews dont lie more that can be said of sony.god i hate that company.

videl6368d ago

you say it, you hate the company, the ps3 can be as good as it is possible, you will never admit it is better than your beloved xcrap.

Dusk6368d ago

aren't of the best quality to really compare, IMO. I'm defending both sides here. You need to play the same game for both systems on the same TV to really compare. However, if you go by the reviewers, nearly all major muliplatform gaming sites say the 360 versions of games like COD3, Ridge Racer, Tony Hawk, etc. all look and play better on the 360. At this point, I have to go by what they say, as its not just one or two sites, but nearly all of them.

Looking at videos from sites like gametrailers.com, I personally think the 360 overall looks as good (and a lot of times better). However, the only completely accurate way to judge is to see them on the same TV, as I don't know for sure where the online videos come from.

Reply Agree 1 Disagree 1

zornik6368d ago

@videl....lol....first you quote super bill he do'nt like the PS3 and then you call the X360 "Xcrap"?????who's the fan boy????

JasonPC360PS3Wii6368d ago

PS3 lovers must hate stuff like this.

marcusfenix6368d ago

Are getting jipped!!!

blackmagic6368d ago

Namco has some balls to call the ps3 Ridge Racer number seven in the series when it is clearly identical to RR6. I'll never understand why no one seems to be upset about this.

Killer Cop6368d ago

How can you even compare graphics with such a little video(s). It's like 300 x 200 pixel. But check the Need for Speed: Carbon video, PS3 has better graphics. The ground, car and envirioments are way better.

Next time, try give us a video with HD RESOLUTION PLEASE!

Bebedora6368d ago

I have not even read the article. Why? It compares a launch console like a PS3 which is harder to develop for too. Wait a minute or a year at least before doing things like this. If the PS3 would make the XBox look bad as of now, I would see the PS3 as a way more muscular console I ever thought, or kick-ass developers not seen on the XBox scene...

But now that's not gonna happen, right? Exceptions do exist of course, but summing it up, comparing the consoles now can, with my eyes, only be seen as just a MS PR stunt (or a fan of the XBox).

Still - If these kind of tests continue it will be intresting to follow.

death monk6368d ago

so were comparisons to first generation xbox titles and second generation PS2 titles dumb too?

power of Green 6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

Yah i'm sure if it were the other way around the comparsons would be a Sony and Sony fanboy PR stunt. lol

Bebedora6368d ago

What I know about first XBox is that it had more gfx muscels, but that didnt make a successful console either. I dont really know about that comparision and how that turned out really. So I wont comment on it more than this.

Ravenator5296368d ago

I get home and download these videos to my Media Player 11 library.

Then I will be able to pull them through my 360 and watch them in 720p rather than my crappy PC monitor.

I tried to make a comparison but you just can't unless you see it in high def IMO.

The true textures and graphics can't be seen on a standard 4:3 computer monitor.

death monk6368d ago

although the 360 does upscale, upscaling from such a low resolution isn't going to do jack

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

Ravenator5296368d ago

So are you seriously going to tell me that I won't be able to make a better comparison on my 52' HDTV compared to my 13' standard def computer monitor?

Move along please!

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

death monk6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

yes I am saying that. I've streamed videos to my 360 and if the resolution of the video is as low as these are, there isn't much discernible differences. you're going to see a lot of video artifacts and you won't be able to make out many textures. I'll move along when I damn well please.

edit: btw computer monitors aren't standard def

MicroGamer6368d ago

I have the VGA cable for my 360 and using an ancient 1280x1024 capable monitor and it does do 720p in native mode on that and looks great. You don't need an expensive HDTV to get 720p output. If you have an old PC monitor laying around, all you need is a $40 cable, less if you go with a generic one on ebay.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6368d ago

NextGen24Gamer6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

from its previous date in NO EXCUSE....Sony hyped up their machine. And now fanboys are making excuses for its shortcomings. Look at the original xbox. Halo and other launch games set the standard for that generation. Halo blew away anything that the ps2 had out for the previous year and a half. And it was the new console...it was the console that didn't have over a year of games under its belt. So, bottom line is the ps3 should have had a few titles that did what halo did to the ps2 last gen. But nope. All their first party games have recieved "F's" and "D's"...with Resistance getting an average of 8 ish. Stop making excuses. Sony isn't a new video game company. And they made all the bold outlandish claims. Now they have to face the music. Its over. Thanks Microsoft.

P.S. Yes. That means that they had been developing games prior to Spring 2006. They wouldn't have said the system would launch in Spring if games wern't in developement. There is no excuse for Sony not having a Halo ish type of blockbuster game at launch. Its SONY folks. Once again...its never ever ever about first gen vs second gen. Its games vs games. Will ps3 games get better? Yes of course. Will 360 games get better? yes of course. If you take what Cliffy said about Gears of war only scratching the surface....its obvious that the best is yet to come. Will sony fans constantly live in the past? Will they constantly make excuses for games not comparing to the 360? All you have to do is reflect on the ps2 vs the xbox. The ps2 came out first. When the xbox launched a year and a half later...its first gen games spanked ps2's games in every way. WHY? How could MS do it as a new company against the biggest video game company of the last 11 years? HOW? That should tell you that there are no excuses to be made. Put up or shut up. Like Jay Z says..."show me what you got". So, yes...ps3 games will improve...but so will the 360 games. And right now...there is absolutely nothing that the ps3 has that even shows glimpses of what Gears of War shows. Gears of War doesn't kill another game for the ps3...it kills the system itself. It sets the bar so high...that I don't believe sony will ever catch up now. Thats my opinion from me playing every single ps3 launch game.

P.S.S The 1up comparissons prove that 85 to 90 percent of the people polled on each game believe that either A. the ps3 games don't look as good as the 360 games...thus the "what the cell is going on" statement. But, this is something I already knew with me having both systems.

Another thing...this is a News4gamers site. There is no rules saying that any gamer can't contribute to discussions on one side or another. Most people who own a 360 used to be a Nintendo fanboy or a Sony fanboy. So we are gamers who have grown up and evolved. We have opinions and views that should be heard. Me personally, I play the ps3 and the 360. I enjoy them both. When there are topics on comparissons I contribute what I know from my gameplay experience. That is what the site is about. Gamers will disagree...but I would rather disagree with someone on my level than a fanboy who has never tried a 360 or a ps3. Looking at screen shots and video's on the computer isn't the same as playing both systems. And I have to agree with MOST reviews. The 360 right now is clearly outperforming the ps3...Graphics and Frame rates are clearly better on the 360. Does that bother some of you? It shouldn't. Be a gamer and play games.

Reply Agree 5 Disagree 1

calderra6368d ago

If it was delayed 8 months, doesn't that mean they should have been ready to go 8 months ago, meaning we'll soon be up to what should have been a year for PS3 games to get ahead of 360?

cchance6368d ago

ya people seem to forget the ps3 was due out almost a year ago... 8 months, and all these "launch titles" or "launch window" games got an extra 8 months of dev time, and their are still only a few on the market, and they cant compete with the 360 versions... god 8 months extra dev time and the games just barely try to keep up with the 360 versions?

Why dont sony fans see this?

Bebedora6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

Why do you play the PS3 when it get so spanked by Gears of War and that the PS3 never will reach that level? What are you trying to say?

The PS3 is a monster to master (so it says). So was the PS2, am I right? Now we can see FFXII running on a 6(soon 7) year old hardware. Have you seen what that old fart can do now? Where the PS3 will shine is physics and number of objects displayed at once (with smooth framerates). That when they can utilize at least 3-4 of the six cores possible.

You doom the PS3 too soon. I cant believe we have seen the end, and I swear on that the PS3 will accelerate faster (since it's so new) than the XBox and eat its distance closer to the XB360 performance (UT2007 may top Gears?).

Let the baby learn how to walk and it will pass by the running 360. (fanboy comment of course).

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 2

marcusfenix6368d ago

http://www.1up.com/do/featu...

No difference at all except FNR3.

meshow6368d ago

Then why Xbox fans always come here ..writing in the PS3 section more than the Xbox’s one…if you got this super-next-gen system ..way even bother and waste your time here.. what are you guys afraid of ?! Or is it the fact that ‘the PS3 launching games are almost equal in quality to the Xbox –one-year games’!!! If you wana keep crying pleas do it some where else

marcusfenix6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

FNR3 was a launch game for the 360, blazing angels is old, all the rest are multi-platform with the pos3 having extra dev time, if anything all should look better for the PS3 but only 1 does. You are the fanboy bud, you should be crying because your PS3 isn't ahead of the 360 at all, and in most games it is behind it in FRAMERATE, the most important part of the game FRAMERATE, the ps3 versions may look the same but believe me they don't RUN nearly as good as on the 360. Go read all of the gaming sites, the reviews are higher on the 360 because of higher framerate and online capabilities.

PWNED!!! 4D LOL!!!

power of Green 6368d ago

Did you read the headlines FOOL!!!! or the artical for that matter!!!!.

At least you got that off your chest it's alright let it all out we'll be your Venting/punching bag.

cchance6368d ago

"always come here ..writing in the PS3"

come here ... ps3... umm this is the 360 section

ImTheNumber126368d ago

It's the same as when the ps3 fans go into the 360 news section and keep telling them that they should be playing their system and how playstation is superior. Most everyone on here is a bigot and a martyr to their system. Some people get annoyed and start to argue like everyone else, others try to ignore it. If you read what you wrote you would see how one-sided it is. Maybe soon people will just admit it and then it will not happen so much.

rjkc6368d ago

that as well why do a huge number of xbox fanatics patrol the ps3 section like they need to justify there system and if they dont like something they resort to insults gaming is meant to be fun

Reply Agree 0 Disagree 1

JasonPC360PS3Wii6368d ago

Come on look up and you will see the differance.
look at the video and now think, price, games, service and quality. By the time I was done shopping this season the 360 and Wii was total $1000 bucs with all extras and 6 games. Now show me where you can find a PS3 for that with everything and give me a reason to buy these games for that PS3. Like I said before Sony took a bad turn this time around and there only supporters are the fanatics. Sony will lose there king status and be even with the other two, that is good for all of us.

sLoP6368d ago

You are a moron, its in the Xbox 360 section too...maybe take the time to read the title a little before you run your mouth.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6368d ago

cchance6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

LOL Im sorry people but sony fans just need to stop posting stupidity.

1. Pretty much all the games look better on the 360 version, this has been seen in person and as well in side by side screenshots, such as ridge racer, where it was blatantly obvious that many textures were lower quality, as well as many things like buildings had alot less shaders dedicatd to them and looked like ps2 versions.

2. Why is it people are saying "the ps3 just launched you cant compare that to the 360 thats been out a year"

Umm last i checked, most of these games were 360 launch titles, or early release titles, and the ps3 got an extra year of development time so they should be way better than the 360 counterparts but arent.

COD3 you cant say the team had more experience on the 360 becasue cod2 wasnt made by the same team as cod3... and guess what... beyond the fact that the game looks better on the 360, the framerate on the ps3 is ABYSMAL! Not to mention on the 360 version i can bring friends into online matches locally via splitscreen, not so with the ps3 its 1 local player only and it still hsa framerate issues.

3. Yes HD resolution videos let you nitpick the comparisons better but the fact is if 2 videos at the same resolution even if its low quality, show the ps3 severly trailing the 360, its kinda blatant that higher quality videos will just accentuate that issue.

4. People seem to keep making excuses that the ps3 is just a launch console... no it was supposed to be out a YEAR ago... so these games coming out now should have been on the market a YEAR AGO... The console was delayed yes... but what do you think the developers scrapped all their work and started over on the games ??? no the games got extra development time... much more than their 360 counterparts.

5. Brightness does not = better... yes a few of the ps3 games are brighter, the issue is that brightness shows off some nasty things, such as in a few games the ps3 not using full scale textures and using repeated crosshatch textures which are really obvious with the high brightness.

6. Resistence was supposed to be the big go-to game for the ps3, and with places rating it a 7-8 (except for ps and sony magz) the fact is resistence looks about on par with .... cod2 maybe cod3 and thats the extent of it.

7. Why is it gamers are ok with paying more for less???? Tony hawk and VirtuaTennis lost multiplayer (2 games that really really benefit from it), launch titles that cant compete with its competitors titles, a slow pc-ified store (come on a mouse for the store wtf)..

THE FACT: Sony claimed the world, just as they did with the ps2, they said it would wipe the floor with the 360 and be 2x as fast, yet general games like cod3 are lacking features and running like crap. People need to stop making excuses for sony, they once agian arent delivering on their promises, Fanboyism is just stupid and people need to stop it.

The 360 is more maturely developed, its cheaper, it has games that are equal or better than the ps3 version, and sorry to break it to you, their are more 360 exclusives people are really looking forward to than ps3 exclusives, i mean the ps3 was basically, FFXIII and MGS4 and maybe GT (then again if gt ends up like gt-hd i'd pass) now, there are some others but they arent really big name exclusives people are dieing for.

Microsofts has, Gears, Halo, Forza, alan wake, bioshock, mass effect just to name a few....

Then theirs Tony hawk and cod3 and virtuatennis and hell even assassin's creed that are all better on the 360, whether it be multiplayer at all, multiplayer features, or in AC's case better ai....

Why do people want a ps3 again besides "its sony"?? (btw forgot to mention, fatal inertia and battlestorm: hundred year war both jumped ship on the ps3... not to mention konami is pressuring mgs to go to the 360 as well LOL)

THE TRUTH6368d ago

Its a fact that if you are a 360 fan, you won't say PS3 games look better even if they honestly did!

Same goes for PS3 fans!

So what's the point? Just play the system of your choice and enjoy games! What's wrong with buying a PS3 if you really want it? What's wrong with but a Wii or 360 of that's what you want? Why does this site have so much hatered over consoles?

Just play the console of your choice and enjoy games! Seriously after re-reading the post in the killzone thread I have to say this site is pathetic! Can we ever have intellegent conversations?

Look its clear all three consoles offer different experiences so just choose the one that appeals to you and enjoy it! Stop hating on others for what they want in their next gen consoles! You CAN say your point without hating

cchance6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

cchance6368d ago

its not just fans b*ching dude, so that isnt the truth, the fact is sony said the ps3 would be 2x as powerful, and that they were so superior, so obviously people will vent over arrogant statements that were made, kinda like "dual hdmi outputs to power 2 1080p displays!"

THE TRUTH6368d ago

power of Green 6368d ago

The hatred comes from PS fans talking down to xbox fans for a year.

The truth is out! and the only thing that's changed is the proof of what xbox fans were saying all along.

It's to late to make yourself look like a fair minded gamer you where one of the worse PS3 hardcore fanboy's and helped lead the charge of the flame wars(console wars).

Now you're telling people to get along. lol

If we see any intellegent postres from fans of a different console we'll have intellegent conversations.

Maddens Raiders6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

The PS3 videos in COD3 RR and Tony Hawk P8 all looked brighter, crisper, fresher. For whatever it's worth the NBA 2K7 looks great compared to the 360 version (I'm not going overboard here, I mean it just looks a little cleaner, and brighter) and maybe you can blame this on the camera angle used to record the back court action on the 360, but the crowd on the PS3 looked a little more "lively" and relaistic. Why? I dunno.

The others are so close that I can't tell one from the other, except for Blazing Angels which is clearly better looking than the 360 version. The clouds and horizon give it away. No comparison there. I also thought Fight Night looked pretty good too on the PS3 - just a little brighter and crisper for some reason. Note the EA banner at the back of the ring.

meshow6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

First of all when did I say that the “ PS3 is ahead of the 360” ??!! only an idiot who say that!! With the Xbox 1-yr life and the PS 1mon …it is obvious that the Xbox will be –ahead- … all I’m saying is that the PS3games are almost equal with lil different .. and that is a fact ..but what bother me is way Xbox fan –like you-who calling ppl Idiot/fool/moron..'yaya keep crying haha'... get mad if the PS3 is that weak ..hah?!

death monk6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

We know that PS3 games should look as good as new 360 games!!! When we got our first xbox our games looked better than PS2 games! This time around Sony came out a year later with supposedly stronger hardware so the games should look AT LEAST as good.

An idiot wouldn't be saying the PS3 is ahead of the 360. That would be somebody who has listened to everything Sony has said but hasn't had the chance to play either console.

Reply Agree 2 Disagree 1

NextGen24Gamer6368d ago

You surprise me sometimes. Sometimes you come across as a rabid fanboy and times like this you come across as a good guy and a true gamer. I agree with most everything you say. But there are people like me who honestly just want to play good games. Though my post seem to favor the 360...I favor great games on any system. If the ps3 would have launched with an AAA title...you would hear me praising it as hard as it is for some of you to believe. You'll see...as soon as there is an AAA title....I will be on it and praising it. There are two in my radar right now for the ps3. Motorstorm...if they can up the frame rate and improve some of the textures when they finalize it, and Final Fantasy. Thats why I come here. I just don't blindly follow sony and I think that bothers some sony only fans. Be gamers folks. Respect eachothers opinions.

ScorpioKyle6368d ago

ok kids, stop fighting over who has the shinier toy.

specialguest6368d ago (Edited 6368d ago )

most games on both consoles look equally the same, except for the noticable fact that most 360 versions has a deeper contrast level.

the one thing i did notice and this may be surprising, is that Fight Night Round 3's lighting against the body actually looks better on the 360 version in my opinion.

i'd have say the 360 versions in most games compared on the link are either identical or technically better looking by a slight edge.

power of Green 6368d ago

It's all taste with the brightness argument.

It took me awhile to get use to HDMI when watching TV because at the time i thought everything was too dark only after a few weeks did i realize it just displayed how bright things should be better and how dark things should be more naturally and more realalisticlly.

HDMI has richer color, brighter brights and darker darks and it reminds me of the 360.

PS3's versions look like the washed out, faded non deep in color, faded blacks, contrast up too hight, lack of texture that you would see on a SDTV.

THE TRUTH6368d ago

Rereading that killzone thread I've decieded and come to terms with its just all about personal preference!

I mean we argue the same things every damn day! Consoles and games are made to be fun! Who cares about the reviews and analyst just enjoy gaming for what it is!

We could all be telling eachother the fun we are having with RFOM and GOW and Zelda but instead we argue about which one is better!

Fact is you can ask 1,000,000 people which game they prefer and why! They would all give you different responses, but the real point is that ALL OF THEIR ANSWERS WOULD BE CORRECT!!!

Just enjoy your console or consoles and spread the good news! I'm tired of fighting about nothing!

NextGen24Gamer6368d ago

WOW. I agree 100%. BTW....You do have Gears of War and Rainbow Six right? Those are the two games I play the most on xbox live. I just started getting into Call of Duty 3. Did you get your ps3 yet?

I think ps3 fans were just irritated by all the 360 fans being so elated about the 360 and bragging about next gen games. I think 360 fans were just upset that sony fans were bashing the console they purchased. And now that the ps3 has launched and its not better than the 360 like most people assumed it would be.....360 fans are rubbing it in sony fans faces. Thats why I say its OVER. Let us all enjoy games now. talk about the games. And give our opinions on different news articles that come up.

ApocalypseShadow6368d ago

WITH TRUTH AND TOP GAMER(wow,i agree with top gamer-kidding).it's the same thing over and over and over again.I LIKE GAMES.ALWAYS LIKED GAMES OVER COMPANIES.i'll admit i felt i had to defend the side that likes japanese games and sony,because when i got here,it was all negative for sony and the games on their system.even games that were not made by sony were being bashed.i wasn't here to see the sony side bashing the 360.so i don't know what was up.but after getting the ps3,i will say it's going to be a toss up.great developers on each side are going to make great games including the wii.bad developers are going to make bad games on each as well.i think most of us were playing before sony,nintendo and microsoft(some of us were playing atari and pong),and if they leave,say an outside company makes 3d holographic headsets that don't make you sick,i think as gamers,we will still be playing.like bloods and crips,it's got to stop.

Maddens Raiders6367d ago (Edited 6367d ago )

is going on with all of this agreement? Agggghhh!! j/k

Are people growing up on this site before my very eyes? WOW. Go News4Gamers!

marcusfenix6367d ago (Edited 6367d ago )

NEW games for the PS3 with alot of extra polish time vs. old games for the 360 and you can't tell a difference. Pretty sad really.

Blu-Ray is losing the format war because of microsoft and the HD-DVD add-on. It has sold hundreds of thousands, more than the ps3 has sold. I purchased the add-on as well and it is the best player on the market.

gearhead6367d ago

The 360 games either look identical or slightly better except for FNR3.

Blu-Ray is failing, the HD-DVD addon has sold more units than the PS3 and is still selling. The 360 has seen a sharp spike in sales even though Nintendo and Sony just launched, which show the hype for the PS3 has already faded. The 360 is the hot christmas item this year with the best game lineup now and in the future and will have 10,000,000 installed userbase which means even more games for the 360. Multi-platform games look almost identical but run twice as good on the 360. First Party games are better on the 360. GOW vs. RFOM+they had about the same amount of development time but Gears of War curb stomps RFOM and chainsaws it into little pieces. Upcoming first party and third party games all curb stomp any upcoming PS3 game. Mass Effect, Too Human, Bioshock, Alan Wake, Halo 3, Halo Wars, Assassins Creed on the 360 shown first at E3 05 under a sheet being fronted as a PS3 LOL

JUMP IN the water is warm and there are hot babes everywhere

daboosa6361d ago

i am goin to wait a year cause all the companys are moaning about the new PS3 prossesor but wen they get there heads round it 360 fans mite (i say mite) feel the PS3 gives more but untill then u realy cant compare, thats my view please dont give me abuse