150°

Sniper Ghost Warrior PS3 Screens and Trailer

Developer and publisher City Interactive has released the official trailer for their anticipated stealth based first person shooter, Sniper: Ghost Warrior.

Travel to Isla Trueno to overthrow a hostile military command in Sniper: Ghost Warrior for Playstation 3.

Read Full Story >>
battlestrats.com
lostinplace4834d ago

This looks much better than the 360 version.

zootang4834d ago (Edited 4834d ago )

Was it any good? I know it got a 2/10 but you can't trust reviews these days.

dirthurts4834d ago

I liked it. Especially after the first patch.

fredfenster4834d ago

It sucked pretty bad. AI was dreadful imo. Also the run-n-gun parts were just lame.

BISHOP-BRASIL4834d ago

It was messed up. You would basically trigger AI reactions that made no sense all the time just depending on what path do you follow, it was easy to skip or get stucked with bad AI reactions too. To be more clear, the AI doesn't look to a region waiting for you or minding their own business or protecting an area looking for any strange movements, you could literally run and jump around if you don't trigger the AI reaction without being shoot, but if the reaction is triggered the AI snipers will simply lock on on you, don't really matter what you do to waste them, they spot you in a point and you can literally walk miles and wait for hours later to try to take a shot but it's still locking on you.

The physics which should be great for this kind of game were messed up. You would take and make impossible headshots all the time. Also the wind and other physics implements seen to not affect AI shots at all and, some times, neither ikt affect yours too.

The dialogues was beyond poor, it was bad writen crap filled with bad spelling and cheesy one liners.

Many of the maps layout wouldn't estimulate sniping at all if you had a secondary option. In fact many are the situations you are better to your pistol and granades than trying to get cool sniper shots.

The only thing good about it is graphics but even that isn't that good.

sak5004834d ago

@bishop-br

100% agreed. I played and finished before the damn patch on 360. It was fkn frustrating when you're half a mile away in the dense vegetation and moving slowly and suddenly you're pumped with bullets cuz the enemy detected you with his naked eyes.

I'm talking about hardest difficulty, 80~90% of the time they could you pick you out like a elephant in your bedroom from as long as a mile away even when you're crawling an inch an hour.

I went back to finish some chevos on some levels so used the easy mode and you can sing and dance infront of AI and they wont bother.

This game was POS and still might be.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4834d ago
FlameBaitGod4834d ago

Good to know the 360 had the beta testing b4 it went to PS3

SpitFireAce854834d ago

Glad to see there is love for the PS3...

awiseman4834d ago

yes but they cant develope stuff on pc, I really cant see them doing any better on the ps3 which is harder to work with.

blakstarz4834d ago

Never really heard of it, read some reviews and definitely not a good look, I sure hope they fixed whatever the reviews complained about before bringing it over to the PS3 or they will find themselves very disappointed with sales.

MiltonZep4834d ago

Game was poop when I played it last year , and unless it gets fixed , will remain poop.

sak5004834d ago

Yes i agree. Who the hell is disagreeing with all the negative comments about this game? Maybe someone from city interactive checking around on n4g for the reaction of gamers.

Show all comments (15)
290°

5 Titles That Critics Hated but Gamers Loved

A look at five games that gamers loved but most critics hated.

Read Full Story >>
8bitdigi.com
iofhua2344d ago

Advent Rising is another good example. It got panned by critics but it has a good story and I enjoyed playing it. The graphics are dated, the enemies all look the same, but it was made in 2005 so what do you expect? I wish they made the sequel so I could finish the story but I think the critics killed it off.

2344d ago Replies(1)
Aaroncls72344d ago

I don't trust critics.
I'd value more the feedback from a random user.

nommers2344d ago

I seldom trust gamers or critics anymore. A lot of times high scores just mean how likely you are to enjoy something from the game, but rarely anything about how much you would enjoy said things, or whether the highly preferred type of qualities in a game you’re looking for are even in it. My initial gut feeling of the premise of a game is usually all I need.

quent2344d ago

Silent Hill: downpour another example

Show all comments (20)
70°

Sniper: Ghost Warrior – The Mobile Version Of The Hit Series is now available

Choose the right weapons for your mission and achieve your targets as the Sniper Ghost Warrior series comes to Android and iOS devices.

Read Full Story >>
gertlushgaming.co.uk
110°

5 Games With A Misunderstood Reputation

Not every "bad game" deserves its reputation, some are just misunderstood because they were too ambitious, over hyped or heavily plagued by a bad development cycle.

Read Full Story >>
8bitdigi.com
stanr2693d ago

Not all bad games are actually bad, some of them deserve a second look.

Nibbs2691d ago

Shut your mouth.

No Mans Sky first trailer looked like this epic world of exploration and conflict.

Reality was - barren waste lands with creatures looking straight out of Gary's Mod.

No Mans Sky also promised the ability to play with friends which all was said during talk show interviews.

Reality Was - Absolutely zero multiplayer found inside the game, there were even sketchy moments of discoveries disappearing if you happened to travel far enough into the center of the universe.

The developers also promised a really cool ending to the game once you reached the center of the universe.

Reality Was - ...just YouTube the ending and realize how much of a shit show this game is.

They EVEN came back with some base making update.

Reality Was - They first sold you on a game of massive nearly endless space exploration, though they came back out with an expansion pack based on base-making which promotes squatting on a damn planet and doing very little.

Stahp.

thorstein2691d ago (Edited 2691d ago )

MP as you claim was never, ever promised. In fact, it was explained in 2014, 2015, and 2016 that the game wasn't MP.

Lack of reading comprehension (GI's "Stop Thinking of No Man's Sky as a Multiplayer Game" 2014) isn't the fault of the developer.

Are some promised things missing from the game? Yes. Are some unpromised things in the game. Yes. Were there lies written by hack journalists and repeated in echo chambers touted as truths (no large scale space battles)? Yes

There are two endings to the game, in reality.

Reality is, you haven't played the new update. Your base and every single space station has a teleporter to quickly move between your base and the space station. That means you can move across the galaxy in the blink of an eye.

stanr2691d ago

You never read the article, did you?

MilkMan2691d ago

My take away from this is something I cling to religiously. Price will often time dictate my expectations levels and perhaps rightly so.
Something priced at $15 to $20 bucks will receive a less critical (not a pass) eye as opposed to a $60 dollar one.
When I put down $60 im expecting a life changing experience. When I give you $10 to $15 bucks I understand that this project may be something personal, or very niche or perhaps even vaguely resemble a game as I know it in its traditional sense.
time and price give one the ability to experience a game quietly and without reservations.
This is not great for developers, especially indie ones, but sometimes it's all you can do to truly enjoy something.
Daikatana was crap, though, not even time can help that mess. Everything else on that list I can mostly agree with.

Razzer2691d ago

Why is there a picture of No Man's Sky? The piece doesn't even mention that game at all.