110°

NBA 2K11 Becomes 2K Sports' Fastest Selling Title with Almost 4 Million Sold

What happens when your biggest rival misses the big game? An instant win for you. Late last year, EA Sports decided to cancel NBA Elite 11 instead of releasing a poor product. This left 2K Sports’ NBA 2K11 as the sole licensed NBA basketball game on the shelves. Well today, 2K announced that the title has sold nearly 4 million copies worldwide since its launch in October of 2010. This makes the basketball game 2K Sports' fastest selling title in the franchise and in the history of the publishing label.

Read Full Story >>
industrygamers.com
BigKev454834d ago

It is a great game. Best b-ball game ever.

donniebaseball4834d ago

Yeah, good news indeed for 2K. I wonder what EA Sports is going to do next year. They would be better off forgetting sim basketball and hype up the Jam series

badboy8084834d ago

I would buy it but the online SUCKS

kaveti66164834d ago

I posted a comment about that a few days ago and was immediately attacked.

This game gets so much credit but no reviewers have wanted to address the online issues. The servers are poorly supported. It can take as long as a few hours to find a player.

Team players who want to join into a match together are usually separated.

And then there's the hacking issue. A good chunk of the online community has found an exploit that allows them to obtain around 30 million experience points instantly (requires a USB and some simple code download) and now there are thousands of max-ranked players online who didn't earn their experience.

This issue was also present in 2K10, and Take 2 apparently has no intention of fixing the problem.

The marketing and hype surrounding this game have blinded the fans to the fact that it has some serious issues.

thugbob4834d ago

@badboy808

LOOK, if you are getting the game for online only then I understand why you don't like NBA2K11. I only play offline (and not because the online sucks, but because as long as sports games have animations, there will always be BS that will occur) so I enjoy 2K11 very much.

@kaveit6616 who thinks 2k11 sucks as balls just because the online sucks.

LOOK, People know that online has issues. Think back to when sports games did not have online. To claim that a sports game sucks just because the online is shitty is just wrong imo.

As for the hacking, I agree it sucks balls, but 2K11 did ban some that obviously cheated when the game initially released.

kaveti66164833d ago

The game cost 65 bucks right? That was the MSRP.

If you ask Take 2 to list all the reasons why they think the game should cost 65 bucks, they're going to list the online portion of the game as a major component.

So, for you personally, I get why you love it. None of the issues I complained about affect your enjoyment of the game.

Good for you.

But online is a big deal for some people, especially people who are paying for XBL gold. My friends have this game and they're always complaining about it. They love the gameplay, but are rarely able to connect to a match. So that's not something that should be ignored by reviewers.

If you don't complain about this problem, then Take 2 won't do anything about it.

It's better to complain about it.

thugbob4833d ago (Edited 4833d ago )

What I'm saying is that 2K11 is a good game. Yes it has online issues that should be complained about and addressed, but that shouldn't be the AUTOMATIC for why 2K11 sucks.

BlazeCP34833d ago

@kaveti6616

the reason you were attacked was because your claims were wack...

i am no 2k fanboy but just a few hours ago i hopped on 2k11 to find an online match... took me about 7 or 8 minutes to find a match. That is indeed not acceptable. But basketball game does last a good 30-35 minutes... so thats the equivalent to 3 matches of COD? 2 or 3 minutes to find each match its THAT big of a deal is it? Anyways, after i played the one match I searched right away and found another one in about 2 minutes. Finished that match and then found another in about 3 minutes after that. Except for the 3rd and 4th quarters it lagged a bit and that made the gameplay suffer.

^My point being is that while the online isnt perfect by any means. It is certainly playable. Generally it is not perfect while matchmaking. Playing with friends i have no issues.

If you think about it though... theres not as many people playing 2k11 as there would be COD or Halo or w/e big name game... theres only about 10000 on at any given time... split that up into all the different game modes and people searching to people actually in game and it would be kind of hard to find a match.

I really could care less about the leaderboards and people cheating... how does that even affect you i dont know...

this game deserves all of the hype it received... because the gameplay was so innovative and smooth and perfect... along with the many game modes... and the depth of all of the players, ratings, tendencies, how they play, beautiful graphics... the online is mediocre for some... but thats an afterthought

Show all comments (19)
knight6265071d ago

Only game iam waiting for is for mafia 2 nothing else intrest me well only Metal gear solid peace walkers but ill get that soon

Conloles5071d ago

Mafia 2 lol all 2K get money from is GTA style games and Nba 2K.

MightyMark4275071d ago

The only game I'm waiting for is Mafia II

killyourfm5071d ago

O_O - Not interested in XCOM?

Syaz15071d ago

nice. waiting to see what mafia 2 and spec ops the line has too offer. not into rts games, so civ 5 not for me, and not too familiar with x-com series.

AliTheBrit195071d ago

I think 2K are probably the best Publisher.

Show all comments (13)
190°

Tattoo artist successfully sues 2K for replicating their designs on a WWE 2K wrestler

From VGC: "A tattoo artist has successfully sued 2K Sports and its parent company Take-Two Interactive for including her designs in WWE 2K video games.

Catherine Alexander filed the lawsuit in 2018, claiming that her tattoo designs had been used without her permission in WWE 2K16, WWE 2K17 and WWE 2K18.

The tattoos in question are original tribal-style designs Alexander applied to WWE superstar Randy Orton’s upper back and arms in real life."

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Software_Lover571d ago

......... Some of these lawsuits I just don't get.

CobraKai571d ago

I don’t either. On can argue that she owes Orton for being the canvas to show her artwork. I personally feel that since money was exchanged between her and Orton, that the issue should be if Orton wants his tattoos showcased or not.

roadkillers570d ago

Very confusing… so Pepsi has no issues with Punk having a tattoo with Pepsi symbol with him being in all of these promotions.

Can you get sued for using WD-40 in a movie? At what point do you own something. Too confusing.

LostinthePANIC571d ago

I can understand the artist's point of view and the ruling was more than fair:

"The jury determined that Alexander was entitled to $3,750 in damages. It also determined that since none of the game’s profits came as a direct result of her tattoos being included, she wasn’t entitled to any further compensation."

Rainbowcookie571d ago (Edited 571d ago )

That is nothing to be honest. It does make it harder for authentic Orton to be included in wrestling games in the future. She will probably try to to push for more. I wonder how the amount was worked out.

Bobertt571d ago (Edited 571d ago )

She won't get more because they ruled even though they included the tattoo in the game they didn't profit off it because no one bought the game just because of her tattoo. The $3750 is for using it without having the rights to it.

P_Bomb571d ago

Ridiculous. Especially if she spent more on legal fees.

andy85571d ago

Any decent tattoo artist wouldn't replicate a design anyway so why does it matter? It's his body 😂 this is a poor ruling because now it opens the can of worms of every famous person in games having to be edited or some tattooist will sue.

MrBaskerville571d ago (Edited 571d ago )

But could also result in companies having to pay artists for using their work, which is a good thing. It's unusual, but why should a tattoo have less worth than a painting, song or a logo?

Adrian_v01571d ago

Getting a tattoo is usually expensive. I'd argue the person paying for the tattoo to be made on his body is owner of all rights for said tattoo.

RauLeCreuset571d ago

"It's unusual, but why should a tattoo have less worth than a painting, song or a logo?"

It's not about having more or less worth. Rights don't exist in isolation and are balanced against other rights in a society. This is why death threats can get you locked up despite being a form of speech.

The decision here gives undue consideration to the artist's copyright, with the implication being that it should trump Orton's right to his own likeness*. The very act of tattooing someone inherently relinquishes control over how that particular copy of the art is displayed. Rather than recognize this, the decision goes against precedent to suggest receiving a tattoo effectively transfers the rights to one's image to the tattoo artist or copyright owner of the tattoo.

*I'm assuming Orton gave permission for his likeness to be used in the games. The article didn't state otherwise.

monkey602571d ago

Oh no! This leads us down a very bad path

Show all comments (20)
160°

EA Sports Thinks 2K’s New NFL Game Is ’A Good Thing For The Industry’

EA Sports doesn’t seem too concerned about 2K getting the rights to an NFL game of their own.

As everyone anticipates the release of Madden 22, we’re also waiting for news on another football game that is on the way. 2K Games, the developers of the dormant but never forgotten NFL 2K franchise, have their own NFL game on the way. Announced back in 2020, 2K has been working on an arcade-style football game with the NFL license. When it releases it will be the first game to use the NFL license not developed by EA since ESPN NFL 2K5.

ApocalypseShadow1033d ago (Edited 1033d ago )

You know what would be even better? Do I really have to say it? Don't even get me started.

Of course EA aren't concerned publicly. Give up the license so that others can make a game and see if that lack of concern still applies. They say more football games are good for the industry. But they are the very reason there's a lack of them.

I haven't bought a simulation football game since NFL 2K5 which I still have on the OG Xbox. That should give clues on what I think of EA, the NFL and the license. And, I'll never buy a game just because it's the only one on the market undeserving of purchase. Playing an arcade game I'm hoping will be good will never make me go out and buy Madden. And that's being nice about it.

Knightofelemia1033d ago (Edited 1033d ago )

I'd like to see Sega start making sports games again. I hate EA to the core and I refuse to support them unless it's a title I care about which is really rare.

badboyz091033d ago

EA spent 1.5Billon$$$ to keep the NFL License Sim to them for anther 5years. This is just EA saying There new game is to arcadey to compete with us.

yeahokwhatever1033d ago

blitz was always more fun than madden, so here's hoping sega can pull off making a fun game

badboyz091032d ago

Take-two owns 2K now it's not sega anymore.

yeahokwhatever1030d ago

im a 10000 years old and forgot about that, despite working with people from sega currently.

brewin1033d ago

Didnt EA also buy up the NFL Blitz rights at one point? They used to have the EA Big label, which made fun, arcadey alternatives to their sim sports games. I miss NBA Street and NFL Blitz style games honestly. I always thought they should have made an NHL Street, but instead we got FIFA Street, which pretty much ended that style of releases from EA.

I hope the 2k NFL game is great, but I also hope they bring back some of the 2k Sports line. The NHL series could use some competition as EA has let that get pretty stagnant. Madden has been crap for years as far as Im concerned. At least they are on Gamepass so I cant complain too much as I never pay for them. I definitely miss the NFL 2k series, those were always a blast to play! They were a fine line between sim and arcade-style fun.

brewin1032d ago

Yes Im aware. I wish 2k would get back in the game though as there is just no competition and EA has gotten lazy the last few years with NHL in particular.

BlaqMagiq11032d ago

They are scared of 2K running them out of the simulation industry and they know it. Even with 2K at its worst they are still 100x better at sports simulation. 2K nowadays is garbage too but I'd rather take my chance with them at a sports game than EA.