730°

New Rage screens set the visual bar high

GB writes: We’ve some new Rage screenshots and they surpass anything that we’ve seen about the game so far.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
gameseveryday4835d ago

Looks Insane...Id at its best. Killzone 3, perhaps not the best looking shooter of 2011 :|

Pandamobile4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

With Crysis 2 and RAGE both coming out, it didn't even have a chance.

despair4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

lol I have to disagree, we still have no idea which will be best, Crysis 2 is not in the running on consoles(its not that amazing) and so far Rage looks really good but its too different from Killzone 3 to compare without proper vids.

Either way still don't care I'm getting all 3 games :)

distorted_reality4835d ago

I would say that Crysis 2 is just as different from KZ2 as Rage is, so why is one comparable and the other isn't? Agree with Panda, KZ3 looks great but it isn't in the Crysis league yet.

OT - I think Rage will end up looking the best, and will probably have the better gameplay as well, id being id. But we'll just have to wait and see I guess.

Ducky4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

Hmm, is Rage at 60fps or 30fps on consoles?

I doubt Rage on consoles would look visually better than KZ3 if it is running at 60fps.
Which is a pity since most people will just talk it down for not looking as good as exclusives while it actually pushes twice as many frames. =(
PC is a different story.

I'm really liking their new engine though. Brink and Rage have a unique visual style to them.

DelbertGrady4835d ago

Brink looks pretty damn sexy as well. Lots of graphically crisp FPS games this year. Let's hope they play as well as they look also. I'm mostly interested in Rage and Brink.

geodood4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

Not on consoles. KZ3 will be the best looking console shooter of 2011. It will be between the PC versions of Rage and Crysis 2 for the best looking shooter on any platform of 2011.

However exclusive development always means more time on one platform which usually = better optimisation and hence better graphics.

Personally I think it'll go like this:
KZ3 console graphics king (not debatable, really. It's obvious)
Crysis 2 PC version overall graphics king

@Kon: who said that? KZ3 doesn't look as good as Crysis does. However I think you're getting confused. I'm sure what they actually mean is the console version of Crysis 2 looks worse than KZ3 (or kz2 for that matter... the jaggies, pop-in and low res. textures in that crysis 2 demo were appalling considering Crytek's claims)

Kon4835d ago

It is funny how people thinks that KZ is more graphically advanced than Crysis. Ignorance is bliss...

SpitFireAce854835d ago

Panda man you crack me up yeah the PC version
of Crysis 2 and Rage console versions not so
much...

Here bud when they show footage comparable
to this on consoles then you can talk until
then put up or shut up...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

AKA4835d ago

i havent seen a video gameplay of crysis 2 or rage that looks better then KZ3.
Show it prove

captain-obvious4835d ago

i think i need a new graphics card

distorted_reality4835d ago

We're talking about overall, not just a single platform.

KZ3 probably will be the best looking FPS on PS3. But Rage and Crysis 2 on the PC will more than likely (read - definitely) look better, and there's no reason for them to prove anything on consoles when they're both huge PC devs.

I don't see where the argument is here. Nobody is saying that KZ3 will look terrible, far from it in fact. But it simply can't compete with the likes of Crysis and Rage running on a semi-decent PC.

@ AKA - as Rage gets closer, and the Crysis 2 PC demo comes out, you'll see some pretty amazing looking footage.

ThanatosDMC4835d ago

This doesnt look better than KZ3 at all. It's more like an updated graphics of Borderlands.

NateCole4835d ago

I see the screens but is this any better than U2?

hassi944835d ago

@FatOldMan

Well it's 60 fps but the videos we've seen have been (mostly) from the Xbox 360 version which looks incredible to be honest.

N4g_null4835d ago

Ps3 fans confuse art with tech all the time. When you finally see rage you will see the limits of kz3.

nveenio4835d ago

Well, the thing that concerns me about Rage is that we haven't really seen them showcase anything special besides textures. KZ2/3 didn't hesitate to show off their spectacular lens effects, volumetric smoke and lighting, and awesome particle effects. When Rage can show anything like that, I'll consider it a contender. Same goes with Crysis. Crysis and Rage just seem empty of those extras that really sell a game for me.

ShinMaster4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

On PCs: Either Crysis 2 or Rage, I don't care.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Not bad for a console game. Even for multiplayer graphics.
Plus, KZ3 will improve on this even more.

HolyOrangeCows4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

On consoles it sure does.

LORD-PHOENIX4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

and then we got to play the console version....

what crysis 2 proved was all the nice screenshots were from PC yet fanboys claimed they were from console until we got to play it, i guarantee the same will happen with rage.

and am i missing something these screenshots are nothing spectacular if they are pc shots i would be worried the game looks empty and graphically not mind blowing..even resistance 3 and gears 3 looks better than this

nycredude4835d ago

It does look look go nothing to go crazy over. Could be cause I play all my pc games on max so I am used to better. In any case these shot show what max 3 ai on screen with nothing else going on. The only thing that looks good is the textures.

xX-StolenSoul-Xx4835d ago

Crysis 2 on the consoles Vs Killzone 3? killzone wins sorry. Crysis 2 on the Pc vs Killzone 3 it will win.

Vega754835d ago

Do anyone know if RAGE will also use direct X11 also? I know they are crysis 2.

zootang4835d ago

PC has no games anyway! Where is Red Dead Redemption?

PC gamers to wait years for games consoles players get to play right away.

WetN00dle694834d ago (Edited 4834d ago )

All titles showcased thus far look amazing!
KZ3, Crysis 2, RAGE, BRINK, Resistance 3(this one left me in awe.) so on and so forth! No title is better than the other one. They will all be great! This is a great year for multiplat gamers.

DA_SHREDDER4834d ago (Edited 4834d ago )

Your kidding me right? This game doesn't even look better than Dead Space and your saying it looks better than KZ3?! GTFO of here you 360 loving nerd. You wish this game was even half as good lookin as the claims you made.

Scroll to 1:30 and tell me that Rage looks half as good. I should slap the crap out of your fanboy ass.

Tinasumsum4834d ago (Edited 4834d ago )

http://www.g4tv.com/videos/...

http://www.g4tv.com/videos/...

http://www.gamespot.com/xbo...

Crysis 2 single player and Rage are not matched on consoles period. Rage destroys KZ3 in every way but the mega pixel textures and sharpness of the game really murders KZ3.

There's going to be a lot of denial out there. I guess PS3 fans should have not boasted PS3's so called power based on PS3 exclusives and the fact no developer bothers making a game engine for the 360 powerful enough to push the 360. Fight Night Round 5 is just more proof PS3 fans need to stop with the BS.

zootang4834d ago

@Tina

First it was Gears then it was Section 8 then Alan Wake then it was Metro 2033 now it is Rage. Keep playing that same record!

Meanwhile I'll be playing KZ3, Rage, UC3, Infamous 2, Resistance 3 and so on.

GooZe4834d ago

Alright im just gonna come out and say it crysis graphics sucks. at least on consoles.

dark3554834d ago

@FatOldMan

I believe that Brink is running on id Tech 4 and Rage is on Tech 5.

morganfell4834d ago

When discussing the graphics a game brings to the table it is also necessary to look at the item most ignore...visual impact...the pictoral slug to the head...ocular impact to the sternum, whatever you choose to call it. But it is the visceral blow a game brings to the audience and that is not possible to judge from a screenshot as it also involves the dynamics of movement and action on the screen.

This is where Crysis 2 gravitates from fidelity to the land of ho hum as it lacks that gritty uppercut to the gut. Killzone 3 dumps this on you in truckloads. To date we have witnessed the refinement of Rage on the PC but it also to date lacks that Saving Private Ryan impact.

Sorry PC purists but resolution alone does not make one the image king. Rather it is the flair of illustrated combat and the awe inspiring graphical wrest for the throne that awards one claim the visual crown.

Dee_914834d ago

LOL!!
better than KZ3 ?
these screens might be cgi and they dont even look as good as KZ3 gameplay videos
I think this is gonna be one of those games everybody think look good until they get some gameplay videos or a demo
and then come all the articles about it .. this site is too predictable

Exquisik4834d ago

Seriously...

It doesn't matter if Crysis 2, Rage, or KZ3 will be the graphics king of 2011, because if you own a PS3, then you will be able to play all 3. If you don't, then I suggest you go pick one up so that you may play all 3.

Theonetheonly4834d ago

i dont agree. i dont think this looks good.

i was more impressed with doom 3

im sorry i just dont

Kleptic4834d ago

I 'was' as big of a fan of iD as anyone...my first 'grown up' game that I ever played the hell out of was Doom/2...and its still one of my all time favorites...

I'm just saying this though because so many are quick to write off other upcoming titles because 'this is iD'...saying the game will play better than all others because iD is iD...

I question that...strongly...iD HAS NOT been at the forefront of game design literally since Romero left after Quake I...NO one can argue that...they have not produced a game from their original core (hollenshead, Carmack, etc.) that crippled the industry since then...when Romero left, it split iD in half...i'm not saying Romero was the best; he was simply the piece to the overall puzzle that made them the absolute best developer of the time...

Return to Castle Wolfenstein was phenomenal...It introduced the WWII shooter genre more or less, even though it was also the least realistic...but iD only did its single player campaign and engine (it ran on Quake III's)...with other developers fully taking over the multiplayer aspect (which was easily the best aspect of the package)...

the biggest point is Doom 3...the EXACT way a developer can take a revered franchise...flip its on its head...and gut it endlessly into something that should have been its own new IP (if Doom 3 was called Dead Space instead...it probably would have been one of the best games of the last decade)...

iD has an uphill battle to get back to the forefront of the industry...a shiny new engine doesn't mean shit; it didn't with Doom 3...did it?...I'm just pointing out that other developers are easily outclassing iD when it comes to gameplay and its innovations needed to stay modern...iD hasn't proved in nearly 15 years that its capable of still doing that...

+ Show (32) more repliesLast reply 4834d ago
just_looken4835d ago

seeing a screenshot is 1 thing but gameplay is another. crysis 1/2 were awesome looking (pc version) but the rest was crap-ok. kinda like owning a ferrari but without a engine/interior. kz3 is a ferrari with a engine/interior

sp1deynut4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

...and add on "_thru_fanboy_goggles " :o

hakis864835d ago

Hey Gamingbolt - how about providing some HIGH RES screenshots? All the ones you guys post are so small. :(

hellzsupernova4835d ago

depends if this is the pc version then of course it will look better but I highly doubt its going to look this good on ps3 or 360 just like crysis doesn't look that stunning on consoles.

just looking at the screenshot makes me think it HAS to be pc

distorted_reality4835d ago

I wouldn't put it past id to surprise everyone with how good it'll look on the consoles. It looked pretty bloody decent on the iPhone, considering what they had to work with.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

4835d ago Replies(2)
FinalSpartan4835d ago

Looks great, Got some boderline cel shading effects going on there. But I saw previous screens. One thing is for sure. It got the best sky i seen in games lol

meetajhu4835d ago

Rage will crush and demolish Crysis 2(PC) and Killzone 3 respectively.

theonlylolking4835d ago

Looks like U3. On the xbox the graphics are as good as unreal engine 3 but its in 60fps so it will look better in motion in person.

vandal GAB4835d ago

People are saying crysis 2 wont look good on consoles =) you my friends are blind!

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

GreenFields4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

I'm not going to disagree and say that it looks bad, but I wouldn't call it next generation, innovative, or amazing. Crysis 2 doesn't look to be the graphical benchmark for the gaming industry that the original Crysis was.

The good news is that it will most likely run a lot better on PC than the original, as hardware has had ample time to catch up.

Hitman11874827d ago

You have to remember, this is the multiplayer portion of the game and this specific build was confirmed to be months old. Crysis 2's single player will set the visual benchmark for Consoles and PC's. I'm really excited for RAGE. It's graphics look AMAZING, possibly better than Crysis 2's, but it's hard to compare 2 games with completely different art styles. All I know is this year is THE YEAR for FPS's no matter what platform you have! Lets all just enjoy the games!

bluwulf4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

This entire generation, 360 owners have used multiplatform screenshots, multiplatform youtube videos, multiplatform previews, but never retail releases of multiplatform games or exclusives to debate the PS3's exclusive visual bar. There has never been a lens of truth or a digital foundry to win a victory for the multiplatform/360 "exclusives" as well.

And its safe to say this is a trend that will continue the rest of this gen.

Every year, its another multiplat dev that 360 owners all fall behind in thinking they've bested Sony's first part developers & exclusive focus on a console... just makes 0 sense. But people honestly believe it.

Simple,

What retail 360 release trumps Uncharted2 or Killzone2. Lighting/Textures/Anim/Particl es/Animation/Streamloading/Mode l Detail? None. And folks can't see how this is a issue of Deja-Vu yet again?

kaveti66164835d ago

"There has never been a lens of truth or a digital foundry to win a victory for the multiplatform/360 "exclusives" as well. "

lrn2english

eliasg4835d ago

unexpectedly this is the only multiplatform game that Sony fanboys are not trying to downgrade. Rage is huge!!!

ps3rider4835d ago

time will come and we will see if you words are correct,

MNicholas4835d ago (Edited 4835d ago )

What's impressing people about this?

The exceptionally huge number of polygon edges indicating that this engine has a pathetically low polygon budget?

Is it the flatness resulting lack of dynamic lighting and complex shading and specularity which is pretty much standard nowadays?

Perhaps they're blown away by the fact that objects that would be properly shaded in other games to look 3D are, in Rage, simply flat colored textures as you can see on this comparison.

Flat texture Armbands on low poly model (Rage)
http://gamingbolt.com/wp-co...

3D shaded Armands on high poly model (Dead Space 2)
http://media.rebgaming.com/...

kancerkid4835d ago

Also, Rage is open-world, 60 FPS, unlike Dead Space which is more like a corridor shooter.

I could just as easily say that Dead Space 2 is nothing to drool over because it does not have foliage.

hesido4834d ago

How about the fact that Rage pushes those graphics double the speed of Dead Space 2, in an open world? It'd be a wonderful world if we played screenshots, but games tend to move, and 60fps makes things that move look REEEALLY smooth.

LORD-PHOENIX4835d ago

lol at this article

graphics are standard at best,maybe itl look good in motion but those screenshots are disappointment

hesido4835d ago

Please also keep in mind that Rage runs at double the frame rate compared to 90% of the shooters.

jadnice4834d ago

So how much money did they pay you to say that... or you just feel like being clueless. No game on the 360/PS3 can top a first party game for the PS3. Enough said... just a reminder... they have to dummy it down for the 360.

m23454834d ago (Edited 4834d ago )

it's funny how people are off-topic, talking about how this game will destroy killzone 3. killzone 3 is in it's league of it's own so please don't compare it, thanks. btw, i'm getting crysis 2 and killzone 3, and a ps3 slim. maybe if rage is good, i'll try it.

I WIN! :3

xAlmostPro4834d ago

Damn it looks stunning :) cant wait for this game! yet another awesome game to buy this year

xtremexx4834d ago

lol, i watched this at eurogamer its pretty amazing

juggulator4834d ago (Edited 4834d ago )

The "Be The Weapon" trailer for Crysis2 is up on PSN and looks great. Sony likely allow PC versions of trailers to be displayed for promo purposes as was likely the case with this trailer but I think the actual PS3 version will be close. It's gonna look great on PC obviously but what about a console owner with a 240hz(or 480hz) 1080p. That'll look pretty awesome too. But it's the gameplay that has me watching that trailer 4 or 5 times a day. All the stuff you can do like jump ultra high and throw enemies is gonna make Crysis2 a GOTY contender for sure.
Rage is employing the Tech 5 engine which uses a special texturing feature, I forgot the name of it but basically every object in the game will be uniquely textured. Plus I believe there's a saying that goes "You are NOT Carmack" so that means Rage WILL bring it.Also id created the FPS so expect the gameplay to be top notch.
Killzone3 may not come close to Crysis2 or Rage on higher PC settings but KZ3 will have alot more going on in the game than those games will and that stuff obviously adds to the visuals. The MAWLR bossfight is simply chaotic. So KZ3 is still in the running. It's hard to say which will look the best but you can be damn certain that Crysis2, Killzone3, and Rage will be the best looking shooters to date.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4827d ago
jaidek4835d ago

I have a feeling that Rage will raise the bar visually for graphics on the consoles. John Carmack is king when it comes to creating new rendering technology.

psb4835d ago

This looks like the latest build of the game. Best screens I have seen of this game yet.

Show all comments (148)
110°

Xbox Deals With Gold and Spotlight Sale Discounts – 4th-10th Aug 2020

Neil writes: "Just been paid? Fancy getting a new game added to that backlog of shame? The Xbox Deals With Gold and Spotlight Sale is back with even more discounts on a variety of great Xbox titles. If you've got time in your life for a new gaming experience, the following bargain basement titles are available for your cut-price purchasing between 4th-10th August 2020."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
90°

Rage's Open World Was Intimate & Memorable, Not Another Huge, Empty Sandbox

Rage from id Software and Bethesda Softworks was largely overlooked, yet its handcrafted FPS open world and memorable characters transcend genre convention.

Read Full Story >>
escapistmagazine.com
Fist4achin1620d ago

I enjoyed the first game. I plan to play the sequel soon!

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster1772d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada071772d ago (Edited 1772d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X141772d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase1771d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted1772d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster1772d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack1772d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH1767d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.