First PS3 images of F.E.A.R.

The excellent F.E.A.R. was announced as a launch title for PS3 yesterday, and these five images were released.

Read Full Story >>
playsyde.com
achira6486d ago

yep, that a good one. nice to have it on the ps3.

achira6486d ago

yep, that a good one. nice to have it on the ps3.

irishguy6486d ago

What the crap is this? I come to this site EVERYDAY and have never registered. This article has forced me to do so. These are the Worst screenshots I have ever seen. i consider myself a Sony fan (NOT A FANBOY), but only because i have never considered owning an Xbox.

I have debated for weeks if i'll get a 360 or not, but when i see screens like this I cry. For all the power the PS3 has, For all of it's superiority, why does it look like poo??

Thats it. i have €600 in my bank account sitting there. Tomorrow I join "The other Side".

Hmmmm, i have never played a console online. Wonder what its like?

LAWMAN6486d ago

Well if you look at the comments within that article you will see a link to the 360 version . . . not any better.

I agree the screens look like crap. This could be because we don't have the capability to view them on a HD set with the PS3 or 360 as of yet. Or it could be that it plain sucks.

NewsGforce6486d ago

there are a few reasons why you should not join the other side.
A:online is free and you wont have to keep throwing in $50 a year that you could be spending on more games
B:you have to put into consideration that this game has been announced for the xbox360 at e3, thats over four mounths so you can expect the graphics to look alot better RIGHT NOW. vivendi is not going to make a crappy looking title for the ps3 but a great looking one for the xbox360
just please wait for more screens at the very least before you buy a xbox360. the game isn't coming out for a while so please reconsider. and look at games like resistance fall of man. those graphics are pimpin!
just please wait because you may regret it in the long run
and console online is really fun like on killzone or halo 2
i just don't like that you cant mod or use a keyboard and mouse(you can use k & m on the ps3, but not on the xb360)

The Real Deal6485d ago

spreading mis information are you. Not cool buddy.

1. xbox live is free for 3 months with the purchase of most live games.

2. xbox live year subscription is 36 dollars at walmart and through the dashboard you can pay monthly if you like.

3. the xbox had an adapter to use keyboard and mouse. I'm sure there will be one for the 360. its made by a 3rd party and it worked beautifully.

4. you get more bang for your GAMING buck with the 360. You will see many of the same games with identical graphics/gameplay but with less of an investment. So with that extra 200 dollars you save you can buy extra controllers or games. Sure, you can't watch blu ray movies on the 360 out the box...but if what you want is to watch blu ray movies on your 1080p tv...then get the ps3. But if you want next gen games, and money to spare for more games. Get the 360. The choice is clear. Jump In. We welcome you and don't demand you to chang3.

SjaakHaas6486d ago

Look at this pic from the 360 version:
http://images.xboxyde.com/g...

and then at the PS3 version:
http://images.playsyde.com/...

Did they downgrade the PS3 version?

DJ6486d ago

but because it's really blurry for...some odd reason. o well.

achira6486d ago

the be honest. the ps3 version has more detail and looks far smoother.

ACE6485d ago

they will say oh its blurry lol lol lol lol.

no fony fans its running at a lower res lol lol lol 1080p loll lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol ool lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

Show all comments (24)
60°

A great F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R. leapt out from behind the TV to scare gamers witless and ruin their underpants in 2005. Amalgamating elements of Hong Kong action films like Hard Boiled with the Japanese terror of The Ring, Monolith hit the nail(gun) on the head. Apart from a large number of grey corridors, it was a tremendous game and one that has had many playthroughs.

Read Full Story >>
thunderboltgames.com
10°

25 Things About Me: Point Man of F.E.A.R.

Between battling Replica soldiers and keeping in touch with his family, Point Man took some time to off of F.E.A.R. operations to talk about his life behind the scenes. Although Point Man could not provide any real personal information and didn’t seem to have much of a personality, he did give us some tidbits about his likes, dislikes and opinions about his missions. We had to get the best typist in the industry to keep up as the interview went really, really fast.

Read Full Story >>
gamepodunk.com
Dead_Cell5050d ago

This has to be the worst article in written existence ever written.

330°

Lamest Video game achievements

The Merriam-Webster'a dictionary website defines an achievement as a "successful result brought about by hard work." However, the following achievements could not be classified as either being considered successful or the result of hard work, mostly since these achievements are boring.

Read Full Story >>
gogaminggiant.com
Murgatroyd75142d ago

Personally, I think most achievements are lame. But for me, nothing is worse than ones that require you to either watch the opening sequence, do the tutorial, or watch the ending credits. I also hate story-based achievements. It's so silly to give an achievement for doing things that have to done in order to advance the storyline. I think the Half-Life 2 achievement is clever. Besides, it's not the points that matter; it's the fact that you did it in the first place. I don't think points should be rewarded for achievements, but maybe that's just me.

zornik5142d ago

Don't forget Quake 2......the full version was a bonus game with Quake 4.You get achievements after every chapter (around 8) with........0 points.

iamgoatman5142d ago

I'd have to say the achievement for watching the credits in Assassins Creed. I just left it running whilst I got something to eat, got back and 50G. Definitely earned that one, that sandwich didn't make itself.

Also any online achievements in general, especially in games with terrible multiplayer.

SPACEBALL 15141d ago

cod waw gave away a 0 point achievement for reaching tenth prestige...

BISHOP-BRASIL5141d ago (Edited 5141d ago )

Where do I sign?

I don't have a 360, and don't know the achievement system deeply, but I'll just assume that what I'll say is reasonable for both.

It's totally bull in an age where I still have to get most games way after they release just because in it's launch there where like 5 other tittles that I wanted more, I barely can complete the trophy list. Take Burnout as and example. Can't get that 8 player meet in baseball stadium simply because it almost never show up and when it does, other player will let the time run out. How cool is that? A trophy you'll be expanding many hours waiting to have the chance to complete and you have no guarantee that you'll get it, even doing the right thing...

Also, since I mentioned Burnout, what's up with that trophy that request the Eye camera? It's pretty dumb to add a trophy, necessary for that platinum, that need a totally optional (and unnecessary) peripheral.

And what happens when everyone left the game? I still having problem trying to get an online match in Brutal Legend (a shame, the strategic batle in the game is GREAT).

Some single player trophies are also dumb as them depend on pure luck. Like that Demon's Souls max bladestone forged weapon... The weapon itself is a piece of crap, the pure bladestone will take you days (or minutes, that's how random it is) to drop and the skill involved, if any, is patience.

Also sucks for gamers that don't play online as they also buy games that have an online part purely for the single player segment. Arguable maybe because trophies are an online comparative feature, but I would argue that some people still like to make 100% of the game for the pure fun of it.

Those were all great games for me, but this online achievements/trophies shouldn't be there or, at least, don't count any point/don't count toward the platinum trophy. That's the reason why the only platinums I got for online games are from Uncharted 2 (which only require you to give the multiplayer a try) and Resident Evil 5 (trophies could be done off or online, probably one of the few good decisions in a Capcom game this gen). All of my other online trophies were got as I was playing with friends, not while trying to get anything done.

I'm no trophy whore, I like the system because it adds some replay value to a good single player not capable of saving a bad one) since you can trace some usually simple objectives that will move you to another one or two playthroughs. Really, except for online-only games (Crackdown, Socom, etc), devs should think a thousand times before attaching games to trophies or achievements that require you to go online, some online trophies are ok, most are just boring and require time much more than skill.

Redempteur5142d ago

do we NEED a article like this every 6 week ??

do we really need that ?

"the most easy/lame achievement/trophies "

Seriously

clembo5141d ago

My Beatles Rockband only came with 3 instruments but I have played it with friends and all 4 of tapping and singing along. But who is this guy to tell us how many people should be playing a game to make it fun? Screw that guy.

Show all comments (10)