170°

HD Re-Releases: Fan Appreciation or Fan Burglary?

What do Halo: Combat Evolved, Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, Splinter Cell: Pandora Tomorrow, and God of War II have in common? They are all a part of the latest trend in the gaming industry: re-releasing titles from previous generations with updated HD graphics.

Read Full Story >>
videogamewriters.com
HarryMonogenis4876d ago

A Halo: Combat Evolved remake hasn't been announced yet.

killyourfm4876d ago

No, it hasn't. But note that the author clearly states that, AND this isn't a news piece. The article is tackling the flood of announcements that HAVE happened and the general trend of remakes. Please remove your report?

I_find_it_funny4876d ago (Edited 4876d ago )

So far I love them all.

Im not going to play old games on HD screen, here i got 2-3 games with better graphics and all, trophies, and even move/3d.
Remastered version don't slow down new games, look who's behind it, Sucker Punch? Santa Monica? of course not.

It's a win for everybody, sentimental gamers, new commers, small devs to get more exp and cred, publishers, etc.

Don't like it? Don't buy it. Only Xbox gamers can be unhappy about all this.

AwakenTheTaco4876d ago

@I_find_it_funny
i dont see why every one points to the xbox gamers as the ones not wanting this to happen..i mean i would love to see a halo ce remake with online co-op...like the old days...i love the thought of hd remakes as long as they dont go trying to add to much on top of it.

Active Reload4876d ago

I'm an Xbox gamer and I don't give two shits whether these things happen or not.

BattleAxe4876d ago

If you don't want to buy the remake, then don't buy it. I hope that if they do remake Halo:CE that it gets released on GFWL, because I'll buy it for sure.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4876d ago
Blaze9294876d ago

I'm all for HD remakes but man, I knew as soon as sony did the God of War Collection that this would soon get out of hand with 3rd parties.

I hope they don't forget they still need to make NEW games/IPs and not just rehash a bunch of old games from last gen to get by since taking risks on new IPs is almost non-existent now.

inb4 everyone starts releasing remakes/collections and forgetting about new games/IPs

TheBand1t4876d ago

It's just easy money in the bank, really. Outsource old games to a cheap dev to bump up the res, FPS and textures, and it's gold.

Besides, a company isn't going to stop making new games just because old ones are easy cash. If anything they're good cushioning should newer IPs not do as well.

morganfell4876d ago (Edited 4876d ago )

I don't understand how it can be burglary if no one is making these games and then sneaking in a stealing money from your wallet and leaving the game behind with you. It isn't robbery because they aren't putting a gun to your head and making you buy it.

These misguided journalistic assumptions start as some sort of mental hiccup and then blossom into spam. It's called choice and opportunity. Obviously enough people want them, I certainly do.

otherZinc4876d ago

What SONY has done is burglary, I'll explain:
The PS3 was announced as a backwards compatible machine. SONY released a new machine & omitted backwards compatibility.

Now, that you cant play PS2 games on your PS3, SONY charges you for Gow 1 & 2/ Sly series/soon ICO & Shadow. At least "IF" M$ releases a Halo 1 remake, you'll still get the Halo 1 experience from the copy you purchased back in 2001/02 when the original XBOX released.

And, when M$ released the 360 Short, they kept that same release day promise of backwards compatibility.

To recap:
SONY is committing a burglary.
M$ is giving you an HD option.

badz1494876d ago (Edited 4876d ago )

dumbest comment of the day?

"SONY released a new machine & omitted backwards compatibility." - and cut the price from $499/$599 previously to $399! they throw out PS2 chips and cut the price by $100, less than a year after launch. what else do you want?

"Now, that you cant play PS2 games on your PS3, SONY charges you for Gow 1 & 2/ Sly series/soon ICO & Shadow." - "charge"?? Sony forces you to buy these HD versions? or else what? your console got banned? you can't play online anymore?

"And, when M$ released the 360 Short, they kept that same release day promise of backwards compatibility." - dude, the 360 is not BC! only a handful of xbox games work on 360!

BShea4876d ago

It's been heavily rumored, however.

Quagmire4876d ago

Wonder if they'll release a Halo Trilogy HD remake for PS3?

Blaze9294876d ago

I hope you weren't serious....

peeps4876d ago

pretty sure halo's owned by ms?

Hozi894876d ago

Hells yeah! That would be the day!

AwakenTheTaco4876d ago

ill see you when they port god of war or jack and daxter to the 360.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4876d ago
peeps4876d ago

It depends if the fans think it's worth the money

e.g. You can buy the 3 pop games for £3 each so you can get the trilogy for £9

Now the HD trilogy is £18 so for £9 more your getting trophies for all 3 games and upgraded visuals to make the games more appealing to the eye. It just depends whether or not you think the extra £9 is worth it or not.

Of course you can argue that due to all new ps3's not having backwards compatibility they are forcing you to buy these remakes, however I believe a lot of gamers who still enjoy playing the older ps2 games will have kept their ps2... Sure some may have traded theirs in when they bought a ps3 (I know i did) but even with my backwards compatible ps3 at the time i personally barely touched any ps2 games, not now games of this gen looked and played so much better.

These HD remakes imo offer nostalgic gamers the chance to reply games or play games they missed the first time with pretier graphics and trophies so I can only see the advantages to gamers

Jdoki4876d ago

And there's also the point that a lot of these remastered PS2/Xbox games were AWESOME in the first place. So giving gamers an opportunity to play them in HD is a great idea.

Queasy4876d ago

If gamers are calling for HD remakes of certain games (which they have been) then I don't have an issue with it. It'll become an issue when the publishers start running out of popular franchises to update.

Show all comments (48)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers3d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken3d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g3d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing3d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H93d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola3d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn6693d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle3d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg4d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos4d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola3d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies24d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken24d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga24d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken24d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6424d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long24d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197223d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic23d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
DivineHand12524d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91324d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer24d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91323d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit23d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
Christopher24d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6923d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit23d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher24d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken24d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197223d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic23d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2324d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218324d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder24d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts24d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)