1060°

GT5: Can this be true? Incredibly ugly standard cars

Cynamite writes: "We could not believe our eyes when we saw screenshots from Gran Turismo 5, which hopefully could only be fake. Either this is a bug or Polyphony has not applied the same standards for all cars."

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
jazzking20014907d ago

or it could simply be that the real version of the car is UGLY lol

SmokexFFx4907d ago (Edited 4907d ago )

Yeah, the real version of the car must be full of jaggies also.

Is this really how bad the other 800 cars look or is it only these few?

InfectedDK4907d ago (Edited 4907d ago )

So, the standard cars looks like Forza 3?

Well maybe there's around 10 cars or something that looks a bit like PS2 and need a patch? Nevermind. Before you even notice those car in the game they'll look better. Nothing here folks. Just play the game.

Braxens4907d ago

Because bashing Forza makes it all better

Chubear4907d ago Show
zootang4907d ago (Edited 4907d ago )

@Braxens

Why bash GT in the first place, it Kills everything else out there and for good measure throws in 3D. These sites should be ignored.

Edit: @Disagrees: Go play NFS with your 67 cars.

Nihilism4907d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

@Chubear

I believe the trolling of GT5 is what we call 'the karmic wheel'. Remember the year long hype train B.S about "silky smooth 60 frames at 1080p" ( people think GT5= 1920x1080), and all those B.S photo mode screenshots where there was nothing going going on on screen?

How could anyone forget. Now that you are driving down a PS2-esque barren landscape with 2d crowds, trees, and blank green textures for 'hills' etc with massive frame rate dips in regular play ( not '3d' ) with copy/paste PS2 cars, all of a sudden people wonder why they are being called out. It's called humility, you need to learn it because in a few days when yet another mutliplat comes out that looks significantly better on 360 you will look rather stupid if you keep up the same old act.

Even GRID, a 2007 multiplat looks better on PC than the uber produced GT5...GRID has better car models and much much better environments incl. 3D crowds/environments

The only thing GT5 ever had going for it was the car models and it doesn't even have that. You can start talking about GT5 sales now, because you're running out of excuses.

T9X694906d ago

@zootang - Wait, so you reply to a guy talking about someone bashing Forza, just to turn around and bash NFS......an arcade racer? Who takes NFS as serious as people take GT and Forza? NFS is a great arcade racer and pure fun, why you're comparing that to a simulator is beyond me.

poopoojames4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

I noticed this when watching pre-release gameplay vids stating that the rear of the cars looked horrible but I got a load of disagrees for saying so. You're eating your words fanboys.

Braxens4906d ago

@chubear, how many articles have you seen hyping gears 3 as the next coming in video games? How many articles have you seen talking about how impossible gears 3 would be on ps3?
How many articles have you seen showing video after video, screenshot after screenshot, photo mode after photo mode showing how AMAZING gears 3 looks?
How many fanboys do you hear saying gears of war 3 is the end of ps3.
How many times have you heard that the release date for gears will be the end of all gaming as we know it?
When was the last time you saw a gears article or the last time gears was in the news for over a year straight?
Now after answering all those questions, do you truly believe that the hype for gears 3 is ANYWHERE close to what we've had to endure for the last 2 years with gt5?

Active Reload4906d ago

Nice try Chubear, but the fact of the matter is...Gears 3 is already pwning Gears 1 and 2 with a beta and dedicated servers. I don't totally understand using Gears as an example comparison for or with GT5, lol. I can really see and seperate the PS3 extremist from the PS3 fans. The ones commenting now are obviously the extremist because they're using excuses to sugar coat the short comings of GT5. But in all honesty this should be a learning lesson for fan boys on both sides. Don't hype these games to unsurmountable levels or the next dish on the menu will be crow.

zootang4906d ago

@T9X

The bashing was aimed at the disagree's.

What is amazing, is the amount of hate this game is getting. When it does it's job pretty well with loads of features. We all knew there would only be 200 premium cars, which is more than most other games anyway. The other 800 cars are always welcome and should not be scolded in such a manor (who drives looking at the car anyway?).

raztad4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

@Nihilism

GT5 looks amazing, it has some graphical inconsistencies but the game looks incredible most of the time. Have you really watched/played the game in your TV?

Check Madrid circuit, London, SSR7. All of them look amazing. The car themselves are incredible (PREMIUMs that is), random weather conditions, smoke, dust, snow. There is a lot going on in the graphical dept, and on top of that real time damage.

GT5 might be flawed (standard cars, some low quality shadows and some upscaled tracks) but at is best is an incredible looking game.

gamerdude1324906d ago

You do realize this site is dominated by PS3 fanboys, right? Last I checked, every article that said even the tiniest bit of GT5 would have a whole group of comments bashing on Forza.

Damn it, stop bashing Forza, stop bashing 360 exclusives, and 360 fanboys AND, at the same time...

Stop bashing GT5, stop bashing PS3 exclusives, and PS3 fanboys. This crap is unneeded on this site and when I'm trying to go here for my gaming news only to see some fanboy on either console ruin it with whichever console he loves, it ruins this site's appeal for me.

And both consoles have their hang-ups.
PS3:
Pros:: Free online service, blu-ray, hardware that has extreme capabilities
Cons:: Inferior online service, XMB is not as useful to navigate in while in a game as the Xbox button's mini-dashboard, Inferior online service (yet it's still free, so...)

360:
Pros:: Currently the best online service, more content to download on the XBLM, mini-dash is smooth and efficient
Cons:: Online costs money, DVDs??, fewer exclusives that simply don't stand up to the PS3 line-up.

Wii's too pathetic to have it's own section.

Ju4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Wow. The green force is strong in this (these) article(s). - it sure is. 3 disagrees within a couple of minutes.

LastDance4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

ive got a mazda RX7 and skyline standard and they dont look like that at all.

They look good actually.

ULTIMATE_REVENGE4906d ago

I own a copy of this game.

I will tell you that the images are 100% authentic because the standard cars have jaggies every where including the shadows. In fact even in the premium models the shadows are full of jaggies but the cars them selves are very good.

When you first play in Sunday Cup in A spec the first race courses look underwhelming, the only ones that look good are the continental tracks... Tokyo, Rome etc...

Raf1k14906d ago

As someone who's completely new to racing sims I kind of expected the standard cars to not look amazing in HD since they're from GT4 and didn't think anyone would care since it's a sim game. It's pretty obvious a lot of people on this site think that visuals are everything in a simulator.

For some reason I kind of console racing sim fans to be like PC racing sim fans who actually care more about the realism of the driving experience more than the way the cars look.

hesido4906d ago

This is not an acceptable quality from GT. They shouldn't have been included, the really bad ones. I have the impression not all them are equally bad, but this also creates even more of a non uniform quality of the product..

They could include it through DLC if they got AT LEAST THE DAMN TEXTURES. Window transperancy through textures, un-flippin believable.

Just hire 1 god damn artist to at least re-amplify the textures, touch up the model here and there with the time left. Let's say the development time was 3 years. (People think the time spent on GT HD and prologue did not contribute to GT 5, they are wrong, but let's say 3 years.)

A single god damn artist could up-convert all those damn textures in 3 years, even touching up the base mesh here and there.

UKdoaney4906d ago

they don't look that bad tbh i have quite a few standard cars and it's only noticeable cos of how good the premium cars look!

JokesOnYou4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

I sorta of knew this was going to happen when I read this awhile back:

http://n4g.com/news/549399/...

If only there was more complaining instead of blind loyalty defending this decision, attacking the website, or spending time hating on *another sim racer then perhaps the devs would have went for a more "quality over quantity" approach with the car lineup. Didn't Kaz himself say he would listen to the GT fans and cater to what they wanted?....If I'm not mistaken thats what lead to damage being put in. I know I'll get some hate but really you don't need 1000 cars anyway, especially if their just 40 variations of the same model. I mean who plays with all the cars anyway? Hell 100 more premiums and NO STANDARDS would of been better imo, yeah, yeah, I get it, then some would complain its not enough cars but honestly at least they'd all be highly detailed cars WITH a cockpit view instead of 80% of car roster looking like generic cars that just seem totally out of place in a blockbuster next gen title like GT5.

Anyways lets not forget most reviews love how the cars handle on the road and for a sim fan that means theres plenty to love about GT5.

8thnightvolley4906d ago

hahah wow .. they make a ps2 no ps1 game and call it gt5 and ppl call it the best graphics.. looooool look how ugly that game looks..jesus

georgeenoob4906d ago

InfectedDK,

Did you mention Forza 3? The game with better reviews than GT5 by a long shot and wasn't even in development for as long?

specialguest4906d ago

Polyphony really dropped the ball when it comes to the standard cars. That's unacceptable for a company that prides on realism and perfection.

SeanRL4906d ago

Can't argue with these. I'm disappointed and I'm really hoping these were just caused by bugs. If not, Polyphony needs to get a patch out now. If you can't make 1000+ cars look good, then there is no reason why you should attempt to put 1000+ cars in your game.

gamingisnotacrime4906d ago

the standard cars in gt5 are GT4 models upscaled to HD. they look like sht, the lights are like stickers on the car. in gmae racing with these standard cars looks like sht too. dont hide it fanboys, most of gt5 car catalogue looks like sht

GrandTheftZamboni4906d ago

I don't have the game but I have a feeling this is like those few large pixels found on the back of Big Daddy in first PS3 Bioshock.

I pity the fool who took these photos: looking for ugly in a beautiful game.

Redrum0594906d ago

its a psp port

premium / standard / psp port

ppl need to wake up

InfectedDK4906d ago

Lol wow some long comments..
Don't even wanna read 'em.

However over 100 people disagree on playing this wonderful game because their mom only gave them a 360.

Dee_914906d ago

only a hand full look very bad
the site not working for me so i dont know what it is .. if its that picture for the article then its way fake ...

all you have fun arguing and calling each other fanboys
while im puttin hours into this game
It might have been over hyped for some sites
but for the fans of gt
it lived up to it hype minus all the nitpicking
and online is a blast
very simple too

ShinMaster4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

How convinient. Good for you guys.
/s

Hideo_Kojima4906d ago

Some of you guys are just so gullible its making me sick...
You will believe anything you want to to justify the fact that you can't have GT5

Of course those are not GT5 standard car screenshots what are you insane?

They are PSP ports

+ Show (28) more repliesLast reply 4906d ago
zeddy4907d ago

yes they're ugly but would you prefer then not to be there? and the uglyness varies car to car.

BYE4906d ago

They shouldn't be in the game, not only they're ugly, you can't use cockpit view which makes them useless.

ct034906d ago

Quality tops quantity.

retrofly4906d ago

I would prefer them not to be there, put it this way I bought a brand new s2000 over a used one, i couldnt bring myself to drive a shoddy perted one with no cockpit view. I bought GT5 for GT5, not GT4 ported cars!

stevenhiggster4906d ago

Most of them are butt ugly, and tbh although they are just as good to drive I'm starting to think that they shouldn't have been included in the game, they are its biggest weakness without a doubt. And if they hadn't spent time (though not much by the look of it) giving the standard cars a lick of HD paint then the time could have been better spent giving us another hundred or so premium cars.
Don't get me wrong, I love the game, check my comment history I am a big defender of GT5 but the standard cars look crap end of.

N4WAH4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Then why is NFS:HP rated high and doing well?
It doesn't have cockpit views at all. Nor does it have manual shifting or wheel support.

Oh man why is it all I hear is how this site is over run with and controlled by PS3 fanboys yet any member that says one positive thing about GT5 is averaging a 5 to 1 disagree to agree ratio?

GT5 is an excellent racing game.
The best yet for FFB wheels.

Is it perfect? HELL NO!
Am I enjoying it immensely (which is all that matters)? HELL YES!

Go back to hating haters and I am headed back to play one of the best sim games I have ever owned "on a console".

8thnightvolley4906d ago

this is soooo unacceptable from gt5 6 GADDAMN years... and u cant even get those cars to have inside not even that the outsides are bad but THAT BAD!!.. ps2 level no ps1. from the selling point on gt5 and how high end it is and the MR PERFECTION that was said to produce the game this is a SHAME. gt5 was touted to be the best looking game with all cars out of this world and so realistic.. YA RIGHT!!

frostypants4906d ago

Lemme get this straight:

PD included GT4 and you can import PSP cars as a bonus. No one is MAKING you use them.

And you people are bitching about it?

Holy sh*t. Grow the f*ck up.

Rush4906d ago

I would rather have 20 more premium cars then 800 standard cars.

Dee_914906d ago

@Rush  
thats bull
it would have to be atleast another 120 premiums because not all standards look bad
il admit there are a few that shouldve stayed out
i only saw 2 standards so far that are butt ugly out of the 20 or so ive seen in all

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4906d ago
Mr Marbles4907d ago

Well I can guarantee the real version of the car doesn't have all those jaggies.

happyface4907d ago ShowReplies(9)
SIX4906d ago

You know what? I'm as big a Supporter of Sony as they come, but if there are problems this big for such a huge game. I would want people to point them out. How is turning a blind eye going to make games better? PD will fix this I have confidence.

gamer81794906d ago

cobpswii3600

Wow nice comeback. The fact of the matter is that I still play halo reach all the time. I am also playing black ops on the 360(you know the version that has better graphics and less problems than the ps3).

HDgamer4906d ago

How is the ps3 version have problems when you don't own it? Your logic and reasoning is childish.

Dee_914906d ago

@ SIX only a small few standards are terrible
all the ones i race against look fairly decent
like the prowler look like a premium

Akagi4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Seriously, the standard cars are a BONUS, the premium cars are the real meat and potatoes. But you know, whatever, just be an ignorant troll.

P.S: You can turn on AA via the options. Again, just plain ignorance.

Braxens4906d ago

So you're ok calling 20% of the game's cars the meat and potatoes and the rest of the 80% a bonus? Ok

Akagi4906d ago

They are called PREMIUM, they feature damage, higher polygon count models, they have cockpit camera. Yes, I would.

stevenhiggster4906d ago

If only that were true, most of the early races kinda force you to use standard cars, and most of the AI racers are in them. They're not a bonus, they're a big mistake is what they are. I originally defended the standard cars being there, but now that I've seen how crap they look, they shouldn't have been included at all. Quality not quantity.

Ju4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Well, if 20% of those cars is more than what 90% of other games deliver today, than yes, the remaining 80% are a bonus.

Would I want 100% premium cars? I sure would. But putting the game down because you get additional content is a joke.

It does what it does in its core what no other game does. That is what makes Grand Toursimo. Always did, and that's what makes the game, not the imported PS2/PSP car models.

4906d ago
Ju4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

W/e makes you happy. I personally think, GT5 should be more. Quite true. I still feel it plays like a HD version of GT4. So, there you have it. I think it should be more. Even that is true.

But, still, there is no other racing game which achieves what GT5 does in what defines this games. This is the realism how cars handle. The achievement in areas like the premium cars etc.

And what I said is, considering, those achievements are only reached with 20% of what GT5 is - even those 20% in scope are more than most (if not all) other racing games deliver today.

Not a single one has 200 cars on the level of GT5. Not a single one has race tracks mapped down to the bumps you find in the real world track. You can actually feel your car react to those.

GT5 is meant to be a "driving" simulation. That is, why these cars are included. Nobody would want to drive one of those standard cars in a race. But if you want to experience how they feel, there you go. You can.

I would suggest PD dropping 1080p all together, tbh. Use all the power you have to improve 720p visuals and effects (yes, I see those shadow - they can be fixed). And I am upset, that after 5 years PD could not brush up those standard cars. I also think, holding on to 1080 was to keep their face when they starting boosting they can when they released Prolog. Dropping down was unthinkable after.

But the rant what people have here against the game mostly comes from those who don't even have the game. Speaking of fanboys (you). And for the record, I did never see GT5 as the second coming of Christ. I even personally believe - for my taste - NFS:Shift is a great game; for what it is. And, yet, I have both. Dirt3 will be next, and the new NFS is on my list, and so is Shift2 next year.

specialguest4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

One of the key selling points and what made GT5 enticing was the 1000 cars the game boasted. The kart racing could be considered a bonus, but not the cars. GT5 is reputably known for having a wide selections of cars, and some of these standard cars looked worse than GT4 due to being upscaled.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4906d ago
DigitalAnalog4906d ago

That this could be the cars that are:

TRANSFERED FROM THE PSP DEVICE!

I heard the quality is horrendous though. I just got a standard car from a dealership and in NO WAY did it look like that whatsoever.

-End of Line

stevenhiggster4906d ago

A lot of them don't look as bad as the one they're showing but they do still look rubbish and it detracts from the rest of the otherwise awesome game. I doubt PD will ever be doing that again.

DigitalAnalog4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

These are PSP cars that are forcefully "upscaled"? These aren't the "official" standard cars, so why should they criticized for doing so? This is like saying "OH THE PS3 plays DVD's but it only upscales to 1080p and not native like Blu-Ray, PS3 is rubbish they should drop the DVD BC support".

Extras are extras, and bonus features are bonus. There are cars on PSP that doesn't exist on GT5 so at least you can experience them right there on your PS3 if you like to see it run on GT5!

-End of line

hesido4906d ago

@DigitalAnalog: even if I KNEW that they were transferred from PSP, I *certainly* wouldn't complain if cars mentioned here did not look like a pixelated mess.

Don't get me wrong, they'd still look real nice in a low resolution environment, I wouldn't call them a pixelated mess on a GT4 screenshot, they surely looked nice. But now, they look *out of place* on a 1080p / 720p backdrop.

Let's say you have a really nice technology that will take Humphrey Bogart from a scene in Casablanca, and put him into a scene in a today's movie and want him not to stand out, natural and in place. Would you keep him B/W?

BloodyNapkin4906d ago

No you see PSP graphics, it is a car transfer from the PSP.

WAWA4906d ago

Damn looks like the original GT on the PS1, but probably they're saving the pictures in MS paint and posting them on the net..Too much GT5 hate I see, really unfair, premium cars deserve the 60 bucks alone

LastDance4906d ago

This looks like a PSP screen shot..This website has been digging at GT since its release.

vhero4906d ago

Standard cars are pretty on the level of premium just without the extra details. Dunno where these pics came from but they are doctored in some way As I drive standard cars all the time and they look lovely in 1080p on my 42" Plasma. In fact I choose standard mostly over premium as I don't wanna damage premium cars.

avengers19784906d ago

could be being played on shitty television, I know this I played the game and it looks pretty damn amazing, and almost real at times. I am not into hardcore driving sims so I won't buy it but it looks far better than any other racing game.

popup4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Let's hope a patch comes out and takes them all out. Then you can look at 200 cars and drive 200 cars instead of look at 200 cars and drive 1000.

/s

This 'comments section' is one epic fail of embarrassing children playing playground games.

BloodyNapkin4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

So we are going to nitpick on cars that transfer over from the PSP, umm ok.

@PR0X1

Awesome keep posting those PSP screens....

thesummerofgeorge4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Woow, the venom and trolling towards GT5 is absolutely out of control. NO other game would get this much shit, and the irony is PD never hyped this game in the slightest and don't deserve this unfair smear campaign, they simply kept to themselves and made an incredible game. The gaming media, if you could even call it that, were the ones who hyped the shit out of it in order to gain hits, and now they bash them for not living up to an impossible standard. It's a fucking video game, and a bloody impressive one at that. You review the games, not the inherent flaws. Fuckin childish trolls. Get a life.

Edit: I can't help but notice the disagree/debubbling fairies are running rampant here. It seems as if they've been planning this day for some time. Idn'it sad?

The Lazy One4906d ago

"NO other game would get this much shit"

no other game on the PS3 maybe. Every game on the 360 gets this much.

ILiveUnderABridge4906d ago

I knew PD would drop the ball on this one, those 5 years were put to great use boys!

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 4906d ago
xYLeinen4907d ago

You get freaking 1000 cars in GT5. How polished do you except each and every car is going to be?!?

This is beyond ridiculous.

T9X694907d ago (Edited 4907d ago )

By the looks of it, only 200. I don't understand the point of adding cars just to have them when 80% look like crap and 20% look amazing. Having only the premium cars on track can make a beautiful looking race, but going half and half really make the 80% look like PS2 cars. Biggest part of GT is the cars, so why make crappy ones to begin just to up the count? Quality over quantity is the biggest response I seen on this site, so that should come in effect even with GT5.

LastDance4906d ago

by the looks of it? PLAY THE FRIKKING game first.

I cant believe the absolute nonsense coming up from these idiotic sites.

I own a sony BRAVIA x series 46" tv and have been driving standard cars all day.

they look really good.

that screen shot looks like a psp GT car.

It makes me sick how hard 360 fanboys want this to fail.

insomnium24906d ago

Show us T9 that all the 800 standard cars look like crap. I dare you. I seriously think something bad should happen to you when you spread fud like this. "by the looks of it"? I hate people like you. Show us all the 800 fugly cars and then and only then you can claim such a thing.

hesido4906d ago

Last Dance:
As a GT fan, I find this lack of quality unacceptable.

Suddenly, graphics are not important. Last time I checked, people were bragging about 1080p support, which I think is not needed, partly because I don't have a full HD TV, but I can still appreciate a Bluray movie all right.

I'd rather have the game 720p, without these ugly cars. And less billboard trees. The processing power doesn't fall from the "trees", surely, they could have shot for more enviromental detail at 720p.

Eamon4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

hesido, it's because most of the people here are not GT fans but Sony fanboys. Their aim is not to appreciate gaming in general but to defend Sony as though it's World War 2.

The same thing happened to Final Fantasy XIII. That is, until it was announced as multiplatform.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4906d ago
Mr Marbles4907d ago (Edited 4907d ago )

They went for quantity over quality, period. To be fair I think that was Sony who pushed Poly to do that, Sony only cares about bragging rights and PS3 numbers being bigger than 360 numbers.

Quality and actual performance is secondary for Sony, just like PS3, looks better on paper than 360, but in real life, 360 is the better gaming machine.

Same here, GT5 looks better on paper, and sounds good in reviews to be able to say 1031 cars, in real life it is a sloppy mess compared to Forza 3.

insomnium24906d ago

Are you people seeing the disagree to agree ratio on this comment? I dare someone to say this site is run by PS3-fanboys with a straight face.

hesido4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Well, that is too 360 fanboyish indeed.

BARF4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

this sight is run by ps3 fanboys. now are you happy??? this is just an example of karma and now all the little ps3 kiddies cant handle it. for the last year almost every article on this site had someone mentioning in the comments how gt5 would be the next coming of christ, even when the article had nothing to do with gt5 or ps3. the ps3 fanboys just seem to be hiding a little more or playing the spin game (which they are used to), because they all feel a little dumb now.

you are getting what you deserve, now take your crow and eat it.

insomnium24906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

@ barf

Ummmm... I was here like 4-5 years ago. Are you trying to tell me how things went?

I havn't told anyone GT5 is like the second coming of crist since I don't believe in him.

Anyway first you should figure out how things went over here during the first 3 years after the launch of PS3. Then you come back and tell me all the same things you just said. OK....GO!

edit: Oh yeah and you will not "beat me" by getting the last word in this. You only get it cause I'm outta bubbles.

stevenhiggster4906d ago

I'm with you there insomnium, it makes me laugh when the 360 fanboys rant about how n4g is run by ps3 fanboys. And don't give us that crap about karma, if any of you used this site in 2007-09 then you would know that ps3 used to be a swear word around here. What goes around comes around though.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4906d ago
alb18994906d ago

Well after 6 longs years it should be well polished if not what were they doing all this time?

SkylineR4906d ago

Adding unnecessary 3D support to make Sony happy.

Personally I was really looking forward to GT5 but 6 or so years in development doesn't show in the final product. The premium cars look fantastic and so do the new tracks with weather effects, but the rest (80%+ of the game) looks like an HD remaster of GT4 C'mon Polyphony! What HAVE you been doing for the past few years?
They should've concentrated on making more premium cars but in a lesser volume. Would be much better than giving us generic cars.

BYE4906d ago

It's only 200 cars actually.

PD was like "Let's add some cars from our last game just to be able to advertise 1000 cars".

hesido4906d ago

If only a few cars are this bad, this confirms for their quantity over quality ambition. They could say 1000! THOUSAND, I tell you. Not 970.. THOUSAND.

bennyace4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

Ok now it doesn't seem to matter if only 200 cars look good!. When it was said that it had over 1000 cars. Every PS3 supporters were like, "That's double the amount of Forza" or "GT5 is going to show how a real car sim is made". Now everybody's on damage controle since GT5 doesn't deliver. Just the fact that there's more people agreeing with anti-GT comments shows that even the GT5 supporters can't defend the game they waited so long to get! I guess that's why when we saw footage, it was always from the 200 premium cars or in replay mode. This is false advertisement and these things should be critisized wether you're a PS3 fan or not.

I tried it (GT5) and tbh after playing both Forza games on the 360, there's nothing in GT5 that gets me excited to play it. I can understand that someone who hasn't played Forza can be excited about GT5. But I guess that's what you get when you stick to ONE console and defend it to your death! LOL. I'm just glad I rented it and I'm canceling my reserved copy for sure.

I think I've had enough of car sims for now. And when I played GT5 2days ago it felt the same as playing Forza but with more jaggies. No way I'm paying 60$ for a game that looks and plays like Forza. Well at least 20% of the game looks and plays like it!

A good day to everyone ...

KotC4906d ago

"How polished do you except each and every car is going to be?!?" All of them should have the same detail. Blu-ray has the space and after 5 years this is unacceptable.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4906d ago
Zir04907d ago

They should have just left out the standard cars, sure there would be less cars but the game would seem much higher quality. Reviews would likely increase from the 7/8s to more 9s.

Sunny_D4907d ago

I think it would have been better to make 500 premium cars than to make only 200 premiums and 800 standards. But, I think with DLC support to come, we might get more and more premiums and maybe an update to turn all standards to dare I say it... Premium??? One can dream right?

raztad4906d ago (Edited 4906d ago )

I cant help but disagree.

Used cars dont look bad in motion and they are mostly optional, they are there (in a separated room) if you even feel nostalgic or need a really cheap car. It's a shame those rehashed articles posting the same already posted pictures keep poping. Why nothing is said about the incredible detailed premium? that would an article worth a hit.

@sunny

Premium cars take too much time to model. I'm guessing 230 was the highest number PD could reach. To me standard cars were an afterthough, something PD didnt put enough time into because they were mostly focused on PREMIUM. To ask for 500 (=2x the current amount of Premiums) is unrealistic. I think make more sense, to ask for Forza 3 quality cars, PD could have made 1000 of those.

Nightfallen4907d ago

Aren't all standard cars taken from GT4 with a little extra polish?

NaiNaiNai4907d ago

really.

Thats just BS.
This game can completely piss off

Mr Marbles4906d ago

NO not all of them, a few are original to this gen, they just still look like poo.

vhero4906d ago

Not all as there are more standard cars 800+ compared to the 750 in GT4.

blakstarz4907d ago

wow...the hate for this game succeeding is STRONG!!

The Maxx4907d ago

You think missing features, poor graphics on 800 of the 1000 cars, poor AI would make GT5 a success if nobody pointed them out?

LOL the desperation and anger of you Sony Loyalists just make me laugh.

LastDance4906d ago Show
muzikjunkie804906d ago

@LastDance

whats the 360 got to do with this?

if i remember correctly pd said they were pushing for perfection. so dont take it out on microsoft or the xbox coz pd messed up.

and dont go hating on forza 3 either, it might no look as good but atleast it plays and feels almost flawless.

irepbtown4906d ago

PD messed up?

Please play the game.

muzikjunkie804906d ago

irepbtown

i will be playing the game once i buy it.

yeah pd messed up or is the game as perfect as they said it would be???

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4906d ago
Sackdude4907d ago ShowReplies(1)
gamer81794906d ago

just like the hate for halo reach and every call of duty game.

Eamon4906d ago

well there was no hate for Halo Reach by the 360 owners.
And COD is a blatantly milked franchise, so I understand the hate.

However, for GT5, many loyal GT fans are expressing huge disappointment. Makes you wonder what PD were doing for 6 years?

Show all comments (250)
90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow647d ago (Edited 647d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel1989647d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow647d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel1989647d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled647d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher647d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim647d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow647d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

644d ago
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv721714d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro1714d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig1714d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright1714d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

1714d ago
neutralgamer19921714d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright1714d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk1713d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare21714d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san1713d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1713d ago
SCW19821714d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech1714d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss1714d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

1714d ago
ElementX1714d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright1714d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali1714d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm1714d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde1714d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

1714d ago
1714d ago
Dark_Knightmare21714d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX1713d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright1713d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

1713d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 1713d ago
1713d ago
xRacer74x1714d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke1714d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech1714d ago (Edited 1714d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig1714d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

1714d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1714d ago
Hungryalpaca1714d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis1714d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz1714d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19811714d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1714d ago
Nacho_Z1714d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig1714d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z1714d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King1714d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)
320°

Gran Turismo 5, Gran Turismo 6, Wipeout HD, God of War 3 and more running on PC via the latest RPCS3

DSOGaming writes: "It appears that the best Playstation 3 emulator that is currently under development, RPCS3, received a new update recently. kd-11 has implemented new Surface Cache fixes to RPCS3 that reportedly improve the appearance of car reflections in Gran Turismo 6, and fix various graphics glitches in other games."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
1751d ago Replies(6)
gangsta_red1751d ago

If someone out there in internet land could make a decent PS3 emulator imagine what Sony could actually do if they put the time and effort in to make this happen for their next console?

It's definitely not impossible as we can see here. It should definitely be done since BC seems to be very important to Sony this next gen. Imagine PS+ free game offerings from Sony that could include the whole catalog from the PS console family..fantastic.

Silly gameAr1751d ago

Why waste time and money on it? Some people want to move forward, not go back.

Eonjay1751d ago

It's not a deal breaker but having the feature would be amazing. I would rather have it than not have it.

gangsta_red1751d ago

Not everyone feels that way and if Sony is making an issue of supporting PS4 games for PS5 why not support their other past games for people who still have them or a means to buy them and play them.

KwietStorm_BLM1751d ago

You literally just said some people. So I'd imagine you can comprehend that there's a larger subset of people not in that same "some" group. PlayStation used to be known for backward compatibility. Xbox made a big deal about support for their entire catalog. What's the issue with PlayStation, who has an even more substantial history in gaming, tapping into that market? We don't have this problem on PC. It's only a good thing for consumers to be able to bring their games with them through generations on console.

Silly gameAr1751d ago (Edited 1751d ago )

@kwietstorm

Yes, I said some people. What I said was MY opinion. I'm one of those people that couldn't care less about bc, but im not saying ALL people don't care about it. I think they should spend that time and energy for future features and games, but like I said, that's only my opinion.

Imortus_san1750d ago (Edited 1750d ago )

Not every body trows their games way every time the new gen cames along, and everybody that likes games like to be able to play their favorite games in the best possible way.

PS: Retrocompatability is the most requested feature in Sony Foruns, even Sony said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1750d ago
frostypants1751d ago (Edited 1751d ago )

The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile? Are the number of additional consoles PS3 BC would push be enough to justify the cost of developing the emulation (and it would have to be bullet proof)? I like the idea of having it, but for my part not having it won't effect my purchase decision.

1751d ago
Eonjay1751d ago

You are asking the right question but the wrong way. For me, the addition of PS3 BC would add value as a customer and make it even more likely for me to buy a PS5. If it is valuable to the customer it is valuable to them.

Also, the way they are doing it would be way cheaper than a program like Microsoft had. The are emulating the hardware. Not the software.

gangsta_red1751d ago

"The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile?"

Sony could definitely make some extra profit selling PS3 games through their marketplace (the same way they have their other classics available). It's not about whether or not it will effect anyone's purchase decision, it definitely didn't do so for the PS4. But as others have expressed, it would be a nice addition to have for PS5 if Sony could open up their whole library digitally and physically to users.

ShadowWolf7121751d ago

Racing games should be some of the easiest to emulate and they're still not hitting 60fps with it, to say nothing of image flickering and occasional sound issues.

Still gonna be a bit yet before they have it fully up and running, it seems, and even then it may only work for part of the library. :/

1751d ago Replies(2)
Gwiz1751d ago

Is it possible to have PS3 emulation on PS5?yes depending on what kind of power it really has.
An i7 9700k is no slouch and the PS4 already has a God of War 3 running much better with less
power required because they converted CBE to X86 which is not something you want to be doing in the long run.

What power would be required to play these games emulated at said PS4 version?.
It's not an easy situation Sony themselves created and ultimately I believe they are happy this way because they
want you to use PSNow,that service is why you will not even get it. (let's not forget that it was a huge investment)

1751d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (45)