400°
8.0

JustPushStart: Gran Turismo 5 Review

JustPushStart writes: In the five years that we’ve been waiting for, I must say, that Gran Turismo 5 is a game still worth checking out whether you’re a fan of the series or not. While the new features are appealing for racing fans, Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit offer more diverse modes than Gran Turismo 5, if I were to compare the two racing titles. Graphically, the game has not changed much from Gran Turismo 5: Prologue but this makes up for the impressive weather effects on offer. It may not be the best game ever made but it’s still a polished title. Racing fans won’t be disappointed.

Read Full Story >>
justpushstart.com
Nitrowolf24923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

"For a game that is five years in the making, the graphics of Gran Turismo 5 surprisingly does not have the best graphics I’ve seen this generation . If NFS: Hot Pursuit is to be compared with Gran Turismo 5, it will be obvious to the gamer that Hot Pursuit’s graphics are superior to Gran Turismo 5. "

WTF ARE THESE GUYS SMOKING

Also why must they compare this to NFS?
First off they are not the same, GT Simulator
NFS full arcade style racing

-Alpha4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

Phase 'em out, relax.

The embargo is Wednesday, so don't take the review too seriously until then.

@Grenadan

Not discrediting everything they say, but if the official embargo is Wednesday then people shouldn't get too riled up. The score doesn't take into account online if I'm not mistaken. Reviews like this, regardless of score, shouldn't be considered until it is official to do so.

The ultimate motive for pre-embargo releases are to beat the onslaught of reviews from more famous sites and hog the attention while they can.

Gue14923d ago

Whatever it is what they are smoking the effects are obvious. Blindness.

tavo11174923d ago

Why do they even botter to write a troll review before the embargo lifts. It would be a little less pathetic.

Exquisik4923d ago

I agree with Alpha, don't take this review too seriously especially after looking at their hot and not list.

Hot:
Welcome to my Home
Gain Experience to Level Up
A/B-Spec Events
Earn Rewards by Leveling Up
Arcade Mode
Let's Make a Track
Online Multiplayer
Taking the License Test
Special Events
Custom Soundtracks/PSP Connectivity

Not
Graphic are not that Good (Seriously?)
Excessive Installation
Boring Multiplayer Mode (It's a racing game! What else do you want? And the game hasn't even been released yet to have a full effect on the online mode.)

All that Hot compare to Not (which doesn't even affect gameplay that much) and they gave it a 4/5.

Just from this line alone "Following the continuous delays that Gran Turismo 5 has faced over the years," you can tell that this review is useless. Continuous delays? There'd only been two delays and the first one was for Japan only!

LilMissGoddess4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

i live on east coast usa nc to be exact, its been wednesday for one hour and 20 minutes, embargo is over since the game released over an hr ago, hence 1201 am wednesday nov 24th 2010

all sites can basically now post reviews

grendan- remember only 360 exclusives deserve scores less than 100% on n4g however all sony exclusives should get a 10/10 for the fact that sony and their devs do no wrong for the fanboys on here that cheer them on.

3 disagrees? ok i don't live in n.c it's not 133 am WEDNESDAY and i guess i live on mars! fucking sony fanboys suck!

wah wah we the teh victims! love my ps3 hate the sony crybabies on N4G.COM
you guys need to grow a pair!

beardpapa4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

you make a game for several years and you have to consider that it's because of numerous delays. I mean, AW was in development for several years which means numerous delays, and the media was allll over it!

/s

Lord_Doggington4923d ago

he said he didn't like the character models and thought that the new nfs game had better physics

i agree. even though gt5 isn't really a physics-flashy game, the character models do definitely look dated

OneSneakyMofo4923d ago

JustPushStart who? Nuff said.

'Excessive installing' the 10GB is mandatory, tartar. I don't see all these multiplatform games getting a mark off because they have required istalls either.

And then he compares the game to NFS? How about compare it to other racing sims. Oh wait, you don't play racing sims? Then don't fvcking review it.

Next up: What's hot? MULTIPLAYER. What's not? MULTIPLAYER MODES (LACK THEREOF)

Contradiction much? Yeah, you just lost all credibility with that one.

I just put these guys on my blocked sites. :)

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4923d ago
N4WAH4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

Oh please Grenadan.
I have played a couple races in GT5 already and now I am doing the full install of the game. I have also played NFS:HP. To say NFS looks better is flat out embarrassing and screams GIVE ME HITS!

I am a racing fanatic. I have played them all this generation and GT5 "graphically" has no equal when it comes to the racing genre. So how can you take anything they say seriously after that?

Oh wait, now I know why. I took a quick glance at your post history. Carry on. With your slanted bias (and I am being polite) that is.

PS3Freak4923d ago

"For a game that is five years in the making, the graphics of Gran Turismo 5 surprisingly does not have the best graphics I’ve seen this generation"

All you need to do is read this sentance, and you will see that they are not worth listening to. English much?

will114923d ago

Sounds like ignorance to me. I disagree with what they are saying but I am not ignoring it. Opinions are opinions.

Ethereal4923d ago

Yea...this review has some serious grammatical errors that need to be addressed. I pretty much gave up when he compared GT5 to NFS:HP....

LilMissGoddess4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

"Sounds like ignorance to me. I disagree with what they are saying but I am not ignoring it. Opinions are opinions. "

let me correct this statement- " doesn't sound like what i want to hear being a sony fanboy, i am ignoring it, opinions are opinions"

funny when people that like halo said about the same you ps3 fanboys crucified them. so there will i said what you don't have the balls to admit too saying. keep being a fanboy, i love hypocrites. oh and next time plz remember to add "teh victims" bs next time.

ya know what i mean, conspiracy theories, and all out hypocrisy, i mean hell it's what you sony fanboys know best on n4ps3fanboys.com!

deadreckoning6664923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

@PS3 Freak- The reviewer probably saw something on the PC that impressed him more. But on consoles, GT5 is the best looking game I have ever seen...and I haven't even played it yet. But then again, thats what MY eyes tell me. I really can't speak for anyone else.

Either way...a 4/5 is a great score.

"If NFS: Hot Pursuit is to be compared with Gran Turismo 5, it will be obvious to the gamer that Hot Pursuit’s graphics are superior to Gran Turismo 5."

For the record, I wholeheartedly disagree with this statement. The reviewer should have said that HE believes Hot Pursuit looks better than GT5. Then it would have been an opinion which is fine. However, the reviewer is assuming that EVERYONE will believe that Hot Pursuit looks better than GT5. Thats totally asinine.

"I want big sites reviews!!!!!!! Not these no name (do whatever they can for hits) type sites."

What difference does that make? Don't tell me you believe that big site reviews from IGN and Gamespot are more credible just because their "big". If anything, big sites are LESS credible than small sites since big sites are usually the ones that get paid to give a review since big sites like IGN and Gamespot hold more weight in this industry than sites like 1up and Playstation Lifestyle.

socomnick4923d ago

Here is another quote from a playstation mag psm3.

"Weirdest of all, GT5's vaunted vehicles don't even look that good. Yes, even the cars - those 1000-plus cars! - are disappointing. Sure, stick them in photo mode and ogle the hi-res versions and they're gorgeous, but on track and in motion they're surprisingly prone to jaggedy shadows, lumpy edges and blurry textures. The cars in NFS Hot Pursuit look better, go better and crash better."

It appears gt5 plays and looks bad.

Here is a link to that quote.
http://www.computerandvideo...

PS3Freak4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

Well looks like this article dragged in the lowest of the low. Shield your eyes, you may get infected.

LordMarius4923d ago

"Visually it's at once comfortingly familiar, in that squeaky-clean sort of GT style, and impossibly beautiful. It's the equivalent of a warm bath on a cold night - with Megan Fox in it. What is immediately obvious is that Polyphony Digital have achieved a technical masterpiece. The staggering full HD 60fps simply never struggles for a single second."

from the same link

Angels37854923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

I want big sites reviews!!!!!!! Not these no name (do whatever they can for hits) type sites. Wheres the REAL GT5 review? Its a shame that the very first one was from a crappy french site who obviously had double standards, memory issues (giving prologue a better score than the final GT5), and fanboys working there. -_-

@PS3Freak
I totally agree
@People who disagree
Die Fanboys. If IGN, Gametrailers, or Gameinformer give it an 8. Then I'll believe these sites.

PS3Freak4923d ago

We havn't gotten any real reviews yet, because the real websites actually plan to play the game before they review it.

SiteNblog Defender4923d ago

Oh, but I thought this smaller websites give truthful reviews. That's what you PS3 fans were saying about the first Halo Reach reviews.

LilMissGoddess4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

thats funny when halo reach came out the no name sites as you say that criticized it was "an honest review" from your same crowd...

hypocrite much?

lived 30 yrs b4 halo and gran turismo, trust me being a gamer instead of part of some kind of cult is better, you should try it sometime.

oh well pardon me a minute while i say

NINTENDO FUCK THE WORLD the only company that pulled this industry from bankrupt to an industry again--- sorry my fanboy came out!

edit to site blog- yes, yes they did! see my posts in here, lmao ill buy gt5 like i bought halo reach see some don't act like nazi's sworn to a certain console, we own both!

I_vAmpiRe_I4923d ago

Well, to be honest, I'm hugely disappointed in this game. I'm a big GT fan, and bought my old 60gb PS3 just because GT5 (a LOT of years ago).
I've been playing the game the last 8 hours, and it really shows that the PS3 is old. (antialising anyone?) The graphics aren't as beautiful as the pictures we've seen earlier, the game looks unpolished, with lots of graphical errors (esp on shadows, but also on car meshes), a LOT of typos, bad A.I. and endless loading times.. They even forgot adding body-roll when driving in-car/bumpercam.. Exept skidmarks and better tiresmoke, IMO it's not better than gt4 on the PS2..
I'm a huge racing-game fan and tbh this isn't the real driving sim. (and no, I haven't tried Forza since I do not have an XBox).

DigitalAnalog4923d ago

From what I've heard, that's when things DO get interesting. Especially 1 fatal crash that would put you out of business for good.

-End of Line

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4923d ago
Cevapi884923d ago

"For a game that is five years in the making, the graphics of Gran Turismo 5 surprisingly does not have the best graphics I’ve seen this generation . If NFS: Hot Pursuit is to be compared with Gran Turismo 5, it will be obvious to the gamer that Hot Pursuit’s graphics are superior to Gran Turismo 5. While the weather effects are pretty good in Gran Turismo 5, the physics and the environment that the game has to offer to gamers aren’t that appealing. The character models and the people behind the race track look dated while the voice overs of the characters are way off-sync."

>__> look of disapproval

-Alpha4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

I do have to agree about the people behind the race track, they seem to be the same models, repeated multiple times like in sports games. Not something you'd notice when racing, but when looking at screenshots it sticks out.

A 4/5 isn't bad mind you, there are bound to be some negatives and some things will stick out when the rest of the game is highly polished.

My friends over the sea keep sending me pics, so I'm only judging from that.

Cevapi884923d ago

i understand that, but this is isnt the real tree simulator or whatever else you would like to substitute, the fact that this reviewer compared GT5 to NFS and said it looks better is mind boggling to me

same models of people and trees should be expected, that does not surprise...im sure that if Kaz had his way with it, he would try and refine everything off track as well, but then again most of us wont care what is happening off track when we are focused on 1st place

-Alpha4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

"but this is isnt the real tree simulator or whatever else you would like to substitute"

I don't think it's fair to make excuses like that. It doesn't have to be a tree simulator to look a little better.

I remember before GT had damage I used to tell people "the point is to race, not crash". But somebody then told me "that's like saying a dev shouldn't code in deaths for a platformer because the point isn't to die"

I'm comfortable enough to be disappointed, but not enough to care.

It's ultimately a cherry-pick, and it shouldn't mean much. It's just confusing as to why they didn't upgrade it, and surely you prefer a better model tree.

Cevapi884923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

it really does not matter to me...what matters to me is that the tracks are top notch and the game is doing what its suppose to do...PD will eventually work on improving what goes on off track, i think it will make the races that much more lively...but as you said its cherry picking at its finest...it wont deter me from getting the game or make me disappointed if a tree is not in HD or on the same graphical level as a premium car

and as i said before, if Yamauchi had time which has been something of an issue when it comes to GT5 then im sure that the tree models and the human characters would have been upgraded...whenever we heard Yamauchi say that he needed more time or something along those lines, it was synonymous with people thinking that the game was going to be delayed yet again...ohh and if prologue is anything to go off of, then we will see many updates to the game since PD and Yamauchi like to be perfectionist and offer as much content as possible

despair4923d ago

The strange thing is that I have Hot Pursuit for PC running at 1920x1080 with max settings and while it is a gorgeous game, I don't think that it looks better than what I saw on GT5,cars for sure are better looking on GT5 but the environments though I'm not sure, I will have to wait until tomorrow when I get my copy(hopefully it ships on time) to tell that.

-Alpha4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

It ought to be fine, though I find it annoying they couldn't fix 2D trees and repeated crowds in such close proximity (for example, seeing 4 of the same guys in one shot makes no sense) some time in the last couple of years.

I know the focus is on cars, but surely the person who makes the cars doesn't make the trees in a game? It's not a big deal, but just something that has stumped me

@Estranged

I'm not saying they are all bad, just that I've seen 2-D ones and they stick out like a sore thumb. It's a nit pick, but it's noticeable enough that people seem to see it

SoapShoes4923d ago

@Alpha - Not all of the trees are bad. I mean the ones on High Speed Ring(even on Prologue) look good. Some of them are not that great, but they aren't bad per-say.

despair4923d ago

Yea it doesn't bother me, I mean environment and spectators have not exactly been Gran Turismo's best area of development. They spent time making the cars and tracks as close to perfect as possible and that's what I want. Foliage and twins popping up everywhere is way way down on my wishlist.

I'm sure reviewers will hone in on that though and while its good to point out problems and areas more work could be done I hope they don't focus on it and blow it out of proportion. Its all about racing and gorgeous cars.

SoapShoes4923d ago

Um, what? I've played the Hot Pursuit demo, and WHAT?

Terarmzar4923d ago

I hated hot pursuit after i tried the demo it was Too! arcadey
and something i dont get with NFS, when they make these new games the feeling of the cars is different in every game which is odd since it is an arcade and made by the same developers every time excluding the new hot pursuit.
*When i say the cars handle different im talking about using the same car they had in the last game and comparing the difference.

4923d ago
SoapShoes4923d ago

Dude even Prologue looked better than Hot Pursuit....

ArcFatalix4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

justpushstart lol so desperate

why do these no name sites want hits so bad, just read the review written so horribly

CrippleH4923d ago

No name sites are probably from N4G contributers posting their own websites.

LilMissGoddess4923d ago (Edited 4923d ago )

so? couldn't i have said the same about 360 exclusives and reviews for those that weren't 10/10? claim the victims 24/7 but you know what else you sony fanboys say " what foes around comes around" well that might be the ONLY honest comment from that "camp" on here.

cry cry cry isn't that also what you sony fanboys said???

oh i see the droids are popping my bubbles sorry but you guys are babies 24/7 fuck the bubbles, all i need is ONE. immature bunch of crybabies, maybe instead of buying this you all need to invest in pacifiers!

edit to turismo- and you are desperate for agrees

edit number 2 lmao -Why don't you get to lvl 30+ and then start giving your thoughts.<---- well then digital analog, why don't you say that when an rpg is getting reviewed? ya know since now reviews have to be level 50 or what not right?

excuses and double standards, you guys we're chomping to bite down fable 3, so i guess all those reviews are moot too, since they weren't "higher levels with that" but still reviewed it.

damage and shit in this game should be for ALL CARS. cock pit view SHOULD BE FOR ALL CARS. they gimped it but whatever make more excuses. the one thing i see thats WRONG WITH THIS TITLE IS LOADING TIMES AFTER THE INSTALL, what the excuses now?

bad coding from PD. one third of the game is installed and still several minutes to load a fucking a track???? be glad i aint the reviewer, that's a point off there!

TurismoGTR4923d ago

These sites are deperate for hits.

Show all comments (98)
90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow662d ago (Edited 662d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel1989662d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow661d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel1989661d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled661d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher662d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim662d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow661d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

659d ago
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv721728d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro1728d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig1728d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright1728d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

1728d ago
neutralgamer19921728d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright1728d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk1728d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright1728d ago (Edited 1728d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare21728d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san1727d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1727d ago
SCW19821729d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech1729d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss1728d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

1728d ago
ElementX1728d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright1728d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali1728d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm1728d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde1728d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

1728d ago
1728d ago
Dark_Knightmare21728d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright1728d ago (Edited 1728d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk1728d ago (Edited 1728d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX1728d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk1728d ago (Edited 1728d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright1728d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

1728d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 1728d ago
1728d ago
xRacer74x1728d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke1728d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech1728d ago (Edited 1728d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig1728d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

1728d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1728d ago
Hungryalpaca1728d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis1728d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz1728d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19811728d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1728d ago
Nacho_Z1729d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig1728d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z1728d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King1729d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)
320°

Gran Turismo 5, Gran Turismo 6, Wipeout HD, God of War 3 and more running on PC via the latest RPCS3

DSOGaming writes: "It appears that the best Playstation 3 emulator that is currently under development, RPCS3, received a new update recently. kd-11 has implemented new Surface Cache fixes to RPCS3 that reportedly improve the appearance of car reflections in Gran Turismo 6, and fix various graphics glitches in other games."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
1766d ago Replies(6)
gangsta_red1766d ago

If someone out there in internet land could make a decent PS3 emulator imagine what Sony could actually do if they put the time and effort in to make this happen for their next console?

It's definitely not impossible as we can see here. It should definitely be done since BC seems to be very important to Sony this next gen. Imagine PS+ free game offerings from Sony that could include the whole catalog from the PS console family..fantastic.

Silly gameAr1765d ago

Why waste time and money on it? Some people want to move forward, not go back.

Eonjay1765d ago

It's not a deal breaker but having the feature would be amazing. I would rather have it than not have it.

gangsta_red1765d ago

Not everyone feels that way and if Sony is making an issue of supporting PS4 games for PS5 why not support their other past games for people who still have them or a means to buy them and play them.

KwietStorm_BLM1765d ago

You literally just said some people. So I'd imagine you can comprehend that there's a larger subset of people not in that same "some" group. PlayStation used to be known for backward compatibility. Xbox made a big deal about support for their entire catalog. What's the issue with PlayStation, who has an even more substantial history in gaming, tapping into that market? We don't have this problem on PC. It's only a good thing for consumers to be able to bring their games with them through generations on console.

Silly gameAr1765d ago (Edited 1765d ago )

@kwietstorm

Yes, I said some people. What I said was MY opinion. I'm one of those people that couldn't care less about bc, but im not saying ALL people don't care about it. I think they should spend that time and energy for future features and games, but like I said, that's only my opinion.

Imortus_san1765d ago (Edited 1765d ago )

Not every body trows their games way every time the new gen cames along, and everybody that likes games like to be able to play their favorite games in the best possible way.

PS: Retrocompatability is the most requested feature in Sony Foruns, even Sony said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1765d ago
frostypants1765d ago (Edited 1765d ago )

The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile? Are the number of additional consoles PS3 BC would push be enough to justify the cost of developing the emulation (and it would have to be bullet proof)? I like the idea of having it, but for my part not having it won't effect my purchase decision.

1765d ago
Eonjay1765d ago

You are asking the right question but the wrong way. For me, the addition of PS3 BC would add value as a customer and make it even more likely for me to buy a PS5. If it is valuable to the customer it is valuable to them.

Also, the way they are doing it would be way cheaper than a program like Microsoft had. The are emulating the hardware. Not the software.

gangsta_red1765d ago

"The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile?"

Sony could definitely make some extra profit selling PS3 games through their marketplace (the same way they have their other classics available). It's not about whether or not it will effect anyone's purchase decision, it definitely didn't do so for the PS4. But as others have expressed, it would be a nice addition to have for PS5 if Sony could open up their whole library digitally and physically to users.

ShadowWolf7121765d ago

Racing games should be some of the easiest to emulate and they're still not hitting 60fps with it, to say nothing of image flickering and occasional sound issues.

Still gonna be a bit yet before they have it fully up and running, it seems, and even then it may only work for part of the library. :/

1765d ago Replies(2)
Gwiz1765d ago

Is it possible to have PS3 emulation on PS5?yes depending on what kind of power it really has.
An i7 9700k is no slouch and the PS4 already has a God of War 3 running much better with less
power required because they converted CBE to X86 which is not something you want to be doing in the long run.

What power would be required to play these games emulated at said PS4 version?.
It's not an easy situation Sony themselves created and ultimately I believe they are happy this way because they
want you to use PSNow,that service is why you will not even get it. (let's not forget that it was a huge investment)

1765d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (45)