320°

7 games Japan should give to western developers

CVG writes:
"We've put on our thinking caps and come up with seven Japanese franchises that we think would be given a new lease of life under western development."

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
Oldsnake0074937d ago

You know I don't understand Japanese developers.

What's the point in making games for the western audience when we already get that from western developers ?

Mystogan4937d ago

the thing is Japanese people tend to make great IP's and then they ruin it.

Mystogan4937d ago (Edited 4937d ago )

They should give pokemon while they are at it, i mean come on who doesn't want real-time battles,Co-op and some real character customization in pokemon?, ow and a BETTER story,western developers are clearly better at story games.
Japanese people with their traditions,, they are just afraid to change it, but that's what will ultimately be their downfall. Also western developers listen better to their fans.

Tito084936d ago (Edited 4936d ago )

So you're saying Metal Gear and some other great Jap-developed games have a bad story compared to Western games.... Thing is Japanese publishers are obsessed with the western market because games like Halo and Call of duty sells like hotcakes, but those sales are more due to marketing besides being great games of course, both games gets ridiculous amounts of money spent on advertisement, that's what Jap. companies are lacking, but that doesn't mean that jap. games sales are bad because the games are bad!!!!!

One thing for sure, they should make their games more towards their own ppl and culture, or have a vision of what their games should be like because most of the games I grew up with are actually japanese, because most companies are focusing on the western market, I mean there's nothing wrong with that, but not everyone is a FPS fan, not a fallout fan, not a Madden fan... Because this gen is of course dominated by westerns but all I see is yearly franchises, like 1735327436 FPSs, FPSs with RPGs, not too much variety anymore!!!!

specialguest4937d ago (Edited 4937d ago )

Giving some these franchise to a western developer will take all of the soul and charm of what makes these franchise shine. The games will be an empty shell of itself, with nice graphics and modern gameplay, and that's it.

Seijoru4939d ago

Don't make me throw up, don't ever mention Zelda and Darksiders in the same sentence.

hatchimatchi4937d ago

darksiders is actually a really great game, yes zelda is better but there's no reason that darksiders should be ignored because it takes its cues from a beloved franchise.

Smacktard4939d ago

While Other M wasn't that great, giving Metroid back to Retro is a bad idea. Retro is frigging AMAZING, and Metroid Prime is one of my favorite games ever, but it was clear with Prime 3 that that style of gameplay was getting a bit stale. We needed a new spin, but Other M was just not that spin.

tunaks14937d ago

other m was great, get off the bandwagon. People here dont seem capable of thinking for themselves. Didn't like the story? Thats wonderful, but its a game and the gameplay was superb.

Urahara4939d ago

Zelda is played out and sucks now. Go play the train one and tell me it still has it. And we do need a new Tenchu.

fight4love4938d ago

zelda is starting to feel repetitive

SeraphimBlade4937d ago

I'd rather play through the 50th Zelda than a 2nd Darksiders. That game didn't do it for me at all.

BYE4937d ago

It's a ripoff. Not saying Darksiders was bad but original games are always better.

hatchimatchi4937d ago

i don't think zelda is played out but spirit tracks was definitely a subpar game. It's the only zelda i've ever stopped playing due to sheer boredom. I still haven't gone back to finish it. The inclusion of the train is what killed it for me, there's no exploration whatsoever and it takes so long to get anywhere. bleh

Dac2u4937d ago

Arrrgh, I persevered and finished Spirit Tracks, but only because it was the only DS game I had at the time. There were some good moments in the game, some that made me chuckle. Some of the bosses were really well done, but over all it was severely lacking in fun.

I kind of agree with the list. The Zelda franchise needs to be reworked a bit, FFS Nintendo get some voice acting already. The only games these days that don't have voice acting are PSN/XBL games and some of the lower budget handheld games. They don't have to westernize it, but get some fresh blood on the team and listen to some new ideas.

turok4937d ago

"readies the shotgun"

now thats something that isnt necessary.

wingman32x4937d ago (Edited 4937d ago )

Skyward Sword is looking good. It'll be interesting to see what they do with it. There seem to be a lot of new gameplay mechanics this time. This is the first zelda game for the Wii. People forget that Twilight Princess was a port from the Gamecube.

I'm really hoping that Skyward Sword will bring some fresh ideas.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4937d ago
Edward-Kraken4937d ago

None. Dante is now dead. I dont want to see any more emo chain smoking freaks. Imagine emo Link. Ugh.

Let Japan be Japan and the west be the west.

SeraphimBlade4937d ago

Yes, because we gained so much deep insight into his actual character from a 2-minute CG trailer

Edward-Kraken4937d ago

When did I talk about the personality of that Dante from DmC? I was talking about his looks. Try asking tons of DMC fans and I assure you about 80% of the answer you'll get as to why they hate him is because of his looks. There were article months ago that even most of the japanese dont like him. The original Dante is one the most stylish and iconic characters in gaming history, you CANNOT deny that.

Baka-akaB4937d ago

actually we did . he is already smoking when he clearly shouldnt , and looks awful in a game about BOTH style and gameplay

dredgewalker4937d ago

That 2 minute cg trailer was the most painful thing I've ever watched in my whole life. I am really positive that even the combat system is gonna be shallow looking at how Enslaved turned out. I don't want a western DMC and I don't want a smoking emo-Dante! Some games aren't meant to be western styled cause they would lose their uniqueness.

Redempteur4937d ago (Edited 4937d ago )

Yes i did ... there were lots of informations on the main character itself including some of his habilities and his style ..

First they made dante smoke , second they changed his look , third they make him a sadist with the creatures .. no sword in sight.
fourth no "over the top" attitude

those trailers have ONE purpose , to get fans excited by hinting on what they intend to do. and it suceeded into doing the opposite .. make every DMC fan angry

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4937d ago
Akagi4937d ago

And yet you have Twilight avatar.

Edward-Kraken4937d ago

Man I regret changing my username believe me. Totally regret it. I'll change my avatar one of these days.

Show all comments (48)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ69d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia69d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73069d ago (Edited 69d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6969d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y69d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot68d ago (Edited 68d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex68d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y67d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

RNTody43d ago (Edited 43d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07228d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde227d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude228d ago (Edited 228d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992228d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme228d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992228d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313228d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69228d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor228d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69228d ago (Edited 228d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack228d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface227d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)