180°
10.0

GM+ | Kinect is Ferociously Entertaining, Time Consuming, Tiring, and Innovative!

"The Kinect is ferociously fun, exciting, loud, and hysterical. This toy is surely a revolutionary item that will spice up any gamers den, or living room with the introduction of new gameplay mechanics that push the envelope of gameplay."

Read Full Story >>
game-medic.com
DigitalRaptor4947d ago

Only the ignorant would call Kinect innovative.

And revolutionary? oh boy who is this journalist?

darkcharizard4947d ago (Edited 4947d ago )

Kinect IS innovative. Can you name anything like it before?

...

...

Stop googling now. Just because it has bad games, doesn't mean you bash it in every other area, you sadistic fanboy.

ConanOBrien4947d ago

so much cries and moans

Suffer from jealousy disorder

mrv3214947d ago

Name me a device that didn't require a controller.

Well the sega activator for ONE
The Eyetoy for second

Watch the sega activator videos... they sound like the Kinect adverts.

FordGTGuy4947d ago

For the millionth time the Eyetoy can not do what Kinect can, at all.

Game-ur4947d ago

You serious?

Kinect is a more accurate EyeToy, like the Move is a more accurate Wiimote.

Raoh4946d ago

that is pretty much my stance as well.. i'm not sure why fanboys are fighting it..

move is a better wii

kinect is a better eyetoy...

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4946d ago
MasterOfThe12Blades4947d ago

Matthew Stenquist
"Hey there! I attend L.A Film for Video Game Production & Programming, Gnonomon Online for Animation, and I'm Seventeen. Please don't call me a journalist , I'm a blogger, not a video game journalist because I do not encompass the arrogance in my personality to stoop to the level of a grammar nit-picking nazi, cheeto stained fiend. "This is my hobby, I write, and enjoy it."

120FPS4947d ago

What so because you dont agree with the reviewers comments, you are right and he is wrong - That my friend is just a form of fundamentalism

Nob head

DigitalRaptor4947d ago (Edited 4947d ago )

Perhaps I should've just written: "The author can't have heard of the EyeToy/PS Eye then if his statements hold true."

That might've gone down better.

Just because Kinect is more advanced doesn't mean it's innovative or anything close to revolutionary.

@ darkcharizard
*sniggers* EyeToy?

I never doubted Kinect as a multimedia device, but as a gaming controller it's pretty redundant and backwards in its execution.

Microsoft should be concentrating on developing PC applications for Kinect rather than wasting it on crappy games with a flawed and limited control scheme.

EVILDEAD3604947d ago

Microsoft should be concentrating on developing PC applications for Kinect rather than wasting it on crappy games with a flawed and limited control scheme

Not even close..they hit it out of the ball park with Kiknect. Own it and it's perfect for consoles. YOU may not like the games..so YOU don't have to buy it.

People like me had an absolute blast with it..iy may not be for everybody..but Halo Reach and Gears of War isn't for everybody either. Wasting the tech on PC applications wouldnt replace a mouse.

I owned a Eyetoy back in the day and this thing surpasses swatting bugs in every way. The masses will love ot in the real world..the haters will complain on the internet..

Win-Win for Micrsoft

Evil

Wh15ky4947d ago

"People like me had an absolute blast with it"

Had????

Novelty worn off already?

10thnightvolley4947d ago

that right there is what most pppl will say coz most ppl are not a tech savvy.. and to most house holds and kids kinect is all that and more. that just what is going to be said..

DigitalAnalog4947d ago

The Kinect rates an A+ for awesome development, innovative, and fun skills that push the envelope for game development, as well push the boundary of what motion games should be."

"Sure, the Kinect may be a vamped up version of Eye Toy that came out a few years ago, but this is a whole new console add-on that really tighten the loose nuts & bolts that the Eye Toy had. Sure, some would not call this innovation, but to those who aren't narrow-minded the Kinect foretells of a new era of gameplay that truly can show what the next level spectrum of game development is."

-End statement

n4gno4947d ago (Edited 4947d ago )

It's not "journalism", it's just another blog, like the one you could create to tell the world how bad is the new eyetoy (but ps3 fanboyz are not so desperated, or just not paid to do it :))

by the way, it's scary to see delusional fanboyz ignoring the fact that eye toy can do most of the thing kinect game do, and with move (the best tech ! the most accurate) it's far superior (and can play all kind of games, and the best ones ! not only casuals stuff)

Are they just brainwashed, or just dumb ? i don't know, but they are not informed gamers, for sure.

lowcarb4947d ago

If you think Eye toy or even MOve are even close to Kinect tech your in denial. I can assure you it makes both of those techs seem decades old.

DigitalRaptor4946d ago (Edited 4946d ago )

That's because Move has been in development since before 2000, no wonder it seems old.

The only reason Kinect seems much more modern than anything else is because it's the first time people have seen such as high-tech camera device in gaming since the EyeToy, which wasn't all that well marketed. But Move is still tighter and works better than Kinect. Kinect's lack of solid inputs is its own worst enemy!

It might be technically more advanced than the Move in terms of hardware, but it's comparing apples to oranges. And the Move actually has more options than Kinect ever could!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4946d ago
gigaware4947d ago

Yes I agree. Have not felt this way about gaming since NES.

KiRBY30004947d ago

omg kinect statements are getting worse everyday...

Neko_Mega4947d ago

I like the part that says "new gameplay mechanics".

Guessing someone didn't hear of the EyeToy or Playstation Eye? Both have games that work the same way Kinect games do and theirs a game coming out for the PS3 called Kung Fu Live (Whichs looks cool but isn't on my buy day one list).

FordGTGuy4947d ago

Can not do the same things as Kinect, get a clue.

Wh15ky4947d ago (Edited 4947d ago )

Yet most of the games seem to play the same.

strickers4947d ago

Have you played Eyetoy?It plays very similar even if tech is superior

Neko_Mega4946d ago

I was saying they both work in the same way, you put your hand over the icon to choose it.

Seem thing, plus both pick up your movement, the only thing that really isn't the same is the specs of Kinect Vs EyeToy and some of the software is better.

I mean EyeToy needed very good light to even work, Kinect seems it needs ok light.

arragion4947d ago

So is ps2 eye-toy,..

150usd ? gimme a break,..

Belasco4947d ago

Funny, I own a Ps3 and have probably used mine more than you, judging from your CONSTANT posting on N4g. Do you even own a console?

Weaksauce11384947d ago

I know and every 2011 car getting ready to roll off the factory plants are just Ford Model Ts.

Wheres teh innovation?

wenaldy4947d ago

Yea, the author seems misinformed...

Show all comments (48)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia851d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog851d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916850d ago (Edited 850d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

850d ago
CrimsonWing69850d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming850d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79850d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember850d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog851d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop850d ago (Edited 850d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog850d ago (Edited 850d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop850d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic850d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop850d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic849d ago (Edited 849d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 849d ago
Aloymetal850d ago (Edited 850d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic850d ago (Edited 850d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10851d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar850d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10850d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell850d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10850d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72850d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming850d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog850d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming850d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming850d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721027d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1027d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1027d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901027d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1027d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1027d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1027d ago
TheEnigma3131027d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1027d ago (Edited 1027d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1027d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1027d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1027d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771027d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1027d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901027d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1027d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901027d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1026d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)