A COUPLE of months ago, the battle over which of the two competing high-definition formats would replace the DVD seemed to be drawing to a close. Blockbuster, the world's largest video-rental chain, announced that, in future, it would stock only Blu-ray discs in its 1,450 local branches. After all, two out of three customers had been renting Blu-ray titles. Henceforth, HD DVD versions would be available only at Blockbuster's 250 main stores and through its online service.
Many considered the announcement decisive. In the 1980s, when the video war raged over two rival video-cassette standards, the decision by America's video-rental chains to stock only one format tipped the balance in favour of Matsushita's cheaper and longer-recording VHS standard. Within a few years, Sony's Betamax had disappeared from the shelves.
Avoid overspending on NVIDIA's 40 series GPUs, and purchase the powerful PNY GeForce RTX 3080 10GB Graphics Card at its lowest price ever!
A look back at 4A Games' admirably consistent post-apocalyptic shooter franchise.
"While the 20 year anniversary edition of Nordic Game, NG24 Spring's homepage on 21-24 May in Malmö, Sweden, is getting closer, the organizers announced that more than 150 speakers are now lined up for the show." - Nordic Game.
Can't we just let sony win and move on ?
This format war is ultimately costing both groups money. Each time the scale tips back and forth customers will simply back away from both formats. When will these guys like Paramount and others ever learn this?
WOOHOOO GO HD-DVD!!!!! and why the hell would we LET sony win.
is awesome, even regular dvd's look much better
First of all it is a paid article.
"Unlike Blu-ray, which has a much shallower (and therefore a more delicate) data layer, an HD DVD has its digital information etched deeper beneath the surface just like a conventional DVD"
This let me think so. As far as I know only first version (already unexisted) of BR disks had this issue& Now the BR disks manufacturers use TDK's "Durabis" polymeric layer to protect BRD data layer, that 100 times is more durable then the plastic used in ordinary DVDs. Durabilis was used in 2005, so iI guess the author was unable to miss this fact. But if he did, what the hell he writes articles about thing he doesnt know.
While HD DVD disk space is enough in most cases to hold all HD video/audio data for an ordinary 1'45" Hollywood movie, it may face the problem for holding a longer lasting HD video content without significant additional compression - and as a result - the worse picture quality.
As fas as it is known the laserdisk capacity is depended on the density of written data and number of disk layers. The density of data that can be read/written on a laser disk depends on the length of light wave used in a laser in an appliance like HD DVD or BR player/recorder. The HD DVD standard uses the length of lightwave that is unsignifically shorter compared to the DVD standard, while Sony used blue-violet laser that differs much from the DVD. That is decisive factor of BR disks and devices - they cannot be manufactured basing on old technologies and facilities. That means the BR format is more expensive then the HD DVD format. But the advantage of the BR format is the future. The BR technology made possible to "shorten" laser wave even further that enables the creation of BR disks of higher capacity - 100 Gb, 200 Gb and even 500 Gb in foreseeable future. Unfortunately the HD DVD technology is locked in 30 Gb maximum and has no technological reserves.
So I may expect that even if HD DVD win this madia formats fight, it will have the only way to extend the format to meet demands of future technologies - it is to use shorter lightwave lasers, in other words - BR technology.
I think that BR format is more 'honest' to an ordinary consumer - it offer to pay once for the future, while HD DVD - according to my opinion - intermediate or compomising format - may make you pay twice in a few years.