The Worst Review Ever Written. Period.

A recent Rock Band 3 review from a major site was quite simply the worst review ever written and a perfect reason why people should not allow reviewers to influence their decision to buy a game or not.

[lostinplace]

Couldn't agree more. Guys a complete moron.

[King_many_layers]

and that's putting it lightly, I find it hard to believe that they were once my only portal for game information.

Their reviews are getting shorter, more opinion ridden and less informative than they have ever once been. The grading for Games make little to no sense at times when you compare them to their words and final review scores.

Objectivity and a sense of unity in terms of how games of slightly different genres are becoming increasingly distant within their pieces.

It's a sad time when you can read more informative words in a preview than you can in a review.

and here's an example for you:
(Preview)
http://uk.ps3.ign.com/artic...
(Review)
http://uk.ps3.ign.com/artic...

[ico92]

IGN are far to inconsistent for my liking, some of their reviews are either too harsh or too high, take Bayonetta for the PS3 they done the exact same thing that the entire gaming media done for the Orange Box, they over exaggerated, did anyone actually play the orange box it was nowhere near as bad as the media said it to be, the exact same with
IGN's Bayonetta review,
i've played both versions and imo Bayonetta is not 9.6 worthy i wouldn't give it anything above a 9.0 and no the PS3 version isn't that bad, the 360 version isn't even that much better, IGN were being overly critical, their reviews are totally unreliable.

[ChineseDemocracy]

I used to use IGN as a benchmark score that would make or break my decision to buy a game. Over the pass couple of years, however, it's been a downward spiral of inconsistency.

Metacritic is my friend.

[Beefstew4u]

The Orange Box on ps3 was actually pretty bad. I never finished half life 2 because the framerate was so poor in some areas (literally a slideshow sometimes). Portal was playable, but it got pretty framey near the end.

I don't see why people are always harping on IGN all the time anyway. Some people need to remember that a review is an opinion piece. It's what the reviewer thinks of the game. Whether you agree with their opinion or not does not matter.
Listen to some of their podcasts and get to know the IGN editors a little better. They're all great guys (and girls) who enjoy writing about what they think of a game. No fanboyism, no money hats, just their own personal opinions.

[tacosRcool]

IGN has gone on a downward spiral. Most reviews are way too inconsistent and it makes me wonder what incentives are being tossed around for reviews. Metacritic is alright since their scoring system for letter grades is quite unfair. Like a B- = 67. That isn't fair.

[nix]

are we all talking about IGN's review system... wow count me in then.

[InactiveUser]

Orange Box for PS3 isn't 'bad'. Yes the framerate gets out of wack at times.. but that's why it double saves. If it starts getting out of wack, you don't load up the out of wack save file, you load up the secondary file and you're good to go until it happens again.

From what I can remember, Half-Life 2 and Portal each got crazy on me about 5-7 times. That's it. Not fun, but not a deal breaker when we're talking days of good gameplay.. and like I showed above, it's a very simple fix.

[King_many_layers]

That's where my problem is with these types of reviews. The fact that they are so heavily opinion based coupled with the fact that they have stronger and more informative preview pieces than what is provided in their reviews. That is where things become a problem.

Personal opinion will always find it's way into a review, BUT it really ought to just be in touches as to whether something worked or not. I want to read about all that the game offers, if I was new to Videogames I would not have learnt much about New Vegas from that Review. I understand tha it's a sequel, but it's a sequel with so much in it that I feel a 2 page review just doesn't cut it considering the game can last 100+ hours.

[DTMBSquid]

IGN is terrible for reviews. They get some decent news stuff, but their reviews are all over the place

[TheLastGuardian]

WTF IGN? Why just get some random guy to review this awesome game? I haven't seen any written reviews that scored this game lower than a 9/10 and that makes me so excited. I knew this game was going to be good but OMG these review scores are better than any game so far this fall.

My keyboard and game are coming tomorrow and I can't wait. I was never going to buy the Pro guitar but they shouldn't have bashed it in the review like that. There is another RB3 guitar that doubles as a real guitar.

[badz149]

they will give it 9/10 at least! again...Kotick knows this!

[BkaY]

reviews are opinions.... and i honestly dont care.... there are many games which score below 7.. and i still enjoyed em more than games got the free passes..

how i select my games...

1... demos
if i like/enjoy the demo... i normally buy it..

2... fav series.. like MGS, GeOW, GOW etc

buy it day one..

3.. if i am not sure... then i do some research by watching gameplay movies or reading articles... i read reviews just find out what reviewer loved and hated about that game... (dont care about the scores)

peace

[nix]

sometimes i'm smart enough to not pick up my fav franchises... like NFS games. i can smell crap a mile away. q: but i agree with your ways.

[Scary69]

@ BKay
I am with you when it comes to purchasing a game. Also if I am not sure about the game and even after some research I still cannot decide I usually rent the game.(best option) Other then that NEVER EVER base your game purchase on reviews because you will be missing out on a lot.

[avengers1978]

It's IGN who cares.
I stopped listening to what they had to say a long time ago.

[Beast_Master]

That Hillary Goldstein wrote the review? HE IS THE EDITOR AND CHIEF OF IGN... so that should answer your questions as to why IGN is in the dumpster right now.

[wquach]

I've followed IGN closely since the PSOne days and they have definitely been on a downhill spiral - in terms of content and quality.

Former great editors like Dan Adams, Adam Douglas, Chris Roper, and Jeremy Dunham are all but gone and replaced by idiots like Goldstein. Goldstein's been a huge part of the 360 team, and is a clear fanboy of the system in general. Even besides that, you can tell from his review on Rock Band 3 that his writing is not only godawful but contradictory in places.

IGN's written reviews in general have been cut down. The reason why people turned to IGN in the past for reviews (or why I used to go there) was because their reviews were epically comprehensive, spanning possibly 5 or more pages, clearly breaking down and covering every aspect of the game (from design to graphics, sound, etc.)

With the introduction of "Video Reviews," which all but hash bits and pieces of their written review, they've reduced their written reviews to 2-3 pages. That and the editors seem more content with only briefly covering a game. The scores are also extremely all over the place. Big name exclusives/multi-plat scores have typically been inflated (GTAIV - 10, Resistance 2 - 9.5, CoD Modern Warfare 2 - 9.5). More recently now, they've gone in the opposite - downscoring most games.

Now they seem more focused on trying to keep up with up-to-date news sites like N4G by reducing their reviews and upping simple news articles, and providing their "daily update" vids.

Gone are their once hilarious and quality Weekly Update videos that didn't simply regurgitate news, but included original content, etc.

Now they include new opinion pieces which simply spark fanboy wars and are made to garner hits; I was disgusted with Miller's "Mass Effect 2 is better than Uncharted 2" article basically shoving down readers' throats that they MUST accept ME2 being better.

And lastly, the fact that they are able to take Pachter's predictions/rumors as having more weight than even Sony's announcements; recent example being how Pachter predicted only 300,000 Move controllers were sold in the U.S. with IGN reporting the launch based off of that as "modest." But when Sony announced that 1 million units were shipped, IGN didn't retract anything about listening to Pachter - they instead downplayed the million number by questioning its validity given that it was a "shipped" number.

[Beast_Master]

Totally agree. Will add that they now have guys that review games that have no business reviewing that genre of game. For instance, they use to have the RPG/JRPG guy (Ryan Clements) that would do all the RPGs, Racing games would have Roeper, FPS titles would have a guy that was a huge FPS fan. (Greg Miller would stand around being fat til a wrestling game came out)

Now you have Clements, the RPG guy doing Vanquish? Dameon Hatfield who is the weird Techno geek that reviews Iphone and handheld games reviewing the 3d Castlevannia? No wonder why the reviews are inconsistant. This site is falling to pieces. What business does Fanboy Hillary Goldstein have reviewing music games?

[King-Leonidas]

Bobby paid IGN to review it

[Chuk5]

Lately, Ign's reviews have been all over the place. The fable 3 review was pretty damn vague, the New Vegas review stressed how bad the bugs are, and the dj hero 2 review said it wasn't as good as DJ hero 1, yet it's better in every conceivable way. The only reviewer at ign a truly trust is Arthur Gies.

[gaden_malak]

IGN has been downhill for awhile and their site is a pain to navigate.

[imoutofthecontest]

I have no idea why people reference IGN's pages as if it's the Bible of game reviews.

[gaden_malak]

Because they used to be good I guess?

[swice]

They used to be really good

[DTMBSquid]

They used to be OK... never really thought them to be good

[Suicide]

IGN's reviews in general are terrible. Those IGNoramus shall be punished.

[distorted_reality]

Wouldn't that be "ignoramii"?

[ExplosionSauce]

Well technically they have reviewed the same game several times before(music games)
The addition of the keyboard is new though :P

Alright, sorry, I was being d*k lol

[gamerdude132]

Man, Hilary Goldstein is really friggin' IGNorant.

[Silentmerc3nary]

You are so clever.

[xxxAnubisxxx]

Freakin stupid. No other way to put it

[QuantumSponge]

We're to stop living our fantasies through playing real instruments? (to wit: keys and guitar)

I have no recourse but to paraphrase this classic nugget from TVtropes: There's bad writing, there's awful writing, and then there's this level. It's not just regular bad, it's so bad that it somehow broke literature.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/...

[n to the b]

thanks fo the link. funny! further down the page there's the classic line from Billy Madison:

"Principal: 'Mr. Madison, what you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.'" lol.

[TheColbertinator]

IGN is nose diving into hell these days

[imoutofthecontest]

One can only hope.

[soundslike]

meh. bad reviewer but at least its not the same old brown nosing to the highest bidder.

[writersblock]

Say what you want, but the premise of the game is basically buttons appear on the screen and you press them

Fun for parties, otherwise, learn to play the real thing

[visualb]

but a review of the game shouldn't point that out...thats not the point of a game review,

[soundslike]

yet it is constantly done in less obvious situations such as action fans berating rpgs for not being accessible to hack n slashers

[King_many_layers]

Exactly. A Review should be a Fact orrientated and informative peice of writing that is merely Laced with hints of Opinion.

Isn't that the case with most things... for example in a shooter. A figure comes on screen, you determine what it is. you press the required button to kill it. It's just not completely on rails.

[alphafinish]

I agree to a point. but if you are going to complain about word usage and spelling, you should probably spell "grammar" correctly. :)

[n to the b]

back on topic: don't know how much I trust this rant, considering the following excerpt, "You'd think that a site that makes that kind of money would at least hire writers who are educated in grammer and the proper way to relay thoughts to an audience, but I guess not."

I believe that would be GRAMMAR. pretty important to get it right when you're gonna hate on someone else's writing...

but I'll still remain a little skeptical when reading IGN reviews from now on since so many n4g members seem to agree the quality is slipping.

[Bloodraid]

I saw that too and literally facepalm'd... Oh the irony.

[DTMBSquid]

There you go, nitpick away.

[JonnyBigBoss]

I don't like to disrespect other reviews, but I think this article speaks for itself. I am very surprised the editors at IGN didn't catch some of these sentences...

[visualb]

they suck. who on earth uses them for gaming reviews?

[WLPowell]

IGN can eat my dick for all I care (seriously, lets get someone who doesn't like ANIME or FIGHTING GAMES to review Naruto shippuden: UNS 2 and hey he should totally admit that basically saying "this game doesn't stand a chance."... face meet desk)

But IGN's lack of QA just reflects the whole of gaming journalism. If a new Halo comes out still playing like 1999 and Call of Duty's coming out broken gets high 9's expect this discussion to continue rearing it's head...

[Highlife]

getting tired of hearing you should pick up a real instrument. You can say the same thing about most games. Pick up a real gun, play football, drive a real car so on and so on. It is a GAME.

[etownone]

EXACTLY !!!

[xXxSeTTriPxXx]

couldn't have said it better myself.a simple but intelligent response

[swice]

bubz

[cwir]

No you can't say the same thing about most games.
- Pick up a real gun? Really? And what? Go to Afghanistan or wherever and kill or die? Or travel back in time to 1944 and land in Normandy?
- Play football.. Yes you can play real football. With friends. But you can't play in the World Cup or Champions League (or in NFL if you're referring to american one) and score those goals and do those tricks which you do in-game..
- Drive a real car? Yeah, to work or to a store.. I can't drive F1 car or a rally car or a $300000 Ferrari, can I? And I'll probably die if I crash at 150mph..

And with the time and skill required to master GH or RB, plus the amount of money it costs, you can easily learn how to play a real guitar. And play it good. I know it's a game and I'm not saying it's not fun because it is. But if you're playing it because you think how cool it would be if you could play a guitar, then maybe it's a good idea to actually get a real guitar..

A better analogy then yours would be playing a videogame of poker with your friends in the same room. Or Monopoly or something. Why not play the real one then?

[batterystrength]

I agree with cwir and IMO the rewiever made a valid point. He said that it is quite easy to learn to play guitar on it with an expensive plastic controller, but that it would make more sense to actually buy a real guitar if you are already planning on learning it.
I bought myself a real piano for 100€ on ebay. I'm still a real noob on it but it is fun to practise and to become better little by little. It makes more sense to actually buy a real instrument instead of a controller with more buttons preteding to be one.

So Rock Band is a party game, and a good one too; 8.5 is not a bad rating, so what's the fuzz all about? That's better to learn to play real instruments than fake ones? Well yes, it is.

[Duckman33]

Yup. Being a musician myself I just cannot justify spending the time it takes to practice and get good at these types of games on the higher levels. I may as well pick up my guitar and practice and actually get some REAL LIFE skills that can be used in the REAL WORLD, rather than skills at a game that in no way shape or form is comparable to playing an actual guitar. The drums are close, specially with the addition of cymbals with RB2 and GH. But the guitar/bass isn't close at all to playing the real thing. IMO, singing is the closest to the real thing in the game(s) as to where it at least forces you to be in key with the song in order to do well.

That said. I also think it is great and even awesome that there is a video game can generate interest for kids and grown-ups alike that could possibly inspire them to pick up a real guitar, or drums, or mic and learn to play/sing for real. I would like to hope that these games are responsible for the influx of young musicians I see playing and posting their videos on youtube these days. :)

[OhMyGandhi]

that writing makes me feel sick.
jesus, does the reviewers at IGN red pen their work after writing it, or do they hit "publish" due to time constraints.

Weird though how far IGN has fallen...I used to like them, but I do sense this odd trend of inconsistent writing, where a reviewer (like Hilary) seems reluctant to voice his real opinion by appeasing the crowd on some aspects, while completely dismissing others because of something along the lines of arrogance maybe? I can't seem to find the word.

[etownone]

I wouldn't trust one reviewer ... but I definitely base my purchases on reading reviews from several websites. Even if it's just the score.

I work too hard to go out and buy a half ass game like Haze or any Kinect game shown so far without getting feedback first.

[majdees]

"You'd think that a site that makes that kind of money would at least hire writers who are educated in grammer"

I agree with the author but when dissing on others about grammar, don't fall in the same hole. It's GRAMMAR for god's sake.

[xxxAnubisxxx]

funny how you compare an entire article with bad grammar to one letter...

[Bloodraid]

The point is, it's ironic that he bitches about the grammar of another article, and in the sentence where he does so, he fucks up and spells grammar incorrectly.

[Beahmscream]

Alright so who has, in general, the best most fair reviews?

[xXxSeTTriPxXx]

enough said.

[xxxAnubisxxx]

yes, you do. Users who play the game write the best reviews. There's no influence from publishers, so user reviews are the best. You can use this site to make simple ones or elaborate ones: http://www.battlestrats.com...

[Silver_Faux]

Lol nah thats clearly a joke. He hates everything.

if you read a few reviews and watch some gameplay footage you should be able to make up your own mind on a game.

[Relientk77]

I have never actually read an IGN review before (I just look at the score IGN gave the game) but wow I'm glad I don't read reviews for IGN then, thats a terrible review.

[Silentmerc3nary]

IGN isn't just one person, bro.

[Redempteur]

really ? they should hire someone to spell check he stuff they put on their website , then ...

[Bass_fisherman]

IGn doesnt deserve any attention among gamers.

[George Sears]

I dont get why people dis on Rock Band/Guitar hero peripherals. Sure, the real thing is better but that is not the point.

It's like saying, "Why buy COD if you could just buy an AK 47 and off your friends in real life?"

[yarbie1000]

Exactly - You would want a P90 instead lol

[Cliff Forster]

I know every Tom Dick and Harry wants a career reviewing video games, but they can't have it. IGN got there first, and does it better than most sites. No, its not perfect, but this kind of bashing in order to obtain some quick interest for a game blog is just distasteful.

[SuperStrokey1123]

Ok fine defend IGN (i personally like IGN but to each their own right?), thats cool but you simply cannot defend that particular review. Its horrible. Even if you can get past the errors in the review the logic however just isnt there.

[Silentmerc3nary]

Makes sense to me.

[tatsukishi]

Sounds like this reviewer should try picking up a real keyboard.

[SuperStrokey1123]

oh my... that is a strange review. I play RB to be able to pick it up and play a song any time i want. I certainly dont want to spend the amount of time it takes to learn a real guitar as i have no wish to play real guitar nor do i want to play rockband at the highest level either. I play it cause its fun to pick up and play, which is EXACTLY what it tries to do.

[SuperMassiveGav]

The point of this review, I think, is EXACTLY that the new features in Rock Band 3 do NOT try to make songs fun to pick up and play. It tries to simulate real guitar, and that this is pointless.

But it's still fun to play the old fashioned way, hence the HIGH score.

[Redempteur]

ok so they added new things that MIGHT appeal to some people WHILE keeping the old gameplay intact .

so why is this a bad thing again ??
BEcause some people have no intrest for pro mode,it should be scrapped without delay ?
i don't get this logic

[QuantumSponge]

Are people still banging on about that whole "why don't ya pick up a real guitar" nonsense? Guess they still haven't gotten the memo regarding Pro Mode.

[ulissesnascim]

I'm not able to view the full story. Guess it's not online anymore.

[xxxAnubisxxx]

I can see it just fine. Try again, maybe?

[DTMBSquid]

Fine for me, too...

[Der_Kommandant]

What can you expect from a guy with a girl name?

[Tikicobra]

IGN is a good website for news, and their reviews are typically on the money.

This is a childish article.

[ajlopo]

Did this guy actually read the review or just pull out random lines?? Many of these lines were prefaced with other information or clarified after. The one about buying a real guitar...the paragraph actually starts with "A full-stringed guitar is in the works but won't be available at launch." He's talking about waiting for that guitar..

[xxxAnubisxxx]

ummm... maybe YOU didn't read this article, because one of those "random lines" is actually the one about the full stringed guitar being released after launch. It's in there. Don't defend idiocy. The review sucked

[The Lazy One]

what are you on about?

Hilary from IGN says, "A full-stringed guitar is in the works but won't be available at launch."

Flaming troll then said, "Stupid. He also failed to mention that the new, full guitar is being made by Fender (maybe you've heard of them) and will be a complete, functioning guitar both with the game and without."

Hilary's review is still miles better than the review that got jeff gerstman fired.

[Iramo]

doesn't even deserve a facepalm but hey I'll do it anyway

[yarbie1000]

I'll do it with you

[Iramo]

what she said.

[BLAKHOODe]

i'm loving that this ariticle was posted on N4G. i've said it a million times that you can't count on a review (a.k.a. one person's opinion) to determine for you rather a game is to your liking or not. the ONLY way to know is to play the game yourself. unfortunately, too many gamers (and not just gamers, but movie-goers and music lovers) rely too heavily on what a reviewer has to say and, like sheep, follow that person's every word.

this isn't the first time IGN has been called out on their reviews. earlier this year, i believe an article was posted talking about how many games IGN gave a top score of 9.0 or more. that article and this article should be proof enough that if one of the top review sites can be such morons on writing reviews, then it's easy to believe that lesser sites can be just as ignorant.

seriously, folks.. STOP LISTENING TO IDIOTS and decide for yourself what you like.

[SuperMassiveGav]

I'm going to defend that review, having played and reviewed Rock Band 3 myself. This Anubis guy doesn't seem to understand the point the reviewer is making at all, and is just throwing his toys out of the pram because one of his favourite franchises got below a 9.

[SeraphimBlade]

Why are we letting somebody review a game in a genre that he thinks is a waste of time? But doesn't? But does?

To quote Miles Edgeworth: "There were so many contradictions in that statement I thought I was going to pass out!"

[Phil Collins]

IGN has gone way down hill, some seem out of touch and jaded. I certainly don't use them as a reliable source these days.

Deadly Premonition a 2/10??? That game was brilliant, it was intentionally quirky and archaic!

[bobrea]

It's fucking Rock Band, anyone that doesn't know what to expect at this point is retarded. This is the worst article ever published on n4g...ever. See what I did? It's called hyperbole.

[J5Feedback]

If I had a dollar for every virtual soapbox this thread was made up of, I'd be a very rich man. Why the hell do all of you feel the need to rip people apart for something like this?

I understand that it's a pretty poorly written review, but this is just dumb. IGN gets millions of hits a month. That's millions of obnoxious pricks hiding behind their keyboards, feeling like their rinky-dink blog posts represent the 'real gamer'.

You can be entitled to your opinion, but writing a fucking article about it and posting it on N4G? It must be empowering. A poorly written review isn't necessarily idiocy. Taking the time out of your day to criticize others work, however, is just embarrassing.

[Kluv]

His description of IGN is way inaccurate. (The site isn't confusing at all and the review is plastered all over their website)

But

His description of the review is completely correct. I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought that about the review. It was unexpected seeing such immaturity from an IGN review.

[CryofSilence]

The writer of this article needs to learn what a sentence fragment is. The chosen sentences, except for the imperative statements, all have a subject and a verb (an object, contrary to popular belief, isn't essential for every sentence). As spartan and non-descriptive as the original text is, they are not fragments--the last two are imperative statements, so they don't need a subject. I will grant that they are choppy and close to unrelated and contradictory.

[mcstorm]

I agree MoH Alan Wake ect have scored far less than they should do. All reviewers seem to do is give the big named games like GTA Halo GT MW ect 10/10 even when they are no where near a 10/10 game.

I read reviews but dont go off what they say it just gives me an impression of the game.

[floetry101]

"Its actually very pathetic how a lot of you come on here, read the review, and then commence to whine and bitch about how poorly written it is. Who cares whether its poorly written or not? All that matters is whether you like the game or not."

Dear God, are these people actually using IGN as their main source for reviews?

[dagamdagee]

ITT: Haters who wish they worked for IGN.

[turgore]

If I would've written that review in highschool my grammar teacher would have failed me.

"kind of dumb."

F right there. As a 20 something old male I think he would have a broader vocabulary.

[ginganinja]

The reviewer is writing for a specific audience and so uses language accordingly.
'kind of dumb' is obviously more suitable for their style and target audiences taste than something deeper.

[T3MPL3TON]

Sounds to me like most of you have been drinking the kool-aid a bit too long. The Rock Band & Guitar Hero franchises are nothing more than cash cows.. all of you SHOULD pick up a real guitar.. all of you SHOULD want to play a real guitar. Hell most of the artists who give their music to those games hope you pick up a real guitar. This guy gave an honest review and you jump on him because he didn't instantly say, "HURR ROCK BAND 3 IS SO FRIGGEN AWESOME, CAUSE LIKE IT'S ROCK BAND DURR." You guys are worst than sports game players.. You'll keep buying the games so long as they lie to you and tell you it's all new. Welcome to Butthurt-Fanboysville. Population: EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOU.

Now get mad because my grammar is worst than his.

[yarbie1000]

I think most of these review sites offer scores based on how much money or incentives the game publishers give them - I am still trying to figure out how so many sites gave Halo Reach a 10/10

[ginganinja]

1st quote;
using the plastic guitar is fun and because you're learning through a game you'll probably pick it up than if you learned on a real one. But, ultimately, you are still using a plastic guitar if you are serious about learning there comes a point where you might want to think about getting a real one.

2nd quote;
(similar to the first)
you're buying into something that is getting so close to reality that if you're thinking of getting serious with it why not learn on the real thing.

So, in essence, the review is saying that as good as the game is, it's getting to the point where realism is concerned that you may want to think about buying a real guitar instead, as you'll get more out of it.
I think that's a fair point, and hardly worth this page of redundant nonsense.

[wuchong]

http://www.shoeswholesale.u...

----- ~ ¤ ╭⌒╮ ╭⌒╮
╭⌒╭⌒╮╭⌒╮～╭⌒╮ HANDBAG 35$
,））））,''）~~ ,''~）
╱◥█◣ ╱◥█◣ SHOES 35$
｜田｜田｜｜田｜田｜ CLOTH 15$
╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬ 2010 NEW

http://www.shoeswholesale.u...

[yarbie1000]

So has anyone tested this out who has no musical background and started learning how to play an instrument? Curious to see if this can really teach you

[MASTER_RAIDEN]

i still love IGN. theyre the sight i trust.

[RudeSole Devil]

How the hell did this hit 1070 degrees. Who gives a poop

[BLAKHOODe]

i don't read reviews at all as i don't believe one person's opinion should matter. but i do read the review highlights that sites like IGN post after the review with their scores and i look at the emblems that gamespot.com gives it's reviewed games. other than that, i don't care about that person's opinion.

[bigjclassic]

people should have know that IGN review standards are horrible. Look at Mario Kart Wii and Zelda:TP scores, Both games got the shaft even though thy are the best games in those genres currently. Also the GTA4 score is garbage as well.

[Blade66]

lol iv aways thought tht ign was full of idiots