Sequels are seldom done right in my opinion. For the most part I see a sequel as a continuation of an existing story or of a different story in the same world as the last game. However, many times it seems developers see a sequel as a way to cash in and do less work (Modern Warfare 2 I’m looking at you) or they lower difficulty of the second title in the name of “appealing to a wider audience”—i.e. make kids buy it for mo’ money mo’ money mo’ money—hence making a shorter lived, less substantial offering than its original incarnation.
The Dead Rising series has enjoyed a long and storied history over the years, but which game in the series is best?
Over the last week, Jake has been going back to the Dead Rising 2 Off The Record remaster and has been an absolute blast. When he was 15 he first got his Xbox 360 and Dead Rising with it, it was unlike any other experience. It made him wonder though, what happened to the Dead Rising series.
Interesting timing. This retrospective was released just a few days ago: https://youtu.be/Et-cKSrWuc...
They took away the depth and charm of the game that made it fun and interesting, and made it into a generic zombie killing game.
This was the series the got me to buy an Xbox 360. The first one was so good. It still had horror elements. As it went on it became kind of a parody. Never forget getting Zombie Genecider achievement and then restarting the game to get the Mega Buster. That thing was monstrous against enemies.
Some video game weapons are so outlandish they could never realistically be used, and that's why they're on our list of the 10 most impractical weapons in gaming.