490°

Castlevania: Lords Of Shadow Review Scores Round-Up

A round-up of all the scores online and in print for Castlevania: LOS...

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
skyward4969d ago

I'm slightly surprised by all those 9/10s. Pleasantly surprised, however. This just went from off my radar to near the top of my most-want list...

Cloudberry4969d ago

.
I have a feeling it would have great reviews.

ddurand14969d ago

dont understand why some people rely on review scores so much. if the gameplay didnt entice you to begin with, why would a high score justify it?

deadreckoning6664969d ago

@ddurand1- Bubbles. I don't get how all of a sudden you can be interested in a game just because a couple of random critics on the Internet say its good.

number474969d ago (Edited 4969d ago )

or constrict them.. Reviews still hold weight with the sheep of the gaming world.

If you're a gamer, you can tell if a game is going to be any good to you without reviews. Or if its in your ballpark. Just sad.

What is Legitimizing some fat dude's opinion at a desk for $500?

Graey4969d ago (Edited 4969d ago )

I'd also probably say the reason why some do this is because its not so much that the game wasn't interesting to them, more so they were more reluctant to try it out.

Example. On the PSN there are games and movies, that I would never had tried out without the rating system. Usually people have a good judgment on telling if something is crap or not. That being the case the rating system helps people who might say be on the fence or interested but not enough to have checked it out without said rating.

Hope that explains it. Then again I could be completely wrong. This is the perspective from my point of view however.

Update: Just to clarify even further I was getting this game regardless of the rating as I like niche things anyway. Sometimes you just have to venture out on your own and see what the deal is.

plb4969d ago

It's definitely on my list as I have nothing to play till GT5 in November. Still unsure about New Vegas though I may pick that up too depending on reviews.

Christopher4969d ago

Do we need round-up articles when N4G already rounds up the scores?

http://n4g.com/tag/reviews/...

skyward4969d ago

7 reviews in the N4G round-up - 14 reviews in this one...

Hallmark Moment4969d ago (Edited 4969d ago )

*cgoodno* is posting that because he's trying to take advantage of what I posted below in a SDF move hoping emotionally shallow and desperate fanboys will start spreading misinformation. Kratosgirl is already trying to do this assuming they are different people.

Reviewed by: Gavin Mackenzie
http://ps3.nowgamer.com/rev...

Reviewed by: Sam Bandah
http://xbox-360.nowgamer.co...

Redlogic4969d ago (Edited 4969d ago )

what the hell did you just say? that made no sense what so ever. You are always so busy trying to be a fanboy that you forgot to make sense....pathetic. I'm not trying to be a dick about it, but all cgoodno did was post some scores and you took that as some sort of fanboy attack? I don't get it, what did I miss?

edit: forgot to put @hallmark

frankymv4969d ago

Good reviews. Nothing earth shattering but good.

remanutd554969d ago

whats up? why did u block me ?

Neckbear4969d ago

Doesn't changes the fact than it's basically God of War: Van Helsing...

Might be cool, but no way this is a "Castlevania" title, putting aside the name.

...Well, at least it's not as bad as what they did with X-Com or DMC.

AllroundGamer4969d ago (Edited 4969d ago )

more like GOW-Uncharted-Shadow Of The Collossus copy... i hope they had at least some own ideas implemented or otherwise shame on them.

DarkRayneRules4969d ago

And that's why I'm getting Enslaved and not Castlevania. I want epic story, good soundtrack and beautiful graphics. I just can't see Castlevania delivering that. Maybe I've got the wrong impression. Either way I've got to buy and play the rest of the Castlevania games first. I'm way behind.

Graey4969d ago

How about you IDK try the game out, you know get a feel for the game. Not saying comparisons are bad...but you seem a bit harsh towards it. You know pre-judging something before you actually had the hands on experience of it.

Everything is meant to change...sometimes change is good, sometimes bad. Stagnation is worse.

Show all comments (29)
60°
100°

Looking Back to 2010 and the Gothic Castlevania: Lords of Shadow

Edgar writes: "To celebrate the game's 10th anniversary, let's take a look at the gothic world of Castlevania: Lords of Shadow."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
NecrumOddBoy1309d ago

Although being linear, which I wish it wasn't, the first game was absolutely incredible. A mix of old school God of War meets Date's Inferno; I was highly impressed by this title. I heard the sequel was trash so I ever played it but I think LoS was a good example of how a 3D CV game could be.

rgraf771309d ago (Edited 1309d ago )

I was very happy the game was Linear as I hate exploring. The first game was one of my all time favorites and the 2nd game was a total letdown with the lame hub system and stealth sections. Playing in current times sucked too. I wish they would make a remaster of part 1.

magdiellima1309d ago

Good as a game but terrible as a Castlevania. The sequence was even worse.

Terry_B1309d ago

It is a great game, but just like DMC is not a Devil May Cry..this one was not a Castlevania :-)

FreeckyCake1308d ago

Give Castlevania to Igarashi team, and they will nail it as they did with Lament of Innocence and Curse of Darkness.

230°

Terrifyingly Bad: A Look Back At the 3D Castlevania Games

If you decide to play a Castlevania game, make sure it's in 2D. Unfortunately, the series has never been able to make the jump from 2D to 3D successfully. Publisher Konami has tried. Six times in fact, but whether trying to build it in-house or with a third party developer, they never captured the essence of the series or make a good game for that matter. So just to be sure you know what to look out for, here are the six 3D Castlevania games that have been made.

isarai1666d ago

I loved the hell out of lords of shadow, lords if shadow 2 had its moments but just didnt leave as much of an impact on me as the first did, still loved it though. They are both great games IMO, maybe not the best "Castlevania" games but great games in their own right.

RememberThe3571665d ago

Yeah that first game was legit good. Really wish they hadn't taken a step back for the second, this series really looked great in 3D.

AK911664d ago (Edited 1664d ago )

According to one of the former devs of Mercury Steam the higher ups kept interfering with the sequel to the point where the game was nothing like what the dev team had envisioned for the sequel so we got the mess that was Lords of Shadows 2.

PhoenixUp1666d ago

I enjoyed Lament of Innocence and Lords of Shadow. They were entertaining titles and I wouldn’t mind trying Lords of Shadow 2 on PS Now.

Just because a game isn’t GOTY worthy does not mean it’s not worth playing. You could do a lot worse than those exceptional titles.

Abcdefeg1665d ago

Curse of darkness was ahead of its time

Hedstrom1665d ago

I really liked lament of innocence and Lords of shadow! Havent tried the other 3d games. But ive played most of the 2d games!

gangsta_red1665d ago (Edited 1665d ago )

I don't know why Castlevania: Lament of Innocence gets a bad rap. It was one of the best in the series at that time and really was a compliment to the Devil May Cry 3rd person style of action that was getting popular at that time.

I rented it on a fluke and was seriously surprised on how good it was. So much so I went out and bought a used copy of Curse of Darkness and instantly returned that trash.

The problem with Nintendo 64 games is they all tried to mimic the Mario/Zelda 64 style of gameplay and how could they not with that whacky ass N64 controller. Almost every game outside of Nintendo's own felt horrible and incomplete.

Show all comments (26)