Bad Company 2 Vietnam: Brand New Huey Shots Emerged

Some brand new Huey screenshots of Battlefield: Bad Company 2 Vietnam released.

[orange-skittle]

This game cannot go wrong. Its battlefield for petes sake. Anything they put to Bad Company 2 is going to be good. MoH doesnt have a chance.

[SoulMisaki]

Er, you do know DICE has said themselves that MoH is a much more realistic, grounded, and fun experience? And they made BC2.

I have both, (MOH is preordered), and I play both. But MOH is going against CoD in the way BC2 never did.

[Aggesan]

source for that?

[Shackdaddy836]

Its a $15-$20 expansion which was built by the same makers of the MoH mp... How is it in any competition with MoH?

Your comment was just fine before you said that little tid-bit but now you look like a troll.

Buyin MoH, BFBC2:V, and CoD. They all look fairly fun.

[r1sh12]

The thing that I do not understand is why fans of bad company would even buy medal of honor?
Just buy this when it comes out.

@below
DICE have not made any comments about MOH being more realistic, and if they have im sure the mean compared to MW2 etc...

[Sevir04]

MOH is made by both Dice and EA VC so its gonna be good. This game looks sick though!!!

[Solo227]

This is the next product their trying to sell... Grounded, whats more realistic than being arguably the most realistic shooter ever made??? LOL

They made MOH simply to TRY dig into CODs marketshare...

[SoulMisaki]

They made it because EA asked them too, and it's more realistic because it takes everything from BC2, and places it in a realism-based fps set in Afghanistan.

I don't think they can get more realistic than using weapons from that time, both teams having their own weapon sets, true, real life locations, and the amazing realism from BC2 all in one game.

[NateDPG]

I don't think they said that, as far I remember they said MoH is BC 2 light

[SoulMisaki]

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

That's where they say it. Just watch the interview.

[BARF]

moh is not realistic, neither is bfbc2. moh is a cod clone at its finest.

[dkgshiz]

After watching a few new videos of MOH. I think I'm going to buy it. The beta was extremely disappointing to me. It looks though that they made huge improvements to the MP though since then. The SP looks really solid.

[SpaceFox]

Dont fall for their tricky marketing. Of course the videos of MOH look good, they stage the gameplay videos and touch up the trailers to make it look better than it actually is. They did the same with BC2 which honestly, didnt live up to the hype.

You've played the game, you didnt like it, what's there to find out? If you really want to see if this game is right for you, play the open beta coming out soon that's apparently representative of the full game (so why even call it a beta when nothing is being tested and the game is a few weeks from release?).

And if SP is what you're interested in you might want to wait for reviews. I remember when I saw the BC2 SP trailer, I almost shit my pants at how awesome it looked. And after actually playing BC2's SP, wow I was disappointed.

Just my 2 cents mate. Looks can be deceiving.

[StarScream4Ever]

Awesomeness! Can I please haz F4 Phantoms? :D

[SpaceFox]

Hehe, I wish. BC2 wont be getting jets in any way shape or form. Engine limits the size of the maps too much and none of the Vietnam maps will be large enough for jets, I can guarantee you.

Hell DICE won't even increase the flag count past 3, they say it's because with 24 players the action will be too sparse. Bullshit, since 1943's maps each had 2 deployments + 5 flags, with 24 players, planes and constant action.

[M0t0rBreath]

The is the design behind BC2. Small maps, I would say more infantry focused. It's not that the engine can't do it. You just mentioned 1943 which had 5 flags, deployments, planes, vehicles. It's the same engine used in BC2.

BF3 will have a different design as well. Most likely similar to BF2, after all, it's a sequel.

[hmmmm]

and there is one map that has 4 flags in BC2, i don't remember the name as i don't play conquest very often but it looks like an old ship yard.

Also, every conquest map in BC1 had 5 flags and that game was also limited to 24 players.

[SpaceFox]

You should know better Motorbreath. ;)

BC2 runs the same engine as 1943, but it has better graphics and significantly more destruction. 1943 didnt have large 2 story buildings, buildings didnt collapse, and it didnt have microdestruction.

BC2 CANT have maps big enough for jets, they've said so themselves.

Every game's design revolves around the engine and its limitations. BF3 will have a different design because they're revamping the engine and optimizing it for larger maps, more players, faster workflow and everything else that gives BF3 the potential to be awesome.

[M0t0rBreath]

Well 1.5 can't. Since it's not really optimized that well. FB2 is going to be all that 1.5 isn't.

For BF3, I wouldn't mind having limited destruction to allow for high player count, big maps, lots of vehicles, etc.

[tbone432]

I should pick up BC2.

[sak500]

Great i hope all the songs will be there for the radio.. that got me hooked on to "somebody to love". Can't wait for this one. Already topped up my MS points.

[BARF]

i hope this game isnt a haven for campers like bfbc2. the campers sniping, spamming mortars and not helping the team at all are why i quit playing. BFBC2 was easily my biggest let down of the year, if not this whole gen. bc2 is a perfect example of how the community ruins the game.

[sak500]

Not much you can snipe when in dense jungle you can't see 10 feet from your face.

[Bolts]

Seeing how nobody bought BF Vietnam I think BC2 Vietnam could share the same fate since this expansion looks like a glorified mod nothing more.

[sak500]

You must be crazy, i always found full servers during my almost a year of playing the game. I only left it to go for BF2.