470°

Paramount Drops Blu-ray Support; Does Not Include Spielberg Movies

Despite selling more movies on the Blu-ray format, Paramount has announced today that they will begin supporting HD DVD exclusively. This move, rumored to be driven by a $150M exclusivity deal with the HD DVD group, comes after Paramount began favoring Blu-ray releases with higher quality video encodings and more HD features. The deal covers all of Paramount's properties excluding those directed by Steven Spielberg.

The move will inevitably lengthen a format war which should never have been. Consumers will unfortunately suffer the most, as they will be forced to support a format which is being supported by corporations instead of consumers. No word was given as to how long the exclusivity agreement is for, but rumors indicate through 2008.

xfrgtr6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

"Sources tell me that Paramount, which has been publishing on both Blu-ray and HD DVD, will receive $50 million to continue publishing in HD. "The deal is that anything they release on Blu-ray, they'll have to release in HD," a source told me. In addition, the studio will give the HD format exclusivity for some older titles in its catalogue".On Dreamworks: "But the $100 million from HD-DVD for DreamWorks Animation is a huge $$$ infusion for that still struggling public company. Sources tell me the money is for "promotional consideration" on future titles beginning with Shrek The Third. "Exactly what 'promotional consideration' means is that if there's an ad running for the Shrek The Third DVD, it'll mention that the pic is available on HD as well Blu-ray". I don't call this Exclusive,but the money is for their continuing support of the DEAD hddvd.Microsoft gives HD DVD group money through Toshiba, and then they hand out money to studios to 'keep those studios publishing on HD DVD' - does anyone else not see that HD DVD is dead - it's on life support.

sticky doja6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

So how is it HD DVD is dead or on life support. If you want to watch Shrek the 3rd and Transformers, buy an HD DVD player.

coolmatrix6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

Do you ride the short yellow bus to school? Not a knock, just a question!

MS sell the most expensive, unreliable DVD player (Elite) in the world at $479.99 and another DVD (HD) at $179.99 for a TOTAL : $659.98.

Am I missing something?

PS3 is for $499.99 or $599.99 complete HiDEF experience with all the features MS 360 DVD players have.

So you play games ONLY on the MS DVD. Want to watch HD, buy another expensive DVD (HD-DVD) player.

SO MS IS SELLING SUCKERS TWO DVD PLAYERS: one low end and one in HD!

Wow! Way to go. A sucker is born every second. Now I know why!!!!!

But wait, you will be buying another Xbox in what 3 years with no Backward Compatibility. WOW! Every second.

Milk, milk, milk.

Oh yes, MS is forcing consumers to buy HD DVD!

I did not buy any 360, will not buy VISTA and heck not even wasting my time with MS and Paramount. If I really want SHrek the Third that bad, I will watch it on DVD on my PS3.

360 Elite + HD DVD addon + LIVE + another XBox in say 3 years. WOW!!!

Milk, milk, milk, milk em dry.

MS meeting: How do we increase sales of our products?

People want to watch movies in HD, yes Mr Bill. We need a way to make them buy our HD DVD addon and then also buy and Xbox and Live. What can we do team? Think, think!!!!

A sucker (ahem customer) is suckered every second!!!!

ALI-G6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

MICROSOFT DO NOT GIVE MONKY A@@ ABOUT HD DVD .
ALL THEY DOINTG IS FCUKING UP BLUE-RAY > taking the biggest advantage the PS3 will have if Blue-ray won the format
milk milk milk your dumb useless unreliable brain ( if you had brain you would not bought BS3 and forced with BLUE-RAY format )

another xbox in 3 years goooooood news i am the first to buy it
becuase xbox = GAMES GAMES GAMES

A Man6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

Now all the sony fanboys will get angry... Once again you live with the truth. HD DVD will win in the end, better quality, better movies and more surport in the long term. If Blu-ray goes under the player in the ps3 is useless. Get ready for a HD DVD ready PS3. LOL

IRISHCALIBER6112d ago

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Viacom Inc's Paramount Pictures and DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc said on Monday they will release their DVD titles exclusively on HD DVD, the high-definition digital movie format whose sales have lagged those of rival Blu-Ray so far this year.

Paramount, which distributes DreamWorks Animation's DVDs, settled on HD DVD after determining that the format offers better quality and lower-cost players and lower manufacturing costs, the studios said in a statement.

Two competing technologies -- HD DVD and Blu-Ray -- are waging a battle to dominate the next generation of DVD players that promise crisper video, audio and in some cases more content in the multibillion-dollar home entertainment arena.

Paramount's first releases under the exclusive HD DVD program include "Blades of Glory" on August 28 and the summer blockbusters "Transformers" and "Shrek the Third," due for release later this fall.

The exclusive agreement does not include movies directed by Steven Spielberg for DreamWorks SKG, which is a Paramount unit. His films are not exclusive to either format, Paramount said.

The agreement does include all other movies distributed by Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks Pictures, Paramount Vantage, Nickelodeon Movies and MTV Films.

HD DVD was developed by Toshiba Corp and backed by Microsoft Corp and is supported by Warner Bros., Universal Studios, New Line Cinema, HBO and the Weinstein Co.

Blu-Ray discs use Sony Corp -backed technology and are supported by most of the major U.S. movie studios.

Both formats came on the market last year. Blu-Ray outsold HD DVD by 2 to 1 in the United States in the first half of 2007, according to Home Media Research.

An estimated 3.7 million high-definition discs have been sold, including 2.2 million in Blu-Ray and 1.5 million in HD DVD through the end of July, Home Media Research said last week.

Gamespot-equals-EGM6112d ago

Will be interesting to see what Blockbuster does.

Blockbuster ***has*** to stock Transformers and Shrek 3 in HD in its brick and mortar stores. If they don't, they're leaving so much money on the table. My guess is they'll probably just make exceptions for those two movies (and any other big Paramount movie coming out on HD-DVD).

cuco336112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

is more proof on my theory how HD DVD is far from dead and this 'war' is far from over. studios will either go multiformat or switch sides (like you see here with paramount)

be ready to embrace both formats since they are here to stay. the only question i have is how will sony's camp handle the BR side? will they bastardize it like they did with UMD and MiniDisk or allow it to strive as a neutral format in high def viewing?

to below: this is a tad side tracked but ofr HD DVD player i wouldn't own the add on. it would be HD-A2 unless i hold off for the 3rd gen toshiba player.

eLiNeS6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

The Disagrees are on the high in here, just showing a lot of pissed PS3 fandroids. Disagree all you want but we've been saying it all along, HD-DVD FTW!

What will Fony do with 4 million PS3 they will have to recall?!?!?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH A HA

Kaneda6112d ago

I think Transformer produced by Steven Spielberg...but directed by Michael Bay...

So is it only HD-DVD exclusive?

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 6112d ago
drtysouf216112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

and its probably safe to say that this format war is going to last a lot longer. Good thing i have a PS3 and HD DVD add on for my 360 in the mean time but still having two formats isn't a good thing.

http://www.reuters.com/arti...

Looks like i'll be getting Transformers on HD DVD.

sticky doja6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

Transformers is tha shiznit.

Edit: Whoever disagreed, can you tell me why you didn't like Transformers? Chicks weren't hot enough? Action not crunk enough? Optimus Prime not cool enough?

blusoops6112d ago

Transformers was produced by Spielberg, so I guess I'll be getting this one on Blu-Ray anyway!!! LOL

Bnet3436112d ago

for having a playstation avatar and not being a fanboy.

Delive6112d ago

http://www.allmovie.com/cg/...

24th name down on the list of the Credits for Transformers.

Steven Spielberg - Executive Producer

eLiNeS6112d ago

No Blu-ray for you, it says in the press release it will be on HD-DVD, "Paramount Home Entertainment will launch its exclusive HD DVD program with the release of the blockbuster comedy hit "Blades of Glory" on August 28th and follow with two of the biggest grossing movies of the year "Transformers" and "Shrek the Third"."

DeadIIIRed6112d ago

Oh and you get Tom Cruise too. I'll admit it hurts a little, but at least we'll get Superbad, chika chika.

blusoops6112d ago

Hmmm...well even if it doesn't come out in Blu-Ray, I'll still get Transformers on regular DVD and have my PS3 upscale it to 1080p. Not as good as Native 1080P but pretty dam close!

MikeGdaGod6111d ago

i can get Transformers on dvd and upscale it through the ps3. no need to buy an EXTRA player just to do that.

i think Paramount is just trying to get as much money as possible from whoever. wont work with me. i already got it on bootleg....ha!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 6111d ago
Loudninja6112d ago

I guess this will go down as one of the mistakes in this war.I mean really, how can they be so stupid First of all, there movies already sold better on blu-ray.And second, Blu-ray sold more has a whole.

No where does it say they will drop Blu0ray

eLiNeS6112d ago

"Paramount Pictures, a unit of Viacom Inc. (NYSE: VIA and VIA.B) and DreamWorks Animation SKG (NYSE: DWA), each announced today that they will exclusively support the next-generation HD DVD format on a worldwide basis. The exclusive HD DVD commitment will include all movies distributed by Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks Pictures, Paramount Vantage, Nickelodeon Movies and MTV Films, as well as movies from DreamWorks Animation, which are distributed exclusively by Paramount Home Entertainment."

Antan6112d ago

So a combo player it is then!! lol.

sticky doja6112d ago (Edited 6112d ago )

"The move by the two studios will include the upcoming blockbuster "Shrek the Third" and all movies distributed by Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks Pictures, Paramount Vantage, Nickelodeon Movies and MTV Films, as well as movies from DreamWorks Animation, which are distributed exclusively by Paramount Home Entertainment.

Paramount previously released movies in both formats.

"Part of our vision is to aggressively extend our movies beyond the theater, and deliver the quality and features that appeal to our audience," said Brad Grey, chairman and CEO of Paramount Pictures, a unit of Viacom Inc. "I believe HD DVD is not only the affordable high quality choice for consumers, but also the smart choice for Paramount.""

Looks like the war is FAR from over.

Edit: @Sony Loyalist
I doubt Microsoft forked the bill, since Toshiba owns HD DVD. Also on thinking the 360 will be third, it very well could be, but if it is it won't be third by very much. There will be no winner of this Console war like there was with the PS2 era. All 3 systems are too good for that to happen.

xfrgtr6112d ago

"$150M exclusivity deal with the HD DVD group":LIFE SUPPORT

The Brave 16112d ago

hey sticky wake up dude!this is just microsoft pooring money into this war that they soon will loose.all signs point to a blu victory.the problem is the longer it lasts the better for microsoft.ther loosing the format war ,they will soon loose the lead in the console war ,and come a distant third by the way.

sjappie6112d ago

they're just one off the companies that back it, if anything, Sony has a hell of a lot more at stake with Bluray.

Show all comments (230)
70°

Best GPU for V Rising in 2024 - our top picks reviewed

Here's our guide to the best GPUs for V Rising in 2024, now that the game is out of early access - the best from Nvidia, AMD, and even Intel.

got_dam4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Slow news day, I guess.

70°

MSI releases new RTX 4060 Ti bundle that fans of Monster Hunter will love

MSI celebrates the 20th anniversary of Monster Hunter with this unique bundle that features a matching RTX 4060 Ti and game controller.

290°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake1d 16h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing1d 12h ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake1d 12h ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

JackBNimble15h ago

MS has educated financial advisers, they knew there was little chance to recoup the 70billion just to break even on the Activision deal let alone whatever other nonsense is going on in MS.
This whole thing was to corner the market for leverage.

thesoftware7301d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman1d 12h ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake1d 12h ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus231d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows1d 11h ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance1d 11h ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier1d 11h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit1d 11h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_1d 6h ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy851d 5h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

fr0sty19h ago

The earnings call only showcased how dire the situation is... Even with ABK and Bethesda, they still couldn't make enough to keep investors happy, gamepass subs are stagnant, and hardware sales are tanking.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 19h ago
thesoftware7301d 9h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake1d 9h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow1d 9h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

Chevalier23h ago

Again at which point did Playstation have a $3 trillion company shift the market with a giant purchase?

"But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue."

Lol. No they didn't. Increased revenue was ONLY due to adding Activision Blizzard revenue in. Growth was only 1 percent. It's idiots like you that have no idea what they're talking about is why Xbox isn't better than it is. You guys just make excuses continually.

If Xbox got so much profit then why did they stop announcing hardware numbers? Why did they stop announcing Gamepass numbers? Oh right because they're NOT profitable. Their sales in every category has dropped off the face of the planet. It's why Spencer will be closing more studios and canceling upcoming projects too.

The Wood16h ago

How can they be profitable when they're not selling enough hardware, software or subs. You need take a seat on this one my friend unless you can prove you angles

jwillj2k415h ago

Sony didnt shut down the studios you mentioned after they made last of us or ratchet and clank or destiny. Cutting jobs is not equal to closing studios. Sony cuts are a candle in the sun of Microsoft’s closures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 15h ago
WelkinCole1d 4h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel19891d 2h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

thesoftware73013h ago

@ Michiel1989

Exactly this!

I'm reading these comments, and it's mesmerizing how off-base most of them are.

I posted a few comments above, and their rebuttals have nothing to do with the points that I presented; when they start doing that, I just ignore them because, at that point, they're debating all over the place.

Profchaos19h ago

30 more like 70 to 80 plus 7 for Bethesda

Tzuno14h ago

meanwhile everything turned woke an inevitably went downward, i'd say it serves them well if they promote such kind of approach, mwuahahahahahhh!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 13h ago
anast1d 12h ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor1d 12h ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows901d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander19721d 11h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody1d 11h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (47)