F.E.A.R. Coming To The PlayStation 3?

Following all the news about F.E.A.R. from yesterday, I have one more interesting bit of news about the PC-to-console port. Besides coming to the Xbox 360, F.E.A.R. will also be coming to the PS3. Upon a visit to the ESRB website, besides finding new Xbox Live Arcade titles, I found a listing for F.E.A.R. as a PS3 title. Perhaps this is the news that will be the big announcement next Thursday when joinfear.com hits zero hour.

Read Full Story >>
videogamejocks.com
TheMART6496d ago

First off, I don't think ESRB is a site to get a scoop on for Vivaldi. I rather say it's a slip-up from the website and done it wrong.

I guess otherwise the gameproducer would have been the first one to mention this.

Untill I've read something somewhere otherwise, I guess it'll only be on the 360

achira6496d ago

ppl should ignore this kid.

TheMART6496d ago

Well actually I give you facts again unless you, who should be ignored actually.

Vivendi has stated nowhere that a PS3 version will be made period. So keep dreaming. If you want F.E.A.R. on a console go buy a 360

zypher6495d ago

"Vivendi has stated nowhere that a PS3 version will be made period."

well so. Ubisoft has stated nowhere that Assassins Creed is coming to the 360, but that hasn't stopped the hoards of 360 fanboys from proclaiming that it will.

TheMART6495d ago

Again things are different there:

Actually AC was shown on X05 first on the 360 running. Ubisoft themselves also stated something on all questions about it. They said, at this point in time other versions are not announced. If it wouldn't come to 360, or let's say it would be a PS3 exclusive they would have said: "AC won't be on 360", or "AC is an PS3 exclusive". After numerous questions they still didn't say these sentences.

I guess the game running last year on a 360 says enough. They haven't said they stopped that proces, nothing cancelled is still coming in my opinion. It's more proof then only mentioning something on a ESRB site period

zypher6495d ago

and have you read ANYWHERE where it specifically says that FEAR ISN'T coming to the PS3? i have no doubt that Assassins Creed is coming to the 360...eventually. but still, i'm not holding my breath until i have some concrete evidence other than fanboys playing on words. but even still, should AC eventually come to the 360 i'd STILL get it for my PS3, for the same reasons i'd get FEAR for my 360 even if PS3 got it; because those games would be available on those respective systems FIRST. so, if the ESRB lists FEAR as a PS3 game, then let the Sony fanboys have their moment to hope and wish; its no different than you hoping/wishing that AC comes to the 360.

and also, just because AC was shown at X05 doesn't mean that it couldn't have gotten canceled. its unlikely that 360's AC got canceled, but it isn't implausible

TheMART6495d ago

It's to soon after F.E.A.R. could be on PS3 when F.E.A.R. 2 (it will get another title though because Monolith doesn't own the brand) will be done next year. That's why I think F.E.A.R. won't be on PS

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 6495d ago
achira6496d ago

this is old news but a nice too. but i played this game on pc, so there is no need for me.

TheMART6496d ago

which news is old? There is no announcement for F.E.A.R. on PS. If you have links of that old news that Vivendi says it will, drop them. Fact's please

achira6496d ago

haha theMart you are a joke. this game comes to the ps3. go make suicide now. lol

TheMART6496d ago

Again achira, no facts. But I expect nothing else from a 10 year old kid that buys toys=playstation

If you ever grow up, you'll buy stuff for adults like the 360

Gamer136496d ago

Dam whos nows i rather the 360 version, it says its coming the 360 first so 360 version for me.

IM OUT.

Show all comments (51)
60°

A great F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R. leapt out from behind the TV to scare gamers witless and ruin their underpants in 2005. Amalgamating elements of Hong Kong action films like Hard Boiled with the Japanese terror of The Ring, Monolith hit the nail(gun) on the head. Apart from a large number of grey corridors, it was a tremendous game and one that has had many playthroughs.

Read Full Story >>
thunderboltgames.com
10°

25 Things About Me: Point Man of F.E.A.R.

Between battling Replica soldiers and keeping in touch with his family, Point Man took some time to off of F.E.A.R. operations to talk about his life behind the scenes. Although Point Man could not provide any real personal information and didn’t seem to have much of a personality, he did give us some tidbits about his likes, dislikes and opinions about his missions. We had to get the best typist in the industry to keep up as the interview went really, really fast.

Read Full Story >>
gamepodunk.com
Dead_Cell5050d ago

This has to be the worst article in written existence ever written.

330°

Lamest Video game achievements

The Merriam-Webster'a dictionary website defines an achievement as a "successful result brought about by hard work." However, the following achievements could not be classified as either being considered successful or the result of hard work, mostly since these achievements are boring.

Read Full Story >>
gogaminggiant.com
Murgatroyd75142d ago

Personally, I think most achievements are lame. But for me, nothing is worse than ones that require you to either watch the opening sequence, do the tutorial, or watch the ending credits. I also hate story-based achievements. It's so silly to give an achievement for doing things that have to done in order to advance the storyline. I think the Half-Life 2 achievement is clever. Besides, it's not the points that matter; it's the fact that you did it in the first place. I don't think points should be rewarded for achievements, but maybe that's just me.

zornik5142d ago

Don't forget Quake 2......the full version was a bonus game with Quake 4.You get achievements after every chapter (around 8) with........0 points.

iamgoatman5142d ago

I'd have to say the achievement for watching the credits in Assassins Creed. I just left it running whilst I got something to eat, got back and 50G. Definitely earned that one, that sandwich didn't make itself.

Also any online achievements in general, especially in games with terrible multiplayer.

SPACEBALL 15141d ago

cod waw gave away a 0 point achievement for reaching tenth prestige...

BISHOP-BRASIL5141d ago (Edited 5141d ago )

Where do I sign?

I don't have a 360, and don't know the achievement system deeply, but I'll just assume that what I'll say is reasonable for both.

It's totally bull in an age where I still have to get most games way after they release just because in it's launch there where like 5 other tittles that I wanted more, I barely can complete the trophy list. Take Burnout as and example. Can't get that 8 player meet in baseball stadium simply because it almost never show up and when it does, other player will let the time run out. How cool is that? A trophy you'll be expanding many hours waiting to have the chance to complete and you have no guarantee that you'll get it, even doing the right thing...

Also, since I mentioned Burnout, what's up with that trophy that request the Eye camera? It's pretty dumb to add a trophy, necessary for that platinum, that need a totally optional (and unnecessary) peripheral.

And what happens when everyone left the game? I still having problem trying to get an online match in Brutal Legend (a shame, the strategic batle in the game is GREAT).

Some single player trophies are also dumb as them depend on pure luck. Like that Demon's Souls max bladestone forged weapon... The weapon itself is a piece of crap, the pure bladestone will take you days (or minutes, that's how random it is) to drop and the skill involved, if any, is patience.

Also sucks for gamers that don't play online as they also buy games that have an online part purely for the single player segment. Arguable maybe because trophies are an online comparative feature, but I would argue that some people still like to make 100% of the game for the pure fun of it.

Those were all great games for me, but this online achievements/trophies shouldn't be there or, at least, don't count any point/don't count toward the platinum trophy. That's the reason why the only platinums I got for online games are from Uncharted 2 (which only require you to give the multiplayer a try) and Resident Evil 5 (trophies could be done off or online, probably one of the few good decisions in a Capcom game this gen). All of my other online trophies were got as I was playing with friends, not while trying to get anything done.

I'm no trophy whore, I like the system because it adds some replay value to a good single player not capable of saving a bad one) since you can trace some usually simple objectives that will move you to another one or two playthroughs. Really, except for online-only games (Crackdown, Socom, etc), devs should think a thousand times before attaching games to trophies or achievements that require you to go online, some online trophies are ok, most are just boring and require time much more than skill.

Redempteur5141d ago

do we NEED a article like this every 6 week ??

do we really need that ?

"the most easy/lame achievement/trophies "

Seriously

clembo5141d ago

My Beatles Rockband only came with 3 instruments but I have played it with friends and all 4 of tapping and singing along. But who is this guy to tell us how many people should be playing a game to make it fun? Screw that guy.

Show all comments (10)