With accusations of the 360 version of COD4 displaying better than the PS3 version we were all dismissed when an Infinity Ward developer confirmed that the two would be identical. But now COD4Forums takes a look at a screenshot comparison that shows a distinct difference in the two.
Images after the jump.
MW 2019 is five years old at this point and on previous gen hardware, but it is still the best looking Call of Duty game to date.
MW was an excellent videogame. They messed up Spec Ops big time, but aside from this it was a huge step in the right direction initially. Most notably, at launch it seemed to come from a very cohesive creative vision that was felt across gameplay, to story to art style/visual direction. It was also very notably written by prominent ex-Naughty Dog guys that quit almost immediately before release.
That COMPLETELY dissolved through post-launch content and the full pivot to a "cross-mode" narrative that completely obliterated the cohesion in overall story direction. Warzone then "became" the new face of Call of Duty and the franchise completely removed itself from anything remotely creatively "good". It is a pure money machine, so I kinda get why they're doing it....but I personally completely lost interest.
I would love to see Infinity Ward move off CoD and get to make their own product with full control. They clearly have some massive talent in their ranks but it's perverted by Activision's corporate interests.
Call Of Duty is back with its yearly instalment, but is Modern Warfare 3 breaking new ground, or just a lazy cash grab? The answer may not surprise you in today's review from JDR.
The original Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 games have been drawing players back in
I really hope we get other activision games on GP soon. My dream would be Scarface but I know the license probably expired
None of those games had dedicated servers on console in the first place? Were always player hosted. Did something change?
A MASSIVE DIFFERENCE! I wouldnt have ever thought it! The ps3 version has SOOOOO much more detail!! Lighting is better. For instance, in the closer look look at the fence, look at the windows, the powerlines, the signs, the railings, doors, the background buildings, the trees (the lack of in the 360 version), the detail on the walls............OMG!! No wonder the developers of COD4 were having a nut and responded to the 'doubts of the ps3' so positively. WOW.
I thought itd be better on the 360 version but WOW IM GETTIN DIS ON MA PS3 NOT MA 360 DAYUMMMMMMMMM
there is much more detail in the ps3 version,dunno if the 360 shots from an old build ,but the lighting makes it look like 2 different games.
thank god IW confirmed PS3 version was running at 60fps else xbots would have started jumping around and saying that the ps3 version would have 30fps especially after the extra details in the ps3 version.
The shadows under the car on the 360 version are better.
The trees are in the PS3 are not the same as the ones in the 360 version. You can just make out a plam tree in the 360.
They look like different times of day.
Its hard to say which one is best.
Notice in the 360 image the pre beta sign is part of the in game display wheras on the PS3 version it has been pasted on top of the shot.
Shenanegins??
My guess is that these are from very different builds of the game, the difference is just too big and it is clear that some of the tectures haven't even been added yet on some of the buildings in the 360 shot.