PS3Center writes ~ There is a lot of talk going around the gaming society these days. With great games finally starting to come out over the next few months, who wouldn’t be talking? Especially after the horrible few months we have had with almost no games at all. Well this is all great, but these games are not the hot topic of many forums. Instead it’s Activision, and how their greedy little paws will possibly be milking our pockets with their hit titles such as Call of Duty. Well I’m here to explain why they don’t need it, why it won’t happen, and why Activision needs to cut the crap.
Call of Duty games used to be streamlined experiences, but COD 2024’s UI could be another nightmarish clutter of streaming tabs.
If we’re beating that drum, can we also stop forcing anyone who wants to play only the single player to download Warzone and all updates BEFORE they are then able to do another download from the menu of the single player campaign. I don’t see why I need 150gb of downloads in several ways to play the single player mode only from a bloomin disk which should have that campaign on it already.
The UI is confusing to me because I have not purchased a Call of Duty iin like 8 years .Only bought CoD MW3 because 3 of my friends I have known since to 70s are playing zombies . But I am used it now .
The UI is the least of the franchise many problems these days. But yes the UI is also terrible.
Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.
Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.
Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?
I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.
Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.
The Black Ops Gulf War leaks continue with a list of weapon descriptions giving more info on what you can expect from new and returning weapons.
Well tbh, I'm sure they realised how much money they make from subscriptions with Blizzard's games, and just want to get the same sort of revenue from all their other games. I mean Blizzard accounts for most of their revenue each quarter, with the exception of Q4 (due to COD).
Sure, they don't NEED it but that doesn't mean they don't want it.
They sell almost 20million copies. These games are poorly produced and people gobble them up. Its a sad thing to see while other unique games that are obviously better get passed up because of them. They don't need a subscription. They need some quality control.
But that sure as hell doesn't mean they wouldn't try to go for it anyway.
they charge ya out the ass for a game the comes with dlc and a toy you'll never use. With people killing themselves to get a copy, yeah they don't need a subscription service!