20°
7.5

Pure Nintendo Review: Transformers: Cybertron Adventures

Transformers: Cybertron Adventures tells the story of the war on cybertron between the Autobots and the Decepticons. Check out Pure Nintendo's review to see if this one is worth your time.

Read Full Story >>
purenintendo.com
Copyright5062d ago

Wow, one of the more lenient reviews of it.

80°

Transformers Double Packs Revealed

Activision has shared news about two new Transformers bundles being released just in time for the Christmas holidays. Under license from Hasbro: Transformers: Ultimate Battle Edition and Transformers: Ultimate Autobots Edition will be made available this winter for Wii and Nintendo DS respectively.

Read Full Story >>
electronictheatre.co.uk
80°

Honesty In Game Reviews: Is It Efficient?

Bitmob: A game reviewer ponders the ups and downs of being completely honest with your audience, and wonders 'Should you have to finish a game to review it?'

reaper10505031d ago

A reviewer should finish the game and relay what seetings were used. I don't want to pay 60 bucks for a game and find out that it rules for 50% and uscks for the last 50%.

RockYou5031d ago

even for 70 hour RPGs? How do you beat an MMO?

darthv725031d ago

it just adds a bit more credibility to the review given if the person has beaten (or came really close) the game.

You wouldnt want to read a review of a movie if the reviewer only watched the first half hour or worse...just the trailer.

We all know that in the end however, reviews =/= opinions and those can differ with everyone.

I do like it if a reviewer tries not to give away so much of the plot of the game/movie within the review itself. That can be hard when you know they want to tell everyone that it was col mustard in the library with the lead pipe but they can't.

allyc4t5031d ago

The reviewer should play the game to completion or state otherwise.

If the game is more focused on multiplayer, IE MW2, Reach, MAG, etc. The game shouldn't have a multiplayer review until the reviewer has had a chance to play with the actual community instead of other reviewers.

admanb5031d ago

Yahtzee writes critiques, not reviews. The difference is not a question of quality or class, but one of goal.

The goal of a review is to help a reader decide whether or not he wants to buy/rent/borrow a game.

The goal of a critique is to ask in what areas did this fail, and why; and it what areas did it succeed, and why.

A review talks directly to consumers, whereas a critique talks to the realm of game development as a whole.

Now, whether or not any mainstream "reviewers" succeed as reviewers or whether Yahtzee succeeds as a critic is an entirely different question. But to analyze Yahtzee's efforts as you would analyze a review is a mistake.

Unicron5031d ago (Edited 5031d ago )

This is why I like Kotaku's review SYSTEM, if not always their reviews.

Likes
Dislikes
What was played

Perfect system. No stupid scores or guessing games. A review is an opinion, but I expect it to be at least ACCURATE. Efficient? Well then, its just an impression if the entire experience is incomplete, no?

telekineticmantis5031d ago

These recent Gaming sites today are made up of a bunch of fanboy and nonprofessional journalists Kotaku and Gizmodo for example. Gaming journalism and game reviews were only respectable back in the days when it was just Gamespot and a few other sites.

Show all comments (10)
10°
4.5

Game-Boyz: Transformers: Cybertron Adventures Review

Game-Boyz writes: "I admit that I was a little concerned when reading through the instruction manual; I soon realized that Transformers Cybertron Adventures didn’t feature a button to transform. Created exclusively for the Wii, Transformers Cyberton Adventures (TCA from now on) shares only a release date with its console brethren. Let’s get on with finding out if my initial concerns were justified or not."

Read Full Story >>
game-boyz.com