DelbertGrady5025d ago

In other words old and rehashed by videogameszone.de?

Rot_in_Fail5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

I'm aware of
SCEA-merica,
SCEE-urope,
SCEJ-apan,
SCEK-orea,
SCEF-rance,
SCEA-ustralia
SCEP-oland,
SCES-pain,
SCET-aiwan,
SCEI-ndia,
SCEI-taly,
SCEP-ortugal

any more? :D

Rep your SCE! lol

Gero5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

videogameszone = cynamite (same publisher) >> http://forums.n4g.com/Cynam...

Blackfire_x85025d ago

There's a SCE for pretty much every country as a turn-to representative. But still they just operate under the main companies for that region.

RageAgainstTheMShine5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

http://asia.playstation.com...

Why?
Zero Piracy!
Let us see Microsoft (or the toy company Nintendo) copy something like this shall we?
World Domination?

stevenhiggster5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Dunno if you're trying to be funny or not my sarcasm detector isn't working but there is no SCE{France, Poland, Spain, Italy or Portugal} they are all part of SCEE-urope.

Sorry if it was a joke, but if it wasn't, now you know.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5025d ago
AAACE55025d ago

Looks good and very responsive... but on more than one occasion they have shown people using 2 Move controllers (no sub controller) to play some games!

What's the deal here?

moparful995025d ago

Yes there are some games that CAN utilize two move controllers but, there's only one or two that I can recall which require 2.. But nonetheless, with move sony utilizes options. While you can easily get into the move universe without a large investment you can just as easily expand move to fully take advantage of it.. This is, in my opinion, the beauty of move. For your skeptical fence rider that isn't convinced by move they can essentially get "MOVING", excuse the pun, for less then a 100 dollar investment and if they find that they enjoy the experience they can complete the package without breaking the bank. Add to that with the fact that all first party move titles will be 39.99(CHEAP) and you have a product that sony put alot of thought, design, and creativity into.. People easily forget that sony does stuff like this alllll the time.. This is just one of the reasons I'm loyal to the sony brand. It has nothing to do with being a fanboy it's just that sony's company ethos reflects my beliefs in alot of ways. They're not perfect and I will never claim them to be but, they strive for excellence and they conduct themselves with a great deal of care and passion.. I know there are going to be "THOSE PEOPLE" who read this and automatically write me off as a fanboy and may even try to convince me how evil or bad sony is but the fact is they are a great company despite some of their missteps and they are great because they try to rectify those mistakes and do it honestly.. SO if you don't agree with my statements please respond but don't be ignorant about it...

ActionBastard5025d ago

Sorcery looks like it could be great (and a blast to play). I'll probably re-play RE5 just to check out the Move controls too.

Heisenberg5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Sorcery looks really cool. For someone who doesn't much care for the whole motion controls thing, I'm very excited about the direction Sony seems to be going with it. Just like 3D, motion controls can be used as a cheap gimmick to draw people in to an otherwise sub par story/game while adding nothing to the experience, OR it can be a very cool feature used sparingly and appropriately, helping the user/viewer to become more immersed in the experience.

It all depends on the approach, and once again I'm happy to see Sony pandering to a more adult audience even when the popular thing to do these days is take the easier and perhaps more lucrative (at least in the short term) route of pedaling shovelware to kids and housewives via cheap gimmicks and dishonest ad campaigns.

Zir05025d ago

Does anyone else feel that Sorcery's gameplay looks really shallow?

Zir05025d ago

In what way do you think its deep then?

zootang5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Real time spells? Like the one where he drew a line of fire and then summoned a gust of wind, which he could then direct where he liked.

Any other games have this? Not to mention with motion control?

Sharingan_no_Kakashi5025d ago

So far the game doesnt really require too much skill or strategy. I havent seen any puzzles either. Looks really fun but with how easy it is to beat everyone it might get boring.

That being said the game was just revealed. And I'm sure there's alot more to the gameplay. We'll just have to wait. This is still my most anticipated Move game.

Dac2u5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Zir0, I've felt that way since I saw it at E3. The game looks like it was made to showcase the Move and nothing more. I hope it's better than what we're seeing, but I don't think it will be. RedSteel anyone? Well, maybe not THAT bad, but the same general idea.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5025d ago
BeaArthur5025d ago

I don't think it looks at all interesting either. If it didn't have motion controls nobody would play it.

acky15025d ago

without motion controls nobody would give sorcery a second glance.
with motion controls it looks quite fun but not my cup of tea.

ActionBastard5025d ago

I disagree. The draw is obviously motion, but the arrogant "If it didn't have motion controls nobody would play it." attitude is what's wrong with "gamers". If Limbo was in color, nobody would play it. If Joe Danger had blood, nobody would play it. None of it has anything to do with the quality.

stuna15025d ago

And the sad thing is if it was on the competitions consoles, it would instantly become the best m/c in the universe!
Some people need to give it a rest! Your envy is showing.

BeaArthur5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

Action Bastard...how is that opinion arrogant? It's true, nobody would pay $60 or $50 or however much it's going to cost if it wasn't Move compatible. It would be a $15 arcade title at best.

stuna1...in case your comment was directed at me, I own all 3. Oh, and I'm not getting Kinect either. My envy is showing? Your desperate grasping at an over priced peripheral is showing.

wanaraceu5025d ago

Well the whole point of that game is using motion controls. As they are now able to add extra bits of game play That would make it realy fun

zootang5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

@Bea

Just to point out, Move titles cost $40.

Sevir045025d ago

I don't get you at all. That's just like saying no one would care about RE5 if it wasn't for motion controls.... oh wait!

Ju5025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

" It would be a $15 arcade title at best".

It amazes me, how people can evaluate this after a couple of seconds from a presentation video without having played the game or having been part of that presentation themselves.

Nobody would say that about Demon's Souls. And yet, I am pretty sure, most of the people here didn't care about that game. Certainly not before the game actually released.

Or is the opposite stereotype true: Because it uses Move it must be casual ? /s

BTW: That said, I would like to see a Move patch for Demon's Souls.

n4gno5025d ago

It's a stupid statement, it's like "nobody would play crysis without guns" "nobody would play wii sport without wiimote"

yeah, of course, and ? the fact is the game is playable with move, the more accurate motion controler soon available, so if you like it, buy it, if you don't like it, don't.. nobody cares.

moparful995025d ago (Edited 5025d ago )

You may or may not be right, thats subjective but, this game was designed for move. This is why it works for move, Also I really don't think this is targeted to everyone. It doesn't look interesting to you? Cool I can respect that but, that doesn't dimish the fact that alot of people do. I'm looking forward to it because it has some interesting mechanics like the spell casting and the shape shifting potions.. I mean isn't that we try new games, new experiences right? This feels fresh eventhough it may not be very deep. I'm cool with that and its nice to know this is a 40 dollar game as oppossed to a full fledged 60 dollar game that we demand depth from.. Less risk means higher likely-hood that you might enjoy the game.. Just my 2 cents..

EDIT... Above^^^^ Guys this is the reason there is alot of hatred on this site. BeaArthor gave his opinion, and while it wasnt a well worded opinion, this is how he feels. Instead of discussing and trying to assist him in finding value with the game everyone is spitting venom. Look I want to play this game just as much as you all do but we can be civil about this, yes? I think we could make this site really enjoyable if we acted on this notion.. Sure there are alot of idiots on this site that shouldn't be allowed to comment but instead of stiring the pot and saying hateful things, which propogates into all out battles, why not just ignore and go on or at least use some restraint and logic in approaching these people.. Think about it.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5025d ago
Qui-Gon Jim5025d ago

I don't expect it to be very deep, but it does look like fun to me.

Johnny_Bravo5025d ago

To me it looked like a "cool" version of Harry Potter...if that's possible I don't even know.

bjornbear5025d ago

but I wouldn't say its shallow.

its solid and convincing at best

DigitalAnalog5025d ago

Maybe on a normal gamepad. The fact that motion controls are always being questioned, it's games like these that alleviates any fears or skeptics regarding the device. This is why I prefer playing SHH on the Wii rather on the PSP or PS2.

-End statement

stuna15025d ago

If the shoe fits then wear it! Whether you get one or the other is n concern of mines, but take in cosideration those who will buy one or the other like me I'll buy move because as of now it's showing more promise of what can be done as of now. No grasping at straws or what have you. Really there is no major price differences for what it's shown to do, too bad I can't say the same for the competition and what it's shown not to do!

Keltik825025d ago

I'm going to take that as sarcasm because that is actually to dumb of a comment to make fun of. How in the hell does that gameplay look shallow?

Heisenberg5025d ago

in fact it looks absolutely scrumtrulescent.....

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5025d ago
VersusEM5025d ago

I cant wait 4 Playstation Move, its weird at first I really didnt care about it, but now Im just so pumped 4 it.

Show all comments (59)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ53d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia53d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73053d ago (Edited 53d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6953d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y53d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex53d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y52d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07212d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde212d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude212d ago (Edited 212d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992212d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme212d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992212d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313212d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69212d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor212d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69212d ago (Edited 212d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack212d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface211d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)