100°

What Games Should Focus on instead of Motion Controls

From DAMNLAG.com's Combo Breaker:

"A lot of time and money is being dumped into motion controls these days by the big three console companies. I wouldn’t call waggle the death to the joystick and gamepad like some of my industry compadres, and I think certain aspects of motion controls have merit. It’s just a wee bit disappointing when you think of all the things game companies could be putting their research and development into. In the massive push to change the modern controller there’s so many things they could be fixing that actually, you know, need fixing."

boogeyman9995054d ago

They really need to fix the lag.

giantchicken5054d ago

That isn't happening any time soon.

playstation_clan5054d ago

why dont they improve on more storylines because the story is the meat of the game and its important for game to have great gameplay as well. anything that doesnt include moving ur hands like a idiot

kneon5054d ago

I rarely every encounter lag online, except for MW2 and LBP. But I haven't played either of those online in quite a long time so maybe even those have improved.

HolyOrangeCows5053d ago

"Make Artificial Intelligence actually intelligent"

Yes please.

Spenok5052d ago

There is some smart AI here and there. It would be nice if every game had some sort of stardard though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5052d ago
MechaZain5054d ago

the running thing is weird when you're in a town and everyone's walking slow

Mastersnake105054d ago

A.I. is still not smart yet I can waggle to make Mario spin.

How the industry as evolved...

spooky2055053d ago

What ever happened to the epic singleplayer experience? or the challenge? or the addictive gameplay? Its like every game can be beaten easily then gets stale after a while and ends up in a bargain bin. I never would dream ever to trade in my copy of super mario world, contra 3, streetfighter 2, etc. but in this gen i could easily get rid of any game with no regrets.

Americanbang5054d ago

I am not into the motion controller gaming, yet. Not sure if I ever will be either. I prefer to play using a controller, it's just the type of gaming I grew up playing my whole life and something I like.

It just seems silly and awkward to stand in one area and do the things required for the game while using your body as the controller.

I agree with one thing though, it's awesome that we now have technology like this and there are people who like these things. Just not for me.

Rocket Sauce5054d ago

I wouldn't mind motion controls if they made sense. So many Wii games have you waving your right hand back and forth. How the hell does that equal swinging a bat (Dead Rising), running (RE 4), shoving (HOTD) or spinning (Mario)? Just let me press a button, dammit.

nellshini5054d ago

Artificial intelligence is anything but, but the author does have a point that it could be a good deal better than what we're seeing in a lot of games. Especially in RPGs where the AI doesn't understand the game mechanics and become liabilities.

Show all comments (18)
60°

Nordic Game has just revealed the winners of Nordic Game Awards 2024

"Nordic Game has revealed the winners of this year’s Nordic Game Awards, which took place on Thursday, May 23, during NG24 Spring and streamed live from Slagthuset in Malmö, Sweden." - Nordic Game.

80°

The Indie Games Scene Is Carrying The Gaming Industry At This Point

Indie games are single-handedly carrying the gaming industry right now and it's about time they get their deserved recognition.

shinoff21831d 2h ago

Idk about numbers but it certainly seems so. I'm cool with indies so no biggie.

anast1d ago

I'm cool too, but perception is just that.

150°

Sony CEO says although AI "has been used for creation," it's "not a substitute for human creativity"

"AI is not a substitute for human creativity. We position it as a technology that supports creativity. Creativity resides in people. We will continue to contribute to people's creativity through technology," the CEO said.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
1nsomniac2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

...not yet but 100% within the next 10 years!

..Then Sony will use it like the drop of a hat. They're no different to the others.

isarai2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They used to be 😞 sure it was always a business, and money's always the priority, but they used to have a very strong stance on supporting artists and creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" was a phrase they touted a few times back in the ps1-ps3 era, a philosophy carried over from their music branch PlayStation was created from. It's not COMPLETELY gone, but it's barely there compared to what it was back then, i just want them to return to that.

Eonjay1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

I am highly encouraged by their statement about human creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" is exactly what they are saying. But at the same time, I don't think people understand that Sony is a corporation. If they don't realize growth, they don't get to exist. When you say 'Sony', you are talking about a bunch of investors. To speak about them any other way is a illogical and incorrect. They haven't changed. They have been a group of investors since they became a public business.

isarai1d 18h ago

Ugh, i really wish people would stop gambling people's livelihoods by turning a project/game into their political soapbox. Im all for statements and having your own opinion, but there's more people working on this than just druckman, ham fisting your political beliefs onto just seems inconsiderate for everyone elses job security when it can result in a failure due to people avoiding it for that reason.

I play games for escape, im so tired of nearly every AAA game blatantly dragging real world issues to shove in my face when I'm trying to take a break from it all. They don't even bother to be subtle about it, quite the opposite, it's blasted and force fed to you and it's just getting exhausting

Einhander19721d 8h ago

People are taking a whole interview and cutting it down to clips that make him look bad and take what he actually was saying out of context. For example he also said things like this AI has "ethical issues we need to address"

-Foxtrot1d 8h ago

@Einhander

Why defend him at this point?

It’s not taking things out of context, he said what he said.

Old ND would never talk about soulless AI taking over so many creative things they are well known for. The whole “ethical issues” is just a good PR spin people who push this crap fall back on to make their statements not seem as bad. So many AI lovers do this.

AI has no place is so many creative based things.

Einhander19721d 8h ago

Well yeah, because everyone else is using it so they need to stay competitive. It's the same as paid online, they didn't want to go that route but their competition was making so much money they needed to add paid online just to keep up.

RaiderNation1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

AI will never replace humans in game development in terms of conceptualizing new games. Humans still need to come up with the ideas and what they want to implement. However much of the day to day menial coding could be AI driven to reduce production time and team size. I could also see AI being used for bug testing/optimization that could lead to better quality games at launch. I'm actually very optimistic about how AI can positively impact game development.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 6h ago
XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Good statement but hopefully this holds up

NotoriousWhiz1d 7h ago

People that aren't software developers just don't understand the benefits of AI. People who's only exposure to A.I is the Terminator movie and other related sci fi films won't understand the benefits it provides.

It's not about replacing human labor. It's about making human labor easier.

Many years ago, I had laser eye surgery done. It was performed by a robot. The doctor took my measurements and calibrated the machine to make sure it would do what needed be done. And then the robot corrected my vision in 10 seconds.

15 years later and I still have 20/20 vision.

Eonjay1d 6h ago

AI in and of itself is not a 'bad'. Money is bad. Money is evil, and corporations will do whatever they can to get more of it. They will find ways to implement AI to replace as may jobs as possible. This isn't even up for debate. It is the charge of the corporation to maximize returns for the investors. They have no choice. I'm a developer and I know that my job will absolutely be replaced. Therefore, I have decided to become an AI dev. AI has a lot of potential to help us solve problem on a scale most can't even imagine. The issue, as ever is that our monetary system only ever allows us to focus on greed and fiscal growth.

But I am a pragmatist. Perhaps an AI model can be built to help protect us from our most dangerous instincts and habits. And perhaps Congress can pass laws to protect us from people who would use AI to manipulate and control us (spoiler: they wont).

RaiderNation17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

Progress is inevitable. Nobody driving cars today is complaining that the horse and buggy is no longer around. Yes, some jobs will be lost but guess what? With innovation comes new job opportunities. It's how the cycle of the job market works.