770°

Dis-Kinect: Leaked Specs, Bad Strategy Show Microsoft Doesn’t Know the Xbox 360 Market Anymore

Microsoft was off to a great start with a nice Xbox 360 Kinect showing at the E3 video game conference, but leaked specs and a contradictory strategy show that, come November, Microsoft may end up losing both the hardcore and the casual gamer.

Read Full Story >>
industry.bnet.com
playstation_clan5067d ago

does this mean there wont be a halo party. 4 players is needed

saint_john_paul_ii5067d ago

i cant wait for that game. i hope i can play as the arbiter....

morganfell5067d ago

No Arbiter but you do get to play as Guilty Spark 343. This way they do not have to worry about the lag of the player's hands.

Oh, one other thing, Guilty Spark no longer looks metallic but instead resembles a red ball.

5067d ago
bjornbear5067d ago

only 100K more than PS3 with a newly released console?

thats not very great =/ expected more
still good for them

monk3395067d ago Show
danfry5067d ago

Oh you poor monk, I reckon there must be better things to dream about though hey?

danfry5067d ago

Oh you poor monk, there are better things to dream about though hey?

darthv725067d ago

I recall first time move was shown, the guys said the eye could handle two move units and 2 sub units. Thus having a limitation of 2 players. How is 360 kinect limit of 2 "active" players different than move?

All i know is i can have 4 players in mario baseball and it is fun.

fooltheman5067d ago

it can track 4 move controllers...
so if a game only needs 1 move controller this mean 4-players

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5067d ago
gynecologistcobra5067d ago

What does Halo at all have to do with the Kinect? Please tell me.

saint_john_paul_ii5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Halo party, Halo DDR, Halo sports, etc, via the power of Kinect....

J/k....

NecrumSlavery5067d ago

nothing because kinect isn't at all a core peripheral. but we all can have a little laugh in good taste

Tony-A5067d ago

They're both on Xbox 360.

masterofpwnage5067d ago

it was just for fun.
honestly you take thing to seriously.

monk3395067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

yo chill out masterofpwnage, he was just being sarcrastic to the sarcasm of the bad joke that was just a thing, not to be taken to seriously, you know?

geez, you take this way to seriously, go out a little?

+bubbles pope, that is some funny stuff, I almost spit out me green tea, rofl.

Godmars2905067d ago

Well if the Pope is right, Halo/Kenect games will mark MS going on the crack-pipe.

Bigpappy5067d ago

PS Fanboy: Oh, M$ lying to us, they say 4 players now specs say 2.
PS Fanboy: M$ say we hardcore will buy game just for achievements.

Reality: Kinect is due to release Nov 4th lots of details sill to be revealed.

Reality: Kinect ($150 and released in Nov) now charting and 7th place on Gamestop.com and 41 on amazon. Move ($50 and releases in 10 weeks)34th at Gamestop.com, noth charted on Amazon.

Calm down fellows. You are sounding belligerent.

Biggest5067d ago

I like how pre-sale numbers make things like "Only 2 players at a time" and "Not one gotdamned core game announced!" just disappear for you, Bigpappy. It's cool that you're happy with crap as long as lots of people around you have the same crap. Either way you slice it. . .
The Kinect supports up to and not exceeding 2 players at a time.
The Kinect has no core games announced for it.

phinch5067d ago

When they announced it as "Natal" last year they said it would be supported with Halo reach, and a whole lot of other lies.

SWORDF1SH5067d ago

Maybe you should compare from video gane stores from other countries.

Also Move as 3 different priced bundles compared to the Kinects 1. Maybe having 3 different bundles will dilute the figure to the true number of actual move pre orders.

Or just maybe comparing the kinect to move from an american store where the install base is 9M more not a true repeesentation of the World.

Or Both!

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5067d ago
HolyOrangeCows5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Microsoft is pretty dis-KINected to what people want these days.

A social phone that doesn't fully connect to Facebook or Twitter (Kin)?
And those commercials....Wow. In the most commonly shown one, they spend 1/2 the commercial trying to make a bad ex joke!

An expensive camera for party games that only allows two players at a time? And they think hardcore, current 360 gamers will be the first to buy??

Oh, and they think we're going to spend $100+ on Kinect plus $60 for a game JUST for Achievements:
"I have one thing to say to the hardcore gamer who says Kinect has nothing for them," said Toulouse while discussing concerns about Kinect on Major Nelson's latest podcast. "Those games will have achievements, so don't tell me you're not going to play at least some of them, you hardcore gamers out there. I know you will."

They're either just spinning out of control to appease stockholders or they're delusional.

-Alpha5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

I don't think it's about not knowing the 360 market. They don't care to use Kinect to appeal to hardcore gamers, and if they say it, they haven't proven it. It's evident Kinect is targeted towards casuals.

It's not that MS has lost sight of the 360 market, it's just that they are broadening the Xbox brand.

The problem is, with a lack of a price announcement (and the $150 standalone all but confirmed), MS is going to have a hard time driving the product to one side of consumers. How much they put into it, I don't know, but I don't expect casuals to jump ship to Kinect, or even the Move for that matter. Not with Nintendo having such a strong hold on the market and with Wii 2 probably competing and likely keeping the casual market. Problem is, Kinect is being pushed so heavily. It remains to be seen, but there is a lot of skepticism at the moment towards how successful it will be. Time will tell.

HolyOrangeCows5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

"I don't think it's about not knowing the 360 market. They don't care to use Kinect to appeal to hardcore gamers, and if they say it, they haven't proven it. It's evident Kinect is targeted towards casuals."

Well they're talking about building the foundation with their current userbase. And they believe we're sheep enough to buy Kinect for achievements and just because they're telling us that it's the next best thing whether gamers care or not.

"People like you HolyOrangeCows, where laughing and calling for nintendos doom when they anounced the name Wii"
http://www.freewebs.com/zel...
To start, I don't know how you could know that, seeing as I joined N4G in January of 2009. Second, I didn't really follow video games as an industry when the Wii released/was near release. In fact, I wanted the Wii. I ended up being disappointed by the software, but I owned one for a little while.

monk3395067d ago

MS is fine, the only people that think they are disconnected are such a small part of the actual market. People like you HolyOrangeCows, where laughing and calling for nintendos doom when they anounced the name Wii.

Snoogins5067d ago

What happened to supporting up to 4 people (or did I imagine reading that)? I guess this shows even the Parade family video demonstration of River Rush where they looked like they were having seisures was misleading. Also, if the pricepoint of $149.99 is true, then this takes away from the argument that Move is the most expensive option of the two ($99 starter bundle and $49 for extra Move if wanting to support two players).

@Alpha-Male22
Microsoft has put themselves into a financially risky position, trying to market an expensive device which is currently only pushed with casuals in mind that requires spending at least $200 on a console to use it. Nintendo is synonymous with family-friendly and sells exceptionally well to this demographic. I don't see how Microsoft can succeed if the entry level for Kinect is going to be $150 more expensive to the most popular casual home console on the market, without having established a casual identity that will attract the Wii crowd. The same argument can be said in that the Move also has the price hurdle to cross, but fortunately for Sony their Wii-too wand is targetting both the core and casual demographic and Sony also has established itself with 3 generations of casual appeal.

RememberThe3575067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

I don't think that Microsoft Game Studio has lost sight of their consumer. I think that they were given a mandate by the Microsoft higher-ups to get a wider audience and I think Microsoft made them take on this camera tech because it's a cool idea on paper.

The culture at MS is to completely dominate whatever they do and they do not like being second place to Nintedo. I love Microsoft for what they've done for Western Washington, but their management is arrogant and they have seemingly no vision of their own.

I still believe that the company that green-lighted Halo:CE knows what their consumer wants, but I think they got their arm twisted and now they have to do what they're told and throw their support behind a product that has more flaws than strengths.

throw_this_away5067d ago

We want it to be less than 100$, we want it to allow 6 gamers to play it at once, we want it to mow our lawn, we want it to run 100% with no lag, etc.

Reality is that the more powerful the system... the more expensive hardware it will need, and thus the higher the cost. Low cost or high performance/features... pick one because you can't have both without increasing cost.

sikbeta5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

MS aiming to the Casuals is the Worst thing they can do, MS don't have the [Iconic Characters] Nintendo have and is not a considered a [Gaming Platform] with Loads of Characters and Genres like PlayStation

xbox is Mainly FPS and More Shooter Games, with the Only Known Character being Master Chief:

First Person Shooter/Third Person Shooter =/= [Family]

First Person Shooter/ Third Person Shooter =/= [Variety]

Also if kinect cost $150 and allow 2 players, do anyone really believes people would buy the damned device, it's an ADD-ON, the console alone cost $200, add the peripheral and you spend $150 [$350 + $60 per game] for something that Only allows motion-control gaming for 2 players, people will avoid this like plague...

And there is nothing Real of The Device, nothing concrete, Not a single Public Demo that let you believe this device can work with Games other than hit-the-damned-red-ball game...

kingjoker345066d ago

so what about all those videos where we saw more then 2 people playing? LIES?!?!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5066d ago
Natsu X FairyTail5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

EDIT: if true then wow Haters are right MS is Dis-kinected. If the premise is 4players and in the end they can only track up to 2 people. its gonna make hella people mad.

halojunkie5067d ago

i agree, and microsoft is jealous of sony in my personal opinion.

Consoldtobots5067d ago

jealous is putting it mildly, this is more like the psychotic stalker who wants to look like you, talk like you and ultimately BE YOU!

problem being he doesn't have your wardrobe, vocabulary or what it takes to take your place.

Donny5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

who cares about sales? and if you wanna bring sales up...isnt is sad microsoft had to give away 360's at e32010?. enjoy your damn games and dont be concerned.

ImmortalLegend5067d ago

I think they are messing around now and preparing to release another Xbox next year. Anyone else think that we are very close to seeing another Xbox?

RememberThe3575067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Kinect seems to be getting a big push from MS and that represents a big investment as well. I think that they are truly trying to push to a wider audience without a larger investment of launching an entirely new console.

But I don't see how they think the hardcore gamers will flock to this thing. Sony has Socom and they are patching previous title to be able to use Move to I can see the Hardcore PlayStation fans picking it up, but Kinect is offering nothing that true gamers want. Games.

JayD-1K5067d ago

released another 360 with all the trimmings! and from the looks of things, people are eating it up!
they do know marketing!

colonel1795067d ago

I have a feeling Kinect will go the "Tony Hawk: Ride route". That thing was hyped as being an innovative way to play a skateboard game, but because of its limitations and lag it went straight to the dump. Kinect has a lot of limitations also, lag too. The problem here will be that the media will be all for it, and hype the thing when it comes out, ignoring all its flaws

vhero5067d ago

So its confirmed 2 player max? Epic fail then. For the casual market you want to get more than 2 players involved.

Condemnedman5067d ago

You have more than 2 friends whero ??? You are full of suprises ! Not lol

sid4gamerfreak5067d ago (Edited 5067d ago )

Well again, its too early to say. Now many ps3 fanboys will come like a swarm of bees and disagree with me cause they dont actually use their brain but their heart, what happened to 3D? Where were all of you then? A pair of 3D glasses to play 3D ps3 games cost 150 dollars. Thats one person. A family with one child would cost 450 dollars. But what happens when friends come over? Fine add in 2 more glasses to the least, thats 750 dollars!! Just for you, your family and 2of ur friends to enjoy 3D. Fine lets say ur a loner and u dont need a family. 150 dollars for a pair of glasses plus a 3D tv which costs like 2000 dollars.

But I know your argument, youll say "give 3D time, the price will go down"

EXACTLY. Give kinect time and the price will go down eventually just like the ps3 at launch. With more preorders, hopefully microsoft will lower the price. Obviously microsoft havent been keen on lowering the price on their other peripherals and infact overpriced them but Im being optimistic on both, 3D and kinect.

Optimism and giving a chance. Have you ever heard of that fanboys?

Sure Im not a big fan of Kinect, infact I hate the concept but Im giving it a frickin chance to prove itself when it releases. For Microsoft to prove themselves after losing the console battle for nearly 3 years. So let all the skepticism wait.

Oh and to regards of the two player support, I must say that Microsoft has gotta do better in terms of appealing to the casual market if theyre only supporting 2 players. 4 players should be the goal.

Nicaragua5067d ago

The sony 3D solution is relatively new hardware and so can be expected to fall in price as it becomes more popular and easier to manufacture.

All the technology in Kinect has been around for years and despite that it still costs MS $150 to manufacture per unit - i wouldnt expect to see it dropping in price much unless MS is going to sell it at a loss.

KRUSSIDULL5067d ago

then it f''ing suck but why would they show Dance Central with 3 people dancing if Kinect cant have more than 2 people.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5066d ago
5067d ago Replies(1)
5067d ago Replies(1)
5067d ago Replies(3)
Paradise Lost5067d ago

Microsoft should just stop whatever they are doing with this Kinect crap.

gynecologistcobra5067d ago

"hurp durp i don't like this hardware so microsoft should not sell it at all hurp"

Chromer5067d ago

I'd say you sound pretty butthurt Cobra.

n4gno5067d ago

""yet now its kicking the 360s ass in worldwide sales."

No it's not. "

yes it is, praticly every years since 2006 (but microsoft had one year and half to trump some sheeps), it's not because ms have one week or two for them now, with the slim release (and blind fanboyz buying it) that it will change anything.!

evilmonkey5015067d ago

Microsoft's Xbox 360 as we know it will shrivel up if KINEKT fails. All the eggs are in one basket now...not so wise. I project one of two ideas : either no more video game systems for Microsoft or :a new system sometime within 2 years. Microsoft stock is really badly sucking so far this year.

Show all comments (133)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia847d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog847d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

847d ago
CrimsonWing69847d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming847d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79846d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember846d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog847d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog847d ago (Edited 847d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop846d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic846d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop846d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic845d ago (Edited 845d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 845d ago
Aloymetal846d ago (Edited 846d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic846d ago (Edited 846d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10847d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar847d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10847d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell847d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10846d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72846d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming847d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog847d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming846d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming847d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721023d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1023d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1023d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901023d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1023d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1023d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1023d ago
TheEnigma3131023d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1023d ago (Edited 1023d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1023d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1023d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1023d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771023d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1023d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901023d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1023d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901023d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1023d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)