290°

Marvel's LittleBigPlanet DLC Details

Beginning July 7, you'll have a wealth of official new Marvel Super Hero and Super villain costumes for your Sackboys and Sackgirls! Starting with the initial offering and continuing every other week following, we'll introduce four different Marvel Costume Packs, each with five different costumes depicting Marvel's mightiest Super Heroes and most dreaded Super Villains.

callahan095073d ago

"We're also unveiling a magnificently massive Marvel Level Kit, which includes four levels of adventure pitting your Sackpeople against the evil plans of Magneto. And of course, while you play through the levels, you'll collect a huge assortment of Marvel-themed music, objects, materials, stickers and a special "Rooftop" background to help you CREATE your own fantastic levels."

Awesome! I didn't even know Marvel stuff was coming, but a new set of official levels for LBP? This kicks ass! Loved the Metal Gear and Pirates packs, a Marvel pack sounds like a great addition.

Simon_Brezhnev5073d ago

i say they should just save this for LBP2

xHarvey5073d ago

No point in saving it for LBP2. LBP DLC can be used in LBP2.

BigRedBall5073d ago

WHERE
IS
THE SEPHIROTH COSTUME?!

fantasygamer5073d ago (Edited 5073d ago )

Awww.. no lilsack Jean Grey D:

( @ imdaboss all DLC will work with both LBP1 and 2)

sikbeta5073d ago

Marvel Characters + LBP = Awesome

cond3m3r5073d ago

lol this is awesome..i made my sackboy into superman..thats as far as superhero i could do during that time.

drdre745073d ago

they announced the costumes over a year and a half ago i thought the deal must have failed since they havent mentioned it since.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5073d ago
Baltis5073d ago

Without super powers this is basically dress up and nothing more. LBP was gimped because of all it didn't allow you to do.

Biggest5073d ago (Edited 5073d ago )

Sounds like someone has daddy issues. If you don't like LBP, don't go into topics about the DLC. Find a "I don't like LBP" topic and have fun.

Edit: It isn't absurd. You feel that LBP was gimped because of limitations you felt were there. The game is not gimped. Maybe your creativity is gimped. You can do quite a bit with LBP as it is. You can do more with LBP than you could EVER do on a console. Try to glean some insight from these guys:
http://www.littlebigplanet....

Baltis5073d ago

What? I didn't say I didn't like LBP, did I? I actually really like it. I haven't played it much as of late but I bought it day one. Why is everyone here so absurd? Gamefaqs isn't like this.

UnwanteDreamz5073d ago

Maybe because you leave no room for anyone to have their own opinion. You know what is stupid?

Thinking everyone has to agree with you.

Maybe you should go back to gamerfags

Keltik825073d ago

That is the dumbest comment I've read.

Baltis5073d ago (Edited 5073d ago )

So, it's not dumb to run around dressed as marvel characters without their powers in Marvel themed levels but it's dumb to want that in the game? Your logic makes no sense. This site makes no sense sometimes.

I guess if you don't like 100% everything Sony and Ps3 here this is what you get. A slew of immature rants from obvious oblivious gamers. Strange. I even said I liked LBP. I just don't see what "some" of the content is released for if it doesn't affect gameplay. I mean, costumes and all that is good but why not give us a few more gameplay mechanics and tweaks. You are seriously trying to sell me on the idea you all wouldn't like to see a sackboy dressed as spiderman and shooting webs and swinging everywhere?

Yeah, you're right. You idea is better. I'd much rather dress up like spiderman and just run around obstacles in marvel themed levels. Who needs powers when you have the suit???
@Biggest
Man, I don't have 100 hours a week to play videogames. I played LBP a great deal when I got it and lost interest with the time. Check my trophy support for Christ sakes.

@Keltik82

"LBP isn't about powers"

No, it's about dressing up as Marvel characters in DLC. Silly of me to want to experience a little more than just playing as sackboy dressed as Spiderman and etc. You're right. I'm dumb. Are you listening to yourself?

Keltik825073d ago

You make no sense. If this site doesn't make sense then stop coming here and making stupid comments. LBP isn't about powers, so to answer your question no it's not dumb.

lodossrage5073d ago

In your comment you said this place was full of "A slew of immature rants from obvious oblivious gamers"

And yet here you are ranting and coming back now and again to edit your comment trying your hardest to get the last word. You sure you aren't calling the kettle black on that "immature" comment?

lodossrage5073d ago (Edited 5073d ago )

"Why is everyone here so absurd? Gamefaqs isn't like this. "

Dude, then go back to gamefaqs if you don't like it here.

I'm not agreeing or disagree with your opinion. But seriously, whining won't help you

Gene5073d ago

Whiner should be your name yeah the sackboys should control weather and shoot optic blast gtfo.

idiealot5073d ago

Yes you do have a valid point, but remember gameplay has changed since the introduction of MGS and PotC DLC ie: paintanator and water. I can only imagine what they will introduce to change things for us again.

Let's not forget this is LBP, everybody will be on an even playing field. Costumes with certain powers would break the game.

Sheikh Yerbouti5073d ago

Use your frickin' imagination! Kids nowadays want everything given to them.

callahan095073d ago (Edited 5073d ago )

OK, Baltis...

You do realize that this DLC, these costumes & the objects and stickers & music that come with it, it is all compatible with LittleBigPlanet 2. And in LittleBigPlanet 2 you can give your characters super-powers using the new creatinator hats, using direct-control seats, using movers, etc. You can piece together a hero for the player to control, super-powers and all. Lots of work, sure, but somebody will do it.

Fruit Loops5073d ago

oh im at N4G!!!

hahahahaha

im just messin, cmon guys be chill

@baltis
you say its gimped and then comment back and say you liked it? Let's be consistent here.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5073d ago
Myst5073d ago (Edited 5073d ago )

"Mystique"
Okay this is a buy for me, and may as well go ahead and put a pre-order on LBP2. Though I'm curious does the LBP1 stuff carry over to the second installment? I'm sure I read this somewhere but not 100% sure on it...

[edit]
Never mind I see Fantasygamer answered the question.

RussM5073d ago

Cannot wait. Looks sick. Does anyone know if all the costumes you unlock in the single-player story of LBP 1 carry over to LBP 2? Or is it just the DLC?

olit1235073d ago

Yup, all content carries over to LBP2.

RussM5073d ago

Guess i'll have to 100% the game again. Stupid YLOD.

Myst5073d ago

I'm with you in that same boat Mercenary...Have to beat the game all over again and just haven't felt like it for the longest.

Sheikh Yerbouti5073d ago

Blows dust off LBP. I'm buying 'em all.

Show all comments (34)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel6d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow6d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1825d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie5d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

4d ago
Hereandthere4d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
Notellin4d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

4d ago
Hereandthere4d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow4d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere4d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow4d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX5d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney3d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno5d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno5d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

4d ago
fsfsxii4d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno4d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville57d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi57d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein57d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos57d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein56d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

Number1TailzFan57d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long57d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger8858d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake57d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts57d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername57d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai57d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
70°

Top 20 Best PlayStation 3 Games (20-11)

Alex DS. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "Is the PlayStation 3 retro? This is a surprisingly hard question to answer as the system definitely has the age to be considered retro, having launched in 2006, over 15 years ago now. But with it being home to so many massive games, many of which still hold up today and in fact were released for the PlayStation 4 when that console was released, make the PS3 a retro console that doesn’t feel retro."

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
shinoff2183744d ago

No ps3 is not retro. I dont even consider ps2 era retro. All imo.

shinoff2183744d ago

Typically, the term retro is given to items which are at least 20 years old (but not yet 40 years old).

Quick google search

badz149744d ago

No the PS3 is not yet a retro console. But if you're gonna put 1 game from a series in this list, then LBP2 should be there instead of the original, Motorstorm PR is also an overall better game than the 1st game and to put Tools of Destruction over A Crack in Time is a blasphemy when ACiT is the best game in the series.