180°

Can Western Games Learn from the JRPG?

Gamer Limit writes "Japanese RPGs are dying, being replaced with the philosophies of the superior Western RPG. Either that, or JRPGs are evolving to become more like WRPGs. "

Read Full Story >>
gamerlimit.com
JQ5101d ago

Try it the other way around.

Reibooi5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

That's a opinion.

I think they can. One of the biggest one is that not every RPG needs to be able the medieval times and swords and sorcery or Dungeons and Dragons type stuff. Sure we have seen a few games diverge from that(namely Mass Effect and Fallout) but so many more Western RPG's are the same ole same ole and they after awhile start to feel the same.

I hardly ever get that feeling in JRPG's. They almost always feel like they have a unique world. The Final Fantasy series love it or hate it is a good example. None of those worlds feel the same. To many series base it's lore off of a D and D model and when you do that the game is gonna feel the same to every other game that followed that model. That's just a opinion. The settings and worlds in JRPG's are MUCH more diverse then stuff I have seen from the west. That's something I think the west could learn.

Millah5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

Its not that the JRPG as a genre sucks now, its just that the focus of the industry has changed and unfortunately the Japanese developers for the first time since the industry began have found themselves struggling to figure out what to do. They keep trying to abandon their culture, which is part of what made those games so great, and instead try to appeal to a wider audience, with Square leading the charge in that department.

Its the developers faults, its not that the JRPG is no longer a good or beloved genre. Its just the developers can't make them like they used to. They need to stop trying to be something they aren't, and instead embrace their unique qualities that make Japanese games different from Western games.

I think part of the blame lies with the Japanese publishers like Square, pushing their developer teams to be something that they aren't. They keep trying to make them make games that are more like Western games, when they should instead acknowledge the two cultures are different and let the developers do what they do best.

The Japanese have always had such an original and creative imagination and really need to start utilizing that strength they have. I think a lot of the developers have lost the passion they once had. But I still have hope, Xenoblade and The Last Story seem to be headed in the right direction. Both exclusives on a Japanese console that involves a lower development cost therefore less risk.

Simon_Brezhnev5101d ago

i couldnt had said it better myself Millah bubbles for you

E46M35100d ago

Lol no.. JRPG's suck

Even Final Fantasy has lost its charm now i didnt like it to begin with.

If anything Japanese devs need to get with the times.

SaiyanFury5100d ago

@ Millah

No shyte! JRPGs need to stop trying to conform to western RPGs. The genres are very different. JRPGs are unique as they've always been. I love Star Ocean 4 and applaud tri-Ace for not making it based on western ideals. Multiple sources rated it a mediocre 5 or 6 out of 10. These days too many gamers expect too much from JRPGs, labeling the genre as un-innovative, behind the times, and just lacking. I say the genre rocks BECAUSE it's unyielding to western games. JRPGs have once again become the niche genre they were before Final Fantasy VII. FF7 brought the genre out of the niche for a few generations, but now gamers' inflated expectations have hurt the genre and now it's gone back to the niche roots it always enjoyed. S-E attempted to make a JRPG that would appeal to the west and they failed miserably to appeal to fans in FF13. JRPGs are what they are, and us players of them love them for what they are. Western RPGs are different in nature and Japanese RPGs should not copy them. We're seeing a real shortage of true JRPGs this gen so far. SO4 is a great game that doesn't follow western criticism, tri-Ace knows their audience and those of us love them for it.

Both genres are different, and while both can learn from each other, it's important that each remain unique.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5100d ago
DangerCurtis5101d ago

Gradually over the years, WRPGs have really started to reign over JRPGs, and to take a stance on such a subject is really interesting in my opinion. Really interesting read and a some pretty valid points.

Davoh5101d ago

I can't help but bring up Square-Enix who for the last few years have been trying to westernize everything and failed miserably. Western Games should stay Western and Japanese Games should stay Japanese, and then gamers have the best of both worlds.

Tony P5101d ago

Hope not. I enjoy them as two distinct entities.

I don't want a TES to have a more structured plot. That would mean less player freedom. I don't want the protagonist to be less faceless. That defeats the purpose of projecting the player into the game.

WRPGs also have plenty of humour without inserting random bits of silliness. Since the tone is often more serious and sombre, it would be out of place and unnecessary mood whiplash imo. I can't think of too much WRPGs should poach from JRPGs.

NecrumSlavery5100d ago

The only thing JRPGs have over WRPGs is they aren't as glitchy.
I think Bioware and Bethesda have shown that west can produce the highest qualiy of RPG. And never once make a whiney emo kid the hero.

Side note, JP company From Software's 3D Dot Game Heroes and Demon's Souls are two RPGs that break away from the repetitive emo crap Japan has been making the past few years...kudos

zatrox5100d ago

...then, my friend, if you don't like the typical whiny emo crap, I'd recommend:
Vagrant Story
Earthbound
Mother 3
Nier
Probably Drakengard, but that one was waay too flawed.
Folklore
And alot of other JRPGs.
Just because the most famous series include whiny teenagers doesn't means less recognized ones don't break the mold.

Tony P5100d ago (Edited 5100d ago )

They aren't as glitchy, but that's because they're more linear.

It's a lot easier to debug a game with meticulously planned scenarios than a TES where you're giving the player all this freedom.

As long as the glitch isn't too damaging, I don't really mind. It's a decent trade off for a huge world to explore at my leisure.

Bigpappy5100d ago (Edited 5100d ago )

I what world are SE games becoming westernized? If you call long a$$ cut scenes summonsing stuff animals and riding chickens "Westernized" then you and the Japanese need your heads checked. Being from the west, I know we like games that are more mature and believable: When someone is shot or stabbed (Blood); When fighting, I don't want to give the other guy a chance to get some shots in; I don't want to summons baby blue and yellow monsters. You see where I am going with this? I am not ten and I don't have a feminine side that needs to be tapped. You feel me?

RedPawn5100d ago

I like JRPG's just not when they're overly animeish, or big eyed loud mouth retards.

Some Western RPG's have good Lore like any normal RPG, they just seem to fall flat in combat & presentation.

Like I said at the bottom they're both one in the same and both need to check their credentials.

Alcon5100d ago

I used to enjoy JRPG's a lot more when I was younger.
I think one of the reasons I don't do as much anymore is that the most of the time the hero (protagonist) is to young, secondly western RPG's are darker than its japanese counterpart (not only the color pallet often used is different, but how the stories are told, the enemies you face (how ridiculous would it look if you had to battle a drop of water or a cactus in a western rpg?, while when I was a kid the monsters in western RPG's did scare me lol), and finally, the motives of why your group is fighting in JRPG's are sometimes to childish/naive and their behavior are as well (even the older blokes you get in your party, who sometimes are already parents or 10 years older than you, the protagonist, are still behaving like 12 year olds...) .
Now that I'm older I regret that the JRPG's did not age as well, to my eyes they still seem to childish. I could still enjoy them and have a good time, but I won't be able to get immersed in the world or really involved with my charachters, because more often than not their behaviour or personalities are that of kids, wich unfortunatly I am no more.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5100d ago
StartWars5101d ago

Anything that is quintessentially Japanese terrifies me.

Yuenanimous5101d ago

While I hear what you're saying, I really don't like the whimsical in my games. It make the game seem childish.

Fullish5101d ago

Which are you implying are whimsical? I would hardly call either Final Fantasy or the Elder Scrolls whimsical

Rocket Sauce5100d ago

I think both of them go to extremes too often.

Eternal Sonata has a cool premise, but I'll never be able to play it because of its annoying cuteness-overload style. Dragon Age Origins might be a fun game, but I remember its ads on TV - they were such a weak attempt to look badass.

hyderide5101d ago Show
Faztkiller5101d ago

Maybe story telling and art but not gameplay I hate turn based

Simon_Brezhnev5101d ago

yeah i agree im not a fan of turn base but the story telling and art are better in JRPG.

Anon73495101d ago

>Implying all JRPGs are turned based
>Implying combat from buldur's Gate/Dragon Age/ect is any good either

Faztkillar, maybe you should try a few JRPGs/WRPGs before you stereotype them.

thedoctor5101d ago

I tend to agree that JRPG storylines are more intriguing. They are able to sink their claws into me far more than Westerns, but the turned-based fighting has to stop.

Enate5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

I don't even think its so much as the turn based needs to stop to be honest. If that were completely true then a lot of people's favorite rpgs wouldn't still be on a PS1 console. Whether that be Xenogears, Suikoden II, FFVII, FFVIII, Legend of legaia, Legend of dragoon, vagrant story an more. The biggest problem I personally see is the same thing that's been said above. Jrpg designers are losing sight of what made their gaames what they are in the first place.

I have yet to see a story this gen from a jrpg that can stand up to any of those games I mentioned above. An to me that is the biggest problem on top of the fact that. They are trying to do a lot of bending to the western world and that's the last thing they should be doing. It is in turn what is hurting them, jrpg fans want the stories that took them in for hours on end. Like Xenogears and the others I mentioned above.

I still personally enjoy two to three times a year playing. Xenogears, Suikoden II, FFVIII, Legend of Legaia, Vanguard Bandits and Front mission 3 the real front mission not that evolved garbage they slapped a name on. An as far as combat systems go I don't mind a higher paced combat system but don't give me something toned down in the process. I love Xenogears, Legend of Legaia and Suikoden II all for their unique and fun approaches to combat in multiple ways in each game. I was never bored watching slow uninteresting combat unfold. That or waiting for a slow drawn out story to move on to the good part because those games had the best of both.

Show all comments (57)
30°

XCOM's Jake Solomon Q&A - Building a Narrative-Driven Life Sim Game at Midsummer Studios

XCOM and Marvel's Midnight Suns director Jake Solomon has founded a new studio to make a life sim game. Here's a new interview with him.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
310°

Microsoft's quest for short-term $$$ is doing long-term damage to Windows, Surface, Xbox, and beyond

Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's plans to increase every department's margins.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Brazz8h ago

"The plan to move Xbox games to other platforms is codenamed "Latitude" internally, and I know there's debate and unease at Microsoft about whether or not this is a good idea. More upcoming Microsoft-owned games slated for PlayStation are already being developed. At least for now, they're potentially obvious games you'd most likely expect. And yes, while it's true Microsoft is a prolific publisher on PlayStation already, it has typically revolved around specific franchises like Minecraft. From what I've heard, Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's mandate to increase every department's margins. "

Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware.

Xeofate6h ago

"Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware."

It's for the best.

Quit stringing along xbox fans and screwing over PlayStation owners.

crazyCoconuts1h ago

Take good care of those Xboxes if you have 'em ...

outsider16241h ago

An Xbox game on a Playstation. Never in my years of gaming did i ever thought this was gonna happen.

gold_drake8h ago

i think it will kill off the xbox brand. windows will be fine.

but there is and would be a chance that xbox might be killed off in the future. if they fail to make the money they put in. imo.

S2Killinit5h ago

They wont kill it, but they will go fully PC while keeping xbox as a brand, and go multiplatform for the most part. They will also work tirelessly to diminish console gaming’s importance.

PRIMORDUS2h ago

It would be best if Xbox goes the way of Sega, just make and publish games. I know I myself will not support them at all with buying games from them, you all can. 🙃

ChasterMies55m ago

The Xbox brand will live for the games. I don’t expect Microsoft to entirely drop out of gaming hardware. They make Surface tablets and laptops. They’ll make Xbox branded hardware for those that want it.

shadowT7h ago

"Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation"

Forza and Starfield next?

Skuletor6h ago

Starfield would be no surprise and there's the rumor that it will come to Playstation after the Shattered Space DLC, Forza (along with Halo and Gears of War) I find less likely but I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually end up on PlayStation too, especially if Xbox give up on hardware and go the Sega route.

shinoff21836h ago

Not to worried about forza. I'd rather see others like what inxile and obsidian are working on. Starfield sounds like it needs more time in the oven so let it cook first imo. If starfield and it's a small if does release on ps it'll be in the fall around the time for dlc or right at the dlc and come packaged with it.

-Foxtrot6h ago

In the words of Phil Spencer when he was talking about Nintendo last year

“It's just taking a long time for Microsoft to see that their future exists off of their own hardware"

S2Killinit5h ago

Yup. MS are a cancer to console gaming.

Aloymetal5h ago

100%!!
I wonder what happened to that dude that was always here posting those court articles with cartoons about MS spending all those billions in studios. He suddenly disappeared, I guess he doesn't like bad news when the green brand is in trouble. No new articles from him as of late...

PRIMORDUS2h ago

Yup, and it's only going to keep spreading.

Outside_ofthe_Box2h ago

Phil Spencer's words always comes back to bite him lol

6h agoReplies(7)
Show all comments (50)
370°

The PS5 Has Shipped An Estimated 5x More Units Than The Xbox Series X/S In The Last Quarter

When the PS5 and the Xbox Series X/S first launched all the way back in 2020, console sales were not what either platform manufacturer wanted them to be. The pandemic slowed things down more than ever before, even though in the case of each next-gen console, all the units that were manufactured, sold.

Of course that didn’t last, and soon manufacturing limitations on the consoles were a thing of the past, and sales started to leap forward. For one next-gen console platform, at least.

-Foxtrot22h ago

I can see why Microsoft is putting their games on PlayStation with these numbers

Imagine how many copies of future games like Elder Scrolls VI, Blade, Indiana Jones and more they could sell if they went fully multiplatform.

OtterX17h ago

If they don't, it would be the death of them.

Cacabunga3h ago

Can we then stop calling this a console war? Sony rolling over xbox trillions with a few cross gen games.. what would it be when a new uncharted, horizon or tsushima 2 comes out.. even worse, with GTA6 no one would buy an xbox to play it..

purple10115h ago

while I see your point, i'm one of those people that dont really want to see a M$ logo, when I boot up, however good the game is, unless truly exceptional, I've got enough games from Sony and enough coming down the pipeline, plus the 2 free smaller games on ps+, why do I need to give Microsoft anymore money,

I usually play just GT7 and cod, you've got Gran Theft Auto coming, its over for microsoft, they shot themselves in the foot, and now have to hobble away, to the losers corner, sit there, and repent.,!!! hahaha

bloop3h ago

That's crazy man. Just because you prefer blondes doesn't mean you should turn down a brunette.

GamerRN2h ago

Yeah and that's the fanboy problem right there in a nutshell

OtterX14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

@Purple101 At this point, Microsoft just wants to be the American Tencent, but also just happen to have a console available for those who want it.

I hate what they're doing to the industry, but I would play the next Elder Scrolls on PS5 or PS6 even if I had to look at a MS logo at the beginning. At this point, I'm just invested in the series. I didn't feel this way about Starfield, which is why I've skipped it. Worst case scenario, I'd pick Elder Scrolls up on PC if it didn't come to PS, but I've stayed true to my word - I have not, and will not buy another Microsoft console after 3 red ringed 360s. They've killed my console support for life. They showed how scummy they can be by knowingly rushing out a product before it was ready, just to try and capture a 1 year headstart.

If a MS logo shows up at the beginning of the next Elder Scrolls on a Playstation console, so what? That means Sony won and MS is just another publisher. Many of the large publishers are quite dirty, so it fits them well. I wouldn't mind seeing their console die off though and them solely take up this publisher role.

Jingsing11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Yeah, I never bought another Xbox console after the 360. But at the same time you shouldn't find yourself captive to Elder Scrolls if the company behind it is very scummy. I dropped COD after Ghosts and I don't regret it the company has only become worse and I'm glad I never was part of funding that.

OtterX5h ago

@Jingsing oh yea for sure. If I sense that Elder Scroll 6 is a shell of its former self w a trashy microtransaction setup, I'll probably skip it. I'll wait for previews and reviews but I sure am hoping for the best. I still play Skyrim to this day in VR.

purple1015h ago

I mean yeh, if they do produce something good, i've got a laptop, +HDMI cable to the telly, link a bluetooth dual sense (that I already own), and hey presto, I don't need an xbox,

but I can't see that happening, ps5pro will the the best way to play, with best graphics and sound, for me.

gold_drake9h ago

yeh same, surprised it took them so long.

jznrpg1h ago(Edited 56m ago)

Personally I did not care for the Indiana Jones trailer. The combat looks too much like a Doom/Dishonored game to me. I think it could have been so much more. Which is too bad as I grew up with the movies and Raiders of the Lost Ark is still one of my favorites from when I was a kid.

If they can bring Elder Scrolls back towards Morrowind I would love it. If it’s like Skyrim it will be pretty decent but not great. Blade has potential. Hopefully it’s nothing like Redfall. I don’t really trust MS to make good games and rather not give them my money as they are bad for gaming. I’ll buy some games used, maybe but that’s about it

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1h ago
22h agoReplies(1)
21h agoReplies(1)
Barlos11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

A surprise to nobody.

S2Killinit10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

5X is a surprise as it’s just unreal.

fr0sty7h ago

Yeah, this console war just became a console genocide.

Jingsing11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

Sony would probably be selling more if they stopped sending mixed signals about their future. Putting games on PC because you are taking data analytic advice from Microsoft about the future of consoles is folly and has limited their potential sales. Microsoft want Sony and the world to believe that consoles are done as a business so companies like Sony and Nintendo etc can end up serving Microsoft's platform. Remember when it comes to Microsoft "It is us or no one and the three E's" Don't fall for it.

S2Killinit10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

MS has forced everyone’s hand in regard to PC. If the other two dont release on PC, they will be giving them an edge. Imo

Although i think Sony/PlayStation would be wise to release selectively on PC.

Jingsing9h ago

The way Sony are doing it though is very suspect, It almost seems like they are trying to tunnel their way out of Steam with a PSN back-end. They should have just launched their own store. Yes this would no doubt upset PC users but you just can't have everything on Steam as that means no market competition. Microsoft and Sony should only use their own stores. That way they can also enforce their subscription fee's (I don't think there should be fee's) like they do on console as right now they are saying people on console have to pay this fee but if you play on PC you don't. That is very anti-consumer.

Skuletor8h ago

While putting their games on PC would lose them some console sales, there's a large market of people that prefer consoles for their simplicity and convenience, I wonder if it would really effect them negatively. Well, I guess at this current point they won't be dragging PC players into a PS Plus subscription, so there's that.

crazyCoconuts7h ago

I think after Xbox is gone they'll make a bigger push to move PC gamers over to PS, and they may halt momentum on the PC ports to do that. PC and Nintendo gamers will be the only ones left to convert

Einhander19727h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Jingsing

This is a reply to this comment.

"The way Sony are doing it though is very suspect, It almost seems like they are trying to tunnel their way out of Steam with a PSN back-end"

That's not accurate, what they want is simply to be able to count PC users as PlayStation users. It's no different than what EA Ubisoft or Microsoft are doing. Heck, people need to sign up for extra accounts even on consoles to play some of their games, you can't play Sea of Thieves or Minecraft without a Microsoft account.

I'm not sure why PlayStation is being singled out like this, I get why it was a problem in Helldivers because they added it after the game was released which caused problems for people who already owned the game, but at the same time it was nothing that all the other major publishers weren't already doing.

ChasterMies7h ago

“Putting games on PC because you are taking data analytic advice from Microsoft ”

Sony is putting games on PC because the market for people who spend $2000 on a gaming PC is different from the market that spends $500 on a gaming console. Also consider that consoles are sold at a loss. Sony probably makes more from selling Sony published gamed to PC owners than selling consoles to PC owners who would only use them play those games.

shinoff21834h ago

I dont think consoles are sold at a loss outside of the first couple years.

InUrFoxHole5h ago

Hold your breath if you think they're gonna stop bringing games to pc

BehindTheRows4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Selling more? They just had one of the biggest periods for a console EVER (20.8m). That’s not exactly something for them to scoff at. They’d just break more records by selling more, but it’s not a necessity.

Their balance of selling what they’re selling while making plenty of money is how you successfully run a console business.

neutralgamer19922h ago

PC gaming is a platform which is compatible with consoles. So many of keep saying the same nonsense for years ago. PC isn’t going anywhere and more and more games will be on PC

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
Show all comments (59)