740°

What The Insomniac/EA Deal Means For Sony

Gameinformer writes: "Insomniac is one of Sony’s heaviest hitters. It develops some of the publisher’s biggest blockbusters, with the Ratchet and Clank and Resistance games accounting for high sales and high review scores. With that in mind, we spoke with Sony and Insomniac to find out just what the previously PS3-exclusive developer’s multiplatform deal with EA Partners means for the franchises moving into the future."

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
ThePlaystationFour5101d ago

INS can do both options...
the EA deal doesn't control INS.

1. Continue to deveople PS3 exclusives
Or...
2. Start making Multi/platform titles

darkmurder5101d ago ShowReplies(4)
Jack Klugman5101d ago ShowReplies(1)
sikbeta5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

It Really means:

A Deal for 1 Multiplat Game for PS3 and x360, in which the IP is owned by Insomniac and Published by EA and at the same time still making exclusives for Sony...

Strange_Evil5101d ago

It means nothing for Sony... Their game is also on the PS3, so it doesn't matter to Sony. And this is the new studio making games as multi-plats.. The old studio is still working on PS3 exclusive as mentioned by Sony themselves in another article....

So PS3 owners will probably get 2 games and 360 will get only 1... Still better for PS3 owners I guess.

theKiller5101d ago

it only means 360 will get to taste what talent is while ps3 is eating the talent.

TotalPS3Fanboy5101d ago

while making some multi-platform games too.

In other word, Sony still wins, because PS3 gamers can play both exclusive and multi-platform games, while 360 gamers can only play multi-platform games.

ClownBelt5101d ago

Am I seeing Infamous Vs. Prototype problem here? Lmao

Alcon Caper5101d ago

uh, what if they make a 360 exclusive?

Cevapi885101d ago

EA doesnt make 360 exclusives other than ME which is on the PC...the only reason behind this is Bioware who started on the original Xbox...but since EA owns Bioware they could make ME multiplat at any time...and it wouldnt make sense for IG to make a 360 exclusive...MS has in no way given any support to IG like Sony has which has allowed IG to come up with the Resistance series and new iterations of R & C

Ilikegames765101d ago

don't gimp the PS3 version just to accommodate the 360.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5101d ago
pkb795101d ago

Insomniac can make a PS3 game and get EA to port it to the 360. Works for me.

Anon19745101d ago

"What The Insomniac/EA Deal Means For Sony"

Then the article doesn't even try to address that statement. If you're going to write an article about "What this deal means," hows about at least attempting to elaborate on that statement.

This article is nothing but quotes we've already seen with no insight whatsoever.

vhero5101d ago

It means they are doing what S-E have been doing for the past 3 years using MS to fund Sony games.. *Simples* As games are getting expensive to stick to 1 console you could say but this is because one console isn't too far ahead of another anymore. People say rivalry is great for the consumer but this rivalry is killing out developers.. Until one console comes out on top developers cannot be stable we already say free radical one of the greats go bust and 3D realms also fall off the tree.

jackdoe5101d ago

Actually they are doing both at the same time. Which is a plus for everyone involved.

DatNJDom815101d ago

So now the 360 fanboys are dickriding Insomniac now? After all the hating I read from you things? Wow you things are something else. I just LOL @ ya.

SixZeroFour5101d ago

the fact that you call the 360 fanboys "things" is what i LOL's at...you do realize it was basically the same thing but reversed when news broke out of the bungie/acti deal right?

fanboys just have some kind of pleasure of annoying the opposing side, live with it, it isnt a first

just like the bungie/acti deal, im "meh-ish" about this deal...if they produce an awesome game, then great...gamers win, but theres no point in trying to rub it in the opposing sides faces, cause it means nothing

reckoner5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

Well said. I love how fanboys on both sides are so alike. They're all annoying and bring a bad name to gamers.

Imperator5101d ago

Unlike MS, Sony just doesn't rely on one or two games. They have 21 studios for a reason. Good luck to Insomniac, just please release R3.

Greywulf5101d ago

Or any type of Bungie equivalent to Sony's first party titles? I'll buy any of their games if they are the scale/quality/performance of their exclusives.

But since I haven't seen any multiplatform on par with a developers exclusive offerings, i wont hold my breath.

Whats their strategy going to be? Making a Shooter, or a Adventure ratchet style game? I wonder if they recall how terribly Banjo did on the 360, and that was RARE studios.

vhero5100d ago

This is better for PS£ as fans may like what the see and come over to PS3 to see more from insomniac games. Though this is doubtful as its not usually how games work this doesn't actually hurt Sony in any way as they don't lose anything.

avengers19785100d ago

It means nothing for Sony. Insomniac will probably still make games exclusive for PS3. Doesn't the deal they signed with EA only cover one title?

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 5100d ago
madmonkey05101d ago

it doesnt really change anything for sony. just give insomniac an opportunity to make more money,

Jeff2575101d ago

Yep and take said money to continue working on R&C games and Resistance games for the PS3 and possibly more of the new IP if it goes well. In the end Gamers are the ones who come out on top with this deal.

BeaArthur5101d ago

Right now it doesn't change anything for Sony, but if this new IP is a hit you never know.

Colonel-Killzone5101d ago

Dark Shut up troll. It means your troll ass can finally play a Insomniac game instead of trolling.

Montrealien5101d ago (Edited 5101d ago )

why are you responding to him? He wins when you respond, that is all a troll wants, attention and you guys need to stop giving it to him. You guys never learn its like you guys just discovered the internat and came to N4G.

LOLconsoles5101d ago

It means that finally the resistance franchise will come to PC and be all it can be without being held back by consoles. Unless the purposely gimp it to keep it the same on PC and consoles.

madmonkey05101d ago

resistance is owend by sony!

Noami5101d ago

They tent to skip thous things when reading their mind skip the word Sony

cellypower5101d ago

I guess reading isn't the IN thing anymore.

huzzaahh5101d ago

Lawl, so true. It's a good thing I'm not "IN" then. It means that I actually KNOW things so I don't end up looking like a fool. Oh, and I can spell/use grammar. That helps too.

blodulv5101d ago

that you PC fanboys always claim your superiority, yet froth over games developed for consoles.

You guys are indeed a dying breed heheh. I know I know, go ahead and list your 30+ exclusives that nobodies heard about.

dazzalfc5101d ago

People just don't bother to read or listen do they

THE RESISTANCE AND RATCHET IP'S BELONG TO SONY.

Is it really that hard to understand, or are some of you guys to busy whacking off to your own mother to actually care?

PiTCHBLaCK5101d ago

Not everyone who visits N4G are playing with a full deck. and often times are blinded by there Fannypack behavior.

Show all comments (76)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers17d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken16d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g17d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing17d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H917d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola17d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66917d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle17d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg18d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos18d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola17d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies38d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken38d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga38d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken38d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6438d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long37d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197237d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic37d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
DivineHand12538d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91338d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer38d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91337d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit37d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 37d ago
Christopher38d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6937d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit37d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher38d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken38d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197237d ago (Edited 37d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic37d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2338d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218338d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit37d ago (Edited 37d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder38d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts38d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)