400°

MAG (Massive Action Game) Gets a Hefty Price Drop

MAG, also known as Massive Action Game for the PlayStation 3, features online play with up to 256 players. Today it received a hefty price drop, allowing gamers to join in on the action.

Read Full Story >>
justpushstart.com
MattyF5115d ago

Sounds about right. It has been out for a decent amount of time so a price drop was bound to happen before E3.

garos825115d ago

i havent bought it yet due to monetary issues plus i still need to pick up a few older titles i havent managed to get. This definately pushes it up my wanted list!

RememberThe3575115d ago

I got the game from GameFly for a little less than 40 and it was a great deal at that. For 30 it's even better.

WhittO5115d ago

I haven't got it simply because it doesn't look to be that good. I have heard many people complain about bugs etc and the game itself being very complicated ?

Anyway, I'm waiting on Resistance 3 & Killzone 3, that is enough FPS for me

Trroy5115d ago

Once you get into MAG, you will not go back to other FPS shooters.

Everything else is... I dunno... empty and boring now?

Chubear5115d ago (Edited 5115d ago )

I mean anything less than 16v16 seems pointless to me.

They either feel so empty or you feel like they put you and 15others on a map the size of a finger nail to help ramp up the action. I end up feeling like a mouse in a tiny lab maze doing the same thing over and over again.

Like I said, 16v16 is the bare minimum for me now when it comes to FPS online. I may over look it for small $9.99 Downloadable games but anything above a $30 price point has to have atleast 16v16 for me to consider putting my money on it.

RememberThe3575115d ago (Edited 5115d ago )

Then I got the controls feeling right and everything started to fall into place. The more I play it the more fun it gets. I stopped playing Bad Company 2 when I got MAG. No other online game can hold a candle to it except Killzone 2 IMO.

ThanatosDMC5115d ago (Edited 5115d ago )

I completely agree with Trroy. After MAG, every online multiplayer FPS game seems extremely lacking.

Yeah, it's an uphill learning curve especially if you're used to games like MW. You'll die a lot and wont be able to aim for crap... but once it clicks everything seems right.

SVER FTW!

Sm0k3y_Bac0n5115d ago

I really didn't like MAG. It does get better, but i'd still only class it as mediocre. Much prefer BC2 and tbh I think even MW2 is better than MAG.

MysticStrummer5114d ago

Unfortunately Zipper and Sony overestimated the masses. The masses want to play a mindless run and gun type game instead of having massive battles that involve many possible routes and strategies. I've been playing FPSs for too long maybe but for me there is MAG and then there is everything else. Resistance, Halo, Modern Warfare, Killzone... all the same to me. Battlefield tries to be better than those games but after MAG it feels empty and boring. MAG does what I always wanted an FPS to do. It puts me in a giant battle instead of a minor skirmish. You know when you have those epic "storming the beach" type levels in the single player campaigns for most FPSs? Well MAG is the online version of that except you can actually go over to where all those faraway soldiers are fighting in the distance instead of being stuck in a linear path with only the illusion of an epic battle. Hopefully this price drop will bring in more people, but I've always wondered why an online only game gets automatic points deducted from it's score. A single player only game doesn't get the same treatment, yet the online only game will get more playtime.

Heartnet5114d ago

if taking objectives is to complicated then what is easy? xD

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5114d ago
MightyMark4275115d ago

It's been out for almost 5 months now. Now i have a reason to get it! Hopefully it won't disappoint

Kamikaze1355115d ago

Though I'll wait till the Summer when my semester finishes off

TheDuke775115d ago

Hope I can sell mine for a decent price first. Playing the same 3 maps (domination) since launch day is getting way to boring.

waltyftm5115d ago

Why not try sabotage or aquisition ?

MightyMark4275115d ago

ouch. How many maps are there anyway? If there are only 3.. thats bad =/

Trroy5115d ago (Edited 5115d ago )

There are 9 maps, but the big maps are basically split into 2 and 4 map-sized combat areas.

There are really more like (3 + 6 + 12) == 21 basically 64-player maps, where you can meander off to "another game" if you're into wandering off.

The big games end up with all the platoon map areas concentrated in one area, so it becomes a super intense, actual 256 player battle, but for much of the game, its a bunch of 64-player maps. Anyone who tells you otherwise is just trolling, and probably hasn't even played.

There is definately not a lack of maps in MAG. In reality, there are basically 42 different maps, since each of the 21 maps I was talking about has two sides, which play very differently, and you have to vet and switch factions to play a map from the other side.

You don't get to explicitly pick a map you like, however -- you get assigned one. I think that's where many of the complaints stem from. That and most people only play Sabotage for some wierd reason (well.. they're in it for a quick-fix, I guess), which quite literally only has 3 two-sided maps. People don't seem to clue in that, if they all stopped playing Sabo, and started playing Dom, the games would launch much faster.

On top of that, different factions tend to favor particular map types -- thus, if you're Raven or Valor, you hardly ever see the (Valor or Raven, respectively) Dom map, because most of your games are against SVER, and if you're Valor or SVER, most of your Acquisition games are on your own turf, or against Raven.

HighDefinition5115d ago

is the size of 16 maps......so..........

ATLGAMER5115d ago

Solid Mechanics...needs more maps

rob60215115d ago

the maps are huge, each domination map actually has 16 different defending and 16 different attacking points -each one plays out differently. Each acquisition map has 8 of each.

I do agree they should add another 3 sabo maps though, I understand the undertaking it would be to make other aquisition or domination maps - so doubt that would ever happen.

Silly gameAr5115d ago

OK. I might take that plunge now. I can get behind 30 bucks.

Show all comments (51)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1568d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1568d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1568d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1568d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691568d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1568d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1567d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31567d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1567d ago
Muzikguy1568d ago (Edited 1568d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021568d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1568d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021568d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1568d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1568d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1568d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1568d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1567d ago Replies(1)
1566d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1566d ago
PrinceOfAnger1568d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1568d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1568d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241568d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1567d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1568d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1693d ago (Edited 1693d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1693d ago
TheGamez1001693d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1693d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091693d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1693d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1693d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1693d ago
moomoo3191693d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1693d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1812d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1812d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571811d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1811d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721811d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001812d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1812d ago (Edited 1812d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1812d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1812d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1812d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1811d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1811d ago
Profchaos1810d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1812d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1811d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1811d ago (Edited 1811d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1811d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1810d ago (Edited 1810d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1810d ago (Edited 1810d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)