550°

Xbox 360 Exclusive: Call of Duty: The War Collection

Ironstar: "Apparently, the Call of Duty Collection is soon to be announced."

Read Full Story >>
ironstarmovement.com
Nicholas Cage5105d ago

box looks cool though, most likely 60 dollars, not a bad deal. but imo please dont add mw2. mw1 owns mw2.

Bnet3435105d ago

Two of the three games are multiplatform unless you count COD2 PC multiplatform then yes all of them are. Amazon has the pack listed at $59.99.

- Ghost of Sparta -5105d ago

Exclusive multiplatform games are exclusive.

5105d ago Replies(4)
IdleLeeSiuLung5105d ago (Edited 5105d ago )

but you will always have pricks think that their opinion is universal truth and that because they bought a game somebody else didn't like it is a mistake for all eternity!

bruddahmanmatt5105d ago

Wow. People say "when will Activision ever learn?" In short, they won't. There's a reason that this collection is only coming to the 360. There are simply too many great games on the PS3 for this crap milk job to compete with, and it's a proven fact that more 360 owners eat from the COD trough than PS3 and PC owners. For the sake of all gamers, please xboxers, vote with your dollar and avoid this trash.

blu_yu_away5105d ago (Edited 5105d ago )

Or maybe the real reason it's not coming to the PS3 is because COD 2 was never released on PS3 and it wouldn't make any business sense for Activision to port a nearly 5 year old game to PS3 to sell in a $60 bundle. Last I heard, MW2 was the best selling PS3 game to date by well over a million copies; so PS3 owners obviously eat from the same trough.

avengers19785105d ago

Does one really need a collection of games that they already have. Fans of the series should already have these games, and I guess if you've never played these games you want to jump all over it...oh wait wouldn't you have done that already.
you can buy all of those games right now for an average cost of 15 bucks a piece that's only 45 dollars total, but no come spend 60 on it.

iPad5104d ago

Lmfao. if this was for the PS3, it would all be in ONE disk! :D :D :D

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5104d ago
Glyn_Dwr5105d ago

Uumm no just a bunch of old titles bundled together. Am I missing something?

Natsu X FairyTail5105d ago (Edited 5105d ago )

no different than GOW collection on PS3.

Edit Below: So what? You get 3 COD games that all have Huge Multiplayer Modes and about 20hours + of main caimpaign for all 3 games.

What more do you want?

Parapraxis5105d ago (Edited 5105d ago )

Really Natsu?
I didn't realize these games were being completely remastered with 720p graphics and all new trophies.
Oh and about that price tag.... do you remember how much the GoW collection cost? (PS it was released at $39.99)

Dragun6195105d ago

You know theres a difference between them.

One is a collection of two PS2 titles remastered for the PS3.
While The other is a collection of 3 Xbox360 games but bundled together for the Xbox360. Do you see the difference? Remastered last gen titles while the other is a Bundle of current gen games.

Natsu X FairyTail5105d ago (Edited 5105d ago )

59.99 for 3 Current gen Games in one. You guys are telling it's a bad thing is that it? smh

Silly gameAr5105d ago

You try to hard man. Just chill.

avengers19785105d ago

@Natsu X Fairy Tail... See my 1.7 reply for why your logic is flawed.

karan86245104d ago

Natsu you raging fanboy, why did you have to turn it into an argument?

And hes saying the truth. Its not a new title. Its a new bundle

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5104d ago
kjordanreyna5105d ago

The Call of Dutys nobody wants anymore? What is the point...

Bnet3435105d ago

You're getting three games for the price of one. I'm sure someone will see that as a good deal albeit the games are old.

dragonyght5105d ago

its not a matter of price they making you buying them again which its just sad really

kjordanreyna5105d ago (Edited 5105d ago )

Depends on how good a deal you consider Call of Dutys not named Modern Warfare.

Ssxtreme365105d ago

i'll admit, i actually agreed with you at first seeing how its 3 games for 60 bucks but after checking out some of the average prices for all these games that are being sold as used copies on the 360, i came to the conclusion that you would probably end up paying half as much money buying these games separately as used copies than you would if you were to buy this package brand new.

it seems like its a good deal at first but if you don't mind buying used games, you would probably end up saving 30 bucks at the most on amazon.

boogey1575105d ago

Never played any of these CODs before. I heard COD2 was pretty good.

Parapraxis5105d ago

Good opportunity to pick them up on the cheap.
It'd be nice to see it on PS3 at some point, I also would have rather they bundled CoD 1,2 & 3 rather than putting W@W in there, it seems out of place to me.

Show all comments (55)
200°

Players claim Fortnite ruined Call of Duty by letting in more corporate greed

Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
GoodGuy0911d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.

Tacoboto10d ago

The "good ole days" are actually what drove me away from COD and Halo 3/Reach. Halo 4 becoming a COD-like drove me away from that only a week or so after it launched and I beat its campaign.

It sucked way back then, going a month or two without playing online-shooter-of-the-moment, and then needing to buy a $15 map pack to play with the majority of the population or your favorite playlist. The "community" rejecting Spartan Points in MCC killed that game's support, too. No revenue = no support, plain and simple.

Cacabunga10d ago

That headline could easily be something Spencer could have said 😅 I had to check if it was really an opinion piece

KyRo10d ago

As times gone on, the COD battle pass has got ALOT worse so they can push people to buy the more premium battle pass which itself is a huge rip off and nearly half the price of the base game.

The cosmetics can be fine but they've taken it to far to the point of no return. Why make a military themed game then have rabbits, dinosaurs, cats, rats & z list rappers as skins? You wouldn't add a Lamborghini to a fantasy RPG to replace a horse and you would never see Mario have limb dismemberment because they know what they are. COD is having identity crisis but kids and streamer but then all

franwex10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?

Inverno10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Exactly! Trends don't all need to be followed. Plus where Fortnite got somewhat better with it's monetization, Acti got worse. Or at least Fortnite has lended itself more to the wacky stuff, and has put more effort and quality into that stuff.

jjb198110d ago

I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.

PRIMORDUS10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.

StoneTitan10d ago

I mean cant really blame them for supporting the game that made them the most money and the most people player...ever?

Psychonaut8510d ago

Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance.

Ra30309d ago

100% correct! The makers of Call of Duty ran out of ideas long, long ago so they take ideas from other games like Ghost Recon, Fortnite and any other FPS game hat had success hell CoD remasters maps that they've remastered several times already then charge you again for it. Call of Duty is simply a cut, copy and paste and then put the $70 price on it every year. Activision and now Microsoft has been essentially remastering Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare every year since it was released in 2007 its to the point it's worse than the sports game like the Madden, NBA and others yearly sports franchises.
@Psychonaut85 is spot on "Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance"!

Show all comments (24)
100°

Massive new COD Black Ops Gulf War leak lifts the lid on loadouts

The Black Ops Gulf War leaks continue with a list of weapon descriptions giving more info on what you can expect from new and returning weapons.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
80°

Call of Duty Players Disappointed by $80 B.E.A.S.T. Glove Bundle Deal

Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Kaii18d ago

Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash

melons18d ago

Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.

Gridknac17d ago

They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.

X-2316d ago

I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.