IGN writes: "Honestly, the lack of modes in the manual doesn't matter all that much, though. Most of the modes can be figured out within a few minutes and of course the core idea is one folks can grasp pretty much the first time they fumblingly push X to kick-start the chain reaction. Even with a dead simple concept and a few copy/paste modes, though, Sneezies is a genuinely entertaining game that manages to rise (far) above the alternatives due to the fact that, well, it doesn't suck so much you almost wonder how someone could pay for something so bad. This, though, is not bad. It is good. You should probably buy it, because if you don't, it's more Ramen Heaven for us".
Eurogamer: "Newsflash! Games are pretty good, aren't they? The fact that the BBC's Panorama has taken approximately three decades to work out what some of us sussed out the first time we clapped eyes on an arcade machine in the early eighties is investigative journalism at its most biting. In other news, food is pretty tasty, and some people eat too much of it.
In fairness, some people are just plain stupid and do things to excess, but is that the fault of videogames and the people that make them? Should we be encouraging them to make them less entertaining so that we can go back to smashing up bus stops for kicks? I don't know about you, but I've got a particular bone to pick with those irresponsible folk at HBO for continuing to make TV shows that render me powerless, and nail me to a chair for hours at at a time. Sometimes, I feel literally paralysed with entertainment."
"Overall, Sneezies is one that I suggest you avoid. It provides a little bit fun while it lasts, but most will find it far too repetitive before the end and with little in the way of other game modes, there’s no reason to come back. Its Peggle-like addictive aspect ultimately isn’t enough to save it from becoming boring very quickly. Call me crazy, but I think there’s something inherently wrong with a game that you can beat without once needing to look at the screen."
Pocket Gamer: Pre-school children's television, that surreal world that we all know is now beneath us, is a curious beast. Built on the foundational trinity of repetition, silly noises, and what are ostensibly brightly coloured fat suits, it's clearly no match for the highbrow programming adults enjoy – such as Jeremy Kyle or Jerry Springer.
a professional review from IGN? It reads like something written by a 12 year old.
And I know 12 year olds.
PBR