140°

Modifying a game console punishable by 10 years in jail

A new release from the Royal Canadian mounted police indicates that modifying a games console such as the PS3 or Xbox 360 is a crime in Canada.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.nl
ClownBelt5151d ago

We know. The place where I buy my games got shut down because of this. They were modding PS2 by putting chips inside of it, and the police got a hold of it and bam.

dangert125151d ago

so when you buy it you can't do what you want to it don't mod your xbox to use better fans or a led case =/ lol

Mr_Bun5151d ago

According to google.translate, a website based in the netherlands, claims that the RCMP can put you in prison for modifying a video game console

It is more likely that you can't SELL a modified console

koehler835151d ago

This is actually being completely misrepresented. It is illegally to modify consoles commercially. There's nothing to stop you from modifying your own console. You can even backup copyrighted material for personal consumption.

This entire section of the law actually refers to stealing passwords, keylogging, data mining, copying ATM cards, etc. You can't modify a device to make a copy of someone else's data (Data you don't own a license for). It's fairly clear-cut.

wicko5150d ago

No, it isn't even illegal to modify consoles as a business. It's illegal to sell pirated material and that is the entire reason the guy got busted! There are plenty of places, retail or online, that offer this service and have been for years. I mean, the place I go to is called Global Mods! It's not like it isn't obvious.

Whether it is illegal or not to sell an already modded console, I'm not sure. But there is certainly nothing illegal modding consoles as a service.

pangitkqb5150d ago (Edited 5150d ago )

Why? BECAUSE IT'S THEIR FREAKIN' PROPERTY! What is the point of ownership if it doesn't grant the owner freedom and governance in relation to that which is owned?

Piracy should be punished, because it is stealing, not modification. If I want to put rotating blades and radio signal receivers on my PS3 & 360 and use them as remote-controlled lawnmowers that is MY BUSINESS. Should I be punished for that?

As long as I am not using something to break the law I should be able to use it as I see fit.

Let's maximize freedoms here.

4Sh0w5150d ago

You'll never see a guy arrested for a case modd or modifying his console to make a backup disc for content he legally paid for. The only thing that is illegal is playing or selling pirated games.

karlowma5150d ago (Edited 5150d ago )

You own the hardware, but the software is only licensed to you. As has been mentioned many times, noone is going to come after you if you want an extra fan in your Xbox. The intent is to curb piracy, specifically at a commercial level. This isn't a new law, btw. Just a much-needed clarification of it's interpretation. Look at the date of the source material for his article. Also bask in translation-free accuracy.

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/q...

MUCH mis(interpretation*conception* understanding) to follow.

InFAMOUS15150d ago

Technically the officer releasing the statement gave a half truthful version of the law. I read the article and picked up the phone and called my friend from university who is now a crown attorney for the government of Ontario Canada. This is what she said basically.

While that CCC(Canadian Criminal Code) states that is section 342.1 it is illegal to possess, sell, distribute, any computer device that has been modified to commit an offense under the CCC, there has never been a successful conviction of any one person charged under the act, for NON distribution purposes.
Basically this means that if you modify your console or computer and burn games that you already own, then you will never be taken to court. If however you posses MATERIALS to modify consoles and are selling pirated games then you will be charged and taken to court!

At the end of our conversation she said this
"The only time an investigation is launched is typically when their is either credit card fraud, or someone is making excess of 50k selling pirated software"

Proxy5150d ago

A local case comes to mind where a school teacher embezzled around 12 million dollars from the school district over the years. She was convicted, and the judge was easy on her because she was otherwise an upstanding citizen. She did have to do some community service and pay 75,000 dollar fine.

I think we should start a list of crimes one can commit which will bring a smaller penalty than game piracy. Wouldn't be surprised if murder ends up on the list.

Anon19745150d ago (Edited 5150d ago )

Nothing to see here, folks. The guy was modding systems and selling pirated games in Quebec. That is generally frowned upon in Canada. That being said, this part of the criminal code doesn't deal with the modding of consoles, but as Canada lacks specific laws regarding this type of modification, this is the section that the police will try to twist to make a case against modders.

The RCMP have only ever used this against people modding and reselling consoles AND selling pirated material. To date no one in Canada has served a day of jail time for modding their own consoles.

It's the courts job to interpret the criminal code, it's not the RCMP's job.

JD_Shadow5150d ago

The gray area with this is what exactly constitutes as a piracy claim. That is the gray area; the blurred line that a lot of companies are doing what they can to KEEP blurred in order to be able to shape the laws to fit their bottom line instead of taking care of the consumer. This, in the US, is a form of special interests that is holding our congress hostage.

The problem is what does the "legal" owner do with the copy of software they got once they get it home. What is he or she allowed to do with it? The companies don't even want you to make back ups of that legal software (if it breaks on you, go buy another 50 dollar copy. Hey, we want them to curb piracy, right?), which is something that, as a consumer, you should ALWAYS have the right to do. This is because they don't want to have you giving that back up to a friend to let them play the game or watch the movie or listen to the music. This is not because they care about the law (if they did, they wouldn't be lobbying congress to push for these innane laws and getting away with draconian DRM in software). That is because that's another 50 dollars that goes not to the developer, director, or musician. That money goes to the officers at the top that is going to use that money to buy a new sports car, or take a trip, or get a hooker, or buy a new computer to "pirate" other companies' stuff.

This is a law devised to fit not the consumer, not the people making the entertainment, but to the people that sit in a comfy chair on the top floor of an office or a multimillion dollar company that sit back with their feet propped up on their big desk sucking on a Cuban that don't give a rat's ass if you live or die. The problem is that, like this law is, we want them to tackle piracy because for some reason, that's the absolute only reason any company ever loses money (maybe focus on if their products are absolute sh!t BEFORE trying to make excuses for why they won't change pricing or peddling habits) that we forget that consumers need to have rights too (rights that, at one point in time, we USED to actually HAVE).

JackBNimble5150d ago

Do you guys really think that the R.C.M.P really give a sh!t?

You wouldn't get 10 years for possession of our awesome canibus, do you really think they're going to kick down the door for a modded console.

Funny the Dutch are the ones reporting this BS story.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5150d ago
What Would Kratos Do5151d ago

Thats an interesting law.

So if I were to buy a car in Canada and modify it to go faster therefore making it easier for me to potentially break the speed limit, would that be illegal too?

ClownBelt5151d ago

No and your example suck balls.

What Would Kratos Do5151d ago

My point is that if I buy my console, it should be mine to do with what I want provided I don't use it to break the law.

If i want to put a handle on my 360 and use it as a hair drier then why should there be a law to stop me.

If I want to put wheels and an axe on my PS3 and use it in the next series of Robot Wars then why should anyone stop me?

Eamon5151d ago

Although your example wasn't the best, I understood your point.

The thing is here, Canada is basically removing the consumer's right to do whatever he wants with his product.

This is ridiculous. The law is basically preventing people from opening up their console to do whatever they want with it including from replacing fans to adding chips.

And unsurprsingly this new law is so ambiguous and unclear that you can just smell that Canada's government were paid off by industry lobbyists to introduce the bill.

This is sad because this new law is unclear in what it's specifically trying to make illegal which obviously shows that it was all in the benefit of money hungry coorporations who claim they lose money due to piracy but in reality it's not true.

The day governments start introducing new laws for the benefit of a few rich men, that's when the world is on it's brink.

kneon5151d ago

No one is going to arrest you for putting a custom case on your console or adding fans.

But if you modify your console to play pirated games/movies or to allow you to break the DRM on games or movies then then why shouldn't they be able to throw your ass in jail.

Eamon5150d ago (Edited 5150d ago )

kneon, that's like saying if you're walking in the street with a pen in your pocket, you have the potential to stab someone with it. Therefore if you're caught having a pen in your pocket, you should get arrested.

Don't be fooled by the lip service from these greedy type of hypocrites who's only purpose is to convince you that they are not taking away your right but only protecting themselves.

Companies want to maximise profit. If you continue to give in to them, one day they'll make it illegal for you to buy preowned games or they'll just turn everything into digital distribution.

Every smart person knows that piracy hardly has any effect on the industry. Preowned games DO have a big effect!

kneon5150d ago

What right are they taking away? Your right to pirate games? Your "right" to pirate games is still intact, as is their right to arrest you for it.

Darkstorn5150d ago

@2.3-
Sounds like Canada is becoming more and more like the U.S.

We've got government and corporations nearly intertwined; it's so bad that we have to actually write legislation around the interests of lobbyists, killing any chance for real, tangible reform.

The last health care bill is an example. It was gutted by the insurance industry and came out a husk of its former self.

InFAMOUS15150d ago

@ Eamon

You seem to have NOT read the actual law in the CCC.

It basically says if you modify a console for ILLEGAL purposes. So you can modify a console to put some lights on it, or add a new case, or maybe a new fan. What you CANT do is modify it for ILLEGAL purposes, like copyright infringement!

5150d ago
+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5150d ago
solidworm5151d ago

cos you wouldnt be breaking any law would you.

What Would Kratos Do5151d ago (Edited 5151d ago )

So why is it illegal to modify a games console?

Would it not only be illegal if you were to play a pirated game in it?

It IS legal for you to make back-ups of your own legally purchased media in the UK for your own use.

(I don't support game piracy, I'm just playing devils advocate)

Walrus5151d ago

Because this is Canada and their laws don't have to make sense.

Mr_Bun5151d ago (Edited 5151d ago )

Example, it is illegal to drive a vehicle containing a case of "light beer" unless it is for the sole purpose of delivery to a U.S. citizen...and even then you can still be fined.

wicko5150d ago

This interpretation of the law is inaccurate. The guy being quoted doesn't understand the law. There are many businesses that offer a service where they modify your console. Perfectly legal, and you can perform the service yourself as well. It's that modifying your console with the intent to commit copyright infringement that is the problem. However, modifying your console does not prove anything about intent to infringe copyrights so you are safe. It's only if you are caught with pirated material (if that, you might actually have to be selling it to get in any real trouble).

karlowma5150d ago

http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/q...

"Project Certifier led to the seizure of 31 modified consoles and over 800 counterfeit video games. Thirteen computers, many computer components used to modify consoles and illegally reproduce video games, as well as 12 external hard drives containing hundreds of copied video games were also seized. It is believed that the individuals involved conducted their criminal activities in the Québec City area and sold and distributed the consoles and games, among others, via Internet sites."

Pretty easy to see the illegality here people!

Daver5150d ago

@3.2 Walrus

I hope you are not living in USA for saying that because United states have the worst laws and you can get arrested for ridiculous things

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5150d ago
Ravage275151d ago

this should be implemented in all countries

Kushan5151d ago

Sorry, but no. I like being able to case mod my console, or replace the fans with better/quieter ones, or heaven forbid, replace a broken component without paying Sony or Microsoft a rediculous fee (£100 to fix a PS3 in the UK?!).

dorron5151d ago

This law is stupid.

If I buy a machine, that machine is mine to do whatever I want. I would be breaking the law ONLY if I played pirated games on it.

Eamon5151d ago (Edited 5151d ago )

Exactly, but since when do fat rich men care about your rights?

They claim to "lose potential sales" when in reality it's a facade for "we want to make more money."

The logic here is that pirates would not buy most of the stuff they pirate. Therefore there were no potential sale loss anyway.

Obviously, MS/Nintendo lobbyists paid off the government to introduce the new law that is directly targetting their citizens for the sake of a couple of rich men who want even more money.

But then, this is how capitalism works in the West.

BeaArthur5151d ago

Agreed, as long as you are not taking it online and having an advantage I don't care what people do with their consoles.

wicko5150d ago

And thats exactly what the law is, you only get in trouble if you are caught pirating material. The guy being quoted misunderstood the law.

Show all comments (67)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader822d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal

210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel5d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow5d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1824d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie4d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

3d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Notellin3d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

3d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere3d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX4d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney2d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno4d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno4d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

3d ago
fsfsxii3d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno3d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)