300°

Only Sony is Stopping Sony From Being Number One in Games

GFB writes: "While fanboys argue back and forth about what holds the Xbox 360 back or why the Wii is "lame", the Playstation 3 and Playstation Portable hardware have been facing the toughest foe of all, their own manufacturer. For some reason Sony just keeps shooting itself in the foot and refusing to catch on.

Starting back with Sony's first major marketing mistake of this generation, the home of Playstation decided to create a fake marketing campaign called 'all i want for xmas is a psp' which resulted in a huge backlash from gamers. Some still argue that the PSP hasn't recovered from the viral stigma slapped on it from this horrible holiday campaign."

Read Full Story >>
gofanboy.com
Jamie Foxx5164d ago (Edited 5164d ago )

Sony have the best first party games,most powerful console,reliabilty,best equipped for the future,most first party developers everything is in place...I believe marketing its strengths is what's needed because if microsoft could boast all of the above we would see commercials saying 'only our console is pushing gaming graphically,only our console has bluray,and our online is free'

Sony need to get aggressive,and get consoles instore

Speed Racer5164d ago

Really? so you dont count the 2 years in a row we got game of the year? 2008( littlebigplanet) 2009(uncharted 2) 2010 probably god of war 3. the ps3 has pushed the graphics bar very very high, and uncharted 2 holds the crown.

VG_Releaser5164d ago

Did you read it at all? The article says the Sony hardware and games are the best. Are you illiterate or only read the title?

poontab5164d ago

Garbage Article. Sony's made a lot of mistakes (IMO nonexistent marketing in NA being the worst) but the PSP? When the PSP in Japan sells 30k+ every week I doubt they really mind the PSPgo floundering.

Lifendz5164d ago

The Author really should've expanded on what Sony has done to correct initial mistakes/shortcomings. The only thing I can knock Sony for now is the shortages of PS3s that everyone seems to be experiencing. Still find it hard to believe that if you live in a major city you can't find a PS3.

The only thing I would say Sony should start doing is give consumers the option buying a PS3 with a blu-tooth and/or a blu-tooth headset in every PS3 box.

Right now the quality of PS3 exclusives and 3rd party multiplats are incredible, God of War 3 needs to be seen to be believed, and GT5 is on the way. I'd say Sony, despite the mistakes early on, have done a stellar job recently in revamping the PS3.

wicko5164d ago (Edited 5164d ago )

I don't think the PSP Go was even meant to replace the 3000. When faced with complaints about the price, they said it was aimed at early adopters. It would have performed better if they had managed to get the entire PSP library digital, and also allow those who bought a hardcopy to be able to download it for free onto the Go. And honestly, that issue wasn't their fault, publishers just wouldn't go for it. Not to mention that some game retailers wouldn't even stock the Go.

PSP Go was more of an experiment than any kind of successor. I hope they continue going digital only with the PSP2 right out the gate. Game retailers like EB/Gamestop can go screw themselves, I could care less if they can't make money off the console, they make enough peddling used games for 5$ below the new price.

sikbeta5164d ago

Don't Give a Damn, Sony is making Amazing Games and as Jamie Foxx said The only problem with Sony is that they don't make enough PS3s

Lightsaber5164d ago

This just proves how F'ing stupid ps3 fanboys are you guys dont have 2 brain cells between the lot of you. Seriously you are f*cking ranting and all you read was the damn title and I'm sure it took you hours just to read that much.

btw the article is about the psp not the ps3

Syronicus5164d ago

They show us exactly how ignorant the journalists are getting and have been over the years. Most of thee journalists were not even around when the PSone launched and cannot make a connection between the launch of the PSone, PS2 and the PS3. Sony has been very consistent between each launch and the sales of each console have been very close. The PS3 was the first of the three to hit the market at such a high price tag but despite the huge price tag it is still selling and has sold faster than the 360. When the 360 had close to an 8 million console lead over the PS3 they now only have a 5 million console lead and that is slimming down very fast now that the PS3 has hit its stride. Once Sony irons out supply issues, you will see the PS3 in tops with sales month to month and their ten year track is on point and slated to show us all that once again, Sony is king when it comes to supporting their consoles for the decade, just as they promise.

ThanatosDMC5164d ago (Edited 5164d ago )

Sony has the most games coming out and it keeps on churning it high quality games. The other two consoles... well... it takes them 6-12 months to come out with something worth while.

PSP is somewhat dead in the water due to publishers not wanting to lose money due to piracy. I hope PSP2 will be rock solid and be unhackable for a long time like the PS3.

God_Of_Epicness5164d ago

Only God Of War is stopping 360 and Wii from "completely" overtaking PS3. Kratos is standing strong and will hold the barrier long enough for other games like GT5 to come in and soon, PS3 will reach number 2 and skips past number 1 and cement it's place as the best next gen console cos 360 is hardly next gen. Wii on the other hand is PS1 generation with those funny "everyone has a big round head" graphics.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5164d ago
Michael Myers5164d ago

this article fails miserably, forget about metal gear solid getting game of the decade on vgcharts? guy above me got it right, i can go on and on, but before i do, ill play beyond.

5164d ago
RedDragan5164d ago

Michael Myers, I love the PS3.

But the article is not bashing the PS3, if anything it is lauding it with praise.

Even today they do not state all the features it can do, but they are doing a better job advertising it today.

The high price wasn't that much of a crisis point, people still bought into the console in high numbers but considering the massive profits from blu-ray related merchandise and cell revenues from business servers... they could have sold from Day 1 at £250 without an operating loss to the parent company Sony Corp.

Sony Corp realised all along PS3 would start off as a money loser, but that was completely made irrelevant by the big profits coming in from the PS3 tech used in other things. Sony Corp gets money from every blu-ray disc ever sold, every blu-ray player ever sold, every blu-ray recorder ever sold, every cell processor sold.

Servers that would cost £2000 and going for over £10,000... just because it has Cell and that processor is far superior to Sun's, Intel and AMD processors for the jobs they are required to do. Those reports of Cell being doomed are quite funny, since they tend to come from "Gaming" websites.

not including Wii, PS3 actually had a good start... it just wasn't selling as quick as Wii, all of a sudden US media deem it a failure because it takes the heat of their own company which has sold worse on every month-by-month comparison to date. Even month 1 sales for PS3 was better than month 1 sales for 360.

However, I know it sounds like I am rambling (I kinda am, but can't be bothered to delete all that) the article is saying what if.... What if they did sell for £250 on month 1? What if they did advertise the blu-ray from month 1?

My guess is it would be close behind Wii.

aCHU5164d ago

while these so called "journalists" and blogs,game sites ec t ect.. dwell on the past of sonys mistakes.. sony themselves are looking into the future and where to keep on improving and giving gamers what they want the most.. LAG FREE online gaming for no price and exclusives that not only push and raise the bar graphically and gameplay wise,but give us ps3 gamers new IP's to get our feet wet into.

something other competition try's but has not succeded very well..
every company makes/made mistakes.. the point is to LEARN from them and only improve on them were needed.

its all about us gamers in the end and no one has done it better then sony since the ps1 days :)

5164d ago
unrealgamer585164d ago

no no it's dumb @ss sites like you'res who's holding sony back

GunShotEddy5164d ago

This article praises the hardware and games of Sony, but the fanboys didn't get past the idea that there may be fault with their god-like company. I guess fanboys can't read.

s45gr325164d ago

Fanboys are fanboys and its bloody sad that the fanboys are now the majority and the gamers like you and I are the minority. The article was spot on you can't deny the fact that the launch PS3 marketing campaign was horrible because it was horrible it didn't inform the gamers what the PS3 was capable. Is bloody sad that gamers can't comprehend that you need an operating system not a computer to make games. Man like the article says the PSP Go has been a failure PSP owners prefer the PSP 3000 over the PSP Go and that's a fact. Damn!!! these people just read the title wich was a misleading title but it was spot on and non-fanboyism a rarity these days.

Show all comments (59)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga1d 23h ago (Edited 1d 23h ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1821d 22h ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie1d 13h ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

1d 7h ago
Hereandthere1d 4h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 4h ago
Notellin1d 9h ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

1d 7h ago
Hereandthere1d 4h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow13h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 4h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow14h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney8h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Sheppard7t31d 22h ago

How did Sony kill the series?

Inverno1d 22h ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

1d 7h ago
fsfsxii1d 9h ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno1d 7h ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)