160°

First MAG DLC free, coming next week

Posted by Jeremy Dunham, Sr. Community Manager of Zipper Interactive on the PS Blog.

"On behalf of everyone here at Zipper Interactive, I'm pleased to announce that beginning March 25, our first official MAG downloadable add-on will be made available to players worldwide absolutely free of charge!

Dubbed the "Trooper Gear Pack," our first DLC addition to the MAG universe will offer a number of cool goodies for veterans and first timers alike. Out of everything in the pack, the most popular will likely be the oft-requested "Flashbang Grenade" that can be used to confuse, disorient or distract your enemies in a single throw..."

Read Full Story >>
blog.us.playstation.com
JoeReno5172d ago

Your support of this game is awesome.

ChozenWoan5172d ago

Massive Admiration from Gamers!!!

Keep up the Massive work Zipper.

guitarded775171d ago

Zipper is doing a great job supporting this game... I wish every developer would pay this much attention to their games post launch. Now with the free DLC and double XP... kudos.

Chubear5171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

..now why the hell would I give my $60 in support to a game like MW2 over a game like MAG? Answer is I just wouldn't.

Thank you Zipper.

Flash bangs! now that's going to make the battle with damaging the pumps on the final leg of domination rather interesting muhahahahaha!!! XD

badz1495171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

they sure know how to make a groundbreaking game and attract people with post launch support! nice job! even a game as critically acclaimed as Uncharted 2 gets free stuff after launch and now MAG!

TehSuperCell5171d ago

Chubear, it is simple.

MW2 is just plain fun. BF:BC2 is WAAAY funner. Most addicting games this gen. Right up there wich counter strike.

Now, you may save yourself money, just as I did.
I bought MW2 and BFBC2 when they came out new.
Why?
Because it was worth every penny. The community, and the addictivness.
Mag... i bought it used 20 dollars at gamestop. Im already bored with it. Im thinking of selling it to buy the new Splinter Cell. New. Why?
Ubi deserves every penny for making one of the best stealth games this gen. Thats why. I just want to have fun.

40cal5171d ago

I am going to have to stop playing GOW III and FFXIII for a few days.

itsralf5171d ago

A. "Funner" is not a word. I believe you meant to say "more fun."
B. MAG is $50-$55 used at GameStop, and the trade-in is $20.
C. Have you played the new Splinter Cell? Didn't think so.

Now go back under your bridge.

El_Colombiano5171d ago

That above me was pure pwnage

5171d ago
FanboysWillHateMe5171d ago

I can't see why you guys would prefer that shooter over MW2 or BC2, I really can't. I mean, reviews aren't everything, but just look all the scores this game got. Not bad, but compared to other shooters, yes bad. Take away that whole 256 player feature and it goes from average to below average.

-Alpha5171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

"Take away that whole 256 player feature and it goes from average to below average"

Taking out the defining feature and trying to say a game would suck without it is rather pointless. Take out vehicles and classes in BC2 and it will suck. Take out killstreaks in MW2 and it will get better actually...

But see? I can do that too.

Anyways, MAG is not "ZOMG, GREATEST SHOOTER EVAR!!1!", but it's fun, and DEFINITELY better than IW's failure that is MW2. MAG isn't the most polished all-around game: graphics can be poor, vehicle controls feel tacked on and last-minute, but the core heart of the game shines with great finesse. It's a well controlled and organized game where teamwork is essential and almost always present, even when playing with strangers.

MAG doesn't even have to be a good game to beat MW2. MW2 fails on its own. But MAG is fun, at least for me. If it's not your style then that's cool, more power to you, but how anyone can support MW2 is beyond me.

Perhaps instead of saying MAG sucks you can offer some valid reasons why, and then support why you think MW2 is so much better. I'll do the same if you like and that way we can have a decent and rational conversation about it. Your name is "FanboysWillHateMe" so I assume you are able to put up a civil debate.

TehSuperCell5171d ago

@dinorawrr
A. Thank you for correcting me, slave.
B. The guy at my gamestop had it for 20.
C. I played the demo on xbox.

@El_Colombiano
That seems like a pure butt kiss attempt.

@cool cole
Wow man, whats up with the personal attack?

@FanboysWillHateMe
You MUST like it. If not, you are a fanboy/casual/noob.
No need to be upset just because I dont like your favorite games, bro.

cool cole5171d ago

I'm sorry, did you take it personally?

FanboysWillHateMe5171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

Well, thing is, those killstreaks and vehicles complement what is already solid gameplay. Take out vehicles in BC2 and I'll still have a blast shooting other people. Take out killstreaks and I'll still have a blast shooting other people. MAG? They can add a thousand players to the capacity, and I still wouldn't try it again.

MAG is a mediocre shooter that supports 256 players. 12, 24, 256, 512, none of it matters if the shooting isn't good. I'm not the only one that thinks this way, there's a reason why its reception has been mixed.

edit: man, don't bother with that whole rational evidence type of thing. we got our opinions, i just feel this strongly about mine. besides, i just finished finals, another persuasive essay is the last thing i need.

TehSuperCell5171d ago

Yes I took it personally. You basically want me dead, only because I dont support your favorite game/console/company, or... not sure, but you just seem to dislike me based on my opinions.
You are further proof why Sony fanboys are the worst.
Thank you for prooving the stereotype true.

Now go play your glorified bluray player.
Go play your single player DMC ripoff.
Enjoy your inferior online service.
I will now enjoy a nice game of Halo, a game loved by millions, both hardcore and casuals. Yes, an 07 game that still beats any game to date. :)

CernaML5171d ago

MW2 isn't fun. Your opinion means nothing. Now shoo! :V

thief5171d ago

"I tried MAG for a few minutes and returned it instantly"
Well, MAG is not the game for you obviously. You need to put in the time, and the payoff is much deeper.

"Take away that whole 256 player feature and it goes from average to below average. "
A comment that really exposes you as someone who diodnt get the game - because anyone who played MAG knows that 256 player is NOT the defining feature - its the emphasis on temawork, leaders and squads, having 256 players is rather more the consequence of that design.

TehSuperCell - the really sad thing is that you dont even realise how pathetic you are. Go back to Halo, you deserve that game.

bjornbear5171d ago

free DLC =O awesome! didn't expect this but this is really great! it'd be cool to see another class or something

@ far frake...

you never know when to stop typing do you?

if you don't like this game, fine, go play something else

stop embarrassing yourself before many people you don't know

anonymity only works so far...

FanboysWillHateMe5171d ago

As I've said throughout this thread, if the gunplay/shooting is mediocre, I can't care less what its defining feature is. More players in each match? Teamwork, leaders, and squads? Whatever you think it's main attraction is, it's rendered worthless if the shooting mechanics are terrible, which they are.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 5171d ago
raztad5172d ago

Zipper ROCKS. Their support for MAG is incredible. I'll be back to it as soon as I finish GoW3. Cant wait to try those flash granades and win some double XP :D.

RAVEN FTW!

mr.selfdestruct5172d ago

Double exp, free weapons, flashbangs, and uniforms sounds good to me. FFXIII is getting a break in a few days, for sure.

ivant5172d ago (Edited 5172d ago )

Good news.

But new maps needed in different climates and night warefare. MAG would be insane with night matches with/without night vision googles, & add gas mask.

btw. Don't abandon MAG zipper. This is a great shooter franchise akin to Battlefield, that could become mindblowing with improvements after improvements. MAG 2 for sure, Socom 4, meh.

5171d ago
trane075171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

*Smooches*

cool cole5171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

Murderdolls is a pretty big fanboy.
On Topic: Ya the Brave Little Toaster is cool.

El_Colombiano5171d ago

Yeah pretty bad fanboy too.

Toaster ftw

Anon73495171d ago

Fanboys will stop arguing, for the toaster.....

Cool beans.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5171d ago
GodFather875172d ago

if I should buy MAG. I'm afraid of missing a great game ...

gamingisnotacrime5171d ago

the huge scope of MAG is what makes it special, while BC2 has a lot of crazy things to do in the matches, i like that a lot. Only con on BC2 is that there are too many snipers, and the maps layouts allowed them to almost dominate the match.
Rush is my favorite mode so far

-Alpha5171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

But MAG's great fun also: it ultimately depends on your taste. If you have an interest in shooters then any of them are a good choice: MAG relies on squad teamwork and strangers tend to be very cooperative which is rare in games. I had this one OIC who sounded very professional and laid out the plan ASAP, and players are extremely cooperative. I enjoy the maturity in MAG. BC2 has a ton of variety in terms of gameplay though: there are so many great ways to kill enemies and the pacing of their modes is much varied than in MAG-- for example, they have short and long modes (Squad rush compared to Conquest) while MAG matches tend to last longer. BC2's classes are well balanced and though there isn't the level of maturity or teamwork in MAG, it does exist depending on who you play with and if you play with friends. It's sometimes frustrating having idiot snipers on your team who are far away from the objective and who only care for KDR. It's like all the MW2 fans decided to hop on and play as a sniper. Luckily the community is finding its way and these players are starting to disappear.

If you aren't much of a shooter fan skip both, if you are looking for a good multiplayer then either or is a great choice. Keep in mind MAG doesn't have a SP, but BC2's is pretty mediocre stuff, so it really doesn't matter.

What I love about both games is that you earn your experience points: In MAG Fragos are great fun to collect because points are worth a lot towards unlocking your skill tree, and in BC2 you are constantly unlocking new content for each of your classes. The added thing with MAG is that leveling allows you to eventually become a leader, while in BC2 leveling allows you to handle special weapons like WW2 guns or G3's.

Bottom line: Don't get MW2 lol.

gamingisnotacrime5171d ago

yep, BC2 campaign makes me wonder, what were they thinking? is pretty bad stuff. As for the MAG vs BC2 comparison, i think if someone can have both, they should. BC2 is crazy in MP, it has classes, vehicles, buildings go down, is fun. MAG has a lot of team work at its core, which is what i love the most about MAG.
I prefer MAg, but at the end of the day i see these 2 games as different approaches to the genre, excellent on both ends

-Alpha5171d ago (Edited 5171d ago )

Agreed, + Bubbles for your common sense lol. I'm fortunate to have both, and though I prefer BC2's variety, I enjoy the "controlled chaos" of MAG and the teamwork of strangers. It's a system that works and its very impressive to see people simply playing games together as opposed to selfishly trying to gain the highest KDR like in COD.

I actually enjoy COD a lot, but #4 was much better. Nobody works together in MW2 as it's all about "me", but in CoD4 people were much more focused on teamwork. It's a shame that games like MW2 promote such crappy antics and it's even sadder when different FPS's are molded through the "COD effect".

bjornbear5171d ago

it did leave me lacking a bit at the end, but i did expect worst =O

i loved the "freezing cold" level and the whole helicopter bail part onward was how the game should have been the whole way =D!

but yeah its basically overshadowed by the MP

but thats no bad thing =) i def see myself replaying the campaign fr the extra m-com's with pleasure ^^

still - i do prefer BF:BC2 to MAG, but that doesn't mean MAG is a bad game

its just not for me =/

i do hate thought that in BF:BC2 it isn't easy finding a team that works well together =( if i don't play w m8's in a squad my team tends to loose -_- even if i do fine myself, its not as good if your team always looses =(

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5171d ago
Show all comments (76)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1570d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1570d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1569d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1570d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691569d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1569d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1569d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31569d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1569d ago
Muzikguy1570d ago (Edited 1570d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021570d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1569d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021569d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1569d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1569d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1570d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1569d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1568d ago Replies(1)
1568d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1568d ago
PrinceOfAnger1570d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1570d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1569d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241569d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1569d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1570d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1694d ago (Edited 1694d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1694d ago
TheGamez1001694d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1694d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091694d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1694d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1694d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1694d ago
moomoo3191694d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1694d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1814d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1814d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571813d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1813d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721813d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001814d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1814d ago (Edited 1814d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1813d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1813d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1813d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1812d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1812d ago
Profchaos1812d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1814d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1812d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1813d ago (Edited 1813d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1812d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1812d ago (Edited 1812d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1812d ago (Edited 1812d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)