40°

GameBrit.com: Why the Wii will beat Project Natal and Playstation Move

"So, motion controllers? Are they really the future of gaming, or just a big fad that only kids and grandparents enjoy? Without being able to travel twenty years into the future to pass judgement, you can only hazard a guess that neither of those two statements prove to be implicitly true."

Read Full Story >>
gamebrit.com
whateva5178d ago (Edited 5178d ago )

check this out!

http://i44.tinypic.com/wgzw...

http://i44.tinypic.com/2jg2...

it does the things that the wii can do and it can do stuff that Project Natal can do.

WildArmed5178d ago

They had an demo like that for the Eyetoy too before.
I wonder how it translates into game.
Can't wait for e3

tunaks15178d ago

3 words why Wii>Natal and Move

Mario
Metroid
Zelda

software>hardware in the motion war

WildArmed5178d ago

I agree for now.
The fact that wii has millions of lead on Move n natal doesn't prove anything.

But the lack of software does.
So far Sony has shown me one or two titles I may be interesting in getting Move for.
(Gt5/Socom.. and Gt5 is still up in the air? The casual games I dont really care about at this point)
And atm I dont recall any Natal games to mind.

So if after E3 Sony n MS continue to show a lacking software lineup, it might as well not bring em out this fall and wait till next year.

I can have the best tech in the world, but w/o anyone using it, it'll be useless.

LittleBigSackBoy5178d ago

Wouldn't try to compair Wii's line up vs PS3's if i were you. Sony has alot of studios that can make games that support Move. Plus there's all the 3rd party games that release on the PS3/360, and not the Wii. If Natal/Move get support from enough developers, they could easily have the better Motion control games line up.

Blackcanary5178d ago

will be using Head Tracking i can't wait.

WildArmed5178d ago

we aren't comparing the PS3 lineup vs Wii.
Because the Ps3 lineup is always top notch.

But the PS Move software lineup isn't so hot.. atm.

E3 will fill alot of those software. so till then PS Move doesn't really have alot of support like the Wii does..
Granted that Wii is just motion games for the most part, while sony does DS3 and PS Move now.

Mahr5178d ago

"Sony has alot of studios that can make games that support Move. Plus there's all the 3rd party games that release on the PS3/360, and not the Wii. If Natal/Move get support from enough developers, they could easily have the better Motion control games line up"

Remember when those developers were doing stuff with the Six Axis and coming out with games like Flower and the Ratchet and Clank games, and then consumers went with the Wii line up instead? There's an important lesson there.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5178d ago
eagle215178d ago

The Wii wins hands down. ;)

Zelda Wii. That's all I have to say about a killer app that uses motion plus. Name another game on that level of anticipation that uses motion coming this year for Natal or Move. :)

N4g_null5177d ago

@LittleBigSackBoy

So you have a realistic racing game and you expect it not to use a pc like wheel and paddle for game play. On top of this please tell me how to hold the move side ways? You see that instant fail. Didnt see it coming did you?

On top of this all of sonys eyetoy games failed at retail. All of them!

Samus HD5178d ago

the wii has the best motion controls cuz:

1.it can be used side ways
2.Wii wheel Wii Zaper etc....
3.Wii balance board
4.and that new thing that it will be released soon ...
5.......

ps3 move a totally Copy . Natal no chance for competing with Wii

end of storyyy

Ps_alm3k5178d ago

Nintendo aren't aiming for Hardcore audience.
Sony are doing both. yes they have more Dev studio then Nintendo and ms combine.
Sony can also make those silly w!! games in an instant( pump out every month)
Now that sony have the same Motion control as W!!, sony is tapping into their market.
because third party will port those game to sony as well. The only thing left to make people want to get a W!! now is, Mario, Zelda, Metroid.

tunaks15178d ago (Edited 5178d ago )

Red Steel 2
Fragile
Murumasa
Monster Hunter Tri
Xenoblade
NBA Jam
The Last Story
NMH 2
Tatsunoko vs Capcom
Sin & Punishment: Star Successor
Arc Rise Fantasia
Dragon Quest X
I could go on, Even though Zelda Mario and Metroid are awesome these titles still exist

Fierce Musashi5178d ago (Edited 5178d ago )

Ps_alm3k:
You just mentioning Mario, Zelda, & Metroid proved that they aren't targeting just the casuals. I must ask you, do you read Wii related articles often or just when it's something console war related? If you haven't, let me inform you. Nintendo's 2010 line up is most certainly not casual based. Hell, they are even supporting Monster Hunter Tri, a game that's not even first nor second party in a franchise that's isn't even know to be on Nintendo platforms. Nintendo wants the Wii to be a console for everyone, including the "hardcores".

On to the Move:
If (IF) Sony is indeed trying to steal the Wii's thunder then they are going to have to give the PS3 a price cut as well as bundle the controller and a game or two in order to compete, considering that the controller (to my knowing) is sold seprately. When it comes down to it, the Wii is the way to go for casuals when prices start getting compared. Why pay extra for pretty much the exact same experence?

Show all comments (22)
50°

Air Conflicts: Secret Wars - PlayStation Move's Best Kept Secret

Air Conflicts: Secret Wars debuted in 2011, and later updated for modern consoles. However, it's the PlayStation 3 edition that stands out.

350°

Why the PlayStation Move Failed

Sony's PlayStation Move may not have been able to contend with Nintendo's Wii, but it paved the way for PlayStation VR's success story.

SullysCigar978d ago

I use them most days and have for years 🤷🏻‍♂️

They're definitely way past a needed update, but I've got a tonne of fun out of them, so they haven't failed me.

bouzebbal978d ago

The best motion control platform it's so intuitive.. Died due to lack of support from Sony.. It had some amazing games

thorstein978d ago

They are used constantly for PSVR games. So, no they haven't failed. Neither has PSVR (or VR in general.)

Bigman4k978d ago (Edited 978d ago )

The article was talking about why it ps move failed before psvr came along

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH979d ago

It failed because it sucked plain and simple.

LOGICWINS979d ago

I feel that's a bit harsh. To this day, playing Killzone 3's campaign with PS Move/Sharpshooter gun combo is the most fun/immersive experience I've ever had with an FPS.

I think Move was simply not as profitable as Sony wanted it to be, but it didn't "suck".

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH979d ago

It most definitely sucked. You people can act like it was something special all you want but it was horrible. The entire motion control fad was a waste of resources and time. Ever single motion controller besides the Wii failed and is no longer being used today in gaming. It's ok to admit it...

Minute Man 721979d ago

@SPEAK

The Move was better that the Wii mote. If the Wii was anywhere accurate as the Move was you could say the Wii was better. Sure it sold boatloads but was it really played consistently??

yeahokwhatever978d ago

I played it in 3D with the move gun on a 100 inch projector and it BLEW MY MIND. I was exhausted, but i finished the campaign standing there.

SullysCigar978d ago

"Ever single motion controller besides the Wii failed and is no longer being used today in gaming"

Just no. Games release most weeks (for years now) that support Move controllers. Some ONLY use Move controllers.

Look, I get you're not a fan, but if you're going to rant, at least inform yourself in advance.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 978d ago
LordoftheCritics979d ago

I would say both Move and Kinect weren't supported properly.

Sony and MS abandoned what could have been amazing.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH979d ago

Kinect sucked too. I would say Kinect may have been cool had it worked as intended but it was ahead of it's time. Both Kinect and Move are gimmicks nothing more. I honestly don't see why Sony still implements "motion controls" recent controllers. Who really uses that crap? And to play what?

Profchaos978d ago

I so t think Sony abandoned the move it's technically repurposed and still supported on the ps5 just for VR

RedDevils978d ago

Kinect should be kept as media interactive features.

LordoftheCritics979d ago (Edited 979d ago )

@SPEAKxTHExTRUTH
Again if it was supported right.

Where even a fast click of my fingers could get an immediate in game response.

It feels trash because we have been shown or lived with bad versions of gesture based tech. Think Minority Report fast. That could be something.

''You people can act like it was something special all you want but it was horrible.''

No one is acting like it was special, I said it could be amazing.

''I think Move was simply not as profitable as Sony wanted it to be''

Like I said, it wasnt supported. Give us a AAA game with precision gestures well implemented into the game and then we can discuss profits.

979d ago
SPEAKxTHExTRUTH978d ago

I don't deal in "what if". It wasn't supported right and even if it was it was still a gimmick.

thorstein978d ago

"Like I said, it wasnt supported. Give us a AAA game with precision gestures well implemented into the game"

You just described every AAA PSVR game. And even the indies have incredible integration. No Man's Sky VR is insanely good.

Silly gameAr979d ago

And, you can act like it was horrible, but I had a blast with my Move. I had the whole collection of House of the Dead, Dead Space Extraction, and RE Darkside Cronicles, The Fight, and Socom 4, and I would play the hell out of those games I even beat a playthrough of the Resistance 3 campaign with the Move. Getting drunk and playing with friends was a freaking blast.

You can pretend that you had a move and played it all you want SPeak the Truth, but it was accurate, and usually on point. I hate when people act like they've played something just to trash it, when they really just have a vendetta, and think the Move is easy prey for your hate.

Minute Man 721979d ago

Wait you can play Dead Space with the Move?? I need it

Orchard979d ago

“You can pretend that you had a move”

I love this crazy idea that if someone has something bad to say about hardware/software - they must be lying about owning it and clearly do not own it!

Because all hardware and software has a 100% approval rating from all purchasers…

P_Bomb978d ago (Edited 978d ago )

Shoot I forgot about Dead Space Extraction and Umbrella Chronicles. Had those too. Still do (digital).

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH978d ago

I have a vendetta against Move? Lmao that's the most ridiculous comment I've read today. I didn't buy it because like I said motion controls are gimmicks. I had a Wii and it was decent enough but a gimmick although successful. I had a Kinect and it too was trash. Don't act as if you know what I have and haven't owned. Move was nothing more than a Wiimote ripoff

yeahokwhatever978d ago

SO MANY really great experiences for the Move. The Fight was excellent!

Silly gameAr978d ago (Edited 978d ago )

@Minute Man

There was a game called Dead Space Extraction that you could play the Move with.

@Orchard. Please don't reply to me, because every time I say something to you, I magically end up restricted. So, just ignore me like I ignore you, so there will be no hurt feelings, please.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 978d ago
Vanfernal978d ago

"Ever single motion controller besides the Wii failed and is no longer being used today in gaming. It's ok to admit it..."

That is demostrably false.... Most VR games have motion controls and the PSVR uses the Move controllers.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH978d ago (Edited 978d ago )

VR games have a controller most of the time not some magic wand. And VR is not the same as PS move or Kinect. I'm not a fan of VR either. A controller and a couch is all I need for my gaming needs.

Vanfernal978d ago

@SPEAKxTHExTRUTH

"And VR is not the same as PS move or Kinect."

PSVR LITERALLY uses the Move controllers. Now it's just obvious you have no idea what you're talking about. You're saying Move failed and nobody uses it anymore when it's an integral part of PSVR and is still being used in 2021.

ScootaKuH978d ago

It didn't suck. It worked but the games just weren't there, that's why it failed.

Father__Merrin978d ago

The move was excellent it was 1 to 1 precise time crisis was a joy to play aswell as sports champions it didn't hit mainstream as it was an addon unlike Nintendo wiimote

978d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 978d ago
Godmars290979d ago

Lack of games that proved the concept that 3rd parties could then copy en masse?

Silly Mammo978d ago

I wish that someone would have made a proper boxing game. I still have a blast with the Sports Champions boxing, but to have a boxing game that was more in-depth would have been awesome.

Dario_DC978d ago

Try Creed for PSVR, it's brilliant

OMGitzThatGuy979d ago

Because it was a uninspired ripoff of the Wii controller without the Nintendo library to back it and didn't try to put any real effort into development such as getting their top developers to make games for it and instead gave tech demos disguised as games to their least talented developers so the best can focus on single player only games.

Ryushaa979d ago

Except the Move was an idea roughly implemented in the PS2. Yes, I'm serious.
Just search on youtube: PlayStation 2 - Motion Controller (2004)

Nonetheless, just like the whole Wii, it was more of a gimmick than a proper input evolution in games.

jukins979d ago

Exactly. Its funny time and time again sony is the first innovate. Often at its own peril. Like your example the move started on ps2 taken advantage of by nintendo. Sony buys gakai for game streaming only for other companies to overtake them.

Profchaos978d ago

Are you talking about the gametrak on os2 which used strings to track your hand position I used to have this and a gold game it was awesome but the game itself sucked if it had integration with tiger woods or something it would be way better the tracking was excellent even back then as it wasn't using guesswork.
However the game was very forgiving and no way to turn it harder and no licensed players or courses hurt it.

978d ago Replies(2)
yeahokwhatever978d ago

99% of the Wii's games were "shovelware", in fact, I think thats what started that phrase..

EvertonFC979d ago

Socom, killzone, resistance and tiger wood 14 were great with the move but agree lacked more games.

yeahokwhatever978d ago

There were plenty of games and I'm glad that not every game became a Move game.

Show all comments (95)
290°

These PS3 Games are Going to get Really Expensive

Could you get rich by investing in PS3 games? Almost definitely not. Can you make a few bucks by flipping PS3 games over the years? Yeah, sure! It wouldn’t even be that difficult. But let’s face it: Once these games are in your collection, you’re probably keeping them forever.

Read Full Story >>
ghettogamer.net
CDbiggen981d ago

There's a reason I didn't buy most of these when they came out.

MadLad981d ago

After a game's multiple generations old, and can't be had new at a reasonable price, that's when I see nothing wrong with emulation.

What's the point of paying someone scalper prices when the dev/publisher isn't even benefiting from it?

mkis007981d ago

Emulation doesn't stop a games physical box from becoming collectible.

Knightofelemia981d ago

I paid $30 for SH Downpour on PS3 now it's around $70-$85 Canadian Lolipop Chainsaw I paid $15 and it has really gone up in price. I wonder if Transformers War and Fall of Cybertron will go up in price two of the best Transformers games every made.

neutralgamer1992981d ago

In 5 years time all those games will be worth at least $150 to $200 that you listed

981d ago
neutralgamer1992981d ago

Ever since Sony announced that they would shut down PS3 store these prices have skyrocketed and even though Sony backtracked now most gamers realize that it's a matter of time before the PlayStation 3 store is shut down. If you want these games get them while you can even if digital because once that story shut down the physical prices will just go crazy high we saw that already

And many of these games did not sell like crazy amounts so they are limited number of copies available for sale at any given time

MadLad981d ago

Folklore is a game I've always really wanted to play, but I got a PS3 late in the generation, and it was already really expensive to find, being it didn't exactly sell well, therefore was already kind of a collector's item.

Kept hoping I'd find a cheap copy randomly at stores and flea markets, but never happened.

franwex981d ago

I got mine for $5 at Walmart like 10 years ago. I have yet to play it.

neutralgamer1992981d ago

It was available at GameStop for a while for under $20. Don't know har happened but GameStop started to sell their used games based on ebay prices it seems

You can still find it for around $60-70 and which in my opinion is a good price for a game that will be worth double if not triple that in next 5 years

Mr Logic981d ago

Have you considered modding your PS3? Neither Sony or the dev would be getting money from that Folklore purchase. Kind of a victimless crime at that point.

MadLad981d ago (Edited 981d ago )

@neutral

Honestly, I just want to actually give the experience a try. I'm not someone who would buy it at a premium just to potentially rip someone off down the road.
I mean, there are collectors out there and if paying a couple hundred dollars is worth it to them then more power to them, but I'm not one to be on either end of that exchange.

I know it's taboo, but I might dig in and see the state of PS3 emulation on PC. I have a good PC, so it might be able to power through the often times poor performance, being PS3 is known to be hard to emulate.

I've never emulated anything past the PS2/Dreamcast but, as I said in my first post, I don't see anything wrong with emulation if the game you want to play can only be had used, with no money going to the creators.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 981d ago
Show all comments (20)