20°

How faithful are mythology-based games? - GamesRadar

A look at how closely Dante's Inferno, God of War and Darksiders actually stick to their source material.

Since it was first unveiled, Dante's Inferno – based loosely on the first chapter of the epic 14th century poem The Divine Comedy – has been roundly derided for being a hack job of a famous piece of literature. For over a year now, we've heard about how the game supposedly sh*ts on the original by turning a thoughtful epic poem into a paint-by-numbers clone of God of War.

That got GamesRadar thinking, though: Dante's Inferno actually has more in common with God of War than just its gameplay and focus on gruesome, rage-fueled violence. Both games are based on established mythologies, with clearly defined characters, settings and events, and both of them take outrageous liberties with their source material in the name of creating an extreme, ultraviolent experience. For that matter, so does Darksiders, another game frequently compared to God of War. With that in mind, let's take a look at all three and see just how unfaithful each one manages to be to its source material.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
sinncross5235d ago

Interesting article.

As for God of War: what I like about it is that they create their own mythos which could easily be put into the Greek mythology.

Though the Zeus comment in the article is classic lol

FaSeCeX5235d ago (Edited 5235d ago )

as fun as gow is its painful to c how inaccurate their characters are/were depicted...it always had me shaking my head while playing it lol and they had to eff up ares...y?! haha still an awesome game cuz thats wat it comes down to in the end...right?

mikepmcc5235d ago

fffffuuuuuuuuu, was just gonna submit this.

Awesome article though.

NateNater5234d ago

Hahaha I beat ya to it! :P

No hard feeling though :)

Its not getting as many hits as I thought it would :/ Oh well

MajestieBeast5235d ago

God of war made me hate Zeus cause he is just such a d!ck. I love how god of war spins the greek mythology. Gow3 is so close it will be a ending to remember thats for sure.

70°

The Best Video Game Opening Levels In Gaming History

The Opening Levels that hooked gamers from the outset.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
240°

Ranking Every God of War Game From Worst to Best

Cultured Vultures: Let’s delve into Kratos’ long and rampageous history and find out which games are worth the hype and which are better left buried under the weight of Kratos’s might.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JL2930210d ago

Both requels over 2 and 3? Clowns. Those are two of the most boring games I've ever played.

Snookies12210d ago

GoW 3 was amazing, but I personally hated just one thing. (This is on me alone, because I was dumb, lol.) I hated that you couldn't skip cutscenes on repeat playthroughs. I had to go back through the game a third time because I missed one trophy accidentally on my way to the platinum... The cutscenes were great the first go round, even the second... But the third was pretty agonizing.

Haven't played Ragnarok, but I still think GoW 4 is a wonderful game in its own right. Not sure how I would stack them up against each other honestly.

Monstieur210d ago (Edited 210d ago )

I don't consider the reboot part of the original series. The original series were high-skill games with combos and rewards for mixing things up.

solideagle210d ago

lol square, square and triangle is the only combo you needed. I have played all of them on the hardest difficulties...

Golfcoachh210d ago

Maybe I’m just old school but I just couldn’t get into the last two. Maybe it’s the slower action and more story telling but the original trilogy was by far my favorite.

Crows90210d ago

It's not that youre old school. They're different genres

JL2930209d ago (Edited 209d ago )

Me either, at all. It's just yap yap yap. They try to be a RPG's instead of being action games like they used to be.

Fluke_Skywalker210d ago

I'd put the two psp games over 3 in terms of story any day. But not over 2.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 209d ago
TheEnigma313210d ago (Edited 210d ago )

My favorite was part 2 and I think Ragnarok is better that 2018.

Shane Kim210d ago

The newer games are better imo.

ravens52210d ago

There is no worst. Except for Ascension, only cause I didn't play it lol. They are all masterpieces. 1,2,3, 2018 and Ragnarok. 1 of, if not the greatest video game franchise...besides MetalGear.

Snookies12210d ago

Oh wow, I actually forgot that Ascension even existed... I never played it either.

Crows90210d ago

I like ascension. It was different and some interesting combat additions.

darthv72210d ago

If you didnt play it, how could you call it the worst? Its not as bad as the media portrayed it. Honestly the worst are those flash games. they arent even considered true GoW games but in name only. At least Ascension is a real GoW game.

ravens52210d ago

Not saying it's a terrible game. Just mean it's at the bottom of my list. I played a little bit of it. Jus to me, compared to the other main games, it's last.

Fluke_Skywalker210d ago

Ascension is the only GOW game I never finished. Hated it.

Inverno210d ago

Can't agree, older games do so much more than the last two. More weapons, magic abilities, enemies are more varied, level design is also more aesthetically pleasing, and agree with those who say that they shouldn't have removed jumping. Was a time I'd agree, but those old games are so so much better, that they really should've looked into bringing into the reboot/sequels.

Crows90210d ago (Edited 210d ago )

If a game is good then a game is good. Doesn't matter what came before or what comes after.

Inverno210d ago

Of course it matters. If not for what what came before there wouldn't be an after. And if something is great before then you strive to make it just as good if not better, after. I personally don't think there's a fair way to judge the new with the old because the newer games are still essentially a reboot, and went a way different direction. But I still believe the old games did it better. I'm probably bias though since I've been going back to old games and have been finding that they lack all the annoying aspects that devs have shoehorned into new games to fluff out game time.

Crows90209d ago

@Inverno

Im not talking about the passage of time here. Im talking about individual pieces of software. If a game is good then it is good. Thats not a controversial statement. You can compare good with good...sure. But you still end up with good. Now if there is a bad game in the mix and you compare you do end up with some differentials between them...makes sense to compare and see where it went wrong.

But theyre different genres and styles which were individually executed very well.

And no. The new games are not a reboot. Theyre a new direction but simply a continuation.
Tomb raider was a reboot.

Inverno209d ago

The new games are definitely a reboot, and a continuation, it can be both which it is. And a good game might be good, but my point is that if there are things done better before it then there's plenty of room for critiquing and trying to make whatever comes after better rather than just good.

Show all comments (31)
240°

5 Of the Most Unlikeable Video Game Protagonists

There are good video game protagonists, and there are bad video game protagonists.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
248d ago
GhostScholar248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

I disagree that max is unlikable. Chloe is infinitely more unlikable in my opinion.

gold_drake248d ago

omg chloe was awful. i really hated her at the end haha

Cacabunga248d ago

Abby was absolute trash protagonist in every way..
Tidus was so meh to me..
On villain side, the one i didn’t like wa Micah, because they wanted him to be that way and it was brilliant👍🏽

Rancegamerx248d ago

I agree, I liked Max, Chloe was a horrible friend and a bad influence.

Cacabunga248d ago

Everyone agrees on chloe, I’m sure even ND do.

H9248d ago

Both are horrible, granted Chloe is infinitely worse, it feels like Chloe is just fanservice for people who too over the edge and wasn't written to be a character that makes sense

GooGobbler248d ago

What about that Forspoken Tw*t

MrChow666248d ago

exactly I was expecting it to be a the top of the list

ravens52248d ago

Ye I was expecting her too. Guess they actually played the game. Unlike you and whoever agrees.

gpimlott247d ago

I played through the whole game and think she is one of the worst character Ive ever played as

ravens52247d ago (Edited 247d ago )

gpimlott. How?

Stanjara237d ago

Why would I payed and played the game if the whole internet is making fun of a character?

-Im here to kill Chaos...are you Chaos?

Yeah, I didn't play that game either.

Christopher248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

She's actually not bad. It's the writing itself that is bad overall, but she's fine overall. She's no worse than Miles Morales IMHO. Both thrust into a spotlight and receiving both praise and blame and dealing with it.

Forspoken is a bland game because it's 75% bland, boring, repetitive going through the motions and diversions that add nothing of the value with purposefully gated memory moments that don't feel organic or like you're discovering things but waiting for others to reveal things.

ravens52248d ago

Exactly Chris. Even though I liked the game. I kno u played it. People who actually played it and went thru her dream saw she was a good likeable person who really just acted out due to being alone and unloved. I think your problem is it was open world, I think if it was more linear you may have liked it better.

savedsynner247d ago

Oh no she's bad. Very unlikable even before you add on the bad dialogue. The game could have been quite good with a good protagonist

ravens52247d ago

For all the people like synner. Shes actually half white lol. Inferior complexity is a hell of a thing. You'll be ok.

Nerdmaster248d ago

Most of these aren't even that bad. Especially comparing to others like Squall "Whatever" Leonhart, Forspoken's Frey, and the guy from Atomic Heart.

-Foxtrot248d ago

Squall is one of the best developed main FF characters so...

People talk about his "whatever" thing thats at the start of the game, not the character he eventually becomes in the end.

Nerdmaster247d ago

No amount of "character development", (especially the ones that for me feels sudden and undeserved like Squall's), will justify him being a d**k to my girl Quistis. Even if he found the cure for cancer, from that moment on, I would never like him.
The article is about being unlikeable, and he was indeed unlikeable for at least half of the game.

BrainSyphoned248d ago

Squall is the best protagonists in FF so you can go whatever yourself.

H9248d ago

My good sir, I need to steal that "you can go whatever yourself" because it's gold

BlaqMagiq1248d ago

Except Squall has actual character development.

gold_drake248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

the "watever" is only present in the english localisation.
so your argument doesnt rly ... stand imo.

Nerdmaster247d ago

Good for you that you could enjoy the japanese version. That's not the case for me and the majority of people here, though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 247d ago
gold_drake248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

i had to stop reading after the "blatant misogyny" in the Dantes inferno section.

i actually liked Max haha.

the forspoken chick is missing tho

Show all comments (49)