330°

MAG will not require headset to play

When ask whether or not MAG will require headset to be played base on a rumor that spread on the internet earlier today, Jeff Rubenstein has clarify the situation. According to Jeff Rubenstein, MAG will not require a headset of any kind to be played.

Read Full Story >>
blog.us.playstation.com
nogolis5216d ago

However, for you to be able to play it 256 other people have to be online at the same time as you, wanting to play the same game as you and not anything else that might've come out... Then, and only then, can you enjoy this game to the fullest extent. Which means, you're never going to be able to experience the game "YOU" bought to "PLAY" without being chained to what ever anyone else is doing at any given time.

Welcome to online only gaming, folks... Below average graphics and below average sales. Future looks bright for Sony and Zipper with this one.

Bungie5216d ago

ok but what about communication
should i write a text during gameplay !

WildArmed5216d ago (Edited 5216d ago )

lol @Bungie
no1 said YOU shouldn't use a bluetooth headset >.>
If you wanna communicate... use one.
But not everyone feels like talking to strangers.. just saying

@nog..

ANd welcome to OPen Zone.
oh wait..
thats over there -->

Shendow5216d ago

Sounds like alot of hate, I have had no problem playing with no headset, people need help call my name or I run to them.

Repair and Medic, plus good at sneaking in the back and hitting them where it hurts.

SoapShoes5216d ago

You're completely brainwashed. The graphics aren't poor(look at Socom, it had average graphics and still became the most popular online title last gen) and the sells aren't poor either. You do not need millions of sells in day one. You know what often happens with huge day 1 titles? They end up not selling near as well the next few months and eventually are forgotten.

Still a lot more fun than Hype Warfare 2. Oh, but I guess graphics and sells are the only thing that matters?

Takoulya5216d ago

It's an absolutely great gaming experience. Of course, almost all games that sell well have a single player mode, but that doesn't mean that the game isn't good. MW2, for example, had phenomenal sales, although most people didn't care for the single player. Still, as you said, the gameplay is chained together with other people, but in MAG, I like that. You must improvise and use tactics with real people. I even use stealth to win sometimes. Also, the graphics are very good considering the amount of players at one time. I definitely feel like I'm playing the game I paid for. I can just join a game mode and I usually get in within ten seconds of waiting in the queue. Lastly, I love the venture Zipper made with MAG. With a full history of TPS's, Zipper went for FPS with MAG and succeeded very well. Sarcasm aside, the future does indeed look bright for Sony and Zipper.

OtherWhiteMeat5216d ago

You don't need a headset.That right is reserved for those who own the game.All you'll need is a headset,the game, and a PS3.Looks like your 0 for 3.

mrv3215216d ago (Edited 5216d ago )

LOL.

So your saying online only games don't sell...

World of Warcraft sells quite a bit last I checked. Star Trek online is doing Well.

And what's that MW2? You had some of the largest sales EVER... and MW2 is as close to multiplayer only while still including singleplayer.

'ok but what about communication
should i write a text during gameplay '

JUST BECAUSE YOUR NOT FORCED TO USE A HEADSET DOESN'T MEAN YOU CAN'T USE ONE. Sheesh people are stupid, USE A HEADSET. Your not forced to use a headset on xbox live, so does that mean I am forced to type? NO BECAUSE I CAN STILL USE A GOD DAMN HEADSET. GROW UP!

'I think the reason why they changed it back to not requiring people to wear a headset, is because they kno most ppl who bought a ps3 for $599 probably are still broke from that purchase and probably dont have enough to buy another $50 blutooth headset. thats just my speculation'

I bought a PS3 for $599 and guess what it was cheaper for me to buy a PS3 at that PRICE than a 360 and buy live and wireless for 3 years.

Also you can use ALMOST anything for a headset

-Bluetooth headsets work
-USB webcams work
-Eyetoy works
-PSeye works
-PS3 headset works

Most people bought a PS3 at $599 so your saying 15 million people bought a PS3 for $599... Your a fanboy, enjoy what remains of your hate filled life... because I for one envy your ignorance and I despise your stupidity.

5216d ago
DMason5216d ago

I dont know what to believe anymore on this site. Theres so many contradictory stories, its hard to keep track of what's the truth and what isnt.

mrv3215216d ago

Basically if the degrees are too high it's a rumour or a lie. If it's degrees are low it's most likely a fact.

LordMarius5216d ago

Bungie = GreenRingofLife

cuz those are some brain cell killing comments

Proxy5216d ago

If you don't have a mic, you can only play in regular games.

If you do have a mic, you can chose to play a regular game, or a mandatory mic game.

znu5216d ago

honestly, how much fun you have playing a game is what's really important

modern warfare 2 had alot of sales, but that doesn't really matter cuz the number of people who buy it doesnt really affect me xD

enjoy ur games, dont diss the xbox 360, dont diss the ps3, dont diss the pc and dont diss the wii

they're all great =D

presto7175216d ago

How else do they expect to play the game properly? If you're gonna get MAG, an online only game, then why wouldn't you get a headset?

NoBias5216d ago (Edited 5216d ago )

I got my bluetooth with SOCOM so it's really no issue for me. What's surprising is how many of the PS3 owners on this site don't have headsets or complain about having to use one... Especially on one of the more important games to use a headset!!

That fake article showed me and many why PSN has a reputation for usually being silent and teamwork is rare to non-existant (Besides SOCOM, cuz if you try not communicating in that game, we have the power to just vote your azzes out... Which more games need to enforce).

Casual players ruin it for the hardcore (But sometimes it's fun... Easy kills).

I do like the idea of having a mic server and a micless server for MAG. That would solve issues like that instantly. I'm actually surprised Zipper didn't do something like that. Either way, I'm just praying that they're back working on the next real SOCOM. Please let Slant 6 stick to PSP.

Homicide5216d ago

"However, for you to be able to play it 256 other people have to be online at the same time as you..."

Wrong; 255 other people have to be online. You included makes it 256 players :)

ZombieNinjaPanda5216d ago

Told you guys that they wouldn't require it and it's just that site and gamestop trying to make money off of head set sales.

SilentNegotiator5216d ago

"I think the reason why they changed it back to not requiring people to wear a headset, is because they kno most ppl who bought a ps3 for $599 probably are still broke from that purchase and probably dont have enough to buy another $50 blutooth headset. thats just my speculation"

1) You can "change back" what was never planned in the first place.
2) A xbox troll still whining about the price 4 years ago? How cute.
3) You can use ANY Blu-tooth heaset, or go with a USB headset, actually. I wouldn't expect a 360-only owner to know that, though.

Anon19745216d ago

If you can't handle tying your shoes, going out to the store, buying a headset, finding your way back home and having the wherewithal to set it up and just want a headset handed to you - quite frankly you'll be doing other gamers a favor if you go without a headset.

Spend just 15 minutes playing Call of Duty on the 360 compared to the PS3. You'll see what I mean.

sikbeta5216d ago

LOL what happened with the other FvCKING "article" saying Headset was necessary to play?

It was SO OBVIOUS, you HAVE THE CHOICE OF USING HEADSET OR NOT IN MAG...

Marceles5216d ago

lol @ the reports, "noooo don't post the correct information about the game! we want people to believe you require a headset!"

RememberThe3575216d ago

What makes you think that they ever changed their minds. Sony never made a statement saying MAG would require headsets, that was a site reporting an alleged GameStop e-mail. That page has no been deleted.

5216d ago
+ Show (20) more repliesLast reply 5216d ago
kenpachi5216d ago

whoever believed this in the first place is a complete noob

WildArmed5216d ago

agreed.
No online game would do that.
that's just stupid

Takoulya5216d ago

I concur. I knew this was no more than a rumour. Any playerbase would diminish with such a move.

Grandmaster5216d ago

If they wanted to even do this in the first place, common sense would tell them to SELL it with a mic, which in my opinion, should of happened in the first place.

goalweiser5216d ago

I think some of these people just don't think. I wouldn't even risk putting such a story up on my web-site. Don't blame N4G. Blame Platform Nation and their web-site director for approving the story to be posted.

Then blame everybody who approved the story here.

Anybody with common sense would have known that requiring anything extra of a gamer to play a game is just flat out stupid.

They would basically be shooting themselves in the foot.

Here's the kicker...if they really wanted to require headsets, why wouldn't they bundle one with the game and charge a little extra like the last SOCOM?

Any way you look at it, Platform Nation comes up looking not credible and to make matters worse, you can't even find the article on the web-site. Instead of apologizing to people for misleading them, they just pulled the article or buried in the archives perhaps?

I won't be reading anything on that site again.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5216d ago
MetalGearRising5216d ago

So what am i suppose to f*ck*n do Text every time. No wonder PSN is a joke.

LordMarius5216d ago

you can just buy a headset, dumb bot

SilentNegotiator5216d ago

The fact that you have any bubbles at all.

OM NOM NOM
Not any more.

Droid Smasha5216d ago (Edited 5216d ago )

no one wants to hear the pimple faced geeks on psn choking on there retainers

CernaML5216d ago (Edited 5216d ago )

If that's the case then it's a good thing this game isn't on the 360 otherwise you're guaranteed to hear 9 year old's crying about getting their asses handed to them because of the fact that you need actual skill and teamwork to play this game. Then you'll have to hear their parents yelling at them for failing school and threatening to take away their Xbox which will lead to even more yelling and crying causing many ears to bleed.

caffman5215d ago

surely for online gaming its a must! And Sony could add one for absolutely no cost whatsoever

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5215d ago
Bungie5216d ago

256 campers with no mics

PLAY B3HIND

infekt5216d ago

Erm. Point and order squad. No texting required. Faster than talking too! Go RROD yourself.

Gun_Senshi5216d ago

lol MAG is anti camper game unlike MW2

ballsofsteel5216d ago

was actually considering getting this game if they made people have mics

WildArmed5216d ago

Surprisingly there are enough people with mics on MAG.

When I played it a few days ago, most leadership position folks had mics.
Was really fun, though I never bothered opening the mic since I was taking turns on MaG with my friend nxt to me

Show all comments (63)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1567d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1567d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1567d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1567d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691567d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1567d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1567d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31566d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1566d ago
Muzikguy1567d ago (Edited 1567d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021567d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1567d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021567d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1567d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1567d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1567d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1567d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1566d ago Replies(1)
1566d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1566d ago
PrinceOfAnger1567d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1567d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1567d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241567d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1567d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1567d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1692d ago (Edited 1692d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1692d ago
TheGamez1001692d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1692d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091692d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1692d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1692d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1692d ago
moomoo3191692d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1692d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1812d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1811d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571810d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1810d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721810d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001811d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1811d ago (Edited 1811d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1811d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1811d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1811d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1810d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1810d ago
Profchaos1810d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1811d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1810d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1811d ago (Edited 1811d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1810d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1810d ago (Edited 1810d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1810d ago (Edited 1810d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)