550°

Will Too Many PS3 Owners Pass On Bioshock 2?

This is kinda like a public service announcement for PlayStation 3 owners. Hopefully, it won't be as annoying and unbelievably insulting as actual PSAs.

Here's the thing: Bioshock released on August 21, 2007 on the Xbox 360 and PC and at that time, there were only a tiny fraction of the PS3 owners that exist today. Granted, they may have played the game on either the 360 or PC but many PlayStation loyalists flat out missed it.

Read Full Story >>
psxextreme.com
zoks3105209d ago

I think PS3 owners will pick this game up. BS1 was a very good game and PS3 owners know that.

krouse935209d ago

I don't really want muddy textures

Blaze9295209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

Xbox 360 Version: 2.42m
Playstation 3 Version: 0.48m

http://www.vgchartz.com/gam...

GOTY 2007 didn't even manage to sell a mil yet on PS3. Granted that's coming from VGChartz but whatever.

With Heavy Rain and White Knight Chronicles releasing the same month, I wouldn't care either if I didn't have the money. But I do so I'll be picking both Heavy Rain and BioShock 2 up that month.

blitz06235209d ago

Blaze - you do know it came out more than a year after the 360 release right? There are PS3 owners who also own a 360 so why buy it again if they already played it before?

headwing455209d ago

Too many games on PS3, can't play them all.

Blaze9295209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

Well first of all, the title and this whole article is talking to PS3 specific owners so out goes the window of your ps3 owners who also own a 360.

Second, speaking about ps3 only owners again, it only pushed ~500k. since it's release. Now if, again, ps3 ONLY owners didnt care a lot the first time around why would they the second? - especially with two exclusives dropping the same month.

@raztad

Yeah I'm not blaming anyone for lack on interest if you're talking to me.

raztad5209d ago

BS1 was touted as xbox/PC only and the PS3 version was denied several times. By the time it was announced/released PS3 owners had lost interest on it. Game is good but ps3 fanbase is not to blame for the lack of interest.

D4RkNIKON5209d ago

I will be passing this one up for sure. I tried a demo of Bioshock a while back and didn't like it much.

Simon_Brezhnev5209d ago

yall should know blaze is always going to be negative towards PS3 no matter what im starting to think omega and blaze are the same people

TooTall195209d ago

I played it on the 360 and for some reason I had a terrible framerate issue, but its still one of my favorite games this gen. I hope this sells well on the PS3 so I have people to play with online.

5209d ago
sirbigam5209d ago

I'm gonna pass on this game, the whole timed exclusive left a bad taste in my mouth, I'll wait for gamer reveiws

aaronisbla5209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

lay off of Blaze, he is right after all, the game just didnt sell well on the ps3 and i think he knows why it didnt sell well.

Megaton5209d ago

It came out a year later and was declared a locked down 360 exclusive during most of that year before it came. No surprise the numbers are very one-sided.

Noob5209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

I'm more than sure it would of done better if it was released day one on the console instead of a year later. Think about it, a year of waiting and denying it was coming to PS3. People lose interest, got tired of waiting, and moved on. I bet 2K won't do that again; well, if they aren't retarded that is.

A Cupcake for Gabe5209d ago

I bought it on PS3, it ran better and looked better. I don't know why it didn't sell. Oh wait it was out a year and a half on everything else. Most people played it already. Oh well, this article is a fial anyway. I am buying Bioshock 2. I loved the first one. It's my next gen metroid prime, but with Slicers instead of aliens. FPExplorations FTW!

Blaze9295209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

Thanks. That's all I was trying to say but it somehow got turned into me being negative against the PS3 for some reason. Apparently I'm also omega now....go figure.

@imdaboss I don't know what your talking about with me being always negative toward the PS3. I GUARANTEE...GUARANTEE you will not be able to pull up comments of me "always" bashing or being negative against the PS3 for just no damn reason or like a fanboy would. Don't worry I'll wait too - also let me know I guess you dont pay attention to any of my other comments huh? Like:

http://n4g.com/RedirectToOb...

Very negative there...oh wait, that's about Microsoft O_O! No WAAAAY!

I don't even so how I was being negative about the PS3 here...the game didn't sell on PS3...wtf else is there to talk about? I said PS3 owners seem to not care and LOOK, the majority of comments in here already are saying they WILL pass on BioShock 2. So am I wrong?

But I guess since I like my 360 as well as my PS3 anything I say is negative toward the PS3. Just do me a favor and hit the ignore button in the left hand corner of this comment. Oh, and I'll tell Omega you said what's up.

@MrJackOfAllTrades

I think you know damn well what kind of PS3 owners this article is talking about. Don't play that nonsense. The general thought of multi-platform owners are call...multi-platform owners. When you single out "PS3 owners" I think it's quite obvious they mean PS3 ONLY owners.

Now, inb4 a zillion disagrees.

blind-reaper5209d ago

I will buy it in spring break or summer vacation along with a bunch of other games (GoW3, HR, GT5"I hope", Mafia II "I hope")... I have no time right now.

Digitaldude5209d ago

I aint picking it up. First one was good. Story was excellent, gameplay... Meh.
Way better games coming out for 010 anyway.

tnator5209d ago

Perhaps PS3 gamers at the time couldn't see the point in playing a year old game when there was new stuff out. I played the first on 360 and it was game of the year for me. Will get the second on PS3 day 1 (as the 360 has cr*pped itself). A must purchase for all gamers i say.

matchgrade5209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

The reason why Bioshock sold so poorly on PS3 was not because we hate Bioshock, but because our port came out far too late after the original release and either
A) we had lost interest and moved onto other games, or
B) a newly-ported game from a year ago still felt a year old to us: dated and underwhelming.

I went out and got Bioshock for the ps3, having never played it before, and while I thought it was a thoroughly entertaining and well-designed game (I would even call it "masterful" in its design), I wasn't the least bit impressed by the tech or the innovations from the previous year. Probably because I had already heard so much about the game from gloating 360 owners :P But none of it felt fresh at that point.

But in any case, I don't think us ps3 owners would be stupid enough to hold a grudge against a multiplat-released Bioshock 2 just because its predecessor was a timed exclusive.

5209d ago
TenSteps5209d ago

Price

they were trying to sell it to me at full price (in my store at least), a year late port for full price no thanks I could have gotten it at half the price on the 360. But what's that they added something an extra difficulty surely that's worth half the price what's this a chance to pay $10 DLC.

Now I don't know about you but the chance to pay $10 and one extra difficulty doesn't warrant it having full price at least not for me.

Obama5209d ago

Just like how metal gear solid 2 sold 5.58m on the ps2 and only 0.62m on the 360 right?

Dragun6195209d ago

I don't know if you notice but Bioshock is still in the top 25 on PS3 starting from November when it dropped and now. I think lots of new PS3 owners are picking this game up especially since the game was around the $10-$18 zone.

I think many PS3 owners, including me, will pick up Bioshock 2 and maybe Star Ocean International when they both release on February 8.

UltimateIdiot9115209d ago

I don't know anyone getting BS2. Personally, I'm picking up Heavy Rain and if I have spare cash and a lot of spare time, WKC.

SilentNegotiator5209d ago

"Xbox 360 Version: 2.42m
Playstation 3 Version: 0.48m"

It was a year old choppy port. They were lucky to have sold that much.

Christopher5209d ago

I'm not passing, just not going to buy it right away. It's definitely not a day one purchase for me since the sequel seems to be a combination of more of the same as well as a jarring concept in regards to the storyline. I have no interest in multiplayer mode and I haven't seen enough of the single player game that makes me want to buy it over many of the other options out there already or coming out in the very near future.

Pika-pie5209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

Its true, timed exclusivity hurts not only the first game sales, but any sequels after that.

And then they were stupid enough to launch the game on the PS3 with a broken demo. The game deserved to do bad on the PS3 if you ask me.

RumbleFish5209d ago

I don't care about Bioshock.

god_o_war5209d ago

lost interest in the game when it was "confirmed" exclusive to 360

ActionBastard5209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

2.2 million copies of BioShock were sold on the 360 and Games for Windows. The PC version alone sold over 1 million copies, yet it's only sold 3 million to date. Where's the remainder coming from I wonder? Cut the puppet strings bro.

Blaze, never, ever, cite VGChartz.

BioShock PC sales - http://www.eurogamer.net/ar...

360/Games for Windows totals of SHIPPED copies (2.2mil) - http://ir.take2games.com/Re... "BioShock®, a wholly owned and internally developed title for Xbox 360 and Games for Windows® shipped over 2.2 million units since its debut in late August." (April 2008)

As of June 2009, 3mil copies had been sold - http://games.venturebeat.co...

FamilyGuy5209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

I wasn't a fan of the first Bioshock, I suck at first person shooters.

ravinash5209d ago (Edited 5209d ago )

I played Bioshock on 360 when it first came out, it was the reason I got the 360.
I had since sold the 360 as i only ever play Mass effect and bioshock on it. Just recently I got bioshock again on PS3 (Only £10) and am enjoying it all over again. textures look fine by the way.

Now that number two is coming out...I'm not so sure I want to get it.
I kind of fell like been there, done that. Its like they have just appended on more story after the story has been told.

Now would you kindly put it away.

Guido5209d ago

It is going on my PC. I played all three versions of Bioshock, PC, 360, and PS3 when they were released respectively and loved them all but the best version IMHO was the PC version. I will be buying one copy of Bioshock 2 and that will be the PC version.

DaTruth5209d ago

I'm one of them! Too many games on PS3. This is another one 360 owners can pretend is exclusive and then say PS3 owners don't buy games because they will be spread thin across the platform!

Commodore5209d ago

Bioshock was alright at best...Nothing special. The online looks like it was thrown on there for the hell of it and looks like a lag-fest.

I won't get it when it comes out but maybe for Christmas.

Daver5209d ago

For me Bioshock was an ok game nothing more. I'm not getting Bioshock 2. Theres too many better games coming out

ceedubya95209d ago

I'm going to pass on this game for the time being. There are some great games that are releasing between now and the end of March, and some sacrifices need to be made. This is a game that I can wait on, or maybe rent first.

This is a bad release time for this game, imo. Some heavy hitters coming out soon, as well as some promising new franchise releases.

I really do believe that Bioshock 1's problem was its release. PS3 owners with a PC and/or 360 already had a chance to play the game a year or so earlier. Why would they want to pay 60 dollars for something that could be had/played elsewhere for much cheaper?

And although I expect this next installment to be good, I wouldn't be at all surprised if it doesn't do as well as the first game did, as it is surrounded by high profile releases on both consoles.

baum5209d ago

"Seems PS3 owners don't care about BioShock"

lol after one year of the original game game out, what makes idiots think the games should sell the same? wow, just wow.

andron5209d ago

Not because I didn't like Bioshock PS3, I loved it, it was a great game. Also nothing against the port, it was a great port so the sequel shouldn't be any worse.

Yet somehow B2 is long down my list of games to get. I fear the large amount of PS3 exclusives might slow the sales of this on PS3. Also the notion that mp is shoehorned into this game. It's greatest strength was the atmosphere and I don't know if that will translate well to mp.

I'll probably get it later when the price drops if it looks good...

Red Panda5209d ago

Jack of all trades, yet master of none..........................

Jinxstar5209d ago

I'll be getting it on steam when it's 20$. Just like I did with bioshock 1

I_AM_ CANADIAN_19895208d ago

but i dunno i like online better on consoles and this game has online supposebly.......anyone know what the online is gunna consist of is it gunna be co op or something....but then again it feels good to play a game theat my pc can run on max unlike crysis warhead that game made me hate my pc lol haha or atleast really wanted to add a graphics card in sli. it sucks that windows 7 and vista take like 30% of your ram just on idle........

goflyakite5208d ago

I've already pre-ordered and paid for it. Plus my classes were canceled on the 9th. :) Can't wait for this and BFBC2.

I feel it's not getting hype like the first one because it's coming to PC, 360, and PS3. Sad, and a little funny.

N4Flamers5208d ago

the first bioshock came out a year later to much controversy of it not being as good as the 360 counterpart. I had played the 360 version by that time along with most of the people who wanted to play it.

Im skipping bioshock 2, the multiplayer doesnt seem to fit with this game, those are wasted resources right there. The game still looks like it came out in 2007 or something, the graphics are just underwhelming. I enjoyed the story of the first one and i dont really have a desire to play as a big daddy (especially since you suit up in the first one). I might pick it up later this year, but its not a day one.

NewZealander5208d ago

ill be getting BS2 day one!

but i got the first game on 360, so even though i own both consoles i like to keep the series on one console, so 360 again for this one.

prunchess5208d ago

Bioshock is an absolute masterpiece. The story is second to none.

The Unreal Engine doesn't do it justice though but the concept and playability of the game make it more than worth while. If any of you haven't played this game through to the end, you are really missing out.

I would advise any gamers that don't like FPSers to put it to easy and give it a go.

+ Show (44) more repliesLast reply 5208d ago
blitz06235209d ago

I will pass on it just like how I passed on Bayonetta - I will wait for a price drop.

Enate5209d ago

I also passed on bayonetta and as for Bioshock it was graphically impressive an did what it was supposed to. Though that's more or less why I'll pass on Bioshock 2. I'm not much for fps games, I don't like the old time atmosphere and I don't like scary games. Plus even if I decided to give it a try it wouldn't be right now there is to many other games I'd rather play. White Knight Chronicles, Star Ocean international edition, Heavy Rain an currently Mass Effect 2 on PC.

Keith Olbermann5209d ago

Too many good ps3 exclusives. This will be a rent.

LordMarius5209d ago

I am, there is no hype for this game and I never played the first one because of the controls in the demo, not my cup of tea
plus I'm tired of FPS for now

WildArmed5209d ago

While I did love the first one, I'm passing on this too. (for all my consoles/platforms).
The fact that they added MP and it's not the same team as Bioshock 1 has me doubting.
So it's going to be a bargain buy for me.. not a day one..
plus, it's too close to WKC, FF13 and GoW for comfort.

N4BmpS5209d ago

There are entirely too many games for the PS3 owners, especially those whom only have a PS3; with WKC, Heavy Rain, GoWIII and other titles coming on the way many PS3 owners will go with something that could be good or great. Not to mention how many of the PS3 only owners want to be loyal to the PS3 exclusive line-up. I hate to say it but irrational games messed up or nearly burned their bridges with the hardcore PS3 audience, however there is still a good chance that Bioshock 2 will do moderately well among PS3 owners. I'd buy but my money tight and I'm looking at GoWIII.

ClownBelt5209d ago

The first one was crap imo. I will never pick this game even if it's on bargain.

Pillage055209d ago

I wouldn't say the first one was crap by any means, but I didn't enjoy it as much as I thought I would. I'll likely rent this down the road or pick it up when the price drops.

mastiffchild5209d ago

Crap? It was a fantastic game and a breath of fresh air as far as storytelling and atmosphere was concerned in the FPS genre. could have done without the pie mini games as it did my head in but the games a stone cold classic. Thing about PS3 gamers not buying it on their platform is moot, imo, they were told for a year it wasn't coming and when it did there were NO sweteners to make up for the wait. Pointles DLC challenge rooms and another difficulty?SH1T! Noone likes to play year old ports when it doesn't make your wait worthwhile as in the mean time you got excited by games you KNEW were coming, no?

Besides, by the time the PS3 version landed i'd played it on PC AND 360-and i'm positive half the possible market for the game on PS3 had played it once somewhere as well. Thing is as the DS3 is my favourite controller I'd have preferred to play on PS3 given the chance and will prolly pick up number two if it reviews O)K but, personally, i'm not in any way convinced a sequel/prequel/second Bioshock is anything LIKE a good idea. I don't want the Levine directed classic impaired in my memory by a crappy second game and, btrw, the multiplayer looks like crap-if you want to talk about actual crap that is.

ClownBelt5208d ago

@ mastiffchild

I got my PS2 December of 2008. At that time, I don't even give a crap about the current gen since I was so in love with the PS2 games to name Persona 4. I never even heard of the game. I played it and I didn't like it. No matter how much you defend it, I still won't like it. It was a horrible game imo.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5208d ago
Show all comments (164)
320°

Netflix announces Bioshock film in the works

One of the most popular video game franchises of all time is set to receive a Netflix film adaptation, according to an announcement on Tuesday afternoon.

Read Full Story >>
invenglobal.com
-Foxtrot805d ago

Gee...can't wait to see how many things they change and stray away from, oh don't forget the miscast actors

Neonridr805d ago

I have such high hopes because the first game is so near and dear to me. That being said, I'm sure they will mess it up. I'm hoping it's adult rated, and violent. I want to see a Big Daddy put that drill to good use :P

camel_toad804d ago (Edited 804d ago )

They're great at butchering stuff but there have also been some gems and surprises.

I never in my life thought I'd like a series based on League of Legends but it was pretty great.

Maybe just maybe they'll do Bioshock justice.

cheetah804d ago

Priority checklist
- Pander to POC
- Pander to woman
- Pander to LGBTQ
- Story

In that order

Silly Mammo804d ago

Damn! It sure sucks when white men aren't the sole focus of everything! Why can't these fringe groups be kept on the fringes like the good ole days?!? /s

senorfartcushion804d ago (Edited 804d ago )

Virgin detector

*****SCREEEECH*****

Vx_804d ago

Remove the story and I totally agree with the list

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 804d ago
senorfartcushion804d ago

You can cast who you want as a director. Don’t be sulky.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 804d ago
Knightofelemia805d ago

Netflix did well with Dare Devil and the Punisher and I hear the Witcher is pretty good I know when I had Netflix at the time Stranger Things was also good. But Bioshock I love the franchise Bioshock Infinite is my favorite game I would pay the $21 Canadian just to check out Bioshock. Normally I would never renew my Netflix after they did their price hike but Bioshock would be worth it.

LoveSpuds805d ago

When firing on all cinders, Netflix do produce some brilliant stuff so I am not feeling pessimistic at all here. If Netflix deliver to their potential then this could be incredible given the quality of the source material. Personally, I am quite excited.

EvertonFC804d ago

Agreed, Netflix originals etc are fantastic in general, it's rare I don't like something they do.
Certainly not feeling negative with Netflix doing bioshock quite the opposite infact.

Ashunderfire86804d ago (Edited 804d ago )

Bu bu bu bu but what about Cowboy Beebop though? That was a little miss opportunity. Just a little nervous that Bioshock could turn to crap 💩 like that show. If they do a Horizon Zero Dawn show, I hope they don’t screw that up as well. I know a few good actresses that could play Aloy like Jon Snow’s girlfriend from Game of Thrones, and his wife in real life. Definitely see Aloy in her.

Livingthedream804d ago

Netflix does a lot of great things, recently finished the first season of Arcane and it was brilliant.

MadLad804d ago

Arkane was so damn good.
I just hope they keep up the quality with later releases.

I'm not even a LoL player.

Livingthedream804d ago

I’m sure they will, I don’t play the games either, I love the fact that I didn’t need to play them to enjoy it.

Michiel1989804d ago

Arcane was insanely good imo, I was hooked almost all the way. Im not sure of this but i think Netflix didnt have much to do with the production of the show? More like they just bought the rights to have it exclusively on there?

Some of their original shows are really good so im quite hopeful this might turn out to be a good show. Lets hope they wont F it up.

Nacho_Z805d ago

Love Bioshock but I'll prepare myself for the likelihood this will be both crap and a pale imitation of the source material. That covers most video game adaptations and Netflix films.

dumahim805d ago

How many have they done? It sounds like Witcher and Castlevania have done well.

Nacho_Z805d ago

I meant Netflix films in general, there are some good ones but most are average at best in my experience. Castlevania is good but I didn't like The Witcher, although it is successful.

Not sure if there are any live action video game film adaptations on Netflix as yet but they don't have a great track record.

dumahim804d ago

@ Nacho
For movies, I think it’s very difficult to cram he narrative from a 10+ hour game into 2 hours. I think that’s why series are much better suited for video game adaptations. Seems we have a bunch coming up, so we’ll see how well it plays out.

Terry_B805d ago

Why are PS2 and Wii and even the PS Vita tagged?

Atom666804d ago

The Vita tag stung a little bit extra.

Atticus_finch805d ago

Starring Tom Holland I'm guessing.

FlavorLav01805d ago

Haha. Now if it was a Sony movie, very likely

Outlawzz805d ago

Lol the Tom Holland craze is real

Terry_B805d ago

Kevin Nash is going to play the..Big Daddy.

Show all comments (54)
200°

Ranking the BioShock Games From Worst to Best

The best games are able to create a never-before-seen setting and weave a completely engaging story into its DNA. One series beats almost all others out for its environmental storytelling and narrative: BioShock.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Inverno977d ago

Infinite better than 2? No way

roadkillers977d ago

IMO Infinite is better than 2... The only thing I remember from 2 is playing as a little sister. It felt too much like Bioshock (which wasn't bad). Infinite was the right stepping stone.

Inverno976d ago

Infinite was a huge step back. It played like a generic fps because it was dumbed down to be an fps and it's not at all the gameplay evolution Bioshock needed. It was a mindless shooter where story and it's world building took a backseat to repetitive shooting galleries against dumb AI while making you look for health in trash cans cause they removed mechanics that worked in favor for a more action oriented gameplay.
I think people are remembering Infinite all wrong.
It's story is a mess and it's world isn't as fleshed out as Rapture was in the first Bio.

LucasRuinedChildhood976d ago (Edited 976d ago )

@Inverno

"It was a mindless shooter where story and it's world building took a backseat to repetitive shooting galleries"
Sounds more applicable to Bioshock 2, tbh. B2 has wave-based gameplay where Subject Delta casually goes through large hordes of splicers to protect Little Sisters. C'mon. I still wouldn't call any of the Bioshocks mindless shooters though.

If you want to criticize the lack of the weapon wheel and the replacement of certain mechanics in Infinite in favour of increased mobility (e.g. addition of the sky-hook), fair enough, but the story and world-building of 2 are less memorable, noteworthy and interesting than Infinite by a huge margin. Most people don't even remember much beyond the basic premise of 2 (including any of the characters) because it felt so unnecessary. It's not even close.

"It's story is a mess and it's world isn't as fleshed out as Rapture was in the first Bio." Needing to use Bioshock 1 to criticize Infinite instead of 2 is an admission that 2's story is the weakest.

roadkillers976d ago

@Inverno

I remember it being very imaginative and a breath of fresh air, while still being familiar. The last hour or two was big on shooting.

SegaSaturn669976d ago

Infinite was the most boring and repetitive in terms of gameplay. It lost the suspenseful atmosphere of the first 2

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 976d ago
SonyPS360976d ago (Edited 976d ago )

Am I reading that backwards or are you really shocked that people like infinite more than 2?

Just wanna make sure I have it right because you're literally the first person I've seen say that 2 is better.

Inverno976d ago

I understand 2 is more of the same but I much prefer more of the same than going backwards in terms of gameplay. It wasn't the step in the right direction. But thats just my opinion, I'm not surprised at all. Just to me I much rather the first 2. However what they had planned for Infinite originally sounded very interesting and it sucks we won't ever see it

Concertoine976d ago (Edited 976d ago )

Imo 2 is tied with 1 as my favorite Bioshock. The gameplay is the natural evolution of the first, with more freedom to experiment. The story and locales are more intimate and less grandiose than you would see in a Ken Levine story. I love the atmospheric break of the underwater sections and never understood the hate for them. All 3 games have pacing issues but imo 2’s are less severe. The level design has a lot of ex-Looking Glass alumnis and is generally more open ended.

The endings are more tailored to your moral choices than the other games.

Infinite hedges on a admittedly cool twist that is poorly executed when scrutinized. The gameplay takes a huge step back, it isnt the game that early gameplay and trailers promised. The world is less fleshed out. It was prescient politically and that makes it interesting but otherwise i have no desire to replay it.

Yui_Suzumiya976d ago

2 had better gameplay but 3 had a better story

leahcim977d ago (Edited 977d ago )

Hurts to see the word "worst" related to Bioshock saga.
The 3 games are masterpieces.

ScootaKuH977d ago

Bioshock 2
Bioshock
Bioshock Infinite

That was easy

Rebel_Scum977d ago

oh great. Can’t wait to see the posts of game titles in a ranked order without context as to why.

Show all comments (27)
130°

BioShock 2's director reveals what could have been a different BioShock

In a podcast with Wassup Conversations, Jordan Thomas, director and the writer of BioShock 2 reveals his initial ideas for a new rapture and how they were shut down by 2K.
"My first proposal was about a little sister, it was playing as a little sister and it was much more horror-oriented pace and about vulnerability, closer to Thief frankly, but I was told no, we want it to be our Gears of War, this need to be a big shooter franchise with an emphasis on the shooter element, and so what I think of the protagonist of a shooter as is a big lumbering sort of porthole on a stick with guns sticking out in front like you’re almost a vehicle."

Read Full Story >>
nikoofarmusic.com
plainview10301497d ago

And he also wanted it to be above the sea or in space. What a wasted opportunity.

Nacho_Z1496d ago

It's surprising the game turned out to be good with this guy at the helm. The combat mechanics were actually the biggest improvement in the sequel as much as he wouldn't want to hear that, everything else was inferior.