600°

Zipper: Xbox Live "more juvenile" than PSN

Zipper Interactive's Ben Jones has said that he believes Xbox Live is "more juvenile" than PlayStation Network, and that MAG "definitely fits more" to the PlayStation audience "because of the things that are being said over Xbox Live".

Read Full Story >>
gamerzines.com
The Meerkat5223d ago

Or in other words.

Ben Jones says most people on PSN don't have headsets.

Wrathman5223d ago

yeah.but your indox will be full of crap bout your mom, with bad grammer and spelling.

and when your gettin abuse on the psn you cant understand it on low quality bluetooth headsets.probably the one daddy uses while he drives.

JsonHenry5223d ago

Like the guy above says, almost no people mics on the PSN, but your inbox will be spammed with insults instead.

Corrwin5223d ago

Or that anybody with a head set on PSN is old enough to afford one.

lociefer5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

lol wow, so u guyz like paying 50$ for live so ur moms can get verbally abused by preteens ?

AndyA5223d ago

"yeah.but your indox will be full of crap bout your mom, with bad grammer and spelling."

Stand back, the irony detector is about to blow!

Bungie5223d ago

i like using a headset when playing online

PSN community don't use headsets

i guess it's just a personal preference

JsonHenry5223d ago

No, we pay $50 so we can have the best (for a console) experience available online. That and all of my friends prefer to play on LIVE instead of PSN.

ActionBastard5223d ago

I missed the requirement to talk while in an MP game with strangers. I have a headset and love it. I use it when I want to, not b/c everyone else does or enjoys spouting off ignorant stuff.

talltony5223d ago

To me its the biggest reason not to pay for live especially if you already have a ps3.. And I was actually surprised how many people had mics in the mag beta but it would be smart if sony bundled mics with mag like they did with warhawk.

gaffyh5223d ago

Quite a lot of people use headsets in MAG actually, just not so much in other games.

JsonHenry5223d ago

@action bastard - I tend to only play games where people need to work together as a team to win. So for me having only one or two other people at most on a team that can call out enemy positions and whatnot defeats the point of me playing online with them.

That, and I think all the racist and childish remarks are funny. (laughing at them, not with them)

AntoineDcoolette5223d ago

Crappy blue tooths? Everyone I hear on SOCOM (which is as bad as xbox live), Warhawk, MGO, or Uncharted 2 is clear. In boxes full of insults? I've only had trouble with that one on 2 occasions. Marvel vs Capcom 2 (people get so pissy over those matches) and one time someone kept sending me inflammatory comments calling me a religious f@g because I have Saint in my PSN name...

5223d ago
Christopher5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

I don't care to talk to people online. 360 or PS3. So, in the end, it comes down to how much BS and annoying crap I have to hear. I'm hoping MAG isn't filled with such things so I can actually enjoy it.

As far as Ben's comments, just not a good thing to say in general. Even if it was true, it's best to not bar one's teeth like this and to be more gracious towards your competitors.

talltony5223d ago

How can a organized 256 player online fps suck? Its like a dream come true for me.

ActionBastard5223d ago

Games where teamwork is needed (Warhawk, Socom, Fat Princess, etc) I use my headset. But playing a Free for All in MW2, I don't. Ultimately, it's a players choice.

tordavis5223d ago

I wonder how the comment section would be if it was turned around and Gabe Newell was the one actually saying it.

Blaster_Master5223d ago

Yeah, your p2p xbox live games are teh best. LOL!

kneon5223d ago

Apparently most don't feel the need to talk just because they can. I wear a headset and it's almost always on mute. In MAG it was on because the game benefits greatly from good communication. There is always going to be the occasional A-hole online but they seem to be in far fewer numbers on PSN. And in MAG I never came across even one, but I'm sure that will change once it's out. But I expect those type of people will quickly lose interest and move on to COD 6.5 or whatever run'n'gun FPS they desire.

And I have yet to receive any crap email on PSN from anyone, all I get are friend invites from random people I don't know. Oh and some holiday greetings, again from people I don't know and have never talked to. Yeah those are some pretty obnoxious messages :) I've found most people on PSN to be pretty friendly and helpful, especially on the MAG betas

darkmurder5223d ago

This guy has no cred after the beta atrocity that was MAG.

ThanatosDMC5223d ago

There were a bunch of annoying kids that were talking in MAG nonstop last time i played. When no one paid attention to him or just muted him (i didnt know how) he started shooting at the team.

Guido5223d ago

It's so true that the PSN is home to more mature adults than Live. In the end, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. You want mature gaming experiences, you play on the PSN.

reaferfore205223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

@Guido above: It really just depends on what game you play, I was playing MW2 last night and every other word I heard from a mic (which there were a lot of people with that night) was either "F*ck, Sh*t, or Duewd.... you ever get so hiiigh that you can't find your controller???" With about a milliion responses of "Duewd that happens to me all the time!!!"

Blaze9295223d ago

So Microsoft is the only company that talks smack huh? If this was them saying this about PSN, fanboys would be running rampant here.

Funny how Xbox 360 owners aren't acting the same way with the comments I'm seeing. Who exactly is more juvenile again?

4Sh0w5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

So its true ps3/sony takes "digs" at the competition. No say it aint so. Oh that's right if sony say's it, its only telling the truth, despite the fact this his statement is pure BS, anything annonymous attracts bad behavior that people would otherwise keep to themselves.

Sevir045223d ago

The problem here is that they really dont car to yous it for one because it really isn't a make or break thing for the system as you can have g=fun playing a game with out it. Most people who use mics on are the ones on the 360, who all ran out to buy one on launch day in 2005. the system is actually bundled with one so most of your friends who play online with headsets are the same ones who bought a 360 at laucnh.

as far as smack talking goes, the PS fanbase is bad but not as bad as the xbox community. there have been instances of irrational smack talk but not soo much as i here on MW2 on live or Halo or Gears...

None the less the notion taht no one uses mics on PS3 havent used the feature to find out.

on Games like Resistance, Modern warfare, warhawk, MGO, gran turismo, HOME, KZ2 Uncharted 2, people are very vocal. i will say however that just about everyone who has Mag uses a head set.

and what Ben was saying about Users in Mag helping those other players out was true... MAG has turned out to be one Organized and cohiesive gaming experience online, the action is tight and everyone for the most part play well, you'll always have the Rambo team or player but even they learn quickly, by either getting booted out, respawning ever 15 seconds or simply quiting because they havent wrapped their heads around the games team mechanics.

MAG is far more suitable to the PS brand.. because there really isn't a tactical shooter of this calibur on the 360. and it shows.

RadientFlux5223d ago

While headsets definitly make it easier to find immature idiots online. I serious doubt that one online service is more juvenile then another.

mastiffchild5223d ago

Well, Zipper shouldn't have said anything about the Live community. It's not their place and is just as bad, imo as someone who prefers PS3 AND PSN to my 360 and Live(which I recently stopped sub'ing to because I wasn't using it), as wha T10 did about F3 and GT5 or Valve knocking the PSN. I think, and I was looking forward to it a great deal as when it's good it's amazing, this may cost Zipper my sale-it's unprofessional and not needed and juvenile in and of itself to say what they have done. I don't like people in the industry smack talking and though Zipper are a great dev(I'm a big fan of THEIR SOCOM ga,mes actually)I just don't like rewarding people who speak ill of the other side like this.

That said I really don't understand why some of the 360 zealots on this thread reckon PSN users get inboxes full of abuse instead of getting it in their headsets. i've NEVER had a rude message off anyone on PSN and have had LOADS on Live. I use a headset on both(or did when I was still on Live)and I would agree that there's a lot more rudeness and abuse on the Live side of things and at one point Halo got so bad that I just stopped playing it online. there are idiots on both but I feel giving everyone a mic was a blessing and a curse on the 360 as it made even the biggest tool think they had every right to talk whenever and however they like whereas he main reason someone has a headset on PSN is if they WANT to coordinate and communicate with their mates and teams and clan online so they're less likly to abuse anyone. there are still idiots, don't get me wrong, but little Timmy who would slag your mum off and likely get angry enough to text after you muted him on Live is unl;ikely to bother having a heady if hew has a PS3 and so doesn't get worked up enough to sit down and write things.

Sure, I've had pproper idiots on PSNB with mics being as rud and racist as anyone on Live but it's really a much lower percentage and I would put it down to demographic and to free headsets. I also think that on Live a lot of kids do have mics and know from my own kids that they get REALLY upset if they feel someone else has beaten them unfairly(and they ALWAYS think that when they lose!)and on 360 every kid can just let fly! The difference does make PSN a better place for MY gaming but isn't the best thing about PSN over Live for me. I hate Cross Game Chat with a passion(distracts everyomne using it and that wrecks you TF2 faster thn having a crap team can-and never mind how it can be used to cheat)and, the biggest reason, I play a lot of KZ2 and Warhawk on the missus account(her PS3, which she shares with the kids, has the wired, better connection)and the dedicated servers make it a far more lag free experience than anytjhing I evr played on Live-I also think that had Livce got more games with dedicated servers we might all have pushed Acti harder when IW took them off PC gamers and made them install them for us all as they really needed to if they were to improve their game over it'#s predecessor. I honestly believe that the lack of many games using them on Live lets companies get away with crappy P2P as a lot of 360 only gamers don't even know of the advantages of dedicated servers and it's holding us on consoles back.

It IS an odd thing that there's more games with dedicated servers on the free PSN as it's one thing MS could use to say theirs really was the better servic if they got more devs to sort it out for us-would get my sub again if they did anyway-even if I do have to put up with effin XGC! Anyway, there'll be a lot of juvenile idiots on PSN but we jut don't hear them without mic and they tend not to buy them if they aren't free as generally, as you all know from palying on Live, the idiots tend NOT to want o play as a team anyway so why would the same guys splash out on PS3? Zipper were in NO position t say anything, mind, and I'#m nothappy that they did! I wanted to buy F3 but Greenawalt stopped that along with their(T10) badmouthing and arrogance and if Zipper add to this unwise outburst I reckon I might be missing MAG as well.Silly, unprofessional thing to say, imo, evn if there's some truth to it they should never, like Gabe should never have knocked the PS3 if he wan't gonna even try it, they should have left live alone as they've nothing to do with it.

vhero5223d ago

It is more juvenile. You get nothing but insults on 360 as every kid has a headset. That's bullcrap about getting pms in your inbox on psn as they have to be in your friends list to send messages so stop sprouting crap you 360 fanboys. Just more proof you know nothing about ps3 and come to ps3 section just to slate it and nothing more. When you give people the choice kids usually don't have headsets as their parents don't buy them headsets just the consoles.

DaTruth5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

All this says is the @$$holes are older on PSN. It's my number one gripe with online gaming. If Live is worse than PSN, I can't imagine it as I can hardly tolerate it on PSN!

The worst is when your mic is turned up and instead of just asking, the person begins full on swearing at you! At which point you're not actually going to comply and tell them so; Which leads to the dude spending the next 3 rounds cussing at you and you telling him to stop the bloodclot crying!

Then there's the @$$hole who starts trolling you just because your the only one with a mic and the jokers who decide to have a conversation about their whole lives... even in Chinese for all of us to hear!

Edit @ above: You actually can get messages from others on PSN, but I never check that box and I can't imagine anyone else checking theirs. What would you really care about what people who aren't your friends have to say?

bacon135223d ago

Cry babies, racists, ignorant and stupid people, pre teens, and just plain s**theads are very well represented on both PSN and LIVE. I really couldn't say which one has more but it does seem much more headsets are in use on LIVE which obviously comes with the free TONKA headset MS so nicely added. If only I had a dollar every time I mute some degenerate with ADD.

ian725223d ago

I have a headset for my PS3, but only use it online if it is needed for the game. If not really needed then I don't bother with it.

LiquifiedArt5223d ago

XBL is definetly a younger player-base and everyone was given a Mic.

(I like the Buy in approach to Mics)

The Maxx5223d ago

LOL that's funny cause when I am playing KZ2 all I hear is..."can anybody hear me?...hello, can anyone hear me? can anyone hear me? 3 minuted pause....then hello, can anyone here me?" then someone would respond "ya I hear ya" then silence for the rest of the game.

ChozenWoan5223d ago

When Home had open mics in public places there was quite a few low IQs running around, but they would go away after you just laughed at them and challenged them to come up with better insults. In MW I would come across 1 or two of them a day, but the mute button was so very handy.

Warhark, I don't remember there being any aholes, and Soccom has some of the most mature gamers around. MAG targets more of these types of gamers and thus the aholes are few and far in between.

Actually, the only gamers I would fear to run into on MAG are the Ultra Competitive types. The guys who take the game far to seriously and should have became (is/was) a drill Sargent in the army. I ran into one of these guys durring the 4.0 beta, he choose to be CIO and was more of a distraction than the grenades exploding around me. lol.

My point is, the more mature the game environment, the more mature the gamers tend to be when it comes to the PSN.

PoSTedUP5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

less people have mics on psn and because of this more adults buy mics because they can afford them.

socom, almost everyone has a mic (because it was bundled) and i play every day and rarely see any youngsters let alone immature adaults.

everyone has a mic on XBL so 40 million people all over the world have a voice and as you can see, there are a lot of messed up people.

i like it better this way (maybe because i am biased) but still rather play socom all day with people i can relate to.

which ever you prefer...

@ chozen1- thats true also. depends on the games but can also depend on a lot of things even dating back to the ps2 with GTAIII picking up a lot of mature gamers and some clinging onto the Ps brand. but yeah i believe that if if everyone had a mic on both consoles it would be pretty much even but a little more mature on PS3 due to some games like socom and GT5 (just because GT series is more poplular than forza and they are simlulators that are much harder for the young audience so they generally stay away from realistic games) ansd thats jsut what i believe with doing little research on it.

bioshock12215223d ago

Pretty much what you said. Not many people in PSN have headsets and if they do they don't talk. Unlike Xbox live which practically everyone has a headset. But I think that's an advantage to play with people who talk I can't imagine playing multiplayer games online without a mic and people not talking. Also he is suppose to say that I love how people never bash ps3 developers for talking crap about the xbox in general yet when its the other way around they get a lot of heat the guy from Forza 3 and valve just to name a few. Plus the only people who say that everyone in xbox live are kids and talk crap all the time are probably ps3 and wii users since if you're an actual xbox live user you would know that is not true I rarely meet little kids.

edgeofblade5223d ago

If you don't want to hear it, mute them. Or turn voice communication to Friends Only.

If Zipper wants to stir up sht like this, I might be disinclined to keep my pre-order...

captain-obvious5223d ago

PPL on PSN got mics but just don't talk
once i was playing killzone and no one was talking
i was asking for a medic several times and 2 or 3 guys started screaming at me to STFU
and i didnt even knew that they got mics

baum5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

"yeah.but your indox will be full of crap bout your mom, with bad grammer and spelling. "

Does anyone find the irony in this statement, or is it just me? And what the hell is an "indox" anyway?

Also, agreed about this, LIVE is too juvenile and full of immature children like all the N4G 360 fanboys, that's why I cancelled my subscription to LIVE after trying it.

-MD-5222d ago

"Or in other words.

Ben Jones says most people on PSN don't have headsets."

Truth.

Arnon5222d ago

These guys are starting to sound like Turn 10. I'd honestly take Valve's word over this company.

Consoldtobots5222d ago

I have 2 motorola and official Ps3 headset that I use most often, and yet it sits in the dock because I have a really deep voice and tend to scare most of dem youngins out there.

finbars755222d ago

Why does everyone suggest that ps3 users dont have headsets?Sorry we are in the next gen fruitcake we use a thing called bluetooth.Sorry your stuck with some foam padded outdated piece of crap called headphones.When I last checked the majority of the people on the ps3 have bluetooth.We dont need a switch that mutes people out from our ears because the mature level is alot better then those screaming little twirps that the xbosx has.Yes we have the occasional kid but for the most of it we are just doing fine.So get over it and accept the fact you will never be blessed with quality games that we get.Time to go back and play with a mature audience.

DaTruth5222d ago

Do you guys really believe there is anyone who owns a PS3 who doesn't have a Bluetooth headset? I have like 2 Motorola's just laying around!

There is just very little reason to use them except to yell insults at people. My friend has two and hasn't bothered to connect them!

TheBand1t5222d ago

I really do hate it when developers run their mouths, whether they be Zipper, Turn 10, or Valve.

:/

Perkel5222d ago

@ 1.0
"Ben Jones says most people on PSN don't have headsets. "

more like ps3 users uses headsets when they need to not just to comunicate everybody :

" FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUooooooKKKK you , you suck ! " :)

DMason5222d ago

@Vhero

Just give it up man. You are easily the most hateful person at N4G, certainly the most biased fanboy I've seen by far.

On topic: Wasn't it the Sony crowd that was saying how MS taking digs at GT5 was childish and stupid. Well, this is irony at it's finest. It's ok for a Sony developer to take shots at MS, but not the other way around. Hypocrisy is shining through for sure.

rob60215222d ago

Suddenly this whole article becomes about 'PS3 users not having headsets' Completely ignoring the fact this guy is actually right on his assertions that the 360 community is juvenile...

http://blog.nielsen.com/nie...

Scroll down to the part page 3 where it says age group....
Xbox360: 12-17
PS3: 25-34

That is quite a pronounced difference with the active players to me.
Zipper is in fact right here.

FamilyGuy5222d ago (Edited 5222d ago )

The first 3 commenting don't/have never gamed on PSN.

I also think it's hilarious how many gamers there are out there (mostly on 360) who wear huge/dorky looking headsets. They look like they work for telemarketing companies or something. Where as on PSN you can use a nice, sleek and unnoticeable blu-tooth headset for gaming.

I laugh every single time I see someone playing on their 360 wearing that strapped on headgear. LMAO! :D

LesterCorncrake5222d ago

alot of people do have headsets however they are not relavent to me, my friends are and they DO have mics, .....point?

TheDeadMetalhead5222d ago (Edited 5222d ago )

XBL is definitely worse, but PSN has a few total douchebags as well. I once played a guy on Warhawk who was the most arrogant, vulgar d!ckhead I've ever played against on PSN or XBL. He wasn't even a kid, either! I think he got banned, though.

I do agree that MAG is better suited for PS3, though.

FamilyGuy5222d ago (Edited 5222d ago )

I play Uncharted 2 online A LOT (level 58 currently), TONS of people play with their mics on and I hardly EVER come across anyone spewing hateful or racist comments. The high level guys will talk sh!t if you do better than them or win against their high level team: Insisting on rematches unless you demolished them the first time and they know they can't win, in which case they go back to the lobby at the end of the match to avoid you instead of rematching.

I may come across someone spewing racist/hateful/prejudice crap (im black) once a week at most in Uncharted 2. So it's not too bad at all and most of the people I game with are in or near their 20s (im 24).

I'd say Zipper statement, though somewhat inappropriate, is correct. For a game like MAG where you really rely on your teammates preforming objectives "maturity" IS needed.

If you play Uncharted 2 online and get into ANY of the objective based matches with people who focus on something other then the overall goal you're likely to loose that match (unless you're phenomenal, like me ;) and can carry the team)

heroprotagonist5222d ago

"Funny how Xbox 360 owners aren't acting the same way with the comments I'm seeing. Who exactly is more juvenile again?"

I agree with you. A lot of PS3 owners freak out any time a developer says something slightly negative about the PS3, but when Sony or one of their developers says something negative about the 360 most 360 owners couldn't care less.

I disagree with the guy, but it goes no further than that. He is wrong in my opinion, but I understand that, as the Japanese say, business is war and companies are always going to talk up their products and talk down their competitors. That's just the way it is. I don't get offended.

Anyway, I play on both Xbox Live and PSN and there is no real difference in the percentage of jerks or kids. All I notice is that fewer people seem to use headsets on PSN.

Personally, I like when people talk because to me it makes it a more social experience. Sure, there are some jerks out there, but I just mute them. On the other hand I meet some cool people online and it is fun chatting with them a little bit. It also enhances the game for the most part since there tends to be a bit more communication. Even hearing people's reactions to getting a good kill or getting killed by somebody else are part of the experience to me. The positives far outweigh the negatives, in my opinion. And like I said, I just mute the annoying players.

I think this comment by Zipper is actually more offensive than the comment made by Valve, if you wanted to take it that way. But I don't really care what he says to be honest and I know he is just trying to play up his platform.

lightningsax5222d ago (Edited 5222d ago )

@Mastiff

I agree with your angle. Whether what Jones said was true or false (and the answer is most likely somewhere in between but skewing true due to multiplayer volume alone), he's a manager of a consumer-driven company talking about both his customers (gamers mostly on PSN) and his potential customers (gamers mostly on XBL that may consider getting a PS3 or going back to it for MAG).

That stuff might be said behind closed doors, but it definitely shouldn't be revealed in anything that might reach the media.

A standard response would be to say something good about the maturity of PSN customers from their own experience with other titles, not mentioning the competition. Anything past that and you start sounding like you need to go back to business school.

Darkstorn5222d ago

If PS3 sales keep up, then we'll just have more and more preteens on PSN. That's the bad thing about sales...

Madmax12819805222d ago

right just too say i own both consoles and any one here that owns the ps3 and says that psn has less racist hateful comments compared to xbox live is a complete fanboy and a lier i play online on both and its exactly the same on both consoles u will never find an online match were there arent ppl (even adults) shouting abuse at other gamers only difference being not everyone has a mic on ps3 so its no as bad but if everyone did it would be the same and whats with ppl using there pseye cam as a mic and shouting at there family lol (heard that happening alot). then again i suppose on ps3 u have to put up with hateful racist comments in games as theres no party chat or private chat while ingame. i hate fanboys on both sides both consoles are almost identical maybe a few differences here and there but thats why i own both so im no missing out on good games and features from both sides. completed uncharted 2 great game, cant wait for gt5 (when it finally arrives) played mgs4 no really my type of game looks great but no really into stealth combat games i also have loads of psn titles like high velocity bownling, pain, inferno pool, hustle kings, socom confrontation etc. even tho i game mostly on the xbox 360 i love the ps3 also but i hate the fanboys pisses me off game on and stop hating.

RumbleFish5222d ago

1st: all of my PSN Buddies have and use Headsets.
2nd: I never have insulting PMs in my inbox.

This must be a english speaking people's problem, or maybe a matter, what games you play. I play MGO and SOCOM. There we talk about tactics and make use of the headset as it's meant to be. I remember when I was playing CoD 4 and W@W sometimes people were insulting me or other persons, but I never heard insults in other languages but english and dutch. So I think it has to do something with me being german and lots of uneducated american, dutch and UK people not being aware of the fact that we germans are not Nazis anymore.
And it has to do something with the mentality of english speaking people, perhaps they are just quicker with the insults.
I was never insulted in french or in russian or in spanish or italian and believe me, I can understand insults in those languages.

Please excuse any wrong spelling or grammar.

+ Show (57) more repliesLast reply 5222d ago
ThatCanadianGuy5223d ago

I certainly agree with them.I don't play my 360 online anymore but when i go to my friends and watch him try to show off by getting the nuke in MW2, all i hear is immature little pre-teens shouting racial slurs and T-bagging People.

Not to say there isn't some people like that on PSN..
There's just way, way less.

The Meerkat5223d ago

Nobody T-bags in MW2.

There is no point, the killcam means your victim would never see it.

Therefore anything you say should be interpreted as being incorrect.

ThatCanadianGuy5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? I see it all the time! Some dude kills a camper, runs up, starts t-bagging him.

Judging by your comment at the top, anything YOU say should be classified as false & failed trolling.

HappyGilmore23005223d ago

No one tbags in MW2... there is no point, the other person wont see it.

The Meerkat5223d ago

HappyGilmore2300 you are correct.

There are some people (Nuke Boosters) that i'd love to T-bag but can't because it has no meaning unless the victim sees it.

ThatCanadianguy420 = facepalm

Rush-Sykes5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

You have a friend that owns a 360? I though you being one of the biggest PS3 fanboys on earth you would sorta try stab anyone that owns a 360 in an ally.

I guess I was mistaken o well.

ThatCanadianGuy5223d ago

Are you honestly that dense? They don't need to see it on the Killcam.
I see people run up and start T-bagging just to show off to their friends who are on their own team.

Like, Hello? Common sense anyone?

@Above, So what my Friend has a 360? I even have a 360! I should stab myself or something? You just prove how immature and juvenile XBL gamers really are.

Rush-Sykes5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

Your right I am immature but I haven't turned my 360 on in 6 months and I haven't used live in 12.

I did use my PS3 last night though so I guess you can add me to the none existent list of juvenile PS3 gamers.

See you in MAG where I will be screaming slurs down my microphone at you. /sarcasm

I mean heaven forbid gaming is "serious business" I don't play games to discover my immature side. I would rather play MAG with a bunch of old English gentlemen.

Anyway thanks for being the first person to ignore me. Which means I can only assume you won't reply to this unless you sad enough to ignore someone then still view there comments and respond.

ThatCanadianGuy5223d ago

See, this is where you fail tho.This has nothing to do with being immature about gaming.You mention something about stabbing someone over a freakin electronic box.That's immature.

Stop trying to twist and weave words together to save yourself from the embarrassment.

For the record, i didn't put you on my ignore list.But i certainly will now.

The Meerkat5223d ago

Wow, you just don't know when to quit.

NOBODY t-bags in MW2, not only because the victim doesn't see it but because its a double press of the crouch button where as in Halo its a single press of the thumbstick. i.e it takes longer and you'll get shot and look stupid.

And while there may be people on Live that shout and swear it makes the game feel alive, i'd rather that than the silence you get on PSN.
You can always mute the ones you don't like on Live. As far as i'm aware its not possible to give everyone on PSN a mic at the press of a button.

Rush-Sykes5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

O great thanks for that using your 9.4billion spam accounts to bubble rape me.

"You mention something about stabbing someone over a freakin electronic box.That's immature."

You spend 5 minutes logging in mulit spam accounts to debubble me that's not only immature but also sad. So you really should practice what you preach Mr Maturity.

Elven65223d ago

The purpose of T Bagging in a game is so the person you killed would get pissed off over what you did, insult to injury if you will. If no method exists for the person to see said act in progress there is no point in doing it. That being said, some people still do tbag in COD games but you have to be careful since it will only take 2 or 3 shots to kill you while you're trying to do the do hence why it isn't as popular.

DaTruth5223d ago

That's how immature they are. You can't picture a 12yr old teabagging someone and giggling to himself and with his little 12yr old friends? I could even see them teabagging the random AIs in single player!

I don't personally know anything about MW2, but that just seems like some $hit a little 12yr old would do. It seems like some $hit I would have done when I was twelve

baum5223d ago

"NOBODY" tea-bags? Really? I guess my roommate doesn't count then. Oh wait.

Absolute statements like that will only expose you to getting owned (you "always" get owned anyway ;) ).

Two-Face5222d ago (Edited 5222d ago )

''NOBODY t-bags in MW2, not only because the victim doesn't see it''

Ever played Search & Destroy on Modern Warfare? When you are the only left on the team, and are about to defuse the bomb. People usually show off and starts t-bagging the dead enemies that guarded the bomb, because it usually is plenty of time left. When there is like 10 seconds left, they start defusing the bomb.

Your whole team and the opposite team can see you on television t-bagging, and showing off.. So you are wrong. Nice way to insult Canadian guy.

DMason5222d ago (Edited 5222d ago )

Sorry bud, but in all honesty, you are one of the bigger biggots that N4G has to offer. Everything you spew is pro-PS3, with no regard to any other system. I agree with Rush-Sykes completely. You using the "my friend has a 360" argument is just like someone that uses the "I have lots of black friends" argument to justify why they're not racist. And now most likely you'll label me "juvenile" because I've challenged your opinion. Ironic much?

When anonymity is present, it's no holds bar on any system, whether it's PSN or Xbox Live. Xbox Live has more users with mics, so there's a good chance there's going to be more jerkoffs. Using a bluetooth is a hassle compared to the Live mic, it sounds terrible, and most people dont even use them.

heroprotagonist5222d ago

I have played both PS3 and 360 versions of MW2 and teabagging is hardly ever done. You basically don't see it. Very rarely.

Also, there isn't any more teabagging in one version than the other so I don't understand ThatCanadianGuy's point in the first place. Coming from him though, it doesn't surprise me.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 5222d ago
OGharryjoysticks5223d ago

I believe the age range of PS3 users is higher, but not everybody grows out of being a d.ck

If you need further proof, play SOCOM Confrontation. The majority of players on that game take it way too seriously and it shows.

-Alpha5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

I like how everybody is acting as if PSN is full of saints. PS3 didn't include a headset, so clearly it is less likely to run across someone annoying.

Additionally, if everyone had access to a mic the PSN could be just as bad as XBL.

With that said, Zipper is technically correct, but I don't understand why they'd point out something like this. Is it supposed to change the way games are played online? I usually mute or block "juvenile" players.

As for gamers, I run across all sorts of annoying players. People always assume kids are juvenile when adults are just as juvenile.

Troll_Police5223d ago

@Alpha

Who said PSN is full of saints? The fact is that PSN is more pleasant than XBL and that's all the guy said. I once had an Xbox and I did hear a lot of high pitched voices screaming racial slurs and all other obscenities. These were kids. Yes, age don't have much to do with maturity but this type of juvenile behavior is much less with adult gamers and I think you know it.

-Alpha5222d ago

Haha, yeah right.

You admitted that this doesn't have to do with maturity and then you said adults are more pleasant.

Really, it's down to personal experience but let's not pretend that older gamers don't whine, complain, and play their annoying music over the mics.

Also, like I said, it's much more common to hear people on 360 because they actually HAVE mics unlike the PS3 which didn't bundle it in.

Personally, I'm fine with that because a lot of PS3 users do have mics, but that doesn't change the fact that you can't determine juvenile demographics through a flawed concensus.

rob60215222d ago

yea lol you're absolutely right, there's still diks everywhere they don't really grow out of it, then again what would you expect from a highly competitive military shooter. In these types of games age doesn't have a lot to do with maturity. Although kids usually do have a tendency to get more of a kick out of teamkilling.
Final Fantasy XI had the best community of any online game I've played to be honest. It tends to be a turn-off to most of the macho-military tough guys that fill up CoD or Socom.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5222d ago
GR8 15223d ago

The only reason you dont get bad language on PSN is because no one has a headset, and out of 256 players 20 will have a headset. LOL

Bungie5223d ago

that's why XBL head and shoulder above PSN

Aquarius5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

is it knees and toes as well?

that is a nursery rhyme, lol.

don't compare things like that with Playstation 3
its much more sophisticated than that fake console 360.

the 360 is dressed up in a computer case made with cheap chinese components
http://support.dell.com:80/...

SSCOOLCHEA5223d ago

Why would sony invite this clown to play there games . Xbox live has all the shltheads not even talking about games . They have there headset on to talk about the JONAS brothers . PS3 owners are wise and smart that we dont need a headset . We know where were going to plant a bomb or defuse a bomb . We know what the objectives are . I love playing with no headset . I'm smart enough to know where to go .The truth is there are not that many kids on a PSN ...

36T5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

MAG sucked really hard. A flop before it drops.

@ Double07

"Maybe you played it at a "friends" house, right.. ;)"

Yes actually. Hard to believe??? LOL!. Just because you're a loner with no friends doesn't mean we're all like you. Good thing you have a Playstation to keep you busy or you might jump off a bridge or something. I have two friends that have all three systems. I didn't "play" the game. I watched for the 5 minutes my buddy was playing and it sucks hard. I'll bet you my paycheck the game flops from what i've seen. Do you get a paycheck or an allowance from mommy & daddy? ;) Believe me or not. i don't give a fvck! lol

Sir Ken_Kutaragi_5223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

...i wonder if ChatBots keep their Headsets on all day??? ;-D

ChatBot 1 - "Where are you now?"

ChatBot 2 - "I'm in the Toilet!"

Later that day -

ChatBot 1 - "Where are you now?"

ChatBot 2 - "I'm in Bed Sleeping!"

ChatBot 1 - "LOVE U!!!"

;-D

Double075223d ago (Edited 5223d ago )

36T how have you played it when less than 24 hours ago you admitted you dont own a PS3?

Quote from you: "If i had a PS3 i wouldn't know what to do either."

Maybe you played it at a "friends" house, right.. ;)

Edit: LMFAO wait wait wait 36T you're calling me a kid? The irony of that is truly staggering just looking at your previous comments prove that either

A: You're under 13 years old.
B: Over 13 years old and mentally handicapped beyond belief.

Not sure which one it is but quite clearly one of them.

And as I said before you yourself didnt play the game and you're (imaginery) buddy played it for 5 minutes and can form an opinion that quickly? Just wow.

And you dont care? Then why did you re check this and bother to edit your comment?

Keep failing even more you little p*ick and go cry to your mother/ sister (same person) =D

Bodyboarder_VGamer5223d ago

More than 24 million PSN users all of them with no mic... Yeah right. And even more knowing that you can use any MIC that you can connect through USB or bluetooth. You even have more options than on the X360.

PSN users = mature people

XBL users = racists, pedos, etc.

5222d ago
The Iron Sheik5222d ago

Thanks for proving Ben's point for us. Now run along and play Halo with all the other 12 year olds.

Maini80005222d ago

i played this for 3 hours the other day... no1 had a mic until my last game... when i tried to strategise with the 5 people on my team with mics their reply... "dude idc i only really want to kill poeple f*** the objective"

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5222d ago
Omega45223d ago

Give every PSN user a headset then and only then can you make that comparison.

Simon_Brezhnev5223d ago

You can give every ps3 user a headset and it still wouldnt be like live. I guess you forgot the average age for a PS3 owner vs 360.

Double Toasted5223d ago

I wouldn't be able to tell by the way you PS3 fans act on THIS website. But I agree with the "Zipper" guy...Live is more junvenile or it use to be, but now with the Party Chat system it is way less severe...way less. Since the NXE update back in '08, the 360 is definitely a new console.

anti-gamer5223d ago

well you can find bluetooth mic that is Cheaper than XBL gold fees.

UltimateIdiot9115223d ago

I have 3 headsets I can use on my ps3. 2 bluetooth and 1 usb headset. I don't use any of them to talk because I simply don't feel like talking to stranger unless there is a conversation worth talking. My friends all have bluetooth headsets lying around but they don't use it either when playing on PSN.

Honestly, it's just a community preference to not use headset for the most part. I rarely hear people being ahole over PSN but every now and then there is one or two.

-Alpha5223d ago

Are you kidding? Age has nothing to do with maturity. Adults are just as bad if not worse than kids. Adults randomly pick on kids in a game too.

Age has nothing to do with it, so don't try using the PSN demographic as if it proves that the community is mature.

rob60215222d ago

Well I agree with your point but not really for the 10-13 year old range, those kids just really aren't old enough to understand how play correctly or communicate with an adult audience. And they're out there.

LesterCorncrake5222d ago

i was sick to death of hearing sh1tty a$$ kids singing over xbox live every other game of cod.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5222d ago
Show all comments (296)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1564d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1564d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1564d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1564d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691564d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1564d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1563d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31563d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1563d ago
Muzikguy1564d ago (Edited 1564d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021564d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1564d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021564d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1564d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1564d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1564d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1564d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1563d ago Replies(1)
1563d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1563d ago
PrinceOfAnger1564d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1564d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1564d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241564d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1563d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1564d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1689d ago (Edited 1689d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1689d ago
TheGamez1001689d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1689d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091689d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1689d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1689d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1689d ago
moomoo3191689d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1689d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1808d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1808d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571807d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1807d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721807d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001808d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1808d ago (Edited 1808d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1808d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1808d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1808d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1807d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1807d ago
Profchaos1807d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1808d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1807d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1807d ago (Edited 1807d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1807d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1806d ago (Edited 1806d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1806d ago (Edited 1806d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)