310°
8.5

IGN: Army of Two: The 40th Day Review

Army of Two: The 40th Day feels like Bad Boys meets 2012. It's essentially an interactive disaster movie because every five minutes something blows up or crumbles around you, which provides an adrenaline rush as you fight through enemies or just survive what's thrown at you. A huge improvement to the franchise, EA Montreal clearly paid attention to the first game's issues, because almost every aspect has been improved. There are still some misses, but for the most part The 40th Day is a much stronger title and lots of fun.

Read Full Story >>
uk.ps3.ign.com
pangitkqb5225d ago

The original was a great time, but really had nothing that made it outstanding and had some serious issues. Glad to hear that EA Montreal has listened to the suggestions of gamers and improved the game overall.

Pennywise5225d ago

I kind of enjoyed the first's coop. The online was messed up badly.

Based on the demo, I would of rated this game a 6.5/10... but maybe the final version has more polish and fixed the clunky controls.

Double075225d ago

Yeah I wasnt overly impressed by the demo and am pretty surprised to see it score that high but as you said maybe the final version has fixed a lot of the things I wasnt too keen on in the demo.

Rainstorm815225d ago

This is an 8.5

but Darksiders is a 7.8

IGN's credibility is Lost

Redlogic5225d ago

How so? Have you played both games? I was curious about Darksiders and 40th Day, maybe you could shed some light on it for me. I want one but can't decide, seems like you know about both...

bacon135225d ago (Edited 5225d ago )

@ Raiinstorm 81

Couldn't agree more. My buddy and I came away from the 40th Day demo underwhelmed and it certainly didn't sell us on the game. The demo is pretty much the full 1st chapter keep in mind which is a substantial portion for a demo. Darksiders on the other hand is a great game imho. Does it borrow from many great game franchises? Yes. Does it still stand on it's own and offer a great gameplay experience? Absolutely. It's a mature zelda. Nothing wrong with that. The AU and UK IGN reviews I feel reflected the games pros and cons in a much better fashion.

@Redlogic

If co-op is your thing, then 40th Day might fill that void. It does offer a good dynamic when playing with a good, competent player or a friend. I just have a problem with the cover system and gun mechanics, they feel a little off and wonky for my tastes. Darksiders is a great single player experience. At first it seems like a button masher, but after more upgrades and areas open up to you it truly makes the gameplay feel more unique and allow many different approaches to combat.

GameScrubs5225d ago

DOOOOOOD thank you for pointing out their credibility. I knew I was missing something and with your infinite wisdom you have showed me the light.

NOW I can say HEY IGN you have NO credibility cuz Raiinstorm81 said so and his opionion >>>>>> YOURS!

High Five!!!

morganfell5225d ago

I wouldn't say IGN's credibility is lost. One cannot lose something one does not have. But Darksiders is indeed far superior to anything I expereinced in the AoT demo.

There is some phenomenal writing and gut wrenching voice acting in Darksiders. Yes Vigil does borrow but to say they do not innovate on what they borrow is absolutely incorrect.

Vigil has delivered a game I would far rather see as a movie than the Clash of the Titans remake. One more note, Darksiders isn't a 9 hour game either. It is far longer.

And other than the fact you cannot pick War's appearance, there is a far greater RPG like experience in this game with plenty of exploring than I ever found in RPG lite titles.

BeaArthur5225d ago

GameScrubs...the only thing you were missing was grammar. I haven't played Darksiders yet (I opted for Bayonetta, which is very entertaining if anyone is curious) but I can't imagine that it is that much worse than this game.

Lifendz5225d ago

but it's all done by different people. Perhaps the guy that reviewed this game would've given DarkSiders a higher score than it got.

Either way, it looks like this is a solid game at the least. I'll definitely rent it.

GameScrubs5225d ago

I gladly take this trophy for all the idiotic comments placed on n4g and I would like to thank the n4g fanboys that read my post and commented and Cenobia for picking me as the winner of the day.

Bubbles to Cenboia "CHEEEERS"

bacon135225d ago

Well played sir, well played indeed

BeaArthur5225d ago

Raiinstorm81...too be fair you haven't played both games. Also there is always some individuality that goes into reviewing games (or anything for that matter), it's not formulaic criteria exclusively. I don't know if the same person reviewed both games but if not maybe one reviewer is more generous than the other. It's just an opinion, just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean their credibility is shot.

NateCole5225d ago

Might pick up this game but for IGN to score Darksiders below 8 is a very very big mistake imo. Darksiders is the best game i played this year sofar. Darsiders is way better than Byonetta as well. The only good thing in byonetta is the gameplay but story and art wise Darksiders is head and shoulders above byonetta.

DelbertGrady5225d ago (Edited 5225d ago )

Some of you mongrels need to get a brain. IGN isn't composed of 1 writer and they don't compare games from totally different genres to each other. Let me clarify: Army of two is a shooter with large emphasis on co-op. Darksiders is not.

Bu-bu-bu does that mean that Bayonetta is better than Forza 3!?

NateCole5225d ago (Edited 5225d ago )

Soda, are you serious?. Then why rate games out of ten?. Why rate games at all?. Isn't a game rated 8 suppose to be better than game rated 7 ?. If it is subjective as you say then why the f*ck rate them?.

It say's IGN review. Nothing there says IGN clements review. Or IGN racer review or IGN shooter review.

Seriously, stop. You are embarrassing yourself.

morganfell5225d ago

@Lifendz,

The issue with IGN and many such sites is the Editors are wholly incompetent. It does not matter who reviews the game. They may note different likes or dislikes, but were the editorial staff to implement actual standards then you would doubtless see more evenly awarded scores rather than a system based on the actual reviewers likes. A standards system allows for more accuracy and fact and less opinion.

I remember when IGN gave GTA4 a 10. They said they give a 10 not for what the game is but rather because it pushes boundaries. This includes graphics. What they were clearly saying was that GTA4 was pushing graphics boundaries beyond anything on the market and such a claim was both absurd and pathetic. The idea that when GTA4 released it was graphically beyond all other titles is pure idiocy. Liking the game is one thing, being blindly oblivious to the point of misleading fans is another. Particularly when you work for a site that is supposed to service the gaming community that is in some cases directly paid for by the userbase.

Sites should have actual standards listed. It would take a page to make clear delineations. But that will never occur. As soon as they have standards then there are now markers to which they can be held accountable. That leaves them no political wiggle room and sadly this will never occur.

@ NatgeCole,

Agreed. Darksiders is far and away a better game than that peacock strutfest called Bayonetta.

Rainstorm815225d ago

I have completed Darksiders & i played through the lengthy 40th Day Demo.....I was addicted to darksiders story from start to finish i completed the game and didnt find half tof the items.

As for AoT its not a bad co-op game but dosent excel that far from the original which was mediocre at best. I will play the final version but the demo didnt warrant a purchase.

As for reviews if you are reviewing a game on a 1-10 scale keep it consistent. 8.5 just because its a shooter shouldnt exist in a real gaming publication (Soda PoP), or does IGN have Monkeys with typewriters for editors.

IGN - bayonetta - 9.5
AoT:40thDay- 8.5
Darksiders - 7.8
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Any real Gamer (that played these games) can see something is wrong here.

Anon19745225d ago

I'm looking forward to giving this a try. But first, Assassin's Creed 2, Heavy Rain, Demon's Souls, Dragon Age, Borderlands, Batman, Lego Indy 2, more MW:2, more Uncharted 2, Fallout 3 expansions. After all that I'll maybe have some time to give this game a spin.

NateCole5225d ago

lol Raiinstorm81. Byonettta is made for tweens that couldn't get laid even if their life depends on it. Such a shame. She has skills but no class at all.

Playing byonetta was like watching Transformers 2 with megan fox soft porn. The whole time i was like thinking. WTF?. Does Hideki think this lowly of men like me but then i realize it wasn't really targeted for me. It was for hormone filled teen males.

BeaArthur5225d ago

Raiinstorm81...so essentially you have played 1 of these 3 games from start to finish and you are saying there is something wrong with the reviews? You are comparing one game to 2 demos and saying there is something wrong with IGN's ratings. Do you see where your argument holds no merit.

Rainstorm815225d ago (Edited 5225d ago )

Ive played Darksiders and Bayonetta start to finish, and played 40th day Demo. Bayonetta is a good game Nate comment above describe the game in a nutshell perfectly. IMHO Darksiders is the better of the three, im sure ill feel the same way after playing the final game but only time will tell.

How many of the 3 have you completed?

BeaArthur5225d ago

Raiinstorm81...I'm still working on Bayonetta but I'm not the one crying foul. Still, the fact remains that one game being better than another (except for glaring instances like MW2 and Haze) are subjective arguments. Many would argue that Halo 3 is better than Killzone 2 (I'm not saying one way or another) but that is an opinion, just because one has better reviews than the other does not make it universally better or worse. Clearly the people who reviewed those games think Darksiders is the inferior game it doesn't make IGN less credible...deal with it. Go look at metacritic, even the PS3 version of Bayonetta (which is considered by many to be a bad port) has a higher score than Darksiders. Some people might say you lack credibility because you think that Darksiders is better.

+ Show (20) more repliesLast reply 5225d ago
FwanK5225d ago (Edited 5225d ago )

Didnt see that coming, hope the final version is better than the demo, because one of my complaints was the camera and the controls

a maybe buy

joydestroy5225d ago (Edited 5225d ago )

wow. nice score for this one. i liked the first one so if they improved on things then this just might be a buy.

still on the fence with this or Darksiders though :/
maybe i'll wait for them both to drop to 40 and pick 'em up at the same time.

DelbertGrady5225d ago

I actually loved the co-op in the first game. Looking forward to playing this with a friend.

peeps5225d ago

hmmm will have a look at some more reviews. was honestly expecting a low score. i played the first game and thought it was alright but nothing special. played the demo for the second and was like wtf. just didn't impress me at all, and with all the other great games out soon this will be 1 game i'll prob miss

BeaArthur5225d ago

Agreed, this score is very surprising. I thought it would be a good bit lower. Although I thought the demo was better than the first game the controls are very clunky. Also I have trouble telling whether I am actually behind cover or if I'm still poking out. This series would be much better with a cover system like Gears of War or Uncharted.

Double075225d ago

The only other review out is from PSM3 who give the game 85% too.

Link: http://www.metacritic.com/g...

Show all comments (39)
250°

Top 10 Xbox 360 Games That Need to be Backward Compatible

Kevin F. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "Many of the best Xbox 360 games are playable on the Xbox One and Series X|S consoles. Some even with some enhanced visuals and performance. Unfortunately, not every game from the Xbox 360 library has received this glorious feat of being able to be played on more modern Microsoft consoles."

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
Orchard1036d ago

Max Payne 3 needs to be on that list.

1036d ago
autobotdan1036d ago

The Spider-man games will never happen. The xbox 360 Marvel Ultimate Alliance games have a better chance of happening than Spider-man titles but won't happen. The Xbox One Ultimate Alliance games delisted years ago

Vits1035d ago

Yeah... you can totally forget about those entries that got delisted because of licensing issues. Those are not happening.

MetalProxy1035d ago

Wait everything isn’t BC? You guys act like it is lol

porkChop1035d ago

Almost all of the games people want to play are BC, and that's a hell of a lot better than having none available.

ApocalypseShadow1035d ago (Edited 1035d ago )

Almost all the games people want to play? Not true. Majority picks screw over the minority who have games collecting dust. Metal is right. Fans make it seem that it's all. 39/997 games from OG Xbox is NOT all. 568/2154 from 360 is NOT all. But you guys play it up like it is.

And from my count, there are 4,000+ PS4 BC games on PS5 that I see. And almost every VR game. Series X has no Kinect games or Kinect 2. But you played that up too. No more dancing.

As for the article, some of the BC games make sense. The others with Spider-Man aren't happening.

1035d ago
Show all comments (22)
260°

God of War 3, The Last of Us, Army of Two, Skate 2 and more showcased running on the PC via RPCS3

The team behind the best Playstation 3 emulator, RPCS3, has shared a new video showing some major graphical improvements that has implemented in the latest version of the emulator. As such, the team showed God of War 3, The Last of Us, Army of Two, Skate 2 and more games running on the emulator.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Razzer2206d ago (Edited 2206d ago )

For pirates. I love running PS2 games on my PC. I can run them directly from the *real* disc. That is not an option for PS3 emulation. Thus....the problem. Endorse this and you endorse piracy. Period.

AmstradAmiga2206d ago

Well, Sony could have kept backward compatibility and not locked it behind a GaaS pay wall.

Outside_ofthe_Box2206d ago

Emulation is going to happen regardless if BC exists or not lol

Razzer2206d ago (Edited 2206d ago )

"Well, Sony could have kept backward compatibility and not locked it behind a GaaS pay wall. "

Right....cuz that halted Xbox 360 piracy in its tracks? Oh....wait.

bigmalky2206d ago (Edited 2206d ago )

How about for people who own the discs and a broken console?

Creating backup copies to play games that you own on an emulator of a console you have, and working or broken, is pretty much legal.

Yes, there will always be pirates, but there are some people who like to go back to their old games without having to buy a second hand console that may or may not work.

Emulation is a great idea, especially if you have already spent a fortune on the items you own, but cannot use.

2206d ago
starchild2206d ago

Most people would just rip the disc to their hard drive anyway. There's nothing wrong with PS3 emulation and it doesn't equate to piracy.

Razzer2205d ago

"Most people would just rip the disc to their hard drive anyway."

Oh come on. Most people go find the bit torrent.

cj1pate1012205d ago

Mr by the law, considering I owned a original ps3 and if I download the games I owned whats the big deal.

MadLad2205d ago

Offer your games on PC, and then less of this will happen.
And that's not even speaking of the visual and performance difference.

Christopher2205d ago (Edited 2205d ago )

***Well, Sony could have kept backward compatibility and not locked it behind a GaaS pay wall.***

They actually couldn't. They shot themselves in the foot in that regard by going the route of the cell architecture. It requires a much better cpu than current generation consoles have to emulate and run.

Fact is that these games are running poorly on PC now and likely will for another two+years.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2205d ago
phinch2206d ago ShowReplies(1)
2206d ago Replies(1)
Thomaticus2206d ago

I need to build a PC that can at least play PS2 games. I have a working PS3 and I don't mind using it to play PS3 games.... but since Sony doesn't support BC anymore.... you have no choice. The PS4 pro, should allow emulation for PS1 and PS2 games....

Guyfamily9992206d ago

The PS4 actually does emulate PS2 games in HD. It's just not universal (it's only a select few games) and you can't actually use your discs, you have to pay a bunch for digital versions. At that point just use a PC.

I'd love if the PS5 was fully backwards compatible (PS4 games natively as a PS4 Pro, PS 1-3 via emulation).

Thomaticus2206d ago

Someone made a video saying that PS4 has software emulation built in according to hackers that were able to hack an older firmware and enable the ability.

found the video: https://www.youtube.com/wat...

PUBG2206d ago

I'd like to se Sony do this on their own, and come out with a proper digital marketplace on PC. Consoles will always be around in some form, but PC is the future.

ziggurcat2206d ago

there's a better method here:

it's called buying a dirt-cheap PS3, and playing the games natively on the console.

conanlifts2206d ago

I would say the better method would be to copy MS on the X. Backwards compatibility with increased resolution and frame rate for no extra cost. The pro could do this. Or even just B/C on a ps4 without having to pay anything.

Bladesfist2206d ago (Edited 2206d ago )

How is that better? You spend money on a console that has a limited lifetime and will only play the games as they were made instead of not spending money and just emulating the games at resolutions and frame rates that will only get better over time, better yet, It will last for as long as the software is executable. Which will be much longer than the lifespan of any hardware.

It might be the best way to play the games if you have to play them right now but I imagine that people that have held out for this long don't mind waiting a little longer. If you're buying used, morals don't come into the question as no money is going to Sony or the developers either way.

ziggurcat2206d ago

"How is that better?"

you're playing the games natively on the console.

"You spend money on a console that has a limited lifetime and will only play the games as they were made instead of not spending money and just emulating the games..."

heaven forbid that you spend money on something instead of stealing...

BVFTW2205d ago

Buying the game and playing it on an emulator is not stealing, there are people playing pirate copies of games on a hacked PS3 (real hardware) right now, as well as stolen discs, morals are up to the individual and not the format/hardware.

Bladesfist2205d ago

@BVFTW I agree, I own three of these games but don't have access to a working PS3. I would love to be able to play them again without shelling out any more money.

BVFTW2204d ago (Edited 2204d ago )

I know, Bladesfist XD my PS3 is on it's last legs and I hav'ent even played half of my backlog yet! I've a lot of retro games as well and sometimes I play one of my oldies in the office through emulation, it's a great advantage not having to haul my old consoles and a crtv with me if I'm just looking for one quick fix with one game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2204d ago
Show all comments (33)
220°

It Takes One Game to Kill a Franchise

We all have game franchises we love so much that we don't care what others
think. Then there are games that the majority just agree shouldn't exist.
Sometimes it just takes one of these to kill our most beloved series.

Read Full Story >>
proxypayload.com
Hoffmann2828d ago (Edited 2828d ago )

It Takes One Game to Kill a Franchise

Street Fighter V and SoulCalibur V come to mind.

naruga2826d ago (Edited 2826d ago )

^^ i agree .....i also damn totally agree with Halo 2 ...if it wasnt the huge fanbase behind the first one and the huge potential of the franchise would be a dead IP ...HALO CE for me is still an unsurpassed FPS but HALO 2 completely trashed the series to below mediocrity quality levels...i also partly agree with MGS2 ...it had ridiculously convoluted and gibberishy plot considering what masterpiece MGS1 was ...but it narrowly escaped...also RE 4 could be considered such type of game ...RE was doomed after that

darthv722826d ago (Edited 2826d ago )

Interesting that you would pick Halo 2 over 4 or 5. I have yet to play 5 but as for the other 4, not one of them has disappointed me in terms of story or play mechanics. Halo 1 is a classic and 2 improved on everything while being a cliffhanger and then 3 having the dual story lines was a nice way to bring things to a close (of that trilogy).

4 was an interesting take on trying to create a new story where it had initially ended. The demand of knowing what was going to happen next for MC was what prompted them to come up with the new trilogy. I hope 6 will bring all things to a proper close... for now.

2826d ago
BrianOBlivion2826d ago

Halo 2 was better than 1 in every way.

MoveTheGlow2826d ago

Dang it, fighting games. Get your single-player content together.

blackblades2826d ago

More like it takes one guy or team to kill a franchise. Its not the game fault it's the person behide it. Same with movies.

xtheblackparade2826d ago

True, and it depends on what the devs learn from the experience whether or not the franchise can make a comeback. Or even make it's first "comeback". Like with Nier. Nobody cared about the first one, but it's hype all around for the sequel :p

StormLegend2826d ago

This is very true, many franchises have dealt with this.

SaveFerris2826d ago

Sometimes a game can kill a franchise even before it starts, if it doesn't perform as well as expected. The Order 1886 is an example of this.

USMC_POLICE2826d ago

That universe though, I hope it gets a great sequel.

SaveFerris2826d ago

Yeah. I hope Sony will one day look to revive it.

akurtz2826d ago

it cant be dead if there wasnt news about the franchise beijg cancelled

USMC_POLICE2826d ago

I want to say socom with socom 4 as it was by far the worst but confrontation had its issues also. However compared to socom 4 confrontation was amazing. Still not socom 2 but it worked.

Show all comments (21)