170°

Games for Windows - Games on Demand Launch Details

It was announced last week that the PC videogames client from Microsoft, Games for Windows – LIVE, would be receiving a Games on Demand service similar to that launched earlier this year in Xbox 360 prior to the year's end. And now, Electronic Theatre can bring you the full details on the launch line-up, and a freebie offered to early birds.

Read Full Story >>
electronictheatre.co.uk
kevco335256d ago

I've never really been one for downloading games, I've always preferred the retail copies to digital ones. But if Games for Windows picks-up titles like those on XBLA, I could see myself getting quite addicted...

chak_5256d ago

no thanks

In my case getting the box and all is a big % of the gaming pleasure.

ZedoMann5256d ago

The Box does nothing to enhance your game.

At least that's how I think of it.

chak_5256d ago

I didn't say it enhance anything but my enjoyment.

Which is enough to me.

That and I like reselling, I'm not rolling on gold

likedamaster5256d ago

Reselling a PC game? Good luck with that.

Letros5256d ago

Stardock is trying to push it, it would be setup well where the publisher gets a cut, unlike the console market.

http://worthplaying.com/art...

chak_5256d ago

@likedamaster : I'm gaming on PC since 10 years, and I only kept 3 games.

And I buy A LOT, so reselling is not a problem.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5256d ago
ZedoMann5256d ago

“With Games on Demand, we didn’t just want to create a cut-and-paste version of existing digital distribution services,” said Mike Ybarra, General Manager Electronic Theatre Imageof LIVE Engagement Services. “We challenged ourselves to deliver an integrated platform that takes full advantage of the unique capabilities offered by the LIVE service. Our goal has always been to create a seamless online gaming experience for the Windows community, and Games on Demand is a great step toward that end.”

So, what exactly will be different? I mean, other than the fact you can connect to Xbox Gamers...

Charmers5256d ago

I wouldn't touch this service even if Microsoft offered a free hooker with each purchase. The GFWL service is totally screwing PC gaming up and is riddled with DRM. The premier title on GFWL is of course GTA 4 a bug ridden sorry excuse for a port. However it gets worse even with Rockstar stating it has "unlimited" activations in reality you can only install it 10 times before you encounter the GFWL DRM and it kills your CD key.

If they use that kind of horrid DRM in games that only use the service then I dread to think what DRM they will be using for these downloadable titles.

After the GTA 4 debarcle I have decided to no longer purchase any games that carry the GFWL branding, this sorry dog end of an excuse for "saving" the PC needs to be taken out and beaten to death.

ZedoMann5256d ago (Edited 5256d ago )

I won't touch it either, at least not too much.
The interface is clunky, it seems simplified, and Microsoft doesn't seem to like PC gamers.

I may download the Free Vista Ultimate Game.

Garrison5256d ago

On December 15th 2009, Games for Windows - LIVE will evolve beyond online gaming and include a portal for accessing and downloading your favourite LIVE-enabled titles. Games on Demand for Windows lets you easily purchase and download games from the Games for Windows - LIVE library right from your computer, and RE-INSTALL your games WHENEVER you want, WHEREVER you want. Games for Windows - LIVE now gives you the flexibility to access and play your games where and when you want, all straight from your PC.

Charmers5256d ago (Edited 5256d ago )

How about you stop tarring people with your own brush eh ? I did read the article and I don't believe what they said about the service for one second. You believe everything you read do you ? In that case I have some magic beans would you like to buy them ?.

It states on the GTA 4 DVD case that it has UNLIMITED activations, the reality couldn't be further from the truth. You have 10 activations on GFWL and that is it. After you install GTA 4 10 times (even if you revoke the securom cd key) you are screwed and you are no longer able to play GTA 4 online because GFWL bans your key. I imagine the DRM with these downloadable titles will be even worse.

Do I think for a second that these downloadable games will allow you to reinstall whenever and where ever I want ? No I don't, not for one second do I believe that. Remember it isn't in MS's interest to tell you the truth, they are not going to say "yeah your $60 game that you purchased from us is only good for 10 installs and that is it".

You would do yourself a favour to be sceptical about information posted on the web. Seriously stop taking stuff at face value, these downloadable games will be riddled with DRM that will restrict what you can do with what you bought, after all that is what MS's history has SHOWN us.

Show all comments (15)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ55d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia55d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73055d ago (Edited 55d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6955d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y55d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot55d ago (Edited 55d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex55d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y54d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07215d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde214d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude215d ago (Edited 215d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992215d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme214d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992214d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313215d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69215d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor215d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69215d ago (Edited 215d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack215d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface214d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)