160°

Third parties not required to release PSP games on PlayStation Store

What do Undead Knights, Naruto Shippuden: Legends: Akatsuki Rising, NBA 2K10, Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Republic Heroes and Cars: Race O Rama have in common? All of these are PSP games released on UMD after the PSP Go's October 1 launch -- and all are currently without a digital equivalent. Owners of the Go system are unable to play these games because they simply aren't available on the PlayStation Store.

randomwiz5324d ago (Edited 5324d ago )

yeah, no 3rd party wants to go through the work of releasing the game on ps store to get their game available to a larger number of psp owners /sarcasm

Isaac5324d ago

"Failure Sony. "

You can't even utter complete sentences now? Should I be surprised? lol

darthv725325d ago

I was thinking this might happen. You figure these 3rd parties released their games on UMD and to go back and digitize them should be easy but maybe not cost effective. I am sure it all has to do with sales.

We know sony will try and fill the store with back catalog and new stuff. Oh well. It just means some UMD games may be worth more seeing as there would be no digital version to purchase as an alternate.

CimmerianDrake5325d ago

If this is going to be like trophies. Where Sony gives devs the choice at first, so that they can have the chance to get accustomed to it, and then later force them to include it. Or will this always be the case. If it is, Sony have really lost it when it comes to the PSP. I don't understand how they can be forward thinking with the PS3, and not the PSP. It's like the saying goes... "the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing."

RememberThe3575324d ago

They will soon have to require games to be released on both UMD and the PSN. Frankly, the PSP isn't exactly flying off the selves. Sony doesn't need another reason(other then price) for someone not to buy the System.

CimmerianDrake5324d ago

I think Sony is all about easing everyone into everything. They don't want to go right into forcing anything because that's how you damage relationships with developers. If Sony forced this right away, and say a smaller developer couldn't take the financial risk involved, they'd just as soon not develop for the PSP and switch over to the DS. But once the Go has been around for a bit, I'm sure Sony will move to forcing it. Afterall, their business model for the Go is largely DL based it seems.

5324d ago
Jamescagney5324d ago (Edited 5324d ago )

LOL! Sorry but that is terrible. A great service for the psp go owners for sure.

colonel1795324d ago (Edited 5324d ago )

For me, the problem is Eric Lempel, this guy should be fired. I have never liked this guy, just looking at him makes me realize that the PSN is not up to XBL yet because of him. I know they have made huge improvements with the PSN since launch, but I know it could be miles better if this guy wasn't in charge. I mean, just look at update 3.00, who the hell asked for all those stupid "cosmetic" changes, while all the fans are screaming for features like Cross game invites, cross game chat, etc...?

I don't know if it's all Eric Lempel's fault, or the team's or both, but something I am sure, is that Sony really needs a new PSN team, cause they obviously suck...

(rant over)

RememberThe3575324d ago

What do you think the fat gray areas around your friends are for? Most likely for future updates that will show your friends trophies or more details about what they are doing on their PS3.

If you think that 3.00 was a pointless update, you don't understand how Sony does things.

Honestly, cross game chat and invites are the only things missing from the PSN, and there are still a ton of people who don't give a rats ass about those features.

You have to understand that Sony Corp. is looking at the PSN as a serious platform for multi-media distribution. This is not going to stay only a gaming network. We will eventually see a music store, and even a social branch that will probably integrate Home and the PSN together.

When it comes to the PSN, Sony is positioning themselves at the moment. We already know that the next firmware update is supposed to have cross-game chat. They're just spoon feeding at the moment.

They don't want a platform that will compete with Xbox Live, they want one that will take on iTunes, and blow Xbox Live away. You can't just release something like that. It take an ass load of R&D, and a lot time.

Be patient, Sony is building the skeleton of will become the body of the PlayStation Network.

colonel1795324d ago

While I agree to what you wrote, Sony should be doing things better. I know they have been doing great, but they take their time to do things, and giving us things we don't want instead of things we, as fans, ask for.

The grey boxes in the friends list is an example of how Sony (or the PSN team) is doing things the wrong way. They might be used in the future for something else as you stated, but why then, not release the grey boxes when all of the things that are supposed to be there, be there; the same goes for Dynamic Themes and avatars, why release the patch, if you don't have more than ONE dynamic theme ready, they should have just waited until they get at least 20 and THEN release the patch with that feauture.

Now, all the features that have been released, like the ability to take pictures, are great, but why the hell does Sony not encourages (and by that I mean, make them a requirement) developers to use them? I really have the feeling that this is PSN team call, and that is why I hate Eric Lempel, as I posted above.

On the topic on the PSP, how the hell they launch an all-digital console and not require developers to get the games on the PSN?.. agian, PSN team...

(second rant over)

CimmerianDrake5324d ago

In answer to your question, it's simple...

An all DL gaming device carries a huge risk within the game industry it hasn't really been done yet. There's no way of knowing how having an all DL service will be received, or what kind of return can be expected. If it tanks, devs lose money and don't want to develop for the platform. It's the gamble involved. Sony is trying to ease everyone into it. At least it isn't like trophies or custom soundtracks or cross-game invites where it could be one dev preventing it from happening, or it just won't work with the games or something. I'm sure that in time it will be a requirement.

Show all comments (25)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel5d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow5d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1824d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie4d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

4d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Notellin4d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

4d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere3d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX4d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney3d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno4d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno4d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

4d ago
fsfsxii4d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno4d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
130°

Acquire Joins KADOKAWA Group: Could This Mean A Revival for Tenchu & Way of the Samurai ?

Acquire, famous for games like Tenchu and Octopath Traveler, becomes KADOKAWA subsidiary. Can this mean a revival for beloved series?

Read Full Story >>
retronews.com
Snookies1233d ago (Edited 33d ago )

I would kill to have a Way of the Samurai game with a huge budget and modern tech... The first game was one of my greatest joys on PS2 back in the day. And I really hope From Software will do something with Tenchu... I hate that they're just sitting on the IP like it doesn't even exist.

Relientk7733d ago

Don't play with my feelings like that.

Also, new Tenchu please!

TheColbertinator32d ago

Tenchu would be superb in this day and age. Ninja and samurai games are hot right now and more is better.

Show all comments (7)
200°

Original Final Fantasy 7 - Is it Worth Playing in 2024?

Final Fantasy 7 has come back under the spotlight thanks to the release of Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, but is it worth replaying the original?

ravens5236d ago

Got to Zacks part in 7 Rebirth. Said f it. Finishing my game in 7 og. Just got to part 2 yesterday. I also got Crisis Core... So it'll be a while before I'm back to Rebirth. I just keep thinking about it too smh, want to get back to playing it. Not till I know Zacks story though. I beat 7 og sooooooo long ago, it's crazy going through it again and remembering things.

MrNinosan36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

Got to Zacks part in Rebirth?
You mean you started the game and turned it off?
The game starts with Zack...

ravens5235d ago

... Really 🤓 lol. His second part, I've played for 80hrs lmao. <---- PS5 Run time, probably not all game time. You guys know how it goes.

VIK212135d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Did you not ever play the OG FF7? After you recruit Vincent, later in the game, disc 3, return to that basement and look at the pod, there's a whole Zack story that'll trigger as a memory.... it's well hidden in the game and a lot of things regarding Zack are cleared up. FF7 Crisis Core is basically an extend feature of that hidden flashback... It took me years to discover it back then lol

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

MrNinosan35d ago

@ravens52
80 hours in Rebirth by doing everything, and you should've reached Zacks story about 5 times 🤣

ravens5235d ago

Ye I kno that's y I said not all gameplay time. But also I am very anal when it comes to exploring.

ravens5235d ago

Not to mention fighting Titan at his full strength. Hours spent trying still haven't succeeded. Found all 3 ruins but I'ma masochist when it comes to games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 35d ago
Barlos36d ago

Very much so. Graphically it's dated but the story and the gameplay haven't aged a day. It's still one of my all time favourite RPGs and for me is better than Remake in some ways.

Barlos36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

It always takes me back to Christmas 1997, I got it as a gift and I was blown away when I played it. I couldn't believe games could look that good. The combination of pre rendered backgrounds and FMV really made it stand out. It definitely still has a certain charm that modern games can't replicate.

I can't imagine people will still be talking about Remake and Rebirth in 27 years.

Tapani35d ago

Fully agreed. To me the atmosphere, pacing, gameplay and music are all better than in the remake.

Rebel_Scum36d ago

Yes, play this, skip remake, start rebirth for new players.

I_am_Batman36d ago

Skip Remake? That's terrible advice.

leahcim36d ago

Remake is so amazing, pure FFVII Love, play it on PS5 please! aww the graphics the battles, the music... a dream come true.

Rebel_Scum36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I disagree Batman

Show all comments (42)