190°

MAG Beta v1.22 Now Live

GamingOwl:

"The MAG Beta is now officially in version 1.22, as the newest 36MB patch is now live on the PSN. After successfully downloading and installing the 36MB patch, you will also have to download an additional 377.83MB."

Read Full Story >>
thegamingowl.blogspot.com
WildArmed5330d ago (Edited 5330d ago )

Yeah, did this earlier today.
Wasnt sure what its for since the server was down when i updated
EDIT
* Remove Infantry Gate from Domination mission primary objective areas
o We have alternate gate behavior on the way, but wanted to get this in for quick testing
* Update Domination gametype primary objective score-bleed
* Lower initial spawn times for attackers and defenders for all gametypes
* Update Major/Minor victory and loss scoring and conditions for all gametypes
* Tune Shadow War scoring and win/loss increments
* Fixes log-in issues if user has a large "block list"
* Several server stability fixes
* Download tuning and fixes
* The user is now able to create a character after deleting a character that is a clan leader

Thats the update log

1233605330d ago

played the beta after download,first time i played the 256 player domination match,i thought it was for that but people said they played the same map before.thats 4gb plus so far for the beta and counting

LukaX235330d ago (Edited 5330d ago )

How did you play? The servers aren't up at this time.

Ju5330d ago

I played that 256 domination, too. Man, crazy, but intense. A lot going on. Too much for my old brain. Still a lot of fun. I am in for the distraction because I don't live long enough for a mission goal...

BabyStomper50005330d ago

So are there no respawns? Anyone who has the beta tell me if it's worth the $5 at gamestop.

Ju5330d ago

There are respawns, what makes you think there are none ? And its worth it. Its a great game. I said it before, it is kind a CoD on steroids (for me).

vhero5330d ago (Edited 5330d ago )

Played the BETA for 1 hour there are respawns but its not like COD on steroids more like SOCOM feel but with mass players. No temp 5 second invincibility soon as you spawn so you can be killed soon as you spawn (happened to me 3 times in a row) so people camp spawn points. Honestly its not the best FPS out there and I totally prefer Uncharted 2 BETA right now and would recommend over it. Don't pay for this BETA whatever you do. Not to mention it can take upto 30 minutes sometimes to get into a match!

Ju5330d ago

Maybe its an FPS with a Socom feel, but its definitively no Socom. Just the amount of players makes this impossible. Its a run and gun game, more then any other, with tactical objectives (no death match - so far). I'm not even sure if there is any other PS3 FPS shooter which is close to this (?).

TBH, I find myself playing MAG much more the UC2. I think UC2 beta is very unbalanced. You shoot a guy in the head 5000 times, and even if he fires the shot 2 seconds later, you are dead. Usually the matchmaking throws you in with way to overpowered peers. No fun for me.

cyberwaffles5330d ago (Edited 5330d ago )

i don't agree with vhero at all. i like the uncharted 2 beta a lot, but i think mag is leagues ahead of the uncharted 2 beta. it might turn you off at first because the game sometimes feels cheap but once you start understanding the game and know what to do, it's a blast. i used to hate attacking on acquisition but once i started understanding the game more, it has became a very addicting mode for me now. i only played 3-4 matches on domination, in which my first match ever was 2 weeks ago where i had no clue what was going on, 2 matches as raven last night (won as an OIC for the first time), and defected to sver for one match since a bug pissed me off from playing as raven (it wouldn't allow me to use any of the items i bought in the respec option.)

anyhow, the game has a lot of depth even when all you do is run n gun. i will say that the game is not as fun for me personally if i'm not at least a squad leader, but the gameplay is solid and enjoyable. now they just need more weapons and where the hell is the shotgun!?!?

EDIT: you were getting angry about the spawn killing? simple solution, stop spawning in that area. i'm guessing you keep spawning on the bunkers, but sometimes it's best just to wait inside of it or just go to a different spawn position to flank them. if anything, its a smart tactical maneuver and should be a blessing for the attackers because it's a pain in the ass dealing with bunkers. you have to set the charges towards the direction of the enemy, it only takes 3 seconds to defuse the C4, and you're vulnerable to attack from behind while setting the charges.

also, if you have a mic, get a platoon leader to set a gas bombardment near the enemies spawn area or even an air strike from a squad leader. the game is balanced if you use your weapons right and not think with a one-track mind strategy. if APC's are rolling up towards your gate, get someone with anti-tank mines and set them up. the game isn't set up to be impossible, just requires a little skill and thought.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5330d ago
Shmotz5330d ago

Is sucking out my HD space.

pixelsword5330d ago

I did.

er, um; I just gotta install it.

:D

Morituri5330d ago

It's so easy. It took me all of 5 minutes. Just be careful with that first blue screw as it can be stripped easily. Loving my 465gb of space now.

matnum5330d ago

Will this come out at the normal time the store updates?

Show all comments (25)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1567d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1567d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1566d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1567d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691566d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1566d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1566d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31566d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1566d ago
Muzikguy1567d ago (Edited 1567d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021566d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1566d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021566d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1566d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1566d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1566d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1566d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1565d ago Replies(1)
1565d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1565d ago
PrinceOfAnger1567d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1567d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1566d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241566d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1566d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1567d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1691d ago (Edited 1691d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1691d ago
TheGamez1001691d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1691d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091691d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1691d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1691d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1691d ago
moomoo3191691d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1691d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1811d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1811d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571810d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1810d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721810d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001811d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1811d ago (Edited 1811d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1810d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1810d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1810d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1809d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1809d ago
Profchaos1809d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1811d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1809d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1810d ago (Edited 1810d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1809d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1809d ago (Edited 1809d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1809d ago (Edited 1809d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)