840°

Forza 3 vs NfS Shift: Audi R8 and Porsche GT3 comparison

Videogameszone compares Forza 3 and Need for Speed Shift. On top: Porsche GT3 and Audi R8.

Read Full Story >>
videogameszone.de
MGSR THE HD VERSION5345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

NF shift doesn't perform at 60 fps.....and so it fails miserably.

Model5345d ago

GT5 runs at 60 and it smashes both games

user8586215345d ago

ur mama doesn't perform at 60 fps.....and so she fails miserably.

El Botto5345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

Did Turn 10 lie about that aswell just like they did with the "10x more polygons" crap?

Did xbots got suckered into ANOTHER one of MSs lies again?

Chubear5344d ago

Can't even get metal or Carbon Fiber to look right. 360fanbase, psst, metal isn't supposed to look like Plastic.

Hellsvacancy5344d ago

Forza 3 bein out-shined by(not only) a Multiplat game but a game made by EA

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

MGSR THE HD VERSION5344d ago

LOLZ,it's not like i care 360 has the better version of shift, so maybe i'll both.

droid and bot5344d ago

"NF shift doesn't perform at 60 fps.....and so it fails miserably."

"360 has the better version of shift, so maybe i'll both. "

you just said it fails !!!
so you just owned your self

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5344d ago
Lord Anubis5345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

Eh, car models are better on NFS (lok at the R8 headlight detail on NFS) why does forza 3 have plastic shaders on the cars especially when all the car photos have reflective surfaces. Also are they using shadow maps for the track?

Marceles5345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

After seeing this, Shift looks better than I thought. Is there a way to pan down or back the camera up while in the c0ckpit in Forza? I gotta download the Forza demo, otherwise I would say it sure makes a Forza modeler's life easier since the camera is up closer to the c0ckpit, so they don't have to model as much of it.

Sarcasm5345d ago

You can pan left and right in Forza, but not up and down.

Lets-Game5345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

I think nfs shots are blurred because almost all of them are taken in motion while in forza cars are standing still.
I gotta say though NFS does look better but does it play better?

Marceles5345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

thanks, damn...that's a time saver then. Put the camera close so you don't have to model that much lower than the dashboard.

http://www.videogameszone.d...

finbars755345d ago

I have been playing Shift since it came out and its beautiful in every aspect.It plays smoothly and the ranking system is fantastic.I have played the demo for forza3 and I was completely dissapointed.Everything was like living in a plastic world.Not very detailed cars either.The engine there using looks like the cod series, which made things even worst.I know its just the demo and not the finished project or I least hope its not but it gives me an idea of what to expect which will be dissapointment.Thank EA for doing the right thing with its series and putting themselves back on the map until gt5 arrives.

Cold 20005345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

Forza 3 > Shift in every aspect.

The PS3 version even outsold the 360 version.

Simply shows the 360 community has chosen FORZA 3. Not bothering with Shift.

The PS3 community...well...they're playing Shift...not like they have the choice...

EvilBlackCat5345d ago (Edited 5345d ago )

Comparing Shift vs Forza3 and say Shift is Better is just stupid. Forza3 is more of a simulator than what Shift is and trust me is not a sim. IMHO i believe that one of the things you must not do while racing in real life is take a time looking inside your vehicle while taking corners. Why the need to look down when you know when and how to shift?

JokesOnYou5344d ago (Edited 5344d ago )

The F3 demo eats Shift for lunch....thats why 360 owners haven't bothered with Shift with F3 right around the corner. As for the ps3 fanboys above who follow F3, you got to forgive them, after PD saw all the features F3 was bringing to the table they knew GT5 wasn't ready to compete with F3 so all that "we can release anytime" BS was just hype, now once again the irrational extremists are directing all their anger as usual at another great 360 game. Its not micro/Turn10's fault GT5 probably won't be out here until at least next summer or longer, well then again maybe it is Turn10's fault in a way, seeing as GT is finally throwing in some damage. So now I guess they're pretty much forced to hype Shift, they can't even lie and scream "I'm buying the PC version", its very sad....how empty they must feel.

Still its strange how the "ps3 fanboys" love to hate all the great 360 games. -Well this explains that mentality very well.

"Fact: PS3 fanboys are the worst"
"Xbox 360 Fanboys support the Xbox 360 by LIKING the Xbox 360.
PS3 Fanboys support the PS3 by HATING the Xbox 360."
http://www.destructoid.com/...

-lol, See all you jealous extremist on the next post about another great 360 game.

JOY

MNicholas5344d ago (Edited 5344d ago )

Shift looks amazing.

Forza 3 ... not so much. So much for "we dont do bull-shots!"

Biggest differences:

Modeling: Shift has smoother curves. Some interior parts that are modeled with 3D polygons in Shift are just painted 2D textures in Forza.
Textures: Shift has better textures
Shaders: Unlike Forza 3, Shift's interior doesnt look like it's all made from the same plastic

In forza 3's favor, having been spanked in every visual category by Shift, is that it's running at literally twice the frame-rate (effectively twice the resolution). This means despite being aesthetically inferior it maybe technically on par or even better than Shift. Sadly the compromises required to run at 60fps are just too many.

Most disappointing is that the developers (in Microsoft tradition), overpromised and underdelivered.

Graphics are not the best of available games
Polygons are not 10x Forza 2
Textures don't appear to be uniformly 4x Forza 2
Damage is still unrealistic
Still only 8 cars
Lots of jaggies

Thanks to whomever posted this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Bloody amazing footage from actual 60fps gameplay (not replay or photomode). Incredible. Not flawless but very close. Even more incredible is that it's doing this in a 16 car race at 60fps at a 50% higher resolution than Forza 3 and effectively 3 times the resolution of Shift.

Mr Logic5344d ago

NFS Shift looks less plastic.

simplyRealistic185344d ago (Edited 5344d ago )

your an idiot, in every aspect, you can clearly see it looks better, just because people choose an exclusive doesn't mean it better, this is like taking candy from a baby, they should of compare NFS:shift to gt5 instead, i know most people didn't buy because Forza is coming out,

i for 1 played the demo and was disappointed people can actually compare that to GT5 let alone GT5:p

xTruthx5344d ago (Edited 5344d ago )

Ah, jokes on you, your so ignorant and blind. Not gonna waste time looking at the uncharted two, GT5 and Quantom theory articles to show you how wrong you are. A fanboy is a fanboy, and they act the same in any console, saying what you said just makes you look worst than most fb's in here. You can stay blind and ignorant but that isn't healthy, and acting like that for a peace of plastic is even more sad. I hope you find more important things than a gaming system.

HolyOrangeCows5344d ago (Edited 5344d ago )

But NFS makes me feel claustrophobic, the way it's so far from the window (I don't care if it IS more realistic, it still makes me feel claustrophobic)

@1.6 (Cold2000)
Gran Turismo 5 comes in March. Keep dreaming, cold.

IcyJoker1875344d ago

Joy is predictable now, I also find it pretty stupid he thinks the only ones saying Shift is better than Forza are Sony "Loyalists".

Ju5344d ago

Well, well. So, that's how it looks without bullshots, eh ? Thought so. Somebody got debunked. Especially if you open your mouth like T10. Its what I was expecting, though. I'm not saying what's better, but both are very close, IMO. I say it again, NFS:S is a great game, and got totally ignored by because of the F3 propaganda. Funny, huh, and people thought it will have a rough competition on the PS3. Guess what. It sells more there - and GT5 will still sell.

soxfan20055344d ago

Having played both NFS:Shift and Forza 2 and the Forza 3 demo, I have a few remarks.

NFS controls terribly. I was very disappointed at how the cars handle - very choppy and sluggish. I understand that it's an arcade racer and not a sim like Forza, but the 360's best arcade racer - Project Gotham Racing 4 - had much better control. Perhaps EA sacrificed in the areas of frame rate and realistic car physics in order to acheive better graphics.

rareairtone5344d ago

They need to wait to compare forza to other things like on nurburgring. I admit that they kinda overdid "well this sun is up high so these cars need to be very bright" on camino viejo. None of the lights turn on in forza so that's also probably why it looks quite better.

As we all know though, turn 10 is touting some great tech but they need artists who render the environments and cars more cohesively as an artistic package. Thats wat gt5 and shift look like. It seems like turn 10 focused on getting those high poly cars into the game rather than trying to make them look like real life in conjunction with their lighting. The lighting creates great shadows but it results in the game still looking very video-game-like instead of a representation of real life.

I once saw a comment tht said forza looks like cgi and gt5 real life--I agree. Both are compliments in their own rights

Dareaver15344d ago

that was a great read, in which i wholly agree to the fullest. And this is a stupid comparison.... A whole game vs a Demo that was released at E3..... Sad....

likedamaster5344d ago

You'd have to be quite delusional not to see how much better Forza 3 looks. But enough about looks, let's see some gameplay. Which one delivers most, who has the best physics, customizations, online modes, etc.

I'm going to be honest, any casual racer will fall in love with Shift. On the other hand, NO hardcore sim racer will settle for Shift. After playing Shift I discovered the lines are highly unreliable. And while the c0ckpit looks really good it hinders the driving experience by offering a limited view of the road. Bad! Limited car selection and mediocre handling physics.

Great attempt at a more serious racer this time around by EA but hardly worth picking up with Forza 3 around the corner. Well, except for those that don't own a 360.

paskowitz5344d ago

If you play Shift on max settings full AA and ASF at 1080p at 60+fps... well its almost like night and day which looks better. Shift may have a TON of flaws but the graphics (at least on the PC) are stellar. Even though overall FM3 will be a better game right now I am finding NFS Shift more fun than the FM3 demo.

Marceles5344d ago

"@Marceles 1.1
Comparing Shift vs Forza3 and say Shift is Better is just stupid. Forza3 is more of a simulator than what Shift is and trust me is not a sim."

Didn't read any damn thing I said, I said Shift looks better than I thought. That's it, talking about screenshots here. I don't know why you're bringing gameplay into the conversation but I agree, Forza does play better than Shift. I own Shift. There is no "need" to look down other than to check out the full interior of the car, not just the dashboard zoomed in. I swear you guys get too sensitive with the comparisons. "DON'T LOOK AT ME! DON'T LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEEE"

caladbolg7775344d ago

I think that Forza vs Shift is a fair comparison, albeit I agree that Forza 3 blows Shift out of the water. It's certainly a better comparison than Forza3 to GT5. GT5 is in a class all its own.

Shepherd 2145344d ago

Do people even care about gameplay anymore? I dont care how beautiful a turd is if its, ya know, a turd. I'll wait until i play both of these games for my own graphics comparison, but obviously both Forza 3 and GT5 will be much better gameplay-wise than Shift.

mebob5344d ago (Edited 5344d ago )

Remember NFS shift is also on PC, so they might be using the pc version to compare? and for PC you can turn the res AA AF all up so it'll looks way better than any console racers.

The Devs who made NFS shift are the same who made GTR evolution the most realistic racing sim ever!!! check it out if you have a PC.

EDIT: i tried shift on a mates PC and i must say its very good, the driving is much better than any racing games out atm but the damage is very last gen. if you play GTR evolution before you would know how realistic NFS shift could of been, i guess EA must of made them dumb down the game a little because if it was anything like GTR evolution it would be impossible for the kiddies to play...

mebob5344d ago

LOL at all the fanboys who never played a real racing sim in their life!!

Seriously if any of you want REAL 100% racing sims check out, GTR evolution, live for speed and Rfactor. The graphics are pretty dated but throw in a nice steering wheel and you'll get the most realistic driving sim ever.

BLuKhaos5344d ago

You know it's really sad when a multiplat on the 360 looks better than and an exclusive of the same console.LOL

Calvin_ISA5344d ago

JokesOnYou has his FACTS mixed up. Does he know who Aaron Greenberg is? Somebody who constantly disses the PlayStation. How often do Sony executives put down the 360?

PlayStation fans only complain about Xbox because people who only use Xbox say that it's the best when they haven't tried everything.

This is what Xbox fans typically say:
"Halo is teh best!!!1111!!1!1"
"Forza is teh best!1!!!!1!11!!"
"Gears is teh best!11!!!!!1!!1!"
"Uhhh..... Oh wait L4D is coming out soon, right? It's teh best!!1!1"

And then the rest is:

"Ratchet and Clank sucks it's so childish"
"Who wants to hunt for treasure? They stole gears' cover system anyway! Thieves! Stealers!" <--IRONY.
"Killzone 2 looks like sh!t compared to Crysis"
"PS3 looks like a George Foreman Grill"
"Gran Turismo's physics suck"
"God of War is lame" <-- Never heard that but I can imagine it.

The term "fanboys" never existed until Xbox came out. Prove me wrong.

I'm a good supporter of Sony; sure, but that doesn't take away my credibility BECAUSE I don't "hate one to make the other seem better", and I don't diss things I don't like just because I don't like them. I wish Splinter Cell Conviction was on the PS3. I would like to play L4D. Halo is not my cup of tea, I don't find it fun.

It's so childish to point the finger, but some people just need to be put in their place.

+ Show (24) more repliesLast reply 5344d ago
ambientFLIER5344d ago

Funny how you didn't link to the article that compared GT5 to Forza 3, and Forza won.

rekonizakilla5344d ago

It was microsoft monthly....................... ............................... ............................... ....
I mean destructoid.
But seriously though, Forza probably handles a little more realistic than shift, and maybe has better features, but definitive racing game of this gen it is NOT.
At the end of the day shift looks better.

Sarcasm5345d ago

I think the lighting looks a bit better on the cars in NFS shift. But man, it's a blur-fest.

Strange how the "Definitive Racing Game of This generation" is being rivaled by a multiplatform racer.

Game13a13y5345d ago

it makes more sense to compare Forza3 with the likes of NFS, as both of them are pretty arcady to be a racing sim. GT5 is much more realistic and should be in a league of its own.

DeepInterludium5345d ago

Sorry but Shift can't match Forza 3's definitive physics engine:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Halo3 MLG Pro5345d ago

Why is it strange? You might be comparing it to a multiplatform game but I'm sure not. I recently read an article comparing Forza 3 with GT5 and Forza won.

Sarcasm5345d ago

You mean the destructoid article?

Well I've seen GT5P and Forza 3 on my HDTV with my own two eyes and it tells me GT5P still looks better. Now don't get me wrong, I've given credit where it's due in the part where Forza 3 has made a great leap above Forza 2 and that's how real sequels should be. It's not Forza 2.5. I'm buying Forza 3 of course, but any real sensible person that isn't a blind 360 fanboy knows that it is what it is. And "IT" just happens to be that GT5P looks better.

I don't need a fanboy publication like destructoid to tell me what's better or not.

pixelsword5344d ago

http://www.n4g.com/up/24668...

Why would someone who knows that they are the winner do that?

beardpapa5344d ago

@pixel

that's pretty interesting and sheds a lot of light re: that neogaf poster. bubbles up.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5344d ago
stonecold35345d ago

been compared to need 4 speed i had to laugh i guess need for speed is better than flopza 3 well they are both are arcade racers

Show all comments (150)
480°

Forza Motorsport players slam devs for using 14 year old car model

Throughout its marketing campaign Forza Motorsport has been described as being “built from the ground up,” but some players are skeptical after discovering a reused car model that first appeared in Forza Motorsport 3.

Flawlessmic222d ago (Edited 222d ago )

yep been playing it all day and the newer car models look ok at best and the older models looks downright ugly and out place. im playing on pc at 4k with everything on ultra with dlls performance mode and the cars just look completey off, even the paints looks off, gt7 on ps5 shits on the car models here and its not even close, espcially paint and materials wise!!

its by no means a bad game but it is again another hype job from MS doesnt get close to living up to what it should be.

i genuinly thought this was gonna improve on GT7 in every way, when in fact at this in point after 10 hours the only thing i think is better is the standing start races as opposed to gt7s god awful chase the rabbit races starting 25 seconds behind.

the fuel and pit stop additions to forza are just surface level additions so they could say hey we did it, i am yet to see a meaningful incorporation of either one and the systems that would facilitate it being genuine are not there.

I cant control my power to fuel ratio during the race like i can in gt7, there is no timing hud for the whole grid, so i dont know how far ahead or behind i am or when drivers are pitting so i could plan my strategy, not that pitting is necesarry at all.

rain doesnt cause a slippery surface or aqua plaining nor does it tell you just how wet the track is like gt7 which informs you if inters or full wets are needed, no weather map, nothing.

its really just shinear version of previous forza, if you want proper sim racing where actual strategy comes in to play with longer races, with real pitt stops and having to manage your actual fuel effectively during the race then this game isnt it, go get gt7.

if you want a really simple and basic sim racer then this is for you.

majorly dissapointed, i thought this was the one game from MS that would hit all the right notes, in reality built from the ground up for next gen was a bullshit line and and its not even better than a cross gen game released a year and half ago.

MTRNYC222d ago

One big thing I feel makes GT7 so much better is that they surface mapped all the tracks so they have actual imperfections which means that sometimes the fastest path is slightly off the expected path because you have to avoid the imperfections to maintain traction.

GT7 is by far the more realistic racing game. It's kind of funny because they claim they reworked the whole driving and physics system to compete with GT Sport and Forza's not even close to as realistic as even GT Sport was and GT7 is way better than GT Sport.

Stanjara222d ago

Excellent write up.
I follow SuperGT and in the preview of the game he was not impressed with improvements.
Said it felt the same as FM7.

The whole time I was searching for ray tracing in race and it was not present.

Built from ground up my ass.

(Yes yes I know there is a performance mode and a visual mode I know)

P.s. You can choose your starting grid position. WTF is that in a sim race?

Flawlessmic222d ago (Edited 222d ago )

@mtrnyc

its all the little details, you see the track evolve in gt7 with the rubbers marks, and the marbles from the tyres start building up off the racing line on the side, you can actually see the tyre deformation when racing an f1 car for instance.

honestly, im actually shocked at how much better and more advanced gt7 is than this game, this is literally just a surface level sim racer, it would make a fantastic entry point for someone new to sim racers but my lord does it pale in comparison to gt7 where it counts

@stanjara

yep picking your starting spot is dumb AF for this type of game

dumahim222d ago

"there is no timing hud for the whole grid, so i dont know how far ahead or behind i am or when drivers are pitting so i could plan my strategy"

Wait, really? They don't have the distance or timing splits options for the HUD anymore that's been there from the start, after they add pit stops, when you'd really need something like that?

Flawlessmic222d ago

@dumahin

i will correct myself slightly just opened the game to see if it was option and you can turn it on for single player races, it was set to multiplayer only but again if the races were really gonna need it they wouldve had it set as on but no the races are like i said simple surface level sim racing.

but to answer the question correctly yes it actually does have the option, you just need to turn it on

Mr Logic222d ago

So...you're rendering at 1080p. Much wow

eagle21222d ago (Edited 222d ago )

And what about the loading times in Forza? They sure are super fast in Gran Turismo 7 (PS5). :)

outsider1624222d ago

"i genuinly thought this was gonna improve on GT7 in every way, when in fact at this in point after 10 hours the only thing i think is better is the standing start races as opposed to gt7s god awful chase the rabbit races starting 25 seconds behind."

This! I really hated this for every race it's always a running start and always last. And we all know the reason for that which is the bad ai.

222d ago
yeahokwhatever222d ago

"its by no means a bad game but it is again another hype job from MS doesn't get close to living up to what it should be" <-- Spot on. I've been playing since the second it launched and I'm a little disappointed too. You're totally right about the paint..its whacky how bad it is visually. I have pretty damn good hardware and the frame pacing is totally jacked up. I wanted a close-to-GT7 game on my PC, unfortunately Forza is the furthest from GT that its been. :-(

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 222d ago
isarai223d ago

Reusing assets is ok, but 14yr old model, when it's a hero model? That's just lame.

MTRNYC222d ago

“built from the ground up,”

This isn't even the oldest models, they are recycling, there is stuff dating back to the 360 in the game.

Everything is all lies with these guys.

Enjoy the battle pass and the DLC to get cars and tracks in your live service b.s. game, meanwhile we'll be getting them for free in GT7.

outsider1624222d ago

Built from ground up for the Series S most probably. I mean that's 75% of the audience right there.

Father__Merrin222d ago (Edited 222d ago )

Forza motorsport doesn't have that traditional campaign but rather just tick box races. Most reviewers are omitting this

Flawlessmic222d ago (Edited 222d ago )

i dont mind how they have done it but, theres not a whole lot of content race wise which is a let down, and the car RPG thing sucks balls.

i unlock the same things in the same order everytime and make the same upgrades in the same order everytime.

rather than being able to look at the strengths and weakness of the car im using and put my credits into upgrading the weakess im stuck upgrading parts i dont really need cause thats all i can do and by the time i do unlock what i really wanted, lo and behold the 5 race series is over and its on to a new car to rinse and repeat my unlocking and applying my upgrades

IRetrouk222d ago

I remember this being a massive negative for another game a couple gens ago👀

dumahim222d ago

On one hand, that was kind of a bigger deal since the old models didn't have an interior so it was all just a black silhouette inside. But on the other hand, they made no claims that it was built from the ground up and were clear there were premium models that did have the full interior and some without.

IRetrouk222d ago

I agree, it was jarring and not needed in my opinion, but it didn't make the game bad or worse, yet that was the impression around here at the time if you remember.

yeahokwhatever222d ago

i uh....liked the black interiors. I got the perspective without the distraction. I wish it was an option.

Show all comments (51)
190°

Need for Speed: Carbon, Undercover, and More to Be Removed from Digital Storefronts

EA has announced that Need for Speed Carbon, Need for Speed Undercover, Need for Speed Shift, Need for Speed Shift 2: Unleashed, and Need for Speed The Run will be removed from digital storefronts beginning today, May 31.

Kombatologist1080d ago

From a preservation standpoint, this is the one thing I hate about digital games. And things will get much worse if game streaming becomes the norm.

darthv721080d ago

The games are already preserved. Hence their existence on the digital stores to begin with. This is no different than when Disney put movies in the vault, only to bring them back years later.

spwittbold1080d ago

Not true. Mass Effect re-release trilogy did not have some of the DLC content specifically because the contractor that played a major role in it's development did not preserve it, nor did Bioware.

thejigisup1079d ago

Any idea of when marvel vs capcom 2 is coming back? That's my favorite game of all time and I can't use it on my ps3 as the file is corrupt and can't find an official dualshock or sixaxis to rebuild the database in safe mode. It's really frustrating that I can't use something I paid for that I expected to have forever.

DOMination-1080d ago

At least it is available digitally. They give you a warning, and if you purchase it, then you will still always have access to it. They will also make it available again one day when it makes sense, but right now I imagine that <100 a day play these games.

Good luck buying Need for Speed: Carbon brand new from a store.

All games have a shelf life. These games are three generations old and had massive circulation. I don't think it is EAs problem if you haven't picked them up by now.

Sgt_Slaughter1079d ago

Why defend EA's bad business practice? There's no way to spin this, it's just bad.

Retroman1080d ago (Edited 1080d ago )

NFS Undercover, Carbon,Prostreets, Rivals, 2015 Reboot, Payback , 2012 Mostwanted was no good, far as I'm concerned they can remove Heat too . it doesn't matter anymore if Ea remove them they "All" crap.
Ea went down hill after Blackbox studio left.
Ghost did not improved NFS , Criterion did nothing better and here they are back to screw NFS again. 2022 will be another flop as the first title they made (Burnout for Speed)

DarXyde1080d ago

Not a fan of those games either, but I think you miss the point: even if someone—for whatever reason—wants to buy those games digitally, they can't. And the transition toward digital platforms makes the issue that much worse. Nevermind buying physical at outrageous prices from online sellers, you literally can't play them if you have an all-digital device.

Kombatologist is exactly right: it is an issue from the perspective of preservation that is likely to get worse with the rise of streaming.

Retroman1079d ago

Ah, no. I did Not missed the point. I spoke my personal opinion on those craptastic titles.
Why would anyone in there right mind but those title's Digitally??.......there is a website you can still buy those games around 19.99 I bought the Ratchet and Clank Trilogy PS3 for 19.99 Amazon and EBay price 79.99 wish I remember the name of the site.

strayanalog1080d ago

I wonder what Need for Speed said a decade ago on twitter.

1080d ago
Profchaos1080d ago

I own some of these games does that mean I can no longer download them? Or just purchase?

boing11080d ago

Removed from storefronts so my guess is it's only about digital purchase.

Show all comments (16)
130°

Ranking the Need for Speed games - from the bad to the great

Paul writes: "Without further ado, here is my list of the best and worst Need For Speed games in the history of the world! I'll run worst to best, so if you want to know which is the best ever Need for Speed game, you’ll have to read on."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
OneEyedSteve1742d ago

Most wanted 2012 imo was awful, on PS3 the graphics are dreadful, and the crash cam was very annoying. Rival is the worst imo, hated that game. My favourite is Hot Pursuit, great game. Also Shift 1&2 are really good.

OnlyThoseOnTheFence1742d ago

High Stakes will always be my favorite. Great cars, great music, and you could see through the windows which was pretty mind-blowing at the time. Best of all it was ricer-free.

steven83r1742d ago

Lame. The list doesn't even include any of the originals. NFS 1 and NFS hot Pursuit 1998. Must be a youngster who created the list.

CYALTR1741d ago

He clearly stated that being this was an Xbox centered site he was going to limit his list to games that released on some form of Xbox. He also stated he had been playing them since OG PLaystation, so pretty sure he's not a "youngster"

Retroman1742d ago (Edited 1742d ago )

From my personal experience NFS I personally don't like.......
The Worst : Underground 2 , Carbon, Prostreets, Undercover, Porche unleashed, Nitro, NFS World, 2012 Mostwanted, Rivals, 2015 Reboot last but not least Paycrap.
Best NFS I personally like :
All ps1 NFS : HighStakes (the best) including NFS 3 Hotpursuit , ps2 Hotpursuit 2 (Excellent game ) ..Underground ( Best so far)
2005 Mostwanted ( Excellent game) Shift 1/2 (Spectacular) remind me of GT , 2010 Hotpursuit Great game but race Waaaaaaay to long in my personal opinion . Last but not least The Run . these are my favorite NFS titles .
After The Run in my personal opinion NFS went down hill fast with Open world mapping crap, always online, multiplayer crap, alldrive, drifting in every freaking corners, no gripping anymore,autolog. None of this crapfest is NFS original formula. until Ea contract Ghost Games to return the original formula back in NFS it will always be Shitty game.