IGN writes: "Majesty 2 turns a number of the conventional real time strategy elements on their head by removing the direct control over your troops in favor of bounties and magic. However, while this places a larger focus on strategy, it also plays directly into some balancing issues, particularly in regards to the loads of creatures that spawn into your territory and the sudden leaps in difficulty that are very hard to compensate for. If you're a fantasy fan or a strategy fan that's looking for a challenge, you should check out Majesty 2. Otherwise, you may want something where you have more impact on the game world".
Does the developer succeed in creating a unique and engaging RTS that stands out from the pack, or will the changes prove to be unnecessary and hampering to the game experience?
Paradox Interactive and developer 1C Ino-Co cordially invites you to the most prestigious royal occasion of the year as the marriage of Majesty 2, the Fantasy Strategy game of regal proportions, is betrothed to its three expansions in one magnificent Majesty 2 Collection.
aradox Interactive certainly have a considerable CV under their collective belts. Games like Supreme Ruler, King Arthur and Sword of the Stars are not to be passed over lightly. They have carved a niche in the RTS market for themselves and now the pressure is on to keep that niche filled with worthwhile candidates. Do they manage this with Majesty 2: The Fantasy Kingdom Sim, the sequel to the 2000 best seller? Too bleeding right they do!
