160°
8.0

Far Cry 2 Under-Rated?

When I went to my local EB Games a couple of weeks ago I was looking for a game that would last me a while or at least until the holiday game release madness that is soon to come upon us. While I was there I picked up Far Cry 2 for a great price. I had been wanting to buy Far Cry 2 for a while now, but seeing the bad reviews of the game from when it was released I didn't bother buying.

Read Full Story >>
outoflives.com
Pandamobile5360d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome for the first maybe 10 hours. After that, the driving gets extremely boring and tedious, the enemies are annoying because you can't get from point A to point B without running into a group of angry Africans, even if you're working for their faction.

Shepherd 2145360d ago (Edited 5360d ago )

this game sucked. Exploring the open, 20 sq. mile world was boring because theres nothing out there except diamonds, animals, and grass/trees.

Too much driving, and no fast travel unless you travel a huge distance to get to the bus stops, which almost defeated the purpose.

Exploration was limited because you couldnt climb on top of rocky formations due to invisible walls everywhere. So much for getting a better sniper spot right?

Horrible story, and no feral/predator abilities like the first Far Cry. It was awesome to have animal-like powers like smelling people, clawing them with your fists, and jumping really far and still be running around with guns and driving vehicles.

Far Cry 2 took away all of that, and made it boring. The only good thing that came out of this game was an awesome map editor, but Far Cry Instincts Predator for the 360(a Re-release of the first game) had the same editor, Far Cry 2's just has more features.

rhood0225359d ago

@shepherd

The travel to the bus stops so that you could fast travel was horrible. I agree. And probably ruined the game for me (well, that and the game ending bug I found right after opening up the southern part of the map. Needless to say, I never finished the game.)

I understand the need to create a "living world" but adding things like instant fast travel, a la Oblivion or Fallout, won't take too much away from the feel of the game.

But one correction on your post. The original Far Cry (PC Only) didn't have the feral abilities. It was more like Far Cry 2 in that it was a more reality based shooter--except for the introduction of the genetic mutations towards the end of the game.

The feral abilities didn't show up until Far Cry: Instincts for the original Xbox.

WenisWagon5359d ago

The story wasn't anything special. What was worth every penny (for the rent, at least) was the Map Editor. I had loads of fun making and downloading maps.

badz1495359d ago

it's boring nuff said! played the game for 1 hour and that's it!

morganfell5359d ago

I just wish they would have had an option that stated when you completely obliterate a checkpoint no bad guys return and rebuild the place for 10 days. Instead I could drive up the road a few hundred meters and return and they had transported down from their starship. It gets old quick. The weapons degrading while novel is wholly unrealistic in a game that was trying to pimp realism.

flankhim5359d ago

I always called it Far Drive 2!

Marquis_de_Sade5359d ago

I agree Panda, the faction thing really got on my nerves, but not as much as the fast respawning enemies.

With that said, planning and executing assaults on enemy bases in the middle of the night gave a certain thrill.

MagicAccent5359d ago

Far Cry 2 is not a game you can sit down and play like a normal fps, because it's simply not fun that way.
You have to know how to play the game to enjoy it. It may sound a bit silly, but that's how I eventually figured out how to get the most out of the game: Dodging patrols, finding shortcuts, exploring and scouting the mission to find the optimal plan of action, ect.
When you stop rushing, it actually becomes more fun. Less hectic and more elaborate. Something that to me sounds like the makings of a great game.

As for the story, I quite liked the dark political undertone and ideas. Something that does very much represent, to some degree, the situation of many 3rd world countries in africa.
If you played through the game without at some point or another recflect upon this, and say the story is crap. Then maybe this game was not meant for you.

BattleAxe5358d ago

This game had a great feel to it. I only wish that there weren't respawning checkpoints. The online portion was solid.

I re-created Foxhunt from Socom 2 on the map editor. Its a shame that there aren't more people online for this game.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5358d ago
KingKionic 5360d ago

BUNNNYAUNNNAYAAA!!!!!

*coughs*

Yeah it was a fun story also the map editor on the consoles was nice .

El_Colombiano5360d ago

I love, LOVE the concept of the game. But the execution got old and tired QUICK.

Szarky5360d ago

Agreed. Concept was brilliant. After 5 hours I wanted to throw my controller at the tv.

Towers765360d ago

I had the same problem with Far Cry 2 that I had with Assassin's Creed the year before: I loved the first couple of hours then it's just the same missions over and over. Though to be fair FC2 did have more area to explore and the occasional unique mission to undertake. Either way I thought it was a decent game that deserved most of the reviews it initially got. If you find it in a bargain bin for $20 or less then absolutely go for it.

rodellison5359d ago

Agree completely. This game isn't underrated, it was actually ok, however it should be known that there's essentially 3 types of missions in the game which ran along side the main story (Cell Tower/Assassination missions, Destroy the Convoy missions, Buddy missions) - and after the first one or two missions its quickly apparent that the formula is rinse/repeat. No doubt the game LOOKed great, and IMO had the repeating junk been reduced a little it would have flowed a little better. It was artificially long. The multiplayer was a joke. With such an awesome map editor capability in the product, it was disappointing the way multiplayer felt - almost like you're trodding around in quicksand requiring entire clips to take an enemy down. $20 or less, pick it up and venture around - the Savannah and a couple missions are worth seeing for that.

Towers765359d ago

Yeah I forgot about the lousy multiplayer. Then again this game released shortly before CoD5. Talk about bad timing for any game with a multiplayer component. I never did play with the level editor so I can't much attest to it's quality but I'm all for any kind of user generated content. Maybe it's something Ubi will expand on in future shooters they release.

Sarcasm5359d ago

Everyone seems to agree, after playing for the first few hours, you've pretty much played the whole game.

I actually played for a good 8-10 hours before I realized how boring it really is. I didn't want to waste my rental, but it was just meh.

jjohan355359d ago

I found the story to be boring and forgettable. Missions got tiring quickly after 50% of the game.

Game mechanics were awesome. It was realistic, it allowed you to be a stalker, and was one of the few games that made it feel rewarding to actually plan out your attacks without boring you with meticulous technical details of execution.

But the best thing the game had above any and every other game is the environment. There isn't a game with an environment that's more alive. I don't know any other game that makes it fun to snipe from bushes or go through buildings/corridors shooting in CQC. You can actually hide in bushes. This goes from single campaign to online play. The world/environment is so amazing, I can't get over it. I've played every other AAA game on both 360 and PS3 but none of them offer the same dynamic environment (even if they offer better gameplay or weapons).

The biggest fault in the game was Ubisoft's lazy developing skills. The game remained buggy for almost a year (single player) and the online play still kicks out players at the end of every 3 games you play. Before the recent patch, everyone would get kicked out of the lobby at the end of every game. I personally think Ubisoft was way too lazy. They had a great environment, great world, great mechanics. They destroyed the game with stupid bugs and a non-compelling plot. If the story was more interesting, the open spaces a little smaller, more bus stops, and A LOT LESS BUGGY, the game would have had a strong online community easily.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5359d ago
ssbains5359d ago

Trophies took way to long to unlock

Game was repetitive, mission after mission.
While the game tracked time of day nicely, night, day, game save by going to a hut --- it got repetitive really quickly.

Driving sequences were way too long

Show all comments (50)
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox425d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever424d ago (Edited 424d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88423d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai425d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle424d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE424d ago (Edited 424d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy423d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE423d ago (Edited 423d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan471d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya471d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled471d ago (Edited 471d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney471d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled471d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist470d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin471d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled471d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE471d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi471d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE471d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf10593d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS17593d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf10593d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop592d ago (Edited 592d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics593d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos592d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt592d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf10592d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt592d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 592d ago
MajorLazer593d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran593d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz593d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof593d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)